| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1001
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
pilotguy's Comment
Ditto both replies. I just got a rejoin promo and, because my memory lasts shorter than my hard dick, I totally forgot I had this problem a while ago, so I clicked on the link. Bad news...it did attempt to run a charge. Good news...I had my card issuer change my credit card number after those assholes succeeded in this trick before so the attempt failed.
It's looking like this once wonderful and groundbreaking porn site has gone straight to Hell. Perhaps it's time for TBP/PU to delist the site because of its horrible business practices.
|
03-22-15 11:39am
|
Reply
1002
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I agree. BB is up front with their ad displays for other sites and isn't using trickery as other sites (like Naughty America*) do.
*See my comment on the PU page for Naughty America.
|
09-17-13 12:55pm
|
Reply
1003
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Federal law limits the consumer's fraud losses to $50. The credit card issuers must eat the rest. Accordingly issuers are becoming increasingly aggressive in dealing with merchants (web and others) who have more than average numbers of consumer disputes.
What you experienced with Bang Bros is happening with many (most?) porn sites.
My experience has been that the major billers like CCBill and Epoch have a much higher credibility than some of the no-name billers so that becomes one characteristic I always look for in signing up.
Danni Ash has created its own biller (DHD) that some sites use but their record is less than stellar.
|
06-29-12 11:02pm
|
Reply
1004
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
I agree with the review except one thing; too many bogus boobies for my taste. Score-wise I would give it an 89, deducting 3 points for the deceptive double DD's.
|
05-11-12 10:15am
|
Reply
1005
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Bingo. I use FireFox for almost everything myself. That had to be the difference.
|
04-25-11 05:42pm
|
Reply
1006
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
I have had no recent trouble with Bang Brothers. Before I posted this reply I accessed the site and downloaded the Raylene update posted on 4/23 with no difficulty.
I suggest you contact their support people. Not the fastest in their response but they will get back to you with real suggestions, not blather.
|
04-25-11 10:29am
|
Reply
1007
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Reply
Got it.
RK was always trouble for me on Firefox.
Don't miss it yet, especially the excessive silicone implants.
BB, with the ability to search for natural, has really improved, but I'm not sure how accurate their "natural" designations are. There are clearly some aftermarket enhancements in the search results.
|
09-23-10 09:58pm
|
Reply
1008
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Reply
malikstarks, thanks. I just signed up to Bang Bros and will be canceling Reality Kings (I'm now at $17.95 per month. I may re-up at $9.98 after my account is closed.
Your tip is very much appreciated.
|
09-13-10 10:46pm
|
Reply
1009
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Now that you mention it, I recall they did the same with me. It'll be a one month signup followed by a cancellation two weeks later...then wait for the email barrage.
|
09-06-10 07:40pm
|
Reply
1010
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I just checked the preview site and see what you mean. However I did find a few babes who have "enhanced" tits in the "natural" tits listing, but it's quite possible the content for them is pre-enhancement.
Another question. Are you a multi-month member? If so are you being billed at $17.99 for later months(the TBP special rate for new members) or at $26.91 as stated in the latest review?
|
09-06-10 03:11pm
|
Reply
1011
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
BZ is loaded with aftermarket enhancements to the point that I'm ready to cancel after over a year.
RK, on the other hand, still has enough naturals to keep me around.
BB, I'm back. BZ, nice knowing you but it's time to move on guys.
|
09-06-10 10:48am
|
Reply
1012
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
It's been about 2 years since BB got any of my hard earned money. I like their style but the aftermarket tits showed up way too often. I'll go for amonth or two to update my collection and see if they warrant a longer term "loyalty." Thanks.
|
09-06-10 10:45am
|
Reply
1013
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I hear you and may switch back to Bang Brothers simply because they have added the natural breasts search function after I drop Brazzers and Reality Kings.
|
09-05-10 11:43pm
|
Reply
1014
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I dropped Bang Bros two years ago because I really tired of the excessive number of aftermarket mammaries they provided. I'm getting very close to dropping both Brazzers and Reality Kings for the same reason.
It's to a point that, if a site doesn't have a genre search function that includes "natural tits," or at least a designation tag that says enhanced or natural titties, I'm not signing up.
|
09-05-10 12:08pm
|
Reply
1015
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Addicted's Review
Have not been a member for over a year, but it sounds like nothing much has changed.
I was constantly finding scenes in their public site that were nowhere to be found on the member site and I never got any response from the support function.
I had no special problems with their download speeds, but that was in 2008. Servers and their bandwith could have changed since then.
And the quantity of silicone installed as aftermarket equipment on their models is HUGE, as you suggested. When I see tits in a porno scene, I like to see a little bit of movement.
|
02-03-10 10:59am
|
Reply
1016
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
beerandporn's Comment
Second that. Their content and quality issues coupled with this made Babg Bros. a former site for me. I was a member for about 6 months but decided to cancel earlier this month and really haven't missed it for a second.
|
03-27-09 11:32am
|
Reply
1017
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
Ditto. The site is sliding downhill and I've had it with the lousy search engine, the silly babble by the camera guy and the garbage footage that sometimes fills over 1/2 of a scene.
There are too many other great sites out there that this one is easy to quit. And I did.
I'll be writing a review shortly and haven't decided on a score yet, but it will definitely bring the average down a notch or two.
|
03-18-09 11:15pm
|
Reply
1018
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
One last point I forgot in my comments.
The most frequent model appearing on the site as listed in the index is shown as: Actors: eeehh... I forgot.
The problem is that, without identification even the most gorgeous babes are totally lost in the huge number of videos. One not uncommon example is a babe called Misty Mae, a young chick with a very nice set of naturals with huge, pancake sized, areolae. I downloaded her video when it appeared in an update but was unable to find out if she has any other stuff on BB.
|
02-26-09 02:00pm
|
Reply
1019
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
84 is a fair score. I have been a BB member off and on over the last several years. In comparison to RA and Brazzers, they haven't done well to keep pace, in particular with their search function (it sucks). (Ask for Carmella Bing and you will get some Carmella Bing along with others who are not Carmella Bing such as Riley Evans.)
And in far too many cases their identifications are misspelled or just plain inaccurate.
Their videos frequently have far too much crap in them that make them unnecessarily large (in far too many cases it takes over 5 minutes just to get to the part where the female finally arrives, then too much chatter before we get to the good stuff.
Navigation needs upgrading. Way too many clicks just to get to the point to download a video.
That said, I'm OK with the 84 score because of TrashMan's "Pro's." BB is still producing lots of very good stuff and is still a good site. But NA and Brazzers are better.
BTW, their tit classification - Real/Fake - is not totally accurate. Some babes have videos made both before and after the aftermarket enhancements were installed so a new category, "Both" is needed. Other babes have tits that have clearly been subjected to some work by a Beverly Hills surgeon but are still listed as real.
|
02-26-09 12:56pm
|
Reply
1020
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
gamblinman's Comment
Candidly, I lost interest in BangBros when they pulled a price bait & switch, but mine was a promised discount listed on PU that billed at the full rate. Their response to my email complaining about it simply said that the discount wasn't authorized and that they had no idea who Porn Users is.
I had been a member for a few months a few years ago and was OK but was not motivated to continue my membership. They've got some babes in exclusive videos that, at the phantom discount, would have kept me on as a member for several months.
I really don't understand the logic in a site being belligerent with its customers. It's rare, fortunately.
|
10-15-08 10:15pm
|
Reply
1021
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Dawn123's Reply
Bottom line, I've taken advantage of several TBP/PU discount offers and all, except Bang Bros, have been honored as offered and all of them were really good deals.
And the folks at TBP/PU immediately pulled the offer as soon as I reported it.
Finally, BangBros belatedly extended my full price membership to make up for the matter.
So I lost nothing except a few minutes of time posting these messages. I suggest staying on top of any deals and squawking immediately if you run into any snags.
|
06-11-08 08:48am
|
Reply
1022
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
DrKnockers's Reply
Nothing at all.
On 6 April, I used the TBP link to Bang Bros. The sign-up screen showed the $14.95 "special discount" price, so I signed up and started surfing their site. At no time did Bang Bros. advise me that the price I would be charged would be $23.95.
On 9 April, when I checked my Master Card account on line I saw that the charge came in at $23.95. That's when I communicated with Bang Bros. who denied any knowledge at all of the discount and of TBP. They refused to honor the discount.
Then on 9 April I sent an eMail to Khan, (PornUsers.com Sr Admin) which he quickly acknowledged receiving, but I have heard nothing back from him over the past week.
What concerns me is the credibility of TBP's discounts. There's really no way to determine their authenticity until the actual charge appears on a credit card and there's no way to cancel the charge once it has been made. It suggests that you should probably be willing to accept the full subscription price if the advertised TBP price is not honored by a site. And if the full price is too much, simply ignore the offer.
In fairness, I've successfully used the TBP discount on other occasions so I suspect this is a Bang Bros. issue, not a TBP issue. But not having heard anything from Khan other than the acknowledgment, I can add nothing to my initial comments.
EDIT: I see that Khan posted an update today. However my suggestion still stands. If TBP offers a discount and the site does not honor it (as was the case with Bang Bros.) there's nothing that can be done after the fact except to accept the full charge. So it looks like TBP discounts should be viewed as possibilities, not promises.
|
04-16-08 11:22am
|
Reply
1023
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
What it means is that it makes no difference who pays for something...it's paid for and thus the user is entitled to use it without restrictions.
You get high speed from your school because it's paid for and you're entitled to use it. So why the criticism by others of your source? It's not relevant.
Bottom line, your beef, as is mine, is that Bang Bros operates it's downloads at a very slow speed.
|
04-06-08 02:23pm
|
Reply
1024
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
BadAndy's point is the speed, or lack thereof, of the downloads, and he has a legitimate issue. But the focus was changed to how he accesses the web.
If my company sends me to Europe from Los Angeles and pays Business Class air fare on my behalf, is it wrong for me to complain about being assigned a middle seat in a sold out coach section just because it's my company that is paying my fare? Of course not.
The same applies to BadAndy. His beef is with download speed.
And yes, BangBros has a terribly slow download speed for their otherwise excellent site.
|
04-06-08 07:41am
|
Reply
1025
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
I am getting a follow-up at least once a week but they offer no incentive to re-join (such as a discount price or an extra week or two) so it serves only to irritate, not attract return business.
I liked the site when I was a member, then canceled when I was expecting to be off-line for about a month. I planned to rejoin shortly after I returned but kept putting it off...then the weekly "we want you back" stuff started to show up. When I saw a review of Brazzers, I decided to give that site a try before going back to Bang Bros. Love Brazzers so I'm still holding out on Bang Bros.
|
04-03-08 12:06pm
|
