Very unique looking site that doesn't seem to take itself too seriously, though I guess that's required given the genre. Actually looks quite similar to the little anime I have seen, except for all the western girls.
Sucks this is streaming-only, though given the content (triple fisting! prolapse!!), it's probably better that this isn't saved on a hard drive for a future date when you're browsing your collection only to find out how perverted you truly are.
Still, the petite girls with the big insertion talents are always interesting...
That's what I have been doing too, though the way their links change is annoying as well.
I've been a member of In the Crack before, when the videos were still pay-per-view. Since they have a better deal now I will probably rejoin soon since their content pretty much speaks for itself -- and I like what it says!
I prefer all-girl sites, and In the Crack definitely fills that requirement, but it goes so much beyond what others do that it's pretty unique and rarely (if ever) boring or predictable.
I recently joined and am pretty happy with the content; nice big photos, beautiful HD videos...almost look like movies compared to others out there. The models are definitely hot, though I don't like how they use different names from other (non-Sapphic) sites. I am also kind of burned out on all these eastern European models, next site I go for will have a lot more American models, or least ones whose native language is English.
You were right about the navigation; annoyingly link-less video and photo pages. Their search tool works well, but then I find a cute model and I have to go through the "Search by Model" pages to see more! I am glad the layout is pretty simple and clean, though would it really have been that hard to link models' names?
Thanks. Yeah, 30G is pretty generous, nearly 1T for a 30 day subscription, so it's not too bad. I get greedy sometimes, especially when I first join a site, so it kind of worried me. I am sure if I focus in (uh sorry, bad pun) on what I like -- and this site looks like it has plenty of it -- I will be fine.
Sorry I missed your review when you posted it the other day. Man, what a score--a healthy 95! Though I would argue if a few sites should be in the 90s this could be one of them (okay, I gave it an 87, but I'm a frugal bastard and I'm a stickler for low pricing). I do think you get what you pay for though, even if you spend half your membership trying to recover from your hot girl-high after first joining. I can't say this has universal appeal but it has a little something for nearly everyone into basic girl-only porn; softcore posing, girl-girl, big butts/lips/smiles/cracks, to a kind of up close nastiness that would make Larry Flynt blush (in envy).
Great review!
(And I am pretty sure you meant to say you would fill your hard disk not "desk"? I think if anything this sight would make you fill your desk with spare tissues and paper towels... ; - ) )
I have always gotten speedy downloads from ITC, even when downloading multiple huge files at once, so it's nice to hear you are now getting in on the 'action' like many other members. They have some seriously large HD video files so fast downloads are pretty critical to enjoying their content.
At $35 for U.S.-based perverts I would say this site is on the high end of the price spectrum, at least for a monthly rate of a single site, but rejoining only every so often I would say it's worth it. But $47.81 is really pushing it even for the quality of the heart-stoppingly hot honeys who step in front of their cameras.
Whatever you do I would not recommend sending cash though, you just might have to calm down and wait a while. : (
It sounds like you need to log in, which is why the file is just 'login.php'. I can't remember if you need to enter username and password with the download managers but I am pretty sure you don't. It's been a few months since I was a member so e-mail the site and see if they have a solution. Hope this helps.
Pretty close to my score and I have to agree with a lot of your points. The "search" feature is definitely weak, especially considering it only applies to the videos and the photo sets don't necessarily have the same content. The alphabetical order is annoying too, but I like to organize by release date since that is how they are numbered.
I never had any login issues with Firefox, so maybe your browser is the problem? I also love the 1920x1080 videos since that's my monitor's max resolution, so combined with the wide angle lens it can make for some interesting videos.
Lastly, I think the number of girls with implants can be counted on one hand, and breasts really are not the focus of the site, unless they change the "C" from crack to cleavage. My favorite models are generally not these anyway. I like the ones who look like the girl-next-door with a nasty imagination and they usually are quite slim with reasonable proportions.
That's odd, though I think I have read about this from other members. My experience is that you get a maximum speed -- for me, it could be up to 1.5Mb/s -- with single downloads, and it halves with two simultaneous downloads, and goes to about a third of the original speed with three, etc. I have FreeDownloadManager set at a maximum of four sections per download and it worked fine.
It's important to remember that InTheCrack limits the number of connections (I think it might be twenty), so certain download managers might not work with this, and I could rarely get more than three downloads going at once with FDM, but it still worked up until that number.
I seriously doubt anyone would likely ever tire of shooting her! ;) And it's nice to see a brunette in the top 10 -- are there any redheads there too?
It sucks that her earlier hardcore was the result of pressure, as this is the cause of much irritation for fans when they see models do shit that they feel is just trendy or dumb (implants, tattoos, etc.). Well, whatever you do, keep bringing her, and other top models, back for more!
This site is a marriage made in heaven, a perfect match of technology and perversion, and its for a good purpose. These are hot and happy models, the smiles seem genuine, and scenes come about only as a result of a girl's willingness and comfort level with the possible task at, or sometimes even in, hand. This means that some girls only really like to show off their smile and might wink at you, while others will show virtually everything and then some, and only wink at you using their asshole. Let me at least say that I know my smile is genuine.
Models are fit and thin, many with fully shaven pussies, few tattoos, and I have yet to find any breast implants (I still have a hard time believing this myself, so if I am wrong please say so). The first two dozen or so are Canadian girls (who I have yet to see anywhere else, but I like them), and the rest are a mix of amateur and somewhat well known Americans, eastern Europeans, and a few more Canadians. This really is not the place for the well-worn veteran, or high figure star, but most know how to show off the goods. The vast majority are white, which didn't really bother me, but I have to mention it, as I know there are prospective members out there looking for some diversity, and this site may not have what they are seeking. Still, much of the content may have you focused less on the outside than on the inside, in which case every model is pretty much the same color.
Nobody's perfect, and this site comes at a high price: $35 per month, with no rebilling or multi-month discounts. I will say you get what you pay for as there is much to enjoy and download here, but it is still a somewhat high price, though it has never risen in all the years I have been a member. Navigation is easy as the site is cleanly laid out, but the search engine is a little too simple. It only searches videos using whatever term or keywords you choose and/or a category out of a list of twenty-nine categories, with categories as diverse as “Beautiful Bums” or “Cervix Views” or “Treadmill”.
If you like your girls to have fun by themselves and view the fun at few inches distance or less, this may be Crack that's worth an addiction. There are no guys taking up the frame, and virtually little input from the crew – hallelujah! I mean little to no talking, no interviews, no heavy panting by the cameramen, and very little behind the scenes fantasy crushers. When anything even close to this happens in a video, the descriptions give ample warning – “male hands involved” or “you do heard the crew talk in this one” – and these are minor infractions compared to many of the other sites' self-centered douche bags as they guffaw and add commentary through countless photo and video shoots. Hey, that's our job!
I would rather them devote a separate site to a more hardcore-inclined model. If their intent is to attract customers who don't necessarily want to spend all their time looking through a macro lens then the current possibility of using Lexa makes sense, I just won't be joining.
When I filled out the poll, I had to look up her sets -- she currently has four -- as she was pretty forgettable as far as my favorite ITC models go. Yes, super hot, but content that is too boring for me to have remembered her. If they can make more money, good for them, hopefully it can contribute to the main site (as if needs any improvement! :) ).
We love having new users, especially if they genuinely want to contribute to the site, so welcome to PU! This sounds like more of a review than a comment, so consider doing a review.
On that note, mbaya's review from a few months ago (currently the latest one on the InTheCrack page) is a fine example of a good review in length and style, though different opinions are always welcome and acceptable. So feel free to to do a full review (here's the forum on what a PU review should include), but we do prefer that members justify their scores and opinions, rather than just hating/loving a site for no reason.
Though they don't really offer a lot to sample, I love how you can browse through their whole collection for free and read the video descriptions. I still check their site to see which videos have certain material when I am about to watch them. I just wish they would say what is also included in the photoshoot section (might entice me to join again, since I do love their photography).
Yes, you definitely get your money's worth for the first month, but after that it seems like a small discount or something would be in order if you were to continue as a member.
Their content does seem like a pretty good investment though, because even as HD video and hi-res photos become the standard, their older stuff is still unique enough and decently shot to be worth saving.
Yes, I was surprised mbaya did not mention price in his review -- $35 is not exactly cheap, despite how beautiful their content is. Even if they had better search functions, I would still give them a score in the 80s with their current price.
Good review. I am thinking of rejoining soon to "catch up" on their previous material. You'd think they were founded by a bunch of horny doctors in the way they capture female anatomy, but it's still interesting and entertaining for closeup porn.
1.) Guy-girl hardcore, no; some girl-girl, but mostly solo girl stuff
2.) No, their site currently says "your inthecrack membership now includes ALL videos in ALL sizes." (I was just pissed off it took them so long to implement this.)
Always good to hear someone is having a lot of fun with a new membership. Just don't have a heart attack -- unless it's worth it, and the way your comment is worded it just might be.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
