| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I have several that I visit a several times a week (ones that don't keep taking you to other tgp sites). I find them useful to see what new sites come up from time to time and what kind of content they have. If there is something that looks interesting I'll then check it out here. I've also found a few membership deals from the links on them.
In all honesty, I think TGP sites are mostly good for people trolling for free porn and porn newbies who occasionally get suckered into misleading promos.
|
02-23-09 11:47am
|
Reply
427
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I've only paid more than $30 for a site once and was only partially satisfied with the content. Sine then I've tended to shy away from the pricey stuff mostly on the idea that there are lots of sites for $30 or less that I would to join before. A rocking site with great reviews would be worth extra but until I exhaust myself, I'll wait.
|
02-22-09 06:55pm
|
Reply
428
|
Sperm From Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
Matt33's Review
Hey Matt, welcome to PU. As a note, I'm glad you're chipping in with some reviews on gay sites since most members are hetero. However, you do need to add more content to your reviews. As they are now, they really don't provide any useful information to readers. I'd suggest looking at some of the reviews of the top posters here or checking out the following forum thread on writing reviews: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ead.html?threadid=57
|
02-20-09 05:16pm
|
Reply
429
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
I do admit you did a good job of justifying your "100" score. My only beef with NA is that their pics lack size, especially the older stuff which hurts them in my book a pic guy. When looking at your score it's more based upon your preference which is perfectly acceptable. Overall, when looking at everything the site has to offer in terms of specs I couldn't pull the trigger on such a score. Guess I try to be too objective.
|
02-20-09 11:56am
|
Reply
430
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
Yeah, it's probably time for a review but I'm thinking it's just marketing. They recently reduced the number of updates to the Brazzer's site in order to start beefing the rolls on Mofos. You're going to see the same girls and pretty much get the same thing as Brazzers just in a new package.
|
02-19-09 11:34am
|
Reply
431
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
If they were straight and if they ever went on a date with me, at that point they would become lesbians ;)
|
02-19-09 11:29am
|
Reply
432
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Since it's my poll I guess I'd better chime in and say that pretty much my cutoff line is 70 but realistically it's more in the mid to high 70's if there is a review. Knowing that I tend to be harsher than the TBP staff I generally only look at TPB sites rated in the mid 70's or up.
I'm sort of surprised that so few profess to have a cutoff line. Let's be real, how many people are signing up for or actively searching for sites that get scores in the 50's or 60's?
|
02-17-09 12:31pm
|
Reply
433
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
Don't know exactly how big you like them but Brazzersnetwork is relatively inexpensive, has a ton of big chested gals, no DL limits and has reasonable quality. DDF Busty is more expensive but has better quality and no DL limits.
|
02-13-09 03:27pm
|
Reply
434
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
OSHA needs to get involved as more government regulation always makes things better ("We're from the government, we're here to help" .... NOT!) No government involvment on condoms but flying man goo must be regulated as an unauthorized use of air space or overseen by the medical boards as a Pink Eye Protein ProtEction Regulation so all the chicks can say "Don't PEPPER my face, dude!".
|
02-13-09 12:25pm
|
Reply
435
|
Suicide Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Thaeral's Reply
Thanks for the feedback on this. I'll probably sign up sometime in the next few months.
|
02-12-09 10:01pm
|
Reply
436
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I am never suprised at the ratings models get on sites becuase no one has as good of taste in women as I do and, as such, cannot possibly know what the heck they are doing when it comes to rating babes ;)
I really don't care or even look at the ratings that members give models on sites. The only thing that is annoying is when your search is limited to the internal ratings system which, thankfully, I have only come across once.
I like the fact that sites let users give ratings and comments as part of the experience but it doesn't do anything for me. Unlike PU you pretty much get a bunch of Neanderthal comments ... so easy a caveman can do it ....
|
02-11-09 11:09am
|
Reply
437
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I follow the old dogma that if it's new to me it still counts as new. Obviously, I would not go back to such a site and I probably wouldn't pay $30 for a monthly membership to get the content. If the price was lower than I would strongly consider it.
|
02-10-09 04:51pm
|
Reply
438
|
Naked Novices
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
I like that word "shonk". Cant' say I've heard of it before. Sounds like a name that should have it's place in the PU vocabularly as an unscrupulous vendor.
|
02-10-09 04:49pm
|
Reply
439
|
Mature Mega Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Jutti24's Review
Pricey ain't the word for it. $60 for a month (40 euros)??? I think I'll stick with Anilos or Allover30 and save a few bucks. I'd hope they have a huge amount of content for that price.
|
02-06-09 03:45pm
|
Reply
440
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Whichever color the voices in my head tell me too ... must do as they command ....
|
02-05-09 12:58pm
|
Reply
441
|
Reel Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
When deciding on whether to sign up or not, I looked at the Newsensations page and their list of network sites and not all of the reelpass sites were listed. I think this is true otherwise TBP would have the reelpass listed a clone site of Newsenations but I could be wrong.
|
02-04-09 05:36pm
|
Reply
442
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Sorry to hear about this. I was thinking of re-upping my membership since it's been about 18 months since I was last there. Sounds like they're cutting back to save a few bucks.
|
02-04-09 04:52pm
|
Reply
443
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Mmmm, I suppose "attractive" toys are better than unattractive toys but, as PinkPanther noted, it's more about the model and what she can do with various implements of satisfaction than a specific type of poon penetrator. Nothing takes the place of acting and no gold plated phallic device will ever make a wretched scene more entertaining.
|
02-04-09 04:28pm
|
Reply
444
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Like most, the uninteresting file labelling system is the way to go. Even staring directly at my folders and subfolders o' porn looks like a bad trip down work file lane ... just so long as no-one does a jpeg or wmv file search.
GO GROUNDHOG!!!
|
02-02-09 11:40am
|
Reply
445
|
DP Fanatics
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
It's been a while since I was at a 21st sextury site and recall that their pic sizes were pretty good. Just wondering what size the pics are coming at now and how about how many you get in a set since I'm thinking about signing up again?
|
01-28-09 05:02pm
|
Reply
446
|
N/A
|
Reply of
picdude's Poll
I said no but I worry about it. The only problem with sort of off-the-cuff saying porn doesn't cause problems is that if you have a problem with it you probably won't be the first person to recognize you have a problem with it. In other words it sort of creeps up on you slowly pushing other things out of your life.
Personally, I think the addiction aspect needs to be taken a little more seriously because porn is a hobby most of us do alone and without others really knowing about it so we get good at hiding what we're doing. Given that porn is meant to stimulate your "base urges" it is something that can lead some to lose a handle on it as evidenced by fellow PUer's shutting down their accounts here. So I consume it but I'm also cautious about monitoring how much time I invest in it.
|
01-28-09 12:52pm
|
Reply
447
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Sorry, that may have been me on the "no DRM" thing that I saw posted on an adult business site that I happened to come across about a week ago. They had a headline saying that Hustler was quitting the DRM thing so I posted a comment here on that primarily to see if that was true or not. Apparently not but not sure when it is/was supposed to take effect but so far, no dice.
|
01-25-09 10:30pm
|
Reply
448
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I was one some DDF sites earlier this year and noticed that recycling content was getting to be a bit of theme with them. My guess is that we can all look forward to "hot new releases" from the year 2005 coming soon ... maybe the porn industry needs to apply for some government bailout money so they won't do this to us any more ;)
|
01-23-09 03:41pm
|
Reply
449
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
In their new forum they do have a section on photo sizes. Basically the only word posted from Holly Randall (who's now running the show) is that "it's in discussion" about going up 1600 or 1800 on the pics. I can't imagine that there's much to discuss but there it be :)
|
01-22-09 08:47pm
|
Reply
450
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Yeah, depending on where you live the cops can be pretty harsh when it comes to pursuing child porn cases against against kids who post their "boobie" shots. Always a great way to start off your career ... get convicted of child porn, can't expunge your record because the DA probably prosecuted you as an adult even though you were under 18 and then you might also have to register as a sex offender for years to come. I don't think enough parents give their kids a hard sit down talk, if that even matters, about that kind of stuff.
As for the myspace and other community sites? My only presence on the web is pretty much here. No nosey employers looking at me here ... I hope.
|
01-22-09 04:45pm
|
