| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1426
|
Shay Laren
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler -
Thanks for your comments.
I checked a few sets and found that sizes range from 682x1023 to 1333x2000, with a few odd sizes here and there (one sample thumb at 133x200 is included in some downloaded sets where the photos are predominately 1333x2000)
The photography is excellent, highly professional stuff.
|
03-30-08 12:22pm
|
Reply
1427
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
That must be new because I cancelled last Nov. with no such offer. I'm seriously considering going back because I miss it and the commentary of the models and the photographer. I also love the videography. That guy knows how to accentuate all of the positive attributes of the babes while making them real, not plastic, people.
|
03-30-08 10:25am
|
Reply
1428
|
Shay Laren
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Comment
OK nygiants03, in an uncharacteristic act of kindness, just for you I signed up on the Shay Laren site. (OK, I'll admit it. Shay has about the finest set of natural hangers in the business and ol' Willy snaps to rigid attention whenever I see any of her stuff so it wasn't much of a sacrifice. ;-) )
I just posted a full review of the Shay Laren site with full details on the quantity of material and other details.
Shay does soft core only with only a little lesbo action. There was only one 4.23 minute lesbo video - a foursome with 3 other girls who are not built like Shay. Shay does a little muff munching but nothing except tit massage is done to Shay. The video is 620 but is not the best quality so if you're a video fan as I am, sign up if you want to check her out in some outstanding solo scenes. (There's one interview video from Digital Dreamgirls - and one other DD Girls watermark video - in the 10 other videos on the site.)
There are 11 lesbo photo sets out of 90 with Anita Dark, Mindy Vega, Crystal Klein and Lisa A Daniels in 2-somes, 3-somes and one 4-some.
Everything is from good to superb quality.
Although signup set me back $29.95, being a Shay Laren fan, I'm OK with the content. But just for one month. She has a lot of content on Danni and more on Twistys, so I suggest just a one month signup, then spend the money next month on one of the other two sites.
There's also a blog, but her last entry was last October, which suggests that she's no longer active in the site.
Hope this helps.
|
03-30-08 09:59am
|
Reply
1429
|
Shay Laren
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Comment
I just checked the site. It says members get access to 5 other sites: Glamour Models Gone Bad, Amateurs Gone Bad, Lonnie Waters, Crissy Moran, and Natalia Cruze.
GlamourModelsGoneBad and the others are all $24.95 sites and each offers the others as "bonus sites." But none of them offer Shay's site. So for an extra $5 to get Shay Laren as an add to the other sites may be a good deal.
I plan to sign up on Shay's site to check it out (looks I'll be the first PU member to do so) and will report back.
|
03-29-08 11:25am
|
Reply
1430
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Comment
Just FYI, I'm a member of Brazzers and live in the USA. I am billed in dollars and I am paying the USD19.95 rate.
I see no reason why you should be paying at par in Euros. By my calculation, the Euro price should be Euro13.12 at the current exchange rate of USD1.52 per Euro1.00.
Please post the reply you get from Brazzers. It should be interesting.
|
03-27-08 02:27pm
|
Reply
1431
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
That's about how I feel as well. I'm not out to get a Pulitzer Prize, I just want to help other P. U. members get the most for their money, just as I do.
Frankly, this site has saved me a bunch of money and frustration because the reviews, both by TBP staff and P. U. members, really tell the story without any "hype." Better yet, I've found some terrific sites that I would never have found without TBP/PU.
|
03-26-08 06:35pm
|
Reply
1432
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I guess I really never understood T-shirts that have messages of any kind. Or, for that matter, bumper stickers. What's the objective? To "make a statement" to strangers that you will never see again? To change the way someone thinks?
Yesterday I saw a T-shirt that said, simply, "Kerry-Edwards, A Fresh Start for America." How, exactly, should I react to that?
I don't even like "logo shirts" with a Nike "swoosh" or a LaCoste alligator. They don't pay me to advertise their merchandise.
|
03-22-08 02:09pm
|
Reply
1433
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick C's Reply
EuroBabez and Dream Babes are back up and running with all the past missing updates now posted. All seems well.
Up do date sites through today:
Babelicious
Sexy-Babes.tv
DreamBabes
EuroBabez
Inactive sites:
BabesUK (last updated in Dec. 2007)
BabesOnFilm
BikiniBabes
CumminAtYa
RoyalBoobs
|
03-18-08 01:18pm
|
Reply
1434
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick C's Reply
Nick,
Good to hear and thanks for your response on the member forum as well. Hope all goes well as you are getting back up and running.
|
03-18-08 06:52am
|
Reply
1435
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
BINGO. and that's why I switched to Brazzers, which I find much better in that regard.
|
03-02-08 01:39pm
|
Reply
1436
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
powerman's Reply
Fair enough, powerman.
Now if you're free tomorrow, I'd like you to chat with my boss about how one can achieve 100 with a few minor "cons." His perspective is that it takes 100 attaboys to offset one you dumb shit...and that a score of 100 means perfection, no improvemt is possible.
For what it's worth I agree that in a sea of relative mediocraty in the Porn Site field, Brazzers definitely rises far above the norm, and in the genre of exclusive material, these Brazzers guys do a fabulous job in producing their stuff.
I can only dream of being a part of the production crew, who seem to be swimming in a constant stream of gorgeous fucking ladies. And I can't imagine life with a magic wand even remotely as prodigious as the dudes on this site carry in their charlies.
By the way, you write like a pro. Great reviews.
|
02-25-08 07:25pm
|
Reply
1437
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
powerman's Review
While I'm troubled by a 100 rating as well, I've now been a member for a few months and plan to stay a few more months.
My issue is that many of the more recent ladies are the "reconstructed" type (excessively exaggerated aftermarket tit jobs, excess botox fills, etc.) rather than basicly beautiful women (even those with more modest body shop work.
All natural babes like Jenna Doll and Natasha Nice get a lot of excellent exposure in exclusive content that, by itself, is worth the price of admission, and gorgeous babes like Bree Olsen and Carmella Bing also predominate.
The best kept secret is that their alphabetic listing of models in a plain drop down located in a hard to find box on the lower left of the Home page is loaded, and far more accurate (comprehensive) than the other, more visible indexes. The search function is a waste of time.
I will be writing a review shortly, once I get more experience using the site, but right now I would give it a 90-93 score; excellent but room for improvement.
|
02-25-08 11:41am
|
Reply
1438
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I can relate completely. Most of the good sites with high resolution videos offer 200-400Mb downloads. Those don't take long to fill up even a 500Gb hard drive.
I've tried using Windows Movie Maker to trim out the garbage from big ones and save just the portions I want but the process downgrades the resolution.
My next purchase will probably be a good video editing software disc that I can use for editing my porn collection.
|
02-21-08 04:50pm
|
Reply
1439
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Also a tittie lover, any activities that show REAL fun bags in all their glory, including nipple tugging/twisting is fine. Self sucking of nipples by big titted honeys also results in my Willy coming to full attention.
|
02-19-08 11:17am
|
Reply
1440
|
Babes.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I signed up twice quite a while back (2006 and 2005) and both times I was denied access a day or two into the membership. In both cases the "don't really care" attitude was apparent because I couldn't get any reply at all for several days from the support people. And when I finally did, the reset password didn't work.
In both cases, I got a full refund of my membership fee so I have no beef about that, but I have stayed away from that site ever since. Interestingly I've been a long term and satisfied member of their Sexy-=Babes.tv site (with several other sites attached) and have had no trouble at all.
I may give it another try because I do like the stuff on their other site and there appears to be a level of satisfaction expressed by everyone.
|
02-17-08 05:57pm
|
Reply
1441
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Actually this question has been on my mind all day (shows you how little I have on my mind since the football season is over) I do have a method to my timing. If I'm signing up normally for a month with a 25/75 chance (25% chance I'll let it auto-renew - 75% chance I'll cancel a week or so in) I'll time it so that the end date of the subscription is a Monday so I can get 5 weekends of membership. And I'll never sign up in February because a month membership will be date to date so it's only 28 or 29 days instead of 31 in the membership.
Aren't you sorry they asked? ;o)
|
02-17-08 05:43pm
|
Reply
1442
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I agree completely, but that was the only reason I could see other than they just ran out of poll questions.
|
02-17-08 01:34pm
|
Reply
1443
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I suspect the webmasters might be interested. There was a recent case where one of our fellow members reported a pricing glitch ($5 too low) that the webmaster instantly fixed. If the error is made during a slow enrollment period (such as weekend days) their loss is insignificant.
|
02-17-08 08:42am
|
Reply
1444
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Danni's Hot Box had very well produced FREE live shows with chat room interaction using multiple high res cameras. Because they had to deal with the traditionally unpunctual porn whores, they frequently had late starts and unhappy participation by paying menbers. (I quit the site for other reasons, so I don't know if those sessions are still there.)
|
02-15-08 07:08am
|
Reply
1445
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
Model Name>Website>Variable title/name
I also have specialized filing for sites (like FTV, Amateur, etc.) that just use phony first names.
I also keep an Excel spreadsheet with thumbnail photos and comments* and with links to the files to make it easy to find the babe/content that will do it for me.
*Big naturals, great face, large labia, etc.
|
02-07-08 10:56pm
|
Reply
1446
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I understand the urge to purge is a major problem when a babe takes it up the shitter.
Nothing can shut down a magic moment any faster than a turd showing up at a very inopportune moment.
The sensation to some women may be positive, but I think it's really a creation of something to add a little variety to a normal vaginal fuck.
As a porn lover, the best part of an anal fuck is that the RCG position shows off the porn whore's cunt in all its glory with no schlong in the way.
|
02-01-08 05:52pm
|
Reply
1447
|
N/A
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Agree. The face is a part of the package. Gotta see the eyes, the lips, the hair, the expressions, etc.
The good news is that the hidden face is a rapidly disappearing phenomenon that started with some low end porn videos in the 1980's.
I suspect the market place has spoken because I don't recall seeing any hidden face stuff in a long time.
|
01-31-08 07:28am
|
Reply
1448
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Frankly I skip past all that "what's your name?" "When did you first have sex?" and "How long have you been in the business" nonsense unless the babe is bare-assed naked and is showing off her assets while she's talking.
Foul language makes no sense to me because it expresses nothing of any value other than to show that the porn whore knows the terminology.
Repeating stuff too frequently, what ever the word (or noise) makes me turn off the speakers and go for just the babe and the sex.
|
01-27-08 02:32pm
|
Reply
1449
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I agree with the general trend of replies; that I go to paysites almost exclusively. The free sites are not that good and there are plenty of paysites that have good pricing (there's a recent trend nowdays where the successful sites have discovered that there is a lot more money to be made at a slightly lower price than by keeping the price high.)
|
01-27-08 02:24pm
|
Reply
1450
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
never's Review
I went to the site. There was no 3 day trial option, just the TBP $5 discount, so I assume that was available 5 months ago when you joined, but not now.
|
01-06-08 06:52pm
|
