| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1426
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Private's Reply
Thanks for your reply.
It would be very helpful if you were to post another reply advising those of us who may be ready to sign up to your site (but who are hesitant) that the cancellation procedure has been updated.
Thanks again,
Jack
|
12-07-13 02:04pm
|
Reply
1427
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Ditto graymane's comments. Excellent review. You are a major asset to the PU site. My trust rating almost 5 years ago continues to be reinforced.
Thanks,
Jack
|
12-07-13 01:52pm
|
Reply
1428
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Good review IMO and it matches my experience.
What's more interesting though is that I've joined all but one of the sites mentioned in past years(Private, Penthouse, Hustler and Playboy, but not Wicked).
All were total wastes of money IMO and lost me after a few days with the content, crappy downloads - or streaming only (Hustler).
I was not aware that Playboy and Penthouse have upgraded their stuff so I may have to check those sites out.
|
06-11-11 06:32pm
|
Reply
1429
|
Pure CFNM
(0)
|
Reply of
FZKK's Review
CFNM=Clothed Female Nude Male
I did what the webmaster suggested and found the preview site to have some real babes. I'm not into that genre, but a specialty site that lasts for 6 years obviously is doing a good job satisfying its market niche.
|
02-01-11 08:19am
|
Reply
1430
|
Queen Snake
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
"...the kind of things the women allow to get done to them is probably not medically recommended."
I suspect you may be right. My problem is that I don't understand what's erotic about any of that stuff. But because it's available and the site apparently is relatively successful, there obviously is a market. But I'm not interested. Thanks.
|
06-04-17 07:28pm
|
Reply
1431
|
Queen Snake
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Boy are you right. I checked out some of the previews and felt ill. For those tempted to check it out, some examples are thumbtacks shoved up into a woman's vagina, a bottle brush on a power drill fully inserted, Materials stapled to a woman's body, and a whole lot more.
|
06-03-17 11:57pm
|
Reply
1432
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
I und3erstand the argument completely, but if the site wants to limit the d/l's to 14, then it should say so BEFORE, not after someone signs up.
It's like going to a restaurant offering a second meal free with the purchase of a meal, and once you order, they give you half portions because they can't stay in business if they actually honor their advertised offer.
The rip off is false advertising.
|
08-29-10 05:29pm
|
Reply
1433
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
It's shit like this that make me avoid sites that might otherwise get some of my hard earned money.
Don't these dolts understand you don't piss off your potential customers before they spend their money?
|
08-29-10 02:14pm
|
Reply
1434
|
Reality Gang
(0)
|
Reply of
Robbi81's Reply
You can get the site at $14.99 if you click on the PU link, then go to the sign up page, then X out of the site. The site comes back with a "special deal" at $14.99 which you then can accept. It does not say whether that price is just for the first month or if it's good for all renewals.
|
08-07-10 10:36am
|
Reply
1435
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
sean68's Reply
I would dearly love to see TBP do that...provide a list of the BS (bait and switch) sites.
|
02-05-19 08:28pm
|
Reply
1436
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Agree with the Squirrel, RA. Another great review.
My only addition is that I use Firefox as my browser and had frequent problems signing on. The unstated limits seemed to arrive even on the first or second D/L. When I had Firefox access issues I could access with IE immediately but couldn't download anything. I also don't like having to switch browsers.
RK's support provided no he;p fixing the issue so I just decided to quit trying. There are plenty of other great sites so fighting to access what I've paid for just ain't worth the frustration.
|
04-10-14 11:29pm
|
Reply
1437
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
peskysushi's Review
Totally agree!
First they made it very difficult to access their site on FireFox for some unknown reason which thus required using IE; then this.
And their predilection to post women with obvious aftermarket boobs, which is the main reason I cancelled, this site is in a self-destruct mode.
Too many other great sites out there and so little time, why even bother with Reality Kings?
|
11-15-12 09:02am
|
Reply
1438
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
I'm good with all of Pat's observations, especially the identification issues and the low quality of the older stuff. Those two aspects are what makes me score this site at 85 (I reserve 90+ for superb sites with no significant shortcomings.
Identification - What's the problem with the site here? There's no legitimate reason these people can't maintain a consistent naming convention and make it easy on those of us who pay the bills to find what we want when we want. My only conclusion is pure laziness.
Older stuff - At least the site could tie the multiple clips together for Pete's sake. It isn't that hard to do. Then consider doing what Bang Bros has been doing; remastering the really good stuff in the archives.
I have one additional significant beef with this site; they don't do a decent job supporting Fire Fox Mozilla browsers. While a member I was forced to switch over to IE to access the site, a real pain in the ass because my download manager is a Fire Fox add-in.
Three significant issues (with a few minor ones at well) make this a low 80's for me.
|
10-26-12 08:11am
|
Reply
1439
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Reply
Agree about Lexxy. Downloading the scene right now.
One more RK plus, good scene descriptors in the links; not like other sites with unintelligible letter/number combinations.
|
05-05-12 01:11pm
|
Reply
1440
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
As a long time member and a first class procrastinator, I have intended to write a review of the site but never got around to it. Your review pretty much matches what I would say myself. One minor addition is that there are somewhat fewer girls with bogus boobies and more naturals on RK compared with Brazzers; and a somewhat larger percentage of attractive girls on RK than on Bang Bros.
And 89 is a "right on" score.
I'm curious, however. Who are the five girls who you found "fucking amazing?" There are several that make my little Richard emerge as big Dick that are not to be found elsewhere.
|
05-05-12 11:20am
|
Reply
1441
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Good review and good observations that pretty much match mine.
I was a member of RK, Bang Bros and Brazzers at the same time at nice low monthly recurring rates. I bailed out on Reality Kings after going a month with no downloads at all; too many bogus boobies, too much ugly body art and, with the few scenes that look like good candidates for downloading (Euro Sex Parties), far too long with too much bullshit.
While I like a nicely turned out butt once in a while, the site seems to have too much focus on asses and not enough on real, natural fun bags and nicely turned out labias. I remember that the last scene I watched was 40 +/- minutes and it wasn't until 20 minutes or so in that we finally got to see a naked breast (it was nice, but all too briefly featured).
The score of 87 is very fair.
|
08-10-11 08:29am
|
Reply
1442
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
After a long relationship with RK (over 18 months straight) I also threw in the towel.
Main reasons are:
Several download problems.
Non responsive customer support.
Less than exciting updates compared to other sites.
I found two sites that are great and are working hard to keep my business: 21sextury and DDFProd. They have convinced me that RK is no longer worth continuing.
The signs are there that you may be right; the site may well be on its way to oblivion.
|
03-19-11 11:56am
|
Reply
1443
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
I agree with the review and thanks for the tips.
A few months back I was having problems with the logon so the techs changed it. Happened again. Fixed again. Happened again. Fixed again.
Each time I lost access until tech support fixed the problem, but no extension of time was offered in any of the cases.
Minor point but each interruption lost me from 24 to 48 hours. (Gave me time to check out other sites.)
Logon has been stable now for at least 4 months.
|
10-10-10 11:18am
|
Reply
1444
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
Ditto that about the photos, but I'm a video guy. And the RK videos still rule.
|
02-15-10 09:33am
|
Reply
1445
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
chancler's Review
That happened to me (expired cc). I called the 800 number of their billing service. They told me to sign up for the $5 trial with the new credit card and immediately sign up from the trial, while I was on the line with her. She said she would set it up at the $9.95 rate. I got the 3 days and am back on the $9.95 rate.
Seems like a silly procedure but it worked fine.
|
08-21-09 08:21pm
|
Reply
1446
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Lews Therin's Comment
I agree that PU should have a new category to rate customer service and support, especially with a site problem like this one.
This site should get no new business from PU and TBP users unless and until it fixes its customer service function.
(Danni.com has the same problem, a non-responsive customer service function.) Bummer when you spend good money and can't get access or any support function to respond.
One suggestion. If the biller is CCBill, you can call them for help in contacting a site's customer support function.
|
10-14-07 02:19pm
|
Reply
1447
|
Rookie Slut Search
(0)
|
Reply of
troglodite's Review
Now this is a quality review, loaded with information but economical with verbiage. And the explanation of the low score makes sense.
I'm signing up for the trial as troglodite did just to do a little "site-seeing" ;o) because the site's concept is intriguing and trog's comments make me want to.
|
10-12-08 10:28am
|
Reply
1448
|
Roxy Raye
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
I just discovered this babe and I agree with Pat's comments about Roxy. In what I've seen on Evil Angel, where she's done a lot of stuff, she's really into messing with her butt in ways I've never considered. She's one super cute babe who doesn't look like she'd ever be into anything as kinky as this extreme anal stuff.
In any case as with Pat, I also don't quite get the erotic appeal of shoving bottles, large dildoes, even miniature basketballs, either as an observer or a participant.
But I am really into Roxy as a total babe!
|
04-15-13 08:26am
|
Reply
1449
|
Rub My Boob
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Good plan.
I'm doing that now with Busty Adventures where the updates are weekly. I've got the entire site downloaded so I sign up for a month every six or so months to catch up and to replace any vids that I screwed up.
|
09-08-08 08:53am
|
Reply
1450
|
Rub My Boob
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
Thanks for your review. I just checked out the preview site and it looks like it's worth a try. I see that it's a Polish site (Rubmyboob.pl) yet I saw some babes I think I've seen elsewhere.
I see you've been a member for over 1 month so did you spring for a 3 month deal at $50? If the site is as good as I think it might be, I'm ready to go for 180 days at $70 which is $11.66 a month - a good price if the site is good.
|
09-07-08 01:50pm
|
