| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1276
|
Rub My Boob
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
Thanks for your review. I just checked out the preview site and it looks like it's worth a try. I see that it's a Polish site (Rubmyboob.pl) yet I saw some babes I think I've seen elsewhere.
I see you've been a member for over 1 month so did you spring for a 3 month deal at $50? If the site is as good as I think it might be, I'm ready to go for 180 days at $70 which is $11.66 a month - a good price if the site is good.
|
09-07-08 01:50pm
|
Reply
1277
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Review
Excellent review. Pros and cons and, especially the way you explain how you judge a site.
You made me think through each of my current sites and I quickly identified two that I don't have an eagerness to see the current updates.
Better yet, your interests match mine. I am very happy exploring a gorgeous babe's body as she does things with it that I want to see...which is not just some dude with a hairy butt pounding her with a mechanical in and out while she makes funny noises. In Focus Girls has been on my "futures" list but your review and the PU discount have me about ready to drop those other sites and sign up for this one.
|
09-06-08 09:10pm
|
Reply
1278
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I check in on my laptop whenever I can. (Like right now.)
|
09-06-08 02:04pm
|
Reply
1279
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
I just logged on again and this time was successful downloading a scene, so apparently it was temporary.
I will stay subscribed, but I really don't like the silence of their customer service. Their responses have always been quick and on point but not this time. Perhaps they were overwhelmed with communications when the site went down.
|
09-03-08 02:19pm
|
Reply
1280
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
The Clyde's Reply
In the past when I contacted their Support I always got a very fast response. This time nada, even after 24 hours.
And in most cases when a site goes down, you can't log in. I couid log in fast and clean but once in (on the home page) I was unable to access any content.
That's why my conjucture that they were out of business.
After about 36 hours I got an email from them that just gave me my logon stuff (access code and password) which meant nothing. No response to my follow-up.
I'm giving it another day then will simply cancel. (My current run expires on Friday.)
|
09-03-08 07:48am
|
Reply
1281
|
Exploited Babysitters
(0)
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Reply
Thanks for the input. It is very helpful. There are several models on the site that appear everywhere, but I suspect that the videos of them on this site are exclusive just by the genre.
I'm thinking about dropping $25 when I can schedule my time to do a 100% drain of all videos in one month. Shouldn't be hard if they have only 50-60 vids.
|
09-02-08 04:05pm
|
Reply
1282
|
Exploited Babysitters
(0)
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Review
Looks like, from the preview, this site has a good quantity of good looking babes doing fun stuff. I can deal with the chatter (I tend to turn the sound off during the sex scenes because there's usually nothing worth listening to).
1. Are the videos all exclusive? (I'm guessing they are by the nature of your comments.)
2. Can you estimate the number of models/videos on the site?
3. Did you sign up for the 7 day trial before you went for the full deal? If so was it as restricted as was reported in an earlier review?
|
09-01-08 01:46pm
|
Reply
1283
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
When I go to the site the banner says "Shocking Price $1.00 unlimited access. No mention of how long that access is.
The sign up page has these options:
$1.00 - 1 day unlimited membership
$19.95 - Special for 1 month membership
$49.95 - 3 Month Membership
$95.40 - $7.95 per Month Billed Anually
I'm currently on a 3 month deal but had the 1 year deal been available when I signed up, I would have pounced on it. This site is a Hell of a deal at $8.00 a month.
|
09-01-08 12:07pm
|
Reply
1284
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Thaeral's Review
Ditto the others. I'm a 4 month member and agree totally with this review,
A few minor adds to the review:
1. I'm quite sure all of their primary stuff is exclusive material. At least I haven't seen any of it anywhere else.
2. They are good with a variety of silly plot lines that add a bit of interest to the subject.
3. Excellent videography. The care they take to show off the babe's assets to their greatest advantage is superb.
4. The more recent updates seem to be mostly of babes with overinflated aftermarket boobs. I want naturals...at least 50% of the time.
5. The search feature is quite well done.
In addition, I'm good with the 87. If they'd switch to more natural babes from the aftermarket boob babes, I'd be ready to give them a 90+.
|
09-01-08 11:59am
|
Reply
1285
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
Thanks. Your comments really help. I've been trying to decide whether to switch or to continue to find as much good stuff as I can on FTV before I switch. With FTV I can always skip past the boring stuff, but I totally hate lousy and unprofessional camera work that fucks up a great scene with a gorgeous babe.
I think I'll stay with FTV for another month before I switch.
|
08-30-08 09:00pm
|
Reply
1286
|
N/A
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Poll
I voted for all the above, but some elements annoiy me more than others:
Horrible camera man (25%):
Who the Hell wants to see close-ups of the porn stud's hairy ass for 5 straight minutes while his dick is doing the reciprocating pumping into her cunt? Who the Hell wants to waste 5-10 minutes watching just the mouth of a stacked naked babe as she's giving the porn stud head? The best porn videos are those where the babe's assets are the center of attention.
Non stop talking (2%):
The chatter is annoying but it's easy to switch off the sound. No big deal. I want to [u]see[/u] the babe, not necessarily hear her.
Terrible lighting (50%):
If you can't see the babe, or the lighting is so bright you see only a vague image, what's the point? Not in the poll question, but equally annoying is the "soft" focus or artsy fartsy videography with lots of froo froo shots that might make one or two porn horndogs happy, but leave the rest of us pissed off.
[u]Very[/u] fake female performance (20%):
The operative word is "very." When a babe is clearly faking it I stop watching. When it's well acted "fake" where it's hard to tell if it's really fake, that's fine with me.
Robotic male actor (3%):
WGAF (Who gives a fuck) - I'm into watching a totally sexy fuck doll doing her thing and really don't give a shit about the guy. Just make sure he doen't abuse the babe or disrespect her. (That's why I really disliked John Leslie's flicks back in the day. He disrespected every fuck doll he porked. My favorite scene was when he tried to ass fuck Angel in a late 1980's flick and she kept saying no. And when he kept trying, Angel shut him down immediately. They left the scene in the video. I loved it.)
|
08-29-08 01:03pm
|
Reply
1287
|
N/A
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Unfortunate about Shay, but Video Box is virtually all h/c and, as far as I know from what I've seen so far, Shay Laren could well still be a virgin! (I'd love to be the first!!!!) ;o)
|
08-28-08 04:33pm
|
Reply
1288
|
N/A
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
My understanding is that "non-exclusive" means the content on a site can be found on other sites.
To me if I want to check out stuff with, say, Shay Laren featured, if I go to a site like Video Box, I'll know in advance that whatever they may have could be found on another site.
Conversely if a site is really exclusive, then I know that, even if their Shay Laren offerings are light, I'll still find some new (to me) stuff.
That said, I'm fine with "non-exclusive" sites because there is so much out there that there ain't no way I'll ever scoop up everything.
|
08-27-08 09:41am
|
Reply
1289
|
Sandy's Fantasies
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Great review. I decided to check the site out and really do like it. I especially liked what you said about the warning that it was inactive. Makes me really want to sign up for this and the other sites because I really appreciate honesty and respect for the customer.
Quoting from the sign-up page:
This site has become an "archive site" - there will be no further updates to the content of this site in the future.
There is still plenty of content and it is definitely worth a 30-day membership, so please take a look!
If you're looking for something with more content and plenty of new updates, we highly recommend our other, larger sites:
* 1by-day-com (Beautiful European Babes - 2 new updates every single day, HD video, huge archives!)
* Hotlegsandfeet.com (The Premier Foot-Fetish site on the net today!)
* Handsonhardcore.com (Huge amounts of high-quality hardcore!)
* OnlyBlowjob.com (BJs, BJs and yet more BJs!)
* DDFBusty.com (Big, bouncy breasts in solo, lesbian and hardcore action!)
|
08-24-08 11:03am
|
Reply
1290
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I haven't seen anything directly related on websites except on sites whose webmaster participates on PU.
I've added a criterion to my decision to join a site; has the webmaster participated on PU? That's one of the reasons I sprung for a 5-month enrolment on PU. Shap, the webmaster, is active one this site.
A good webmaster would be nuts not to be checking out PU daily and paying attention to his customers, past, present and potential. It's the best (only?) true market research capability in the porn site biz.
|
08-23-08 08:06am
|
Reply
1291
|
Jaime Hammer
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I was correcting williamj's review that mentioned a $19.95 price by pointing out that PU is showing a $24.95 price.
|
08-22-08 10:35pm
|
Reply
1292
|
Jaime Hammer
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
Looks like the price went up. The PU advertised price is $24.95.
Apart from that your review tells me that this is a great individual model site. There are so many sites out there that are totally dormant and are there only to suck some cash from unwitting horndogs who happen by.
I really like Jaime Hammer for her obvious major assets but also from a personality standpoint.
Your review was very informative and tells me that this site could be a one month deal where I can go in and drain the site in a month's time then sit it out for a year or so before I go back in to update my collection.
Great review. Thanks.
|
08-22-08 11:46am
|
Reply
1293
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Not being a big photo guy I totally forgot about that. FTV is way below average as a photo site vs. a video site.
But you and Denner tend to match my tastes so as I said to him, I'm going to switch over to Nubiles for a month to give it a go.
|
08-21-08 01:23pm
|
Reply
1294
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
You and Drooler (see comment #3) tend to match my tastes and your comments tell me that I should cancel the auto-renewal of FTV and use the $30 on Nubiles instead.
Thanks.
|
08-21-08 01:21pm
|
Reply
1295
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
kkman112's Reply
We're on the same page about FTV.
They make it hard to love with the unnecessarily long and boring stuff interfering with the really good stuff. My sense in checking out the Nubiles previews is that they are more conventional with single episode videos that get to the point much quicker than FTV.
|
08-21-08 01:18pm
|
Reply
1296
|
Victoria Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Read it. Sadly it shows that no effort has been made at all to update the site in well over 2 years.
I suspect she's found a sugar daddy in Las Vegas who has taken her out of the skin biz.
|
08-21-08 12:49pm
|
Reply
1297
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
landers4's Review
Having joined twice (currently in my second month of subscription #2) I agree with the comments but not the score.
It's a great site but the scenes can go on far too long with no variety. Watching a girl stick a dildo in her snatch and move it around for 10 minutes in the same position gets very boring. The producer needs to edit down the static scenes.
I will be writing a review shortly but wanted to note that I agree with landers-4 that this site is truly special and warrants a high rating.
|
08-20-08 08:26am
|
Reply
1298
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
As with the old 900 Phone Sex operations, I really never quite understood the market. If a guy was starved for personal, but non-sexual, interaction with a babe, I guess phone sex or a live girls webcam site can satiate his need. But can there really be that many out there with that need and who are willing to pay big bucks to support the cost of setting up and operating the site (or phone bank)?
I agree with the others that such a need can easily be satisfied in a titty bar at far less cost.
|
08-19-08 10:10am
|
Reply
1299
|
N/A
|
Reply of
NMC2008's Reply
Jennifer Avalon was the opposite. She did h/c before she became a big no-fuck model doing the hardest softcore I've ever seen. (VideoBox just posted her early hardcore and it really demonstrated why she was far better in the softcore biz.)
Then there's Sydney Moon. Please Syd. No h/c.
Vanessa B and Betty Ballhaus are two more great natty babes in addition to Shay Laren who would be fun to see in h/c.
So yes, I agree with NMC2008. It depends on the babe.
|
08-13-08 08:28am
|
Reply
1300
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Not sure what the distinction is between "using" porn and "watching" porn.
I watch porn because I love looking at the PTA being displayed in an erotic manner. Fantasy? I guess. Turn on? Most definitely. Fill a void? Sure. Getting off on porn when I'm not in a place where I can't do the deed is an objective. Maintaining a monogamous relationship? Yup. When I'm away from home, a session with my hard drive is a whole lot better (and cheaper and safer) than other pursuits.
PTA - Pussy Tits and Ass
|
08-11-08 08:15am
|
