| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Pornluver's Comment
I doubt ccbill would actively participate in the type of double billing these guys are known for. Incredible Pass is able to double bill people because you are sending your credit card data directly to them: notice that the page where you enter CC data is at their site while sites that use ccbill send you to enter CC data at ccbill's domain.
My only concern is whether a membership purchased at ccbill's store is always a valid one. I had never noticed you could buy memberships directly through ccbill's site but I see there's an option to buy access to incrediblepass.com there. I searched for some other sites and the descriptions don't match at all.
So, I don't think you should be concerned with your CC data if you enter it at ccbill; as long the ccbill store is legitimate, you should get access to the site.
|
10-12-08 10:10am
|
Reply
252
|
Mia McKinley
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Another site powered by the same people, Naughty Natalie XOXO, also got a rave review with little info. I wrote a review for another site by them, Miss Laura Lee, whose picture content info shouldn't be much different from the one here.
The free section from these people usually shows the amount of content available in the members area. Be advised, though, that pictures are probably quite small and cannot be downloaded. Video sizes are probably big but there's no info on resolution or duration. Only a handful of videos. There's a free video sample which is 1280x720 (6000kbps); IMHO, very bad camera work, though.
|
10-12-08 05:35am
|
Reply
253
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Short answer: yes.
Long answer: wait for my review later this week.
|
10-09-08 01:51pm
|
Reply
254
|
Valentina Vaughn
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I was interested in Valentina Vaughn but, as my review shows, I was quite disappointed with the site she is offering. I knew what I was getting into, though. I see things haven't improved since I left: no updates with Valentina Vaughn during last month.
Haven't been at Misha Online yet but I'm not sure Misha has any connection with this site apart from a few photosets. Maybe she helped get the site started (design, etc) but the exclusive content is mostly very artsy and doesn't seem something Misha would shoot, I believe. Given the great amount of Marquis Models content, I thought instead there might be some connection with Angela Melini.
|
10-02-08 02:45pm
|
Reply
255
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Cybertoad, maybe I didn't see it clear enough the other day but I just want to say that your review is well worth it and I'm sure that a surfer looking for HD video will find the recounting of your experience valuable and avoid this site at all costs once they see the advertised HD video is nowhere to be seen.
I see your review and rating are honest for someone looking for a regular solo model site but Morphious seems to be so much into this site and model that I'd very much like him to arrange his thoughts and explain what makes this site so absolutely special for him.
The thing is I believe the site perhaps only SEEMS to advertise itself falsely for several reasons:
a) we usually expect solo model sites (or sites in general) to deliver mainly photos and video on a regular basis: journals, chats, live cams are a rare extra and not the main course;
b) at one point in its 8+ years of existence, the site was a usual solo model site and its design mostly stuck with it;
c) the site design fails at conveying to the visitors what it's really about;
When someone arrives at the site, he sees the model and some white text on a sky blue background on the right that he just ignores: hard to read and his eyes are probably fixed on the girl (at least, that's what I did). He scrolls down the page and sees the icons you mentioned: HD Videos, photos and all. OK, he thinks, we just found a usual solo model site, girl's hot, I like HD video, let's type in the credit card number and get the party started. Reality check: 3 streaming-only video updates in a year and lots of photos which aren't his favorite dish.
That text he ignored (rightfully, as it looks like they wanted people not to read it) says "Welcome to the internet's newest and most extensive reality show yet! Live cams are running 24 hours a day seven days a week to fulfill your voyeuristic pleasures. Go behind the scenes of a woman's world and enjoy". For once, I believe it's not lies in its entirety and this site is, in fact, delivering live voyeur video on a regular basis. OK, I guess those spy cams show recorded video during some hours of the day but Morphious seems to hint that he once caught Francine Dee having sex live on one of the "spy cams"! My crush on Francine Dee died a long time away (never was a member of the site, and never will) but, if that thing can happen in this site, I think it's pretty remarkable.
When you are so much into a model as Morphious seems to be, getting a weekly live chat plus video blogs plus contests plus spy cams plus getting her to call you on the phone during a chat plus being able to bid on her lingerie must make you live with a constant hard-on. HD what? Pictures? You get her LIVE daily! This site fails miserably to deliver HD video by all accounts but 3 different people came here to praise the site (2 reviews, 2 comments). Morphious seems to be the only one who didn't hit and run so I'd very much like him to make some sense of his initial review.
|
10-01-08 12:23pm
|
Reply
256
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Morphious's Reply
Morphious, not to be bitchy but I feel that your last reply is longer and more informative than your own review as it currently is. As you are clearly so fond of the site, would you consider doing a rereview and adding there all this info plus all the other bits you've scattered around?
I know you are new here but extremely short overenthusiastic reviews that go near the 100 rating are usually a bad sign. You seem to be not short of words so make use of those 1000+1000+3000 characters and justify that rating. There's little point in keeping on bugging Cybertoad's review when you have lots of space in a new review.
Check Cybertoad's Catalina Cruz review and compare it with your Francine Dee one to see what I mean.
|
09-30-08 02:42pm
|
Reply
257
|
Fantasy Girl Brooke
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Thanks again. Few new updates but that's a respectable amount of probably exclusive scenes. As I said elsewhere, I'll probably visit the network soon and the scenes alone are just one more reason to do it. Even though other sites in the network will be much more interesting for sure.
|
09-30-08 02:26pm
|
Reply
258
|
Fantasy Girl Brooke
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Thanks for the info. She is not only a beauty (if you manage to ignore the tattoos) but I believe she has quite a character. Pity the site fails to show that side of her. I'll have to make do with the behind the scenes videos when I join. Thanks again.
|
09-30-08 11:28am
|
Reply
259
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Sorry but I still feel you based your review too much on the video content (or the lack of it). The site seems to have many other things apart from videos. I'm not so sure the site is misleading, either. The home page is misleading but free video section states the right facts. TBP facts also state what you have encountered in video terms. If the site was a video-only site and it offered only what it offers, it would certainly need work but (I may be wrong but) I believe there's much more than videos to this site.
On the other hand, you certainly deserve much more trust than the other two revieweres. Your reviews of Catalina Cruz's network are top notch and I will definitely join those sites in the near future. I decided not to ask the other reviewers for the reasons behind their extremely high rating because, with all due respect, one site fanatics aren't so much different than one book fanatics.
But, just as I am sure the site isn't paradise on earth, it looks like it has some interesting features which the other reviewers only hint at (even though those features are probably the reason why they like the site so much) and you almost completeley left those features aside. I'm not discussing the rating per se but basing the review in only one feature of the side.
|
09-29-08 09:57pm
|
Reply
260
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
With all due respect, is the site such a disaster to deserve a 51 rating? I simpathise with you feeling ripped off because the other reviewers also made me think this site was some sort of paradise but, anyway, a 51 is sending it next to dead sites with 0 content while this one is clearly alive and has a decent amount of picture content.
I've only seen the free tour but it has some things I always appreciate like stating all the updates with dates. I agree the site claims to have "Hi Def video" on the home page but the video section in the free tour only claims to have "HD Flash Video at 1000K" plus ipod and psp versions. Maybe the streaming is at higher resolution than the downloadable ones?
I counted 60 solo picture gallery updates in the first 9 months of this year alone, which is quite a lot for a solo site. What resolution are they in? There was a scheduled chat last week which not so many solo sites really offer although every one claims to do. Did it take place? The contests also seem interesting and are absolutely rare. There seem to be way too many sections which are probably hot air but, anyway, a 51?
All in all, I believe this is a site Francine Dee fans certainly enjoy or she wouldn't be still in the business 8 years after it was launched. I am just guessing, but maybe the other two reviewers let their fan factor influence their first review ever and sent the rating way too high without clearly explaining their reasons.
This site has been on my radar for some time. I probably will never join at this price but I'm sorry to say your review in its current form is just as unhelpful as the other two.
|
09-29-08 02:08pm
|
Reply
261
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
IKnoPorn's Comment
Thanks for the tip and for an excellent review. Your suggestion to stick to the model list has proven useful.
|
09-27-08 10:24am
|
Reply
262
|
Naughty Natalie XOXO
(0)
|
Reply of
ConkDaddy214's Review
I'm almost certain this site doesn't allow you to download any pictures or videos.
I was a member of Miss Laura Lee, another site done with the same content engine (RT Web Designs) and a script blocks all attemps at right-clicking. If you check the free section of Naughty Natalie XOXO, you can see it for yourself: if you right-click on any page, no context menu appears.
|
09-27-08 09:06am
|
Reply
263
|
The Minion
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
I wasn't familiar with The Minion's story until recently so I don't know whether any of the scenes were released previously. I did some research and I'm not sure if they will be filming more updates than the 150+ scenes that Chico Wang did. Scenes, so, are probably a couple years old. Maybe, if the site is successful enough, the guy will perform in some more scenes.
The Minion now goes by the name Doron Pepperscone and works as PA for Billy Watson (owner or director of most sites in this network). If you are interested in his story, there's a podcast interview with him at PornStar Podcast. There's also another one with Billy Watson.
|
09-21-08 02:36am
|
Reply
264
|
Jaime Hammer
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
JFYI, they have recently lowered the price back to $19.95.
|
09-08-08 12:10am
|
Reply
265
|
Curry Creampie
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Good catch. When you join a MILF site, you don't expect all models to have children in real life but this case is different.
As further proof, some American porn starts I spotted in the free tour: Luscious Lopez as Kumani, Alexis Love as Shanti, Nikara (aka Aurora Jolie) as Ara, Ricki White as Ashari, ... None are known for being "100% Indian" and it's very unlinkely they were "fucked on film for the first time" for this particular site as the tagline claims.
|
08-26-08 10:25am
|
Reply
266
|
Bitches In Training
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks for confirming my suspicions. I used to think the Girlvert series had quite a following so I don't understand why they are offering it with a different name through this site. Looks like the plot / recurring story is thinner than I thought.
One correction, though: Ashley Blue is NOT the director of the Girlvert series. According to iafd.com, she's been appearing in the series since #2 but the director is Jim Powers. Among other things, Ashley Blue's directed the "Attention Whores" series which also has an interesting premise: porn stars who act as divas / prima donnas during their scenes. The result, depending on the porn stars involved, can be quite funny.
|
08-25-08 01:36pm
|
Reply
267
|
Bitches In Training
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
"Dixie" is played by Ashley Blue, a well known porn star who also directs a DVD series entitled "Girlvert". As the themes are almost identical, I believe this site could consist of the scenes from that series alone. There should be a recurring story behind the different titles in the series, which might be interesting if you can catch them all in a single site. Thanks for the heads up.
|
08-25-08 10:32am
|
Reply
268
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
Bletch's Reply
Sorry if I didn't make myself clear. What I meant is that everyone sees 14.95 USD at the TBP/PU site but, once you go to the Devil's Film site, they are using regional pricing and you see the price in your local currency: 14.95 GBP in the UK, 14.95 EUR in the EU or 14.95 USD in the USA.
|
08-24-08 11:48pm
|
Reply
269
|
The Real Me
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
Your review prompted me to join and I really liked what I saw. I haven't had time to watch all the content but so far, so good. For a trial membership, it's a real bargain if you like this type of content.
I was prompted to research around the site and the sad thing is that the site is for sale. I came across a webmaster message board where the owner of the site said he was listening to offers. I doubt that there will be any updates in the meantime. If the site is sold, it's unclear whether the new owners will be able to keep up with the quality of the first 14 updates.
|
08-22-08 03:16pm
|
Reply
270
|
Jaime Hammer
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Glad that you found my review useful. It was my second review ever but I feel it's still accurate. Ever since I discovered Jaime Hammer's site, what's offered here is what I expect in other solo sites and most fall short for one reason or another. That's why this site stays at the top of my list of reviews.
If you like her personality, let me suggest that you try to make it to one of her webcam chats. As for her major assets, she is currently working mainly for her site so this is almost the only place where you can find her recent pictures and videos. She recently did, though, some pretty awesome sets for Digital Desire, which were being released here even before they were available at DD.
One more detail that, IMHO, sets this site apart is that there was a message board thread asking site members about their opinion prior to raising the price. They also added multimonth membership options then.
|
08-22-08 03:07pm
|
Reply
271
|
Flexible Positions
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
I was aware of the fellow user's review and stood clear of mpeg files (just in case) and downloaded wmv files only. I usually download wmv files only anyway. I've watched many of the files and haven't had any issues I am aware of.
I joined through Porn Pros Network as all sites in the network showed me regional pricing (24.95 EUR). I chose the main network site because the tour explicitly said I'd have access to all sites. Now I see that Flexible Positions is offering the same at half the price I paid. Lucky you :)
I've also noticed that Flexible Positions is using a different billing provider (SSC). I had never heard of it.
|
08-08-08 09:21am
|
Reply
272
|
Flexible Positions
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
I was meaning to post a review in a couple of days. You may check my Porn Pros Network review to get a feel of the pros and cons of the network in the meantime. If you go to Porn Pros Network site and click on Flexible Positions logo, you will be able to see the actual 10 scenes released so far. The site is fairly new even though the release dates go back to 2008-05. The network as a whole is well worth joining.
I don't know if it was you but I remember reading some time ago some fellow porn user's complaints about a similar site that employed porn stars instead of real athletes for the scenes. Same case here: porn stars. I've only watched bits so far.
Scenes usually start with the male performer pretending to be a trainer at a gym and helping the girls do some workout. Jayden Jaymes does some long, serious running on a treadmill, tits bouncing and all to the point she is sweaty and almost panting. A big soft training ball is often used for the sex. I also remember Angelina Valentine hanging upside down from one of the gym's machines while giving a deepthroat blowjob.
|
08-07-08 12:06pm
|
Reply
273
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I wouldn't post more but it would be a good idea.
We may already get a ticket by writing 5 replies or giving 5 trust ratings but I've never felt fellow users abuse it to get that ticket. I'm guessing the forums were introduced after the badges system was in place; maybe the replies ticket could also include forum posts.
|
08-07-08 08:27am
|
Reply
274
|
Club Sophie Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
You pretty much nailed it with your review back in 12-2007. The quality isn't that good. But, IMHO, when discussing a solo model site, it's also important to take into account the model's involvement with the site.
Not to mention that many porn stars keep on talking about their "new site" and how good it will be. Most get lost in webmastering nightmare and don't even get to release a site; those who eventually do, usually don't have what it takes to keep it intersting and fail to keep on updating after the launch.
I agree the quality should be improved but this site has mantained an awesome update rate of 2 new photo galleries and 1-2 videos per week for the last two years. Plus a constantly updated blog, message board activity and so on. I am not a big fan of Sophie Dee but I've signed up several times to the site over this period because I knew lots of things would have happened since last time.
I wish more porn stars followed her example.
|
08-05-08 02:28pm
|
Reply
275
|
Nikki Benz
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks! Sometimes I wish I could be more succint, though :)
Ms. Benz is a favorite of mine too. The site had a trial membership in its previous incarnation but not now. I'll let some time pass so it builds up more exclusive content before joining again. We'll always have Brazzer's Network in the meantime.
|
08-05-08 02:03pm
|
