| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2776
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I believe you are correct and maybe I'm wrong but I think that they hire the more popular mature models and sadly the enhanced versions outnumber the natural ones. I am more forgiving of older women who get implants because time isn't kind to us and sagging breast does affect morale. Of course you would assume that more mature would equal better decision making abilities and therefore these older women would not get giant implants and that's where you would be wrong.
I know you taste in women so it would be great if this site finally had something for you but I don't know if it really has.
|
10-15-12 05:53pm
|
Reply
2777
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thank You for the compliment but I can't actually take all that much credit because my style is actually stuff I stole from all of you guys. All I did is look what others did and the way they did and I incoporated those things into my reviews.
I can't remember which member said that he did his review on a Word perfect spreadsheet and then transfered the info to the site but that was something that I had never thought about doing and which I know always do.
|
10-15-12 05:14am
|
Reply
2778
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
I try to give credit to porn surfers so I just assume that they are all smart enough to visit TBP or PU before they join a site if for no other reason than you get some amazing deals.
Although 25$ is a much bigger amount than the one they get with TBP/PU. It's still a very reasonable amount for 5000 porn scenes and an additional 40 plus during the month you are a member.
|
10-14-12 09:36am
|
Reply
2779
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Comment
I just tried PU's link and it takes you to their site where you can get the 5$ monthly membership so no need to give out another link.
This may be just me but although I love that they are offering this deal. It also makes me very nervous because I feel that it's the kind of gimmick a site in financial trouble might do to help them survive for a little longer. They are already only chnarging 10$ for a monthly membership. I just hope that many people try NA because they dop make some good porn.
|
10-12-12 09:11am
|
Reply
2780
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
old perv5087's Reply
Mind you FTV, ALS and Nubiles aren't really hardcore sites per say. They may have some hardcore content but they are at best midcore and often closer to softcore. They do have a greater selection of more natural performers but some of them are at the beginning of their career so the body modification you see on other sites are not yet there but that's just a question of time.
It's the sad reality for most of us fans who would rather see a girl go through her entire porn career without modifying anything about herself. The number of girls who start and finish their career without one change is tiny.
|
07-08-12 08:19am
|
Reply
2781
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
old perv5087's Reply
You'll have to give me the names of site(s) whose content you like because if you don't like NA and BB then you may not like most if not all American sites.
|
07-07-12 09:15am
|
Reply
2782
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
old perv5087's Reply
I'll have to agree to disagree with you because NA was a great site not so long ago. The last year or two have been pretty bad for them with all the torrent and tube sites steling their content. They are sauffering like most other sites and therefor their more recent content may not be as good as it once was but anyone joining for the first time will get his or her moneys worth.
Now if your complaint is in regards to the performers they hire then I highly recommend you avoid Bangsbros, Reality King and escpecially Brazzer because all of them hire the same performer as NA. Now it's true that NA's brand of porn was a little more vanilla than others but that was their trademark. I don't know if it was a budget reason or a choice to shoot more couple friendly porn but it worked for a long time.
|
07-06-12 06:25pm
|
Reply
2783
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Comment
That would be grest news if it was on any other site with similar content but NA has made sure to always have the least amount of anal than the other sites so their customers can't really be all that interested in anal. Who's going to join a site with the least amount of anal than all the other similar sites or for just one dpd scene. NA has 28 anal scenes this year while Bangbros has 52 and Brazzer has 194. I wish I could tell you how many Reality king has but their site is a clusterfuck when it comes to looking up scenes for non-members.
Maybe this is a new trend for NA and they'll start to shoot more anal in the new year but I won't hold my breath.
|
12-20-11 07:05am
|
Reply
2784
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MountainMan's Reply
I really don't like implants which is pretty much how most other PU members think. The problem is that it's now a reality for most porn fans. The days that a performer would spend her entire career without going under the knife is rare. I just looked at the last 25 updates at NA and at least 14 of the performers have implants. I suspect that Brazzer has a similar if not higher number of women with implants but the difference between both sites is not so great that you will be happier with one VS the other. At least not where implants are concerned.
|
04-22-11 06:14am
|
Reply
2785
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MountainMan's Reply
I would recommend Brazzer because it is far superior to the others.
|
04-21-11 06:16pm
|
Reply
2786
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MountainMan's Comment
You should post review instead of simply using the comment section. This way you'll have a lot more space to offer more information.
Have you been a member of other similar sites like Brazzer and Bangbros?
|
04-21-11 06:07am
|
Reply
2787
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
I visit this site regularly to see the latest updates but the last time I visited I got the free 30 minutes offer. This was the first time that I was given this offer. I didn't take it but that's because I'm a past member and the current updates don't appeal to me.
|
09-14-10 06:59pm
|
Reply
2788
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
monty2222's Reply
That makes sense because they have the least of all the other sites like them. I wonder if that was such a great idea or if they aren't feeling the loss of revenue at all. Don't get me wrong. I like the offer but it's not like they were charging such a high price to begin with.
I just worry when I see a big site drop their price.
|
07-15-10 03:05pm
|
Reply
2789
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
The anal unit of measure is a little hard to use since it requires that you compare similar sites. In this case I used NA, Brazzer and
Reality kings and these 3 sites are pretty similar in content and the performers they employ. I forgot to add Bangbros and they have over 30 anal scenes since early March.
It's quite possible that NA chose to distinguish themselves with more live stuff and less anal. I hope it works for them because it's a great site.
|
07-14-10 07:18pm
|
Reply
2790
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
I checked and the 10$ deal does recur at the 25$ so your best bet is to cancel and then if you want to come back then join through Pu or TBP.
I can't speak for quality of the new content but I use the anal unit of measure. Since this happens to be a very popular fetish then I look at how many anal scenes a site releases to figure how they are doing. NA has released only 13 anal scenes since March 4 while Reality kings has over 40 and brazzer has over 80. Of course it could be a business decision on NA's part but it also could be that money is getting low and they've had to cut on the more expensive type of sex scenes.
|
07-13-10 07:02pm
|
Reply
2791
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I got a similar offer but I didn't get burned but I can appreciate the fact that once burned twice cautious. I'm actually curious about their special offer. I'm wondering if they aren't feeling the recession pinch alittle more these days. I've noticed that their most recent updates aren't all that great.
|
07-13-10 02:41pm
|
Reply
2792
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
As far as I know it's a recent offer and for alimited time so you can use the TBP or PU link but once on the site. Go to the section that says "new porn" and you'll see the offer.
|
07-13-10 02:39pm
|
Reply
2793
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
I also don't think it's an inherantly bad idea. It's the fact that most of them choose to get large grapefruit sized implants to be the bad part. If implants truly equal more money than it's a question of how much danger do you want to take for that extra money. Getting breast implants may be common these days. It's still a serious medical procedure that requires a certain amount of recuperating even if everything goes great. You and I won't change the fact that girls will still get them. I just wish that those that do would choose a smaller implant.
|
02-25-10 07:55pm
|
Reply
2794
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
Thanks for the info.
On my second statement. Do you mean that you think girls getting breast implants and plastic surgery is a good idea?
|
02-24-10 05:58pm
|
Reply
2795
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I could understand them wanting to edit if it was a tirade that all their models are ugly and stupid but since that's not what it was.
Good for NA to have gone back on what was a bad business decision.
I'm with you. Let's hope more models chose to do like Jenna Haze.
If that girl can be super popular after many years and still have her original equipment then there is no excuse for saying that you need them to get jobs.
|
02-23-10 06:15pm
|
Reply
2796
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I would hope that a site would keep both the positive and negative comments on their forum but maybe the negatives one should have an even bigger meaning. Afterall a site usually knows what they are doin g right but may not always know where they could use some improvements. If a comment is insighfull and inteligent then the fact thatit's negative or positive should have no bearing on whether it gets removed or kept.
|
02-22-10 06:20pm
|
Reply
2797
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Reply
I haven't used a download manager in years so my speed judgements are always based on using IE or Firefox only. I do not download all the content from a site but instead I pick and choose what I like.
I've yet to find one site that required me to download all the time to do that.
|
12-05-09 09:31am
|
Reply
2798
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
Hi fiou.
Did you email them because my membership ended yesterday and I did not have a single problem with surfing and download speeds.
They might have had some server issues.
|
12-04-09 05:25pm
|
Reply
2799
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
Hi smut.
I'm glad your asking because I didn't add any info on pics in my review. The pics are just as bad as you suspected. Their newer videos mention pics in high resolution but the resolution is only 673x1000. I checked some of their older material and the pics were 732x492. The resolution is pretty bad and one of the newer sets has only 25 pics. In my book that makes the pics just teaser for the videos.
|
11-27-09 10:12am
|
Reply
2800
|
Naughty At Home
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Let me see if I can come up with a few suggestions and I'll let you know.
|
07-29-12 07:11pm
|
