| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2626
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
|
Reply of
Salvo's Reply
I can't speak for miss hybrid because TBP/PU no longer list it but I am quite familiar with Jim's and Lara's sites. Here are the things that are now banned in the UKSpanking
Caning, Aggressive whipping, Penetration by any object "associated with violence", Physical or verbal abuse (regardless it's consensual),
Urolagnia (known as "water sports"), Role-playing as non-adults,
Physical restraint, Humiliation, Female ejaculation, Strangulation,
Facesitting and fisting.
I can't remember if many of these things were common on Miss Sonya but if they were than you now know why she removed them and you also know that Jim doesn't really have any of this and that's why he is still updating.
|
05-31-15 10:03am
|
Reply
2627
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
|
Reply of
Salvo's Reply
If you read the info on the first page of her site than she explains that changing UK laws were the primary reason for why she has removed the hardcore content. There may be other reasons but since I don't have any proof than I'll take her word for her reasons. What was quite obvious to me when I was a member is that she is concentrating all of her time and energy on her escorting/dom business and that does not leave a lot of time for doing porn on a regular basis.
|
05-30-15 07:24pm
|
Reply
2628
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I like her now look or at least what I assume is her new look because the dates on the content don't always make sense except that they may be when the scene was uploaded as oppose to when it was actually shot.
My actual issue is with the bulk of the content. I prefer g/g and b/g content that is at least midcore to hardcore in nature and there is not a whole lot here and what there is isn't very good.
|
10-27-14 05:15pm
|
Reply
2629
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
|
Reply of
mike11w's Comment
Am I wrong in thinking that you can no longer download her videos? The TBP review is a year old and it stated that you could but it now says that you can stream all her videos on her site but doesn't say anything about downloading them.
|
10-19-14 09:02am
|
Reply
2630
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
It's not a big surprise considering that they pay American performers significantly more money than their European counterpart. That said I think they are getting to the point where they will have a harder and harder time hiring new performers. It used to be that DAP's were only every few videos but they must have quickly discovered that this is by far their most requested type of scene because these days it's in almost every one of their videos. Call me crazy but I don't think European models are anymore interested in getting two guys to shove their huge dicks in their anal cavity.
|
03-29-17 03:35pm
|
Reply
2631
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
haagar's Comment
Did you really think anything had changed since I posted my comments last year? They have a system that works for them and that is why they are not changing it. I wished that I had gotten a full refund as I never actually used any of the sites services but I at least have the right to bitch about their bad business practice because of that. You can now do the same. If enough people feel like you and I then maybe one day they will have to change their policy. Mind you by the time they do. The damage will have been to great and it will be too late to fix the problem.
In many ways I'm not sad that I didn't get to join. I like their choice of models and some of the stuff they get these women to do is right up my alley but every time I see a trailer. All I am left with is a sick feeling because it's just not sexually stimulating. You wouldn't think that porn shot in a bright white room on bright white furniture would somehow look dark and dingy and yet that is what I usually feel about what they produce. of course it doesn't help that it feels mysoginistic in nature and filled with circus acts.
|
02-24-15 06:17pm
|
Reply
2632
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I thought I'd answer your query. The free stuff as far as I can tell is all the stuff that the studios sineplex and sinsatinal shot prior to becoming what is now LP. For that reason you can no longer get new sineplex or sensational movies because they don't exist anymore. If my memory is correct. One of the owners of both studios started LP a few years ago and that's why he was able to offer the Sineplex and Sinsational movies for free to paying members of LP. If as you guys say they haven't added any new (actuaklly they aren't) videos to the free stuff then maybe it's because they have uploaded the entire Sineplex and Sinsational library or the rest is leased to other companies who aren't allowing anyone else to use those scenes.
It any case. It doesn't bode well for future customers of LP because unless they are new then they will only want to download the more expensive scenes.
|
12-27-14 05:39pm
|
Reply
2633
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks. I think you answered all of my questions and then some. In many ways I'm really glad that they make joining so hard because I know that if it wasn't then I would join and regret it two seconds after I had my membership. For me the only appeal is the models who wind up working for them because their style and type of porn is not something that stimulates me sexually. In fact it tends to have the opposite effect. I was hoping that maybe the trailers for some strange reason picked the worse parts and that there might be a pearl somewhere but I guess I'll have to look for treasures elsewhere.
A thoroughly informative review with no bias.
|
12-27-14 05:22pm
|
Reply
2634
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Another great review and I'm glad I was able to help. I want to add that just buying tickets will not be any easier as you still have to do the same things those buying a membership have to do.
My opinion in regard to the type of porn they produce is mostly based on the trailers for their scenes because this is about the only stuff I have seen and I'm hoping you can answer some of them as you are a member.
1-Am I wrong in thinking that a lot of the stuff they shoot is pure circus gonzo with an emphasis on intense penetration, many DAP as well as a few TAP and a low desire in making the women comfortable?
2-Do many of their scene feel sterile? That is to say. Do they have more of a feel of a medical exam involving penises rather than people having sex?
3-Would your average gonzo fan truly enjoy their type of porn or does it push the boundaries of pleasant to look at?
4-Are the women who most are clearly beautiful made to look trashy and slutty and not as beautiful as they obviously are based on their appearance on other sites?
|
12-27-14 10:10am
|
Reply
2635
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I can't comment too much about the looks on the girls face because I simply haven't seen enough of any of their scenes to have a decent sample but these guys aren't trying to shoot porn where the girl is having a good time so it's probably next to impossible for the girls to fake it. I guess their formula works so why change it? I won't say anything else on their method of billing but their ticket based system is a guaranteed cash cow. I mean how can it be anything but that when a 30$ membership only gives you 35 tickets which will get you a maximum of 35 videos but only if you pick old content newly updated. I would say that 35 tickets gets you about 7 to maybe 9 scenes but that's it.
|
03-31-14 05:18pm
|
Reply
2636
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
The main reasons why I wanted to join this site is because they hire all the really hot new Euro girls and they make them do some truly hardcore stuff. Their choice of models is amazing. Just look at Lucie Wilde: http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/luciewilde.html
for a good example. You would think that good looking girl having hardcore sex would be a great recipe for success and I suppose to some people it is but I've come to the conclusion that the stuff LP does is so bad that they prove that it's possible to screw up a great recipe.
The reason I've come to the above conclusion is that whenever I watch a preview (obviously a full scene is impossible since I got shafted) of any of their scenes then there are recurring themes that ruin the scene. Here is the list in no articular order.
1-Hot girl is made to look as skanky as possible.
2-White sofa, white wall, bright lights make all the scenes look like they were meant for some kind of documentary rather than porn.
3-The sex is mostly all circus porn so you get weird positions, pile driving penetration of the girls orifices and a general disregard in regard to the model.
I'm kind of glad that I didn't actually get to download anything because I would have had to delete it all from my drives sooner or later.
|
03-30-14 09:40am
|
Reply
2637
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I hope it does because I don't want anyone else to have to go through what I did. I have to give these guys some kudos because the scam is really not obvious while you are joining.
|
12-03-13 04:22am
|
Reply
2638
|
Lela Star
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Reply
I would save you the money and heartache when you join a solo model site hoping to get some intimate stuff and some exclusif content. Only to discover that there is neither and what there is isn't worth the money you paid.
I got burned so badly when I first started surfing the net that I had no choice but to avoid all solo model sites. Luckily it's not as bad now (in large part because of TBP/PU) but it's still wise to ask before you take out your credit card.
|
02-24-13 10:21am
|
Reply
2639
|
Lela Star
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
My rule of thumb with all solo model sites is that unless you know exactly what you are getting inside the members area then it means that there isn't anything of value. If you have visted her site then you already know that you can't see the content so she falls under the avoiud like the plague.
I'd also like to add that she hasn't posted anything on her Twitter accout since last July and she wasn't really active as a performer a long time before that so you are certainly won't be getting anything recent.
|
02-23-13 06:16pm
|
Reply
2640
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
Reply of
devmsr's Reply
I think your post makes perfect sense. I actually had to read again hat I had posted because I didn't remember much of it and I find that some of what I wrote makes no sense. I just re-read myself before clicking submit.
I hope you understand that the type of content that Lelu produces and me are not compatible and that's why I said I'd pass on it. I'm glad that she posted more info about her site nd I hope that other peole who read these and were on the fence before made the jump and joined her site. I get the distinct feeling that she tries really hard to get intimate with her fans. At least as intimate as one can in this kind of relationship and that is a cedit to her. If Lelu ever decides to start shooting hardcore porn using a cameran then I can see myself being interested but since she is mostly going for the cam/POV style porn site then I hope you understand that I will not join her site.
|
10-11-12 06:44pm
|
Reply
2641
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I tend to avoid commenting on a review unless I feel that the score given and the info simply don't make sense. A score of 100 is often the catalyst that will make me post a comment if I don't see hard data to justify the scire. I'm glad lelu cm here to add info to the review. Her type site is not something that does anything for me but I can see the appeal for some people. I get the feeling that her content is a lot like a cam site except that you have only one model and the interaction is possibly a little more personal.
|
07-17-12 08:57am
|
Reply
2642
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
This is really important when you dare to give a site the coveted 100% score. Many of the statements are in regards to the reviewers feelings and not cold hard facts.
I'll pass on this one unless I see a lot more info.
|
06-03-12 10:43am
|
Reply
2643
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
I won't comment on the 100 score because you seem to be a huge fan and that tends to affect our perception of things to the point where we lose objectivity. What I will say is that I would never join her site based on the info you have put into this review because there is frankly very little actual data about the content.
How many videos does she have?
What's the resolution?
Are the pics only stills taken from her videos?
Are they all shot in POV style?
Does she shoot with anyone other than her husband?
How many live shows does she do in a month?
Is the bulk of the content softcore to midcore?
The site is 30$ and based on a quick visit then the content mostly looks like some softcore to midcore style content with solo stuff being pretty high on the list of things. When you couple that with the bulk if not all of the videos shot using a handcam or tripod and that already doesn't endear it to me.
|
06-02-12 06:48pm
|
Reply
2644
|
Lesbian Strapon
(0)
|
Reply of
tankker's Comment
Hi tankker. You might want to take a look at straponlesbian.com. They still update and it's not a bad site. Be advised that it's an all anal
strapon lesbian site so if that does not appeal to you then do not join. I have been an off and on meber for a few years. The scenes often contain a certain degree of forced sex. Not to a very high degree but then again if that is not your cup of tea then avoid. If you do decide to join then let me tell you a trick that has worked for me everytime. The site advertises a price of 29.95$ but there is a way to get it for only 18.95$. You click on the join page and when you are on the CCbill page. You simply enter part of your info, but do not click join. Instead you use you back button. Depending on which browser you use. I use Internet Explorer and when I do that I have to press the "control" button at the same time. What happens is that you get a pop-up page that offers the site for 18.95$. Clcik on that link and you then complete the purchase for 18.95$ instead.
|
07-19-09 09:45am
|
Reply
2645
|
Let's Play Lez
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
So do I but here's are some examples that add to my fear. The new anal queen Alyssa was added recently and we haven't seen any updates to the site let's play lez. Both sites have identical content. The only difference between them is that Alyssa is in more content on her site but she's not in all the updates. They have 3 sites that center on lesbian sex. lez cuties, let's play lez and anal queen
Alyssa but the content is somewhat simialr on all of them except that lez cuties is a little less intense and normally centers on only teen models.
They have 4 sites that are centered on one model. Aletta Ocean, Blue Angel, Sophie Moon and Kathia Nobili. I'm not including Club Sandy because Sandy hasn't been the main attraction to that site in years. I'm also not adding Alyssa because her site is still too new and I'll need to see a little more from them before I judge it as a viable addition. Of the 4 I named. Only Aletta is still updating regularly with new content. Blue Angel's last update is in march, Kathia has 3 updates since january and most of Sophie's updates are usually backsatage stuff for shoots that will apear on the other 21sextury sites. You have 5 filler sites that have old content and most of it is leased material.
Now it's not all bad because there are still six sites that update regularly and these are all amazing sites. I would much prefer they drop the filler crap that isn't worth looking at and work on the sites that do.
|
07-14-11 05:49am
|
Reply
2646
|
Let's Play Lez
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
There is an upcoming gapeland update that is with a super cute girl and that's good news but for some strange reason I get the feeling that things aren't all that rosy at 21Sextury. The recession is still going very strong and that means less and less people who have availble porn funds.
|
07-13-11 07:28pm
|
Reply
2647
|
Let's Play Lez
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
I don't know if you've noticed but the site has already stopped posting new updates. Their last one was on June 15. That's a major drop when you consider that they use to post at least 2 uopdates per month.
|
07-13-11 10:35am
|
Reply
2648
|
Let's Try Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I'm sure that for some it's at least a 50/50 split because you dont' see a lot of lube being used. I'm no doctor but sticking a penis in a girls ass without using any lube can't be comfortable for the girl.
Mind you that might be the plan and that's why they do it. I guess it works since the site is still producing scenes. It sadly has the opposite on me as I don't enjoy seeing pain (fake or real) on a girls face during that kind of scene.
|
07-27-13 05:49pm
|
Reply
2649
|
Let's Try Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Another great review. I will only add two small things that may or may not make the site more appealing. The site is still known for having the only anal scenes from some of the more popular new girls in the industry. The sad part for me is that they are still shot as though the girls are being tortured or something. I'm not saying that the girls are enjoying the anal but the way they take a dick in their ass then most can't claim to be anal virgins so there is a lot of acting in pain during their scene.
|
07-25-13 06:35pm
|
Reply
2650
|
Let's Try Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
Anth's Comment
I don't know if the error messages you got were a glitch or they were trying to trick you but I tend to lean toward a glitch since you were offered a one month membership at a reduced cost when you could have cancelled the trial. The sad part for you is that if you had simply used the TBP/PU link then you would have gotten a 1 month membership for 20$ instead of 25$ or in your case 26$ since you paid a 1$ for the trial as well.
P.S: I don't know if you read any of the reviews prior to trying the site but if you didn't then let me give you a small piece of advice. Please do so in the futur because you will save yourself some money and a lot of headache. If you hade checked TBP's review of the site then you would have seen that the trial is very limited and it tells you what you get with the trial membership.
|
03-17-13 09:45am
|
