| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2601
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I try to be impartial with my score when it's not a sites fault that their content didn't appeal to me.
|
06-18-11 11:35am
|
Reply
2602
|
Katie K Official
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Review
Thanks for the review. I wasn't aware of her until earlier this year and now I keep hearing about her site but I'm affraid the content is not what I'm looking for. Not too mention that her download limit is way too smal to make thi site worth any amount.
|
10-24-11 05:52pm
|
Reply
2603
|
Kelsey XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
badmanblu's Comment
I wouldn't believe anything this site says because it has all the trademark clues for a scam site. Not to mention that TBP gave the site a score of 66 in 2011 and when they updated the info on what you get for your money in 2012 then they said there were only 4 videos lasting about 3 minutes each. 4 videos in 6 years is a joke and not a funny one at that.
The clues are all there to see when you visit the site yourself.
1-Site design is really bad
2-There is no actual preview except 3 pages of useless dialogue that hasn't been updated since the site went online and worse you can't even get an idea of what you get for your money.
3-The last clue is that if you look at all the sites owned by these people then you will see that out of 282 only 99 have any score and only 8 have a score above 80.
|
11-10-13 08:13am
|
Reply
2604
|
Kiara Mia
(0)
|
Reply of
bebelover's Reply
As far as I know she has nothing to do with the site as I don't think that she is active anymore. At least not in the industry. She might be camming but I don't actually call that doing porn. I believe that most of the performers on her network are all retired from performing.
|
05-12-15 06:02pm
|
Reply
2605
|
Kiara Mia
(0)
|
Reply of
bebelover's Reply
See that's where you made your biggest mistake. Never join a solo model site based on anything but pure hard facts. It's possible that you might pass over a decent site by doing that but my experience has been that the scams will so far outweigh the good deals that the money you saved from skipping those horrible site will be money you can spend on many great sites.
|
10-08-13 05:50pm
|
Reply
2606
|
Kiara Mia
(0)
|
Reply of
bebelover's Review
I have to ask you why you joined this site when there was a terrible
review done last year? Did you join only after seeing the review or did you simply not look at the review? The main advantage that PU has brought me is the ability to avoid joining crappy sites like this one. The only pleasure I have ever taken from a bad review I did was in the fact that the site was likely to lose money because people would avoid joining.
|
09-05-13 06:18pm
|
Reply
2607
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Giving videobox a 100 score may have been a little high, but in your defense that site is amazing for people that want to download porn movies instead of buying them. It's important that we all police the reviews because we have a few newbies that might fall prey to the B.S reviews that have been appearing. I've always thought that the most important thing that PU does is prevent others from being taken in by fake reviews.
|
03-11-09 07:13pm
|
Reply
2608
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I'm glad you are doing this. You might want to change your name to Genghis. This way we could warn newbies that if they post fake reviews, then Gengis-Khan will stomp on their balls. Just a thought.
|
03-10-09 03:25pm
|
Reply
2609
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
This review and the one just before it smell so much like crap that I feel we should flush them before they stink up the place. It's one thing to love a site, but I can't help to wonder when 2 reviews come up a 100 score and little substance in them. I also found the attitude of dhilon to be mean spirited.
|
03-10-09 02:02pm
|
Reply
2610
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
Keep it up's Reply
I'm sorry for the BS comment. If you had not mentioned the part about being careful of them then I probably wouldn't have been as hard but there are very few companies that I'll defend and Kink is definetely at the top.
I have never had one incident with them in the last 6-7 years and I've never heard of anyone else having an issue. If you joined recently then through which CC processor did you go through? They have made some recent changes so did you inquire with them instead of checking with Kink? My most recent Kink membership was through Epoch so if I hve a log in issue then i would inquire with them if i can't contact Kink directly.
|
06-30-12 11:33am
|
Reply
2611
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
Keep it up's Comment
Sorry but I have to call BS on your comment. I'm a current member of 3 Kink sites and I have tried most of their sites over the years and I've never encountered your problem. Not too mention that if you're a past member of any Kink site then you should be able to log in to any of them. It's just that you'll have to join the site if you want to download the content.
|
06-29-12 06:45pm
|
Reply
2612
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I've never joined a femdom site because I have no desire to see guy abused anymore than I'm curious to see a guy take a strap-on. I'm fine that some people like that kind of stuff but I'm not one of them. I've been a member of fucking machines, ultimate surrender, public disgrace, whipped ass, sex & submission, everything butt and bound gangbang.
I didn't like the first 2 and I'm borderline on the third. I've already said that the machines make way too much noise for me to enjoy the scenes. Ultimate surrender is mostly wrestling in front of a crowd and less so about sex. Nothing wrong with that since that's how it's advertised but I wanted more than the site offers.
I enjoyed a couple of the public disgrace videos but the premise doesn't appeal to me. Seeing girls abused in front of a crowd is not my kind of porn. The only ones that I liked were filmed indoors.
Now I've been a member of all the other sites more than once except for bound gangbangs but that's only because the site is new. I always comeback to these sites. I have a soft spot for everything butt and whipped ass because these are mostly women with women and anl is always the main theme.
|
08-08-11 10:19am
|
Reply
2613
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I agree that it would be nice if they offered some kind of group pricing but I don't really mind paying a little more than for other sites. The reason why I don't mind is that I find them to be one of the best internet porn companies and they've retained that quality with all the problems facing every other company. I don't know if you ever look at their calendar but Tanner Mayes did a fucking machine shoot on August 2. I don't know if this is a one time deal but I certainly hope not.
|
08-08-11 05:37am
|
Reply
2614
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
The only site that seems to have less tattooed girls is fucking machines but as much as I wanted to like the site. Those machines make a lot of noise and that overhadows whatever thrill I got from hearing the girls have an orgams.
Mind you 30$ for 2 months is really hard to pass up. Especially if you have never been a memeber of the site. I much prefer girls without tatoos and implants but I`m usually able to overlook that for the kink sites because unlike your standard porn. The girls that choose to do kink shoots are usually into this stuff or want to try it. In both cases it tends to make for great porn and when it doesn`t then the site is usually quite honest about it and tells the viewer that such and such scene had to be cut short because the shoot was too intense for the performer.
|
08-07-11 10:03am
|
Reply
2615
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
You are correct that on paper they would make more money but the reality is that if they made each scene only one kink then every dick head content thief would buy those scenes and post them on free sites and there goes their extra money. By making them so expensive then they don't get as many thieves.
It's possible that you saw a different screen then me but the sites that I saw at 14$ are really 29.95 for 2 month memberships. The 14$ is not a lie so much as a little bit of misinformation. The only way you can get that price is if you join for a year. Mind you 29.95$ for 2 months is an amzing deal for any of their sites.
|
08-07-11 09:26am
|
Reply
2616
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I've never really understood the pricing for this site. The only thing that I can see is that they offer it because people might want to stream some scenes rather than join the site. Maybe the reason why they charge such a high price for buying a scene is that they'd prefer the people buy a membership. There are plenty of deals where you get a 2 month membership for 29.95$. That's less than 15$ a month and that's hard to beat for such great content.
|
08-07-11 09:12am
|
Reply
2617
|
Kink.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Another excellent review. I'm afraid that the God awful navigation prevents me from scoring any Kink site above 90 and in all likelihood doom them to get scores that will vary between 80 and 90. The only reason I wasn't more critical of my recent review of EB is because EB is a more recent site so less clicking ans scrolling to do.. I already know that my score will have to be lower when I review Whipped Ass because there are double the number of scenes and having to click and scroll for a couple of minutes to reach the bottom of the page of content is not unacceptable in 2016.
P.S: I could be wrong but I believe that the reason why you see a buy shoot is because the content belongs to another company. I notice that they have some Evil Angel videos available and it makes sense that you have to purchase them. Mind you it's cheaper to join EA but maybe some prefer to go this route. I notice they have some old Chanta's Bitches videos which I think are also videos you must buy. if that's the case than they are sort of cheating a little because I think they sort of bought them when Chanta stopped doing porn many years ago.
|
09-07-16 03:26pm
|
Reply
2618
|
Kirtu
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thank You. Your score was a difficult one to achieve. Now let me be the first to say that I will not be attempting to reach number one.
|
09-24-13 03:35am
|
Reply
2619
|
Kiss Me Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Reply
The good thing for me is that many of the girls appearing on this site have done movies for Girlfriend Films and with those movies I get the full package: a storyline, clothes, tease, dialogue, kissing and sex. This is what I'd like to see on this site. I know there is a vast market for it. Hopefully somebody with money will do it.
|
08-01-10 07:05pm
|
Reply
2620
|
Kiss Me Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
My biggest issue with this site is that it's only kissing. I think we don't see it often enough in porn today but I still want the rest that usually follows. I would never join this site even if they offer full length scenes in HD. I'll always feel that it's more tease than anything else. The day that they add actual sex between the player is the day I join ths site.
|
08-01-10 06:38pm
|
Reply
2621
|
Kscans
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
I get the feeling that you really want to join this site so simply go ahead. The worse that will happen is that you wasted 30$.
|
03-13-14 09:18am
|
Reply
2622
|
Kscans
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
I also remember downloading a couple of clips but we are talking stuff that I downloaded about 6-7 years ago. If the site was 10$ than that might be one thing but it's worth 30$. I don't believe their updates schedule is accurate. I believe the content which is dated 2011 and before is older than the posted date but even if it isn't then you are still talking about paying 30$ for content that is 3 years old with no possibility of getting newer stuff.
It's your money so if you want to spend it on this site than go ahead but I fear that you will be very disappointed with what you get for your investment.
|
03-10-14 08:33am
|
Reply
2623
|
Kscans
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
Why would anyone want to join this network? I mean it' been dead for at least 3 years and I suspect that it's even longer. Just click on the TBP/PU link and then click on updates and check the date on the last update...2011.
They had some kinky stuff but they were already dead prior to the recession.
|
03-08-14 06:13pm
|
Reply
2624
|
Kscans
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I didn't say it but I also thought that the score was a little high for a site that you more or less say scammed you. I'm still waiting to see if what night owl says about the crecit card processor.
|
08-29-10 07:41am
|
Reply
2625
|
Kscans
(0)
|
Reply of
night owl's Review
That fact that you had a very hard time cancelling is an automic pass for me. What credit processor did you use? They have verotel and CCbil listed on their join page. I've never had any problems with either. Strange that you did this review because I actually thought they weren't producing any new content.
|
08-28-10 05:35pm
|
