| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1301
|
Illeana's
(0)
|
Reply of
Darkness's Review
Several questions:
How many videos?
How frequently do updates occur? (Example, how many updates in the last month?)
How many photos? Are they zipped for easy download?
Any DRM limitations?
Any download maximums?
How many "girlfriend" sets are there? Any videos?
Any HD material?
|
08-08-08 03:55pm
|
Reply
1302
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Review
Two points to add to MargulisAZ's excellent review:
1. The one major drawback is that about 5% or so of the scenes do not identify the models so the search for Aurora Snow won't result in all of her stuff, just the 74 that were accurately identified.
2. They just passed the 5000 video title total a few days ago. At 1,825 new videos added per year (5 per day), they'll be passing the 10,000 mark by late April, 2011. That's a whole lot of fornicating!
|
08-07-08 06:00pm
|
Reply
1303
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I don't like the idea.
The Forum is intended to be an exchange of ideas and opinions. By rewarding people for posts in the forum, you will be encouraging a bunch of low interest posts on low interest subjects made solely to run up ticket totals while, at the same time, reducing the value of the forum.
|
08-07-08 08:17am
|
Reply
1304
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I'm in relative agreement with all you say, Drooler.
When I see anal sex, I'm reminded of the old ship board caution of Navy EM's, "after a 3 month cruise, if you drop the soap in the shower room, leave it on the floor unless you want a rude surprise."
To me the sensation of experiencing vaginal sex is so much better than the sensation of shoving my willy up a girl's ass that I really don't see the attraction as a "doer." Now for gays, of course, rear-ending is the only way to get any physical sexual gratification.
Thus the logical connection is made between a male who enjoys doing anal as being "queer."
As for group sex, I also agree. My interest in watching a porn video is the babe, not the guy(s) doing the porking. A GGB video is fine, but a GBB is usually not so good because the babe is hidden behind the two guys. I want PTA* in my porn, not dicks, scrotums and hairy asses.
*PTA = Pussy, Tits and Ass.
|
08-06-08 10:37am
|
Reply
1305
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The thought has occurred to me. Often (usually?) with DP flicks, the cameraman captures both schlongs in great detail but we horndogs can't dee much of the bsbe. With gangbangs, there's a better chance of enjoying the babe, which is all I give a shit about, but really. If she's porked by one guy or 10 guys, why does it matter?
|
08-05-08 07:04am
|
Reply
1306
|
XVN.eu
(0)
|
Reply of
deadelvis's Comment
I just went to this site.
This notice appears at the top of the home page.
2008-07-28
MAINTENANCE NOTIFICATION
Thank you for using XVN.
We will be carrying out some maintenance work on our payment systems.
==========================================================
On Monday 4th August 2008, 21:00 thru Tuesday 5th August, 04:00 GMT
* Maintenance time might be extended.
==========================================================
The following services will be affected by this maintenance:
- Login to your XVN account
- Registration
- Purchase
- Viewing of all SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) pages, including your account pages
Please accept our apologies for the inconvenience.
|
08-04-08 12:10pm
|
Reply
1307
|
Want Boobs
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
I just visited the site (not as a member) because I got an email offering me a join price of $10 per month. It has a total of 32 models with no indicaton of any more, and the sample clips are all LD (lousy definition) and have copyright dates of 2004 and earlier.
If the site is that stagnant (or if that's the best they can do in promoting their site...use old stuff and not even brag teases like "hundreds of big tit babes"), it sure looks like a loser.
On top of that there is no apparent interest in the site by PU members.
Based on all that I decided to pass. The $10 could be better spent on a lottery ticket, or a couple of Big Macs. I'd get a better return on my $10.
|
08-04-08 12:03pm
|
Reply
1308
|
N/A
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
Ditto that, MarquilisAZ. The "celebs" who have made porn aren't all that great. The great ones are unlikely to permit any photos or videos of their coital activity.
|
08-04-08 12:32am
|
Reply
1309
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
If the review comments support the score, I'll remain silent about the score but may comment on some aspect of the review with which I disagree.
Otherwise I'll post a question if the reason for the score isn't explained in the commentary.
[If it's a newbie review I'll ignore the review altogether,)
|
08-02-08 07:31am
|
Reply
1310
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
odlbo's Comment
I've had no problems, except finding hard drive space on my computer.
|
08-01-08 08:26am
|
Reply
1311
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
"Sick?" Yup. When I see the occasional over the top garbage, like scat videos and such, which can make me physically ill.
Disgusted? Yup. When I see stuff like excess physical violence perpetrated on women, when I see women forced into gagging on large schlongs to the point where they are experiencing severe discomfort.
Bored? As porn "matures" with ever increasing video/photo quality and with more sophisticated scene direction and production, I am increasingly bored with some of my archived stuff which just a few years ago I thought was superior stuff. I am also less patient (less willing to compromise) with a lot of the marginal stuff that I used to keep, especially where the video spends far too much time recording the hairy asses of two guys in a DP scene involving a gorgeous babe that is invisible. [The good news is that I just finished dumping a bunch of "unkeepable" stuff and freed up a 360 Gig hard drive.]
Genbrally my enthusiasm can vary over a period of time but so long as Little Willy can snap to attention and make like Big Dick when a gorgeous babe is showing off her PTA* in a variety of scenarios, I'll never tire of porn.
*Pussy, Tits and Ass.
|
07-30-08 02:21pm
|
Reply
1312
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
The zip file associated with the sample I mentioned above is janaredlng.zip. I agree with you completely that an effort to use more descriptive zip file names would be a major improvement. These days, with substantially improved file naming protocols, there's no technical reason why severely truncated file names must be used by Twistys.
|
07-25-08 11:20pm
|
Reply
1313
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Twistys has a third bonus site, Anette Dawn.com, which is not a clone.
Blue Fantasies is a very well populated site with tons of good stuff. Naughty Staff is a brand new site with excellent stuff, but not much of it yet.
Thus there are 3 clones and 3 separate content sites in addition to the mother lode called Twistys.
|
07-25-08 07:08pm
|
Reply
1314
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I just checked one photo set and one photo in it...here's the label...janaredlng_003.jpg.
It's a Jana Cova photo set posted today that they call "Dip and Lick" and the red, I suppose, refers to her bright red panties. There are clues, obviously, and I suppose their naming is better than others that use just numbers, or the same names for everything.
|
07-25-08 07:05pm
|
Reply
1315
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Frankly, DP puts far too much focus on the schlong and far too little emphasis on PTA for my taste.
DP, in most cases, causes the PTA parts of the babe to be obscured in favor of a hairy male ass or two.
That's kinda why I am happier without DP, or, if it must happen, if it means the babe is servicing two guys with a single blow job I can go along with that.
(By the way, PTA means Pussy Tits and Ass)
|
07-25-08 10:55am
|
Reply
1316
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nineinch's Review
Having been a member during the good old days when Danni ranm the site and things were good with great support efforts, the DRM was annoying but the site provided work-arounds.
Then Danni sold the site, the support staff stopped responding and they stopped a lot of their features, especially the big boob stuff like "Honest Bra" (all naturals). Worse, the work-around for DRM protected downloaded files was dropped so the "Danni Promise," while still on the site, was no longer operative.
Their best feature, in my opinion, is the live shows with member interaction. (The one with Shay Laren was totally memorable.)
But their worst aspect, a non-functional (non-existent?) Customer Support staff and a large bunch of old, but good, content that is available only in "Danni-vision" or in very low res mpeg drags it way down.
Based on this review and the possible improvements that may have occurred during my one year hiatus, it's possible the site has returned to its old glory as a top-notch site. I may sign up again to check things out.
|
07-23-08 06:53am
|
Reply
1317
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
A note of explanation. The shop knows me as a business customer so he could have thought he was doing me a favor telling me about the porn so that I could deal with an employee. However I did tell him when I brought it in the day before that he was to charge me, not my company, for the work done. In other words it was not a 100% MYOB deal, but closer to a 75% MYOB.
|
07-20-08 07:17pm
|
Reply
1318
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
To amplify a bit on Drooler's reply, the Twistys network has 7 separate sites:
These five are individual with unique content. Some models appear on more than one site but there is no duplication of content among these five sites:
Twistys - the "parent site" Multiple updates daily
When Girls Play - Lesbian - Several updates monthly. They keep it fresh. (This does not appear to be a separate site that has a preview/join us capability.)
Anette Dawn - Single model site with 4 or 5 updates each month.
Naughty Staff - Brand new site - No established update schedule as far as I can tell.
Blue Fantasies - Glamour site - 2 or 3 updates each week
These two have content duplicated from Twistys that fits their genre. There's no unique content:
Eurofoxes
BustyOnes
As Drooler said, the quantity is superb for the price.
|
07-20-08 01:39pm
|
Reply
1319
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm with Davit.
A few years ago I took a computer to a repair shop that had some porn sites listed in My Favorites on IE and some recent activity in history. (I transfer all of my downloaded stuff on an external hard drive to save space on my computer's hard drive.)
He fixed the problem, whatever it was, and when I picked it up he said "I found some 'naughty stuff' in history." He offered me some suggestions on how to clear out such stuff.
I thanked him with no other comment other than to discuss the issue that he resolved. Haven't been back to that shop again.
The new shop I use has never brought up the subject. Either they haven't looked, don't care, or have decided that they want to keep me as a customer.
In any case, it shouldn't be a big deal unless the repair shop guy wants to make a big deal about it...then it's time to find another shop.
|
07-20-08 10:36am
|
Reply
1320
|
Naughty Staff
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
There are a few duplications with other network sites that the site says will be corrected. I'm looking forward to the Naughty Staff site growing with more of the super-high quality of material it has already provided.
|
07-19-08 10:21am
|
Reply
1321
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
Mac & Bumble was a great site several years ago and was rather popular with great content.
Two possibilities since then, both not particularly good:
1. The site's owner has lost and is just letting the site sit dormant while he collects revenue to support his retirement.
2. The site was sold to someone who has decided to use it as a scam operation.
These days there are so many great sites at great prices, and there's also Porn Users where many will be educated about shit sites like M&B that their approach to doing business will fail.
|
07-17-08 07:11am
|
Reply
1322
|
N/A
|
Reply of
moshic's Poll
I agree with Drooler.
My machine handles 1280's like a champ but has major trouble with 1900's. Maybe a new machine will do better, but the bigger issue is the huge space needed for the huge formats for only slightly better sharpness.
If given a choice, I'll stay with the 640's to save on disk space unless the added sharpness is significant enough to go higher.
But a poorly lighted video, or worse, one shot at lousy angles or with a shaky camera, cannot be improved by technical adjustments.
|
07-16-08 07:57am
|
Reply
1323
|
Veggie Bang
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
You refer to a "trial price" but I can't find one. The TBP summary shows a $29.95/month price as does the website. Could it be that yours was a short term (or a tie-in) deal of some kind?
|
07-15-08 07:55am
|
Reply
1324
|
N/A
|
Reply of
NMC2008's Reply
Ditto. I don't like QuickTime at all.
I do stream many videos first to see if they are worth downloading, but I'll never knowingly join a streaming only site.
|
07-14-08 08:02am
|
Reply
1325
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Frankly seeing a skinny, anorexic, immature, rich bitch like Paris Hilton getting laid ranks just one step below watching two German Shepards getting it on.
If it's a girl with a good face and body like Lindsay Lohan...now we're talking.
Bottom line, it all depends on the girl.
|
07-12-08 07:55am
|
