| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1251
|
Anabolic.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rawx's Comment
O don't think you will ever find any of their content in HD because it was never filmed in HD in the first place. That's not to say that you can't get some decent resolution but it won't really be true HD.
Mind you TBP gave this site a 68% in their review so why would anyone want to join it?
|
03-12-13 06:22pm
|
Reply
1252
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
All of the above but I find that women who are in their mid 20's and up tend to be more fun to watch than there younger counterpart.
|
03-12-13 06:19pm
|
Reply
1253
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I don't think this site or VB will ever be able to satisfy cystomer desire for HD porn because the bulk of their content was made prior to that type of video resolution. They will add more as time goes by but most of them are still using past porn to fill their library as opposed to newer stuff so it will take years before there is a huge amount of HD.
|
03-11-13 01:51pm
|
Reply
1254
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
I find that her other site is even more of a scam because you can't download anything. I don't agree with sites that offer streaming only of their videos but I at least understand why they do this but I really don't understand why you would prevent paying members the ability to download the photosets. She appears to still be doing cam shows but I'm not sure if they are only for ehr site or if she freelances on other sites. She is quite active on Twitter.
|
03-10-13 07:50am
|
Reply
1255
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I tend to always come twice a day if only because I will post something continue surfing and then come back to see if there was a reply.
|
03-10-13 07:02am
|
Reply
1256
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
The only reason I called it a scam is because there is so little HC on this site that almost everyone joining will feel cheated since this is suppose to be her HC site. This is compounded by the fact that she has a few other softcore sites so unless someone sees your review prior to joining then they will rightly assume that Ann is doing only HC stuff on this site.
That's not to say that a few months or a year from now that the site won't be full of HC porn but that won't help all the people who like you joined expecting some HC porn from a favorite girl.
|
03-10-13 05:37am
|
Reply
1257
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
Thanks for the review.
If I read your review correctly then her site is pretty much a scam since she hasn't actually done any hardcore sex yet. She may have done some midcore stuff but that is not the same thing at all.
|
03-09-13 06:48pm
|
Reply
1258
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
It's not only how they present it but the way they keep shooting the scenes so badly. I don't even think that it's lack of talent but an actual desire to shoot the scenes in that way.
|
03-09-13 06:14pm
|
Reply
1259
|
Who Is Nexxxt
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
TBP says the site has been online since 2004 but they have never updated the info since the beginning(first warning), they don't plan to ever review it(second warning) and there is no actual preview on the site itself(third warning). I'd say that this is a strike out and a clear indication that you are more than likely going to regret your decision to join 1 minute after you enter the members section.
I'd also like to add that I recognize quite a few of the women on the main page and many of them stopped doing porn years ago.
|
03-09-13 08:53am
|
Reply
1260
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Another excellent review and I see that you and I are on the same page with this site. This is truly one of the more annoying sites that I have ever joined because you know they could do so much more and/or do it better. I don't know if it's a lack of talent or worse a lack of interest but it isn't a site that I plan on joining again simply because the videos are just too frustrating to watch.
|
03-09-13 08:41am
|
Reply
1261
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
If you think she is hot then visit her store and buy one or more of her movies. You won't get a discount but I have already explained that the discount is only good if you buy a lot of movies.
|
03-08-13 08:58am
|
Reply
1262
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I completely agree with you. I've rarely had to deal with webmasters
but if they start to use every possible excuse to justify what I consider to be bad business decisions or practices and/or treat me like some piece of crap then they can kiss my money goodbye because I will never spend another penny on any of their products.
|
03-08-13 08:22am
|
Reply
1263
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I think that they haven't really changed anything since day one and maybe they get just enough people to join to make it worthwhile to keep it as is. If you are a fan of Janet and plan on buyng many of her movies than joining the site is more than worth it because you get a 20% discount on her movies. Sadly that's not the case for me.
|
03-07-13 06:24pm
|
Reply
1264
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I have also been a fan of Janet for a long time and that is why I decided to finally try her site. I don't know if it took me more than 4 minutes to regret my decision but I do know that I knew I was in trouble the moment I visited her video section and download a couple of clips.
I can at least take comfort in the fact that the site has a more recent review and maybe people who were thinking of joining will now change their mind.
|
03-07-13 06:18pm
|
Reply
1265
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
She's a hot looking woman but her site isn't. I agree that 5$ would be a decent price to join because you would get your money back with buying just one movie and come out a winner with anything above that.
|
03-07-13 06:12pm
|
Reply
1266
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I agree that the price is on the high side but hopefully they use a lot of their profits to find more movies to add to their library. It is a pretty nice library but there are so many greta movies that srtill need to be discovered.
|
03-07-13 06:10pm
|
Reply
1267
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I had to pick other because it usually takes me a lot longer than a few days before I decide to join a site. Mind you it wasn't that long ago that I was quite impulsive but I always seemeds to regret my decision.
|
03-06-13 06:23pm
|
Reply
1268
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
My idea of stag films are low quality mini films with no sound. The precursor to what is now called gonzo porn.
Yeah it would be great if someone had tought to keep copies of those great early porn films. You won't really see many here. The best you will see is one that is an average quality print but that is fine with me.
|
03-05-13 06:31pm
|
Reply
1269
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Dracula's Poll
I've nevr used them but I must confess that I am also curious to know hoe they work. Not enough to actually try them myself because that might not be a very smart thing to do.
|
03-02-13 06:36am
|
Reply
1270
|
Cassandra Calogera
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
I don't know if you are aware but she retired from porn at least 2 years ago. She sort of left the door open for a possible return but most people felt that she wouldn't be back. I like most of the girls in the network but most of them have been gone from porn for many years so I know trhat i would only be paying for older stuff and for some of them some really old stuff.
|
02-28-13 06:34pm
|
Reply
1271
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't know if age as anything to do with it but I am a huge fan of them. You don't see them all that often now so anyone not a fan has very little to complain about. I tend to agree with Droller on one thing and it is that not every girl will look good with them. My preference is for girls with smaller breast because there is a nice contrast between the place she wore her bathing suit and the exposed skin. I think the most recent gilr I say with tan lines was Jessie Rogers when she first came in the industry. Sadly it did not take her long to get implants so I never really got a chace to really appreciate her tan lines.
|
02-26-13 06:01pm
|
Reply
1272
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
It's a little worse than the scenes start to look the same because frankly most of them usually do that anyway. No what I meant to say is that you now get about 2 or more almost identical scenes with the same girl and often the same guy(s) doing the same thing in a very short period of time. It's not necessarily a deal breaker for you but I was for me. I'm sure i will join sometime this year but not anytime soon.
|
02-26-13 05:57pm
|
Reply
1273
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
The only negative thing that I can say with 21 sextury is that they tend to have way too many of the same type of scenes starring the same girls. This wasn't the case but it is one of the main reason why I cancelled my membership last year and I don't plan on joining for a little still. Mind you it is an amazing site the first time around.
|
02-25-13 06:30pm
|
Reply
1274
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Reply
Sorry. I never even looked to see if Roku was an option for those movies. I think you got ten free minutes so at least you can check a few things out. I sort of prefer Hot Movies to AEBN because they tend to have a lot more older titles but they also have a lot of Bull shit content so that means a lot of searching to find what you want to watch.
|
02-24-13 10:53am
|
Reply
1275
|
N/A
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Poll
Sorry but what is metadata?
|
02-24-13 10:21am
|
