| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1226
|
Little Caprice
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
It might have been a better deal but I don`t know how much you would hvery prolific performer to begin with and that was reflected in her site.
|
03-30-13 05:46pm
|
Reply
1227
|
Little Caprice
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
Her site wasn't too bad when I was a member but I would not have given her as high a score if it hadn't been for some of the content from the bonus sites. Mind you two of those were already dead sites when I was a member and that's almost 2 years ago. Little Caprice left porn not long after my review so now the content is quite old (in porn years). I believe she has either made a comeback or was planning to do so but I don't think that will affect this site so I would not recommend anyone join this site. At least not unless you want older stuff.
|
03-30-13 09:03am
|
Reply
1228
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm also picky about what I download but I still use a download manager and that's even when I'm only downlading one video.
|
03-30-13 07:30am
|
Reply
1229
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
I think we can both agree that whichever option someone picks. That person will have had at least one dollar stolen from his pocket and if he or she is not carefull than that amount could go up pretty quickly.
|
03-29-13 06:32pm
|
Reply
1230
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
I don't agree with their method and it's bad business practices in my book but is it really any different then all those 1$ trials that so many sites like to employ?
Both lure you in using a small amount as bait and both hope to cath a sucker in the process. I assume that enough people fall for it and that's why you still see sites do that. If a site thinks it's content is only worth a dollar then why would anyone think it's worth more than a buck?
|
03-29-13 10:30am
|
Reply
1231
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I have ultra high speed cable internet and I get about 31Mbps. Mind you I don't know if this is all the time because I rarely check my speed. I'm also about to get an increase of an extra 20G of allowed download per month which will put my total to 150G of allowed download per month. Maybe now I will be less choosy when I look for stuff to download and I won't mind downloading a few HD scenes.
|
03-29-13 06:08am
|
Reply
1232
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
The variety of fetishes these guys offer definetely limits the total amount of a particular fetish you like and that might be a problem for some people.
Yeah the full scene split into 2 or more sections is rather annoying.
I sort of understand why they do it because trying to download an hour long scene in true HD takes a lot of server power and must also take quite a long time. Maybe one day when the net is super fast for everybody or they create new types of algorithm that accelerate download speeds we will see full scene on H-o-T.
|
03-29-13 06:04am
|
Reply
1233
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
If English speaking is important that you should be satisfied with most all the videos that have dialogue because I'm pretty sure that even the Eastern European girls speak English in their scenes.
|
03-28-13 06:09pm
|
Reply
1234
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Is probably the wave of the futur but not an near futur that's for sure. The technology is no even close to being good. The only virtual stuff that I've seen are different versions of the same pre-recorded scenes that are connected through some type of interface where you can choose where the actions goes next but your choices are guided by what was filmed so it's not really a choice as much as options.
|
03-26-13 04:10pm
|
Reply
1235
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
They use some of their older content that has been cleaned up and where the resolution has also been increased. It's not a bad result but you can see why it's probably not technologically possible to serioulsy alter older stuff to make it very high def. I wish I could tell you which videos have been altered but I can't. I assume that any video that has a release that after 2006 but doesn't have the true HD 1080p resolution is probably one of those videos but that is just a guess on my part.
|
03-26-13 04:05pm
|
Reply
1236
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Reply
I knew they couldn't be older videos because MP4 is one of the more recent types of video files. Did the tech guy tell you what the resolution is on their MP4 videos?
|
03-24-13 05:22pm
|
Reply
1237
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Reply
Be advised that if the resolution is only 320x240 then you may want to avoid the site because that is piss poor resoluion on any normal sized screen.
|
03-24-13 05:15pm
|
Reply
1238
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Comment
Maybe somebody is a current member and can give you more recent info but for now you can look at TBP's info on videos and you'll see that the answer is yes but they claim that the resolution is only 320x240 so not worth bothering with.
|
03-24-13 05:03pm
|
Reply
1239
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'm in complete agreement with everything Drooler wrote so I won't add anything.
|
03-24-13 09:21am
|
Reply
1240
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I was on the fence with this because I wasn't sure if I should pick waste of time or depends on the model. I settled on waste of time because I find that too many of them are BS interviews where the questions and answers seem fake.
|
03-22-13 03:35am
|
Reply
1241
|
First Anal Quest
(0)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Reply
If there is then I have never seen it and I have downloaded at least 90% of their content. I think that might be something they do for their trailers.
|
03-21-13 06:36pm
|
Reply
1242
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Comment
I'm sure VB is well aware that studio output of new movies has been dropping for the last 3-4 years and therefore other sources had to be found but I don't think that this is the main reason why they are adding older titles to their library. I think that although you may not like those older titles. Many members probably do and they have been asking VB to add them. I know that new stuff is nice to look at but a lot of older stuff is better(at least to me).
|
03-20-13 05:24pm
|
Reply
1243
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I find that pregnant women have a certain look to them that is attractive but not in a sexual way. I'm probably not saying it the right way but maybe you understand what I mean. That said I have no desire to see them nude or have sex.
|
03-20-13 05:12pm
|
Reply
1244
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
There is not a single site owned by these crooks that is worth it. I know because I joined a couple of them last year and they are so bad that 50 is still too high a score.
|
03-18-13 06:38pm
|
Reply
1245
|
Plumper Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
This is a very small niche type of porn so variety may be a big problem for them. The fact that a lot of the content is older makes sense since the more popular types of porn started suffereing a few years ago so any kind of porn with a smaller fan base would have suffered faster and harder than the other types.
|
03-17-13 05:27pm
|
Reply
1246
|
Let's Try Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
Anth's Comment
I don't know if the error messages you got were a glitch or they were trying to trick you but I tend to lean toward a glitch since you were offered a one month membership at a reduced cost when you could have cancelled the trial. The sad part for you is that if you had simply used the TBP/PU link then you would have gotten a 1 month membership for 20$ instead of 25$ or in your case 26$ since you paid a 1$ for the trial as well.
P.S: I don't know if you read any of the reviews prior to trying the site but if you didn't then let me give you a small piece of advice. Please do so in the futur because you will save yourself some money and a lot of headache. If you hade checked TBP's review of the site then you would have seen that the trial is very limited and it tells you what you get with the trial membership.
|
03-17-13 09:45am
|
Reply
1247
|
Whoring Out My Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
You can bitch plenty because whether you're getting robbed 5$ or 20$ the faxct remains that you got robbed. I don't know how much it cost me but I think it was 20$ and I didn't even get single video or photoshoot for my money. It was crap all the way.
|
03-17-13 09:36am
|
Reply
1248
|
Catie Minx
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
I checked her site out and also her blog site and here is what I can tell you.
1-She is a cam model first so be advised that you will probably get bombarded with offers to see her do cam shows. I seems that you get access to some weekly free cam chats but you'll still have to pay to see some action.
2-This is a really hot looking girl who once had great small breasts. She is still hot looking but she recently got implants.
3-There is so little to see in her preview sections that you really don't know what your money will get you.
4-There are no update schedules anywhere so who knows how old the content is. I can confirm based on Freeone that she has been doing cam stuff since 2011 and by default some of the stuff on her preview sections has to be older thana few months since she now has implants and nowhere do you see that.
**It's your money so you can do what you want with it but I wouldn't touch this site even if it was half the price it is. It is afterall 30$ so that is very high for solo model site.**
|
03-17-13 05:37am
|
Reply
1249
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't know the number exactly but I don't think it's much more than about 30%. Mind you I'm sure I spend more than 50% on some days but those are the rare ones. I would love it if I had to surf more than 30% because that would mean there is so much new and great stuff that I need more time but that isn't these case.
|
03-16-13 09:13am
|
Reply
1250
|
Whoring Out My Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
I wouldn't join this site if it was only a 1$ because I made the mistake of joining a couple of their other sites last year and that was a huge mistake. The previews looked okay but that was not representative of what was inside the members section. Bad doesn't even cover it.
I looked at a couple of the videos on this site and they look to be at least 5 to 10 years old(closer to 10) and the quality was subpar at best.
Now I don't know if you are saying that all the movies are broken into 1 minute segments but if that is the case then you will have to download a lot of segments to get just a 15 minute scene. Just that should teell you that you are going to regret spending any amount on this site.
|
03-15-13 03:57pm
|
