Justification for a high score, as well as lots of exclamation points, is what reviews should be about. We are all biased in some way or another, but I think a 100 or 99 can be validated, especially with the higher character counts that are allowed for reviews.
These reviews barely even read as advertisements, they just come across like every spam subject line we have had to read as we empty out the junk mail folder.
Is there a way to temporarily block reviews for this site until the flood of enthusiasm recedes some?
Hmm...this is the third review in just as many days for the same site, and the scores from these three range from 99 to 100. They are also all by three brand new users who have joined PU in the last few days and only reviewed this site.
If it wasn't for the newbie ratings, super high scores, and countless exclamation points, I might consider these to be at least somewhat legitimate.
Maybe I am wrong, and this site has gotten really popular in the last few days.
Welcome to PU and thanks for the review, but I was wondering if you could give a little more insight into your score and review. For example, in the Bottom Line you wrote that the site is "the superior one" to five other soft core but you didn't explain why or how it's superior. Just some suggestions, and welcome to PU.
If only it were true...but I am afraid not. Her shoot with ALS was back sometime in the fall of last year; I don't remember the exact date, but it was in the fall. Her recent announcement concerning her health is dated April 8th of this year. :(
I only hope that she just hasn't updated her site with some good news since then.
I thought she was getting better, but according to her site I am wrong. :(
She shot with ALSScan last fall, after having first shot with them sometime around 1998-'99, and she had a clean bill of health and was in good spirits. Now, at age 30, she has had her second diagnosis of cancer! Due to her preexisting condition, she can't get health insurance (we really do have the best health care in the world, don't we?), and now needs donations (through her site) so she can have more surgery for the hysterectomy.
Hope she gets better -- she is one the sweetest girls in porn!
Just out of curiosity, did you actually sign up for a full month or just a trial membership? Also a more thorough bottom line would help explain things a little.
Sounds like just another anally-themed site, though with a great name. Too bad about the speed issues; twenty to thirty minutes is terrible for one scene, and an hour for an HD version sounds unbearable. You also did a review of Dildo and Fisting, but are any of the other sites' content worth anything?
Thank you Denner, and you're right about this site being "major;" it's very damn big...647 models! I still put most of my judgment in the solo content, as it just never felt like a really hardcore site. The fact that some models got down 'n' dirty with a dude was more of a bonus to me -- especially the ones I had previously only seen do solo or girl-girl work -- rather than my primary motivation for joining the site.
D'oh! I only looked (and looked and looked) on the photo set pages for a way to change the number of displayed thumbnails, never my profile page. I guess I am just used to the way a lot of other sites do it with the option in the photo sets.
Thanks for the kind words Monahan; I was worried I had starting rambling there for a while. It is a pretty big site, and I was trying to cover as much as possible (and I didn't even look at the review tips forum, so I am sure I missed something).
"Round tuit" almost sounds like a way of describing a girl's ass. Uh oh, I think you may have come up with a new site name...
Thanks lk2fireone! I could have sworn you had extended one of your reviews into a reply, but I may be thinking of someone else, though you do seem to frequently max out and extend your pros and cons sections.
I'll write your next review if you pay for the membership. ;)
I enjoyed the photos more than the videos, but I frequently prefer photos over videos anyway. The site tends to be more about its photographic content than its videos, so I was happy with many of the photo sets. The problem was repetition, where models seemed to repeat things done by nearly every other model on the site; panty stuffing, lots of toys, striptease, some mild spreading (what they call “explicit nude”), and even more toys. Don't get me wrong, I don't hate toys; in fact, they probably keep a number of women from picking up guns and coming after us guys for subscribing to so many sites, but I do get tired of them in scene after scene after scene.
Technically speaking, the photos are of professional quality, though obviously shot by multiple photographers and camera models, as they release three new models a week. A few models had some harsh lighting situations, where it looked as if only a small flash was used, or there wasn't much setup involved, but these are only a few earlier models, so don't worry. Some girls had what looked to be a little too much Photoshop work, where parts of their skin had a soft focus to it (more noticeable in closeups), especially when compared to videos, where cleaning up a model's complexion can be prohibitively time consuming. Additionally, some shots just were out of focus, or focus was neither on the face nor on the fun stuff. There were only one or two of these per set, but still annoying.
Navigation is simple and easy, with a good search function that can also break down by body and scene content types, plus links to videos, updates, top rated models, and the complete model directory. My one complaint for navigation was on photo set pages where I could not change the number of thumbnails per page, and it was set around twenty. Some sets are not too big, but others are and you have to browse through quite a few pages, but it is really a small problem, as you can still change thumbnail and picture size.
I think this site is well done and can serve as a model of how to shoot and capture content, if not necessarily what type content to shoot. Again, I approached this more as a solo girl site, not a hardcore one, though I really wish they had more girl-girl content then the minute amount that I found. But even the softcore content felt weak to me, but maybe I just expect more than stripping and happy-happy-toy-toy action when it is just a girl by herself.
Karupspc looks like it has way to many Euro models for my tastes, so I will say this about Nubiles: they have more American models than I was led to believe, and to me that is a plus.
Wish I had read this before I recently joined. Yes, they have beautiful models, many shot in HD and in professionally done photography, but all without the passion!
I know they have toys and some hardcore, but it is all so bland and boring to me. The sheer number of girls actually makes it worse, because they have applied this formulaic blandness on a mass scale. It seems like every single girl will engage in similar acts, poses, and even in bio responses.
I am going to wait at least another week before I do a review, but my hopes are not very high at this point. :(
I don't really think he is a jerk, he seems to just come off that way in your review, which I thought was quite funny, especially the fifth and sixth pro points. I find it funny when he is selling a pill, or giving advice on how to pick up women...when he is a porn star! All he has to do is go to work, and never change his identity.
I am not sure if it is him simply being a reliable legend, or just a sort of sideshow/freak act attraction to his up-gunned cumshots, but the ladies do seem to love working with him, and he comes off as quite civil in his scenes, at least compared to the more abusive fare now offered. Oh, and his hairstyle from the '80s was great, he needs to bring that back!
Great review, and you came up with a ton of pros, considering the score. I can't imagine joining a guy's site, plus your review makes him sound like kind of an asshole, or at least a guy with a lot of ego.
Is it just me, or does his photo on the site look like it was Photoshopped? Supposedly he is addicted to working out, and he does look like he is in shape in his videos, but that photo looks terrible, as if his head was just pasted on a different pic of his body.
Yeah, the other "review" is extremely similar to this one, except the score is 95 instead of 100...
Didn't we just have this problem a few months ago? If peterhd (and/or caperuzo) is just spamming or promoting for this site, then just take this suggestion: don't! The members hate it, and the staff will just disable your accounts and restrict reviews for the site.
Thanks for the answers, they're what I figured but it was nice to hear them confirmed by a member. Looks like I'll be making a small deposit in this bank pretty soon. ; - )
I was thinking of joining this site this summer...and then I completely forgot the name! But now that someone has done a recent review, I have a couple of questions:
1.) Is there DRM on any of these videos? I couldn't tell from TBP or PU, or even their tour.
2.) What's the average length of videos, or are they of all sorts of different lengths?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
