| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
401
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
I re-upped a few months back and can say that that there is little to no condom use going on any more. Hope that helps.
|
03-23-09 05:22pm
|
Reply
402
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Well, I'm to crush everyone's little fantasy trip here with a dose of reality. Let's face, when you start getting older, you really don't want to be seeing your ex's, friends or high school heart throbs doing the whole over-the-hill MILF thing. Man, getting older sucks. That and my neighbors are fat asses. That pretty much leaves me with the celebrity picks. Somebody just shoot me now.
|
03-23-09 11:43am
|
Reply
403
|
Tasty Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I actually got burned on that one when I signed up a few months ago. I had a hell of time getting the stuff cancelled when I found out that they had "hidden" the cross sales below the transaction button. I should have noted that one in my review so good work in getting a comment posted on this devious practice.
|
03-22-09 08:24pm
|
Reply
404
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I put that it's nice but not that important. I agree with Drooler that a good search function makes rejoins a lot easier. Most of the sites that I do rejoin have a simple and clear update schedule or good search that makes this easy. As you might expect, they tend to be the higher scoring sites (not that amazing that good quality porn and good site design and search seem to go hand in hand).
However, for most sites that I don't plan on going back to or rarely go back to, it's not that important. If I pick up a few duplicates so be it. I'd rather have the quality over the search capabilities.
It is frustrating that a lot of sites can't seem to figure out the search thing. It's pretty easy, put some hidden tags on a scene or set and enter it into the data base and put a date on the update. However, this takes work and too many sites, even decent ones, seem to skimp on this aspect.
Large sites that don't have good search like Teendreams get knocked a couple of points in my reviews for crappy search. For smaller sights, it doesn't really hurt their scoring for me.
|
03-21-09 12:16pm
|
Reply
405
|
Cara's Nylon World
(0)
|
Reply of
marinette's Review
I'll echo what G Code said. Sorry about getting ripped off. However, we usually rely on reviews to see what the general content of a site is and what you get for your membership. Thus, adding some of that info to your review would be welcomed, along side your problem with the custom shoot.
|
03-19-09 02:40pm
|
Reply
406
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Uhhh, how about on a sweet set with a hot babe and with good photography and editing skills. Once I find this fantasy land I'll let you know.
|
03-19-09 12:19am
|
Reply
407
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I prefer to think of it as bad porn. They sucker you in, rip you off and take your money to pay royalties to the producers who left long ago after turning in their worthless turd productions.
|
03-18-09 10:22pm
|
Reply
408
|
Dream Stash
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
I really dug this site years ago. Yes, it has stopped updating and so I don't go any more. Haven't been a while but sounds like they've downgraded the pics and removed some of the sets. Too bad as I thought it was one of the best POV sites around.
|
03-17-09 09:19pm
|
Reply
409
|
NS All Access
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
Denner has talked about is issue a few times in the forum (there's a new thread by him today on the topic). Basically, contact NS and see if they'll change their pricing or give you a partial refund or something.
|
03-14-09 01:53pm
|
Reply
410
|
Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Comment
I haven't joined there in a number of years but as memory recalls the material is almost all nonexclusive. If you've been a member of Twistys or Babestv or Babelicious or similar megasite fecently you've probably already seen most of what they have. Twisty's is cheaper so I haven't bothered to go back to Glamourmodles in a while.
|
03-13-09 10:10pm
|
Reply
411
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
higgy's Review
Man, what is the deal with this site? A never heard of niche that suddenly gets a bunch of glowing reviews from newbies with no content to any of the reviews. Spam conspiracy or coincidence? I choose the former unless the reviews on this place start getting better.
|
03-12-09 12:32pm
|
Reply
412
|
Black Cream White Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I like the idea of a "CIA covet" operation, it definitely has Biblical implications ... sort of what canceling might be like here. This one caught my eye because it has a 3 day trial which is usually enough time to cancel. If this offer is still around in a week or two I might test the waters after digging through the fine print on the sign-up page and confirming that they use a reliable billing processor.
|
03-11-09 11:47am
|
Reply
413
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Oh, I like the idea of the PU board game. You get penalty cards that say you didn't read the reviews before joining a site or get sent to "PU Jail" by Khan for being a nasty poster in the forum. I assume the ultimate goal would be to amass the most points and win big raffle money and trust scores?
|
03-11-09 11:44am
|
Reply
414
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Poll
It all depends on how it's done. If it's some gross looking Ron Jeremy wanna be tossin' some young girls salad it really doesn't do anything for me. If they guy is still in decent shape and the production value is good I really don't care. Too often though it's just some old farts porn fantasy that he's trying to peddle on the web or it's just some gonzo angle that they're using to push a niche site.
|
03-11-09 12:33am
|
Reply
415
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Yeah, this has come up in the forum before so I thought I'd toss it out as a poll question. I would buy stuff it was tasteful in regards to clothing. If there was something like a coffee mug or something similar that you don't tote around in public everyday I'd probably snap it right up.
|
03-11-09 12:27am
|
Reply
416
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Poll
Since I happen to have seen more than 1 or 2 porn vids in my lifetime I'd have to say that it's nice to see some variety in the shoots and that goes for the scenery as well. There are times when the photographer gets carried away trying to emphasize that they're shooting on location someplace exotice. However, when looking at scenes from a particular production company it gets pretty generic when every scene is shot on the same couch or same hotel room, etc. Everything starts bleeding together.
So, I guess variety is good, just don't go overboard trying to emphasize variety for its own sake.
|
03-09-09 11:57am
|
Reply
417
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
Pornviewer's Reply
I've actually never joined but I know that I have seen B/G scenes on some tgp sites and you might find some on the tour. How much b/g they have I can't really say. You might try posting a comment under AO30 here at PU to see if someone else knows more than I do.
|
02-27-09 06:22pm
|
Reply
418
|
Enigmatic Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
marco2006's Review
Just wanted to say welcome to PU. However, you're going to need to put more effort into your reviews if indeed this is not just a spam posting. Giving a site a "100" is going to get you grief. Giving a "100" without any detail in your analysis is not really helping anyone out who might see your reviews in the future. I hope you take the time to come back and edit your review otherwise you're going to get a lot more negative trust ratings than you're already starting to get.
|
02-25-09 02:35pm
|
Reply
419
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Actually, there's a good tat ration here. Only a few and they tend to be more modest. As for the vids, can't really help you there. Most of the solo vids are in the 10 to 15 minute range if that helps at all.
|
02-25-09 10:31am
|
Reply
420
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I have a few times, mostly before I started relying on PU and review sites to help guide me. Since then it's mostly been because of a fracked up sign-up process that left me wondering who the hell the billing processor is or wondering if I might have been cross sold because I wasn't careful enough in making sure the pre-checked boxes were unchecked. It's been a while since I've felt shafted by the content after a few minutes. A few hours or days? That's a different story.
|
02-25-09 12:04am
|
Reply
421
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks for the kick-ass review on this one. It's on my list but I still need to check out ALS Scan first. I know, I'm lame for not having been there but I'm more into hardcore.
|
02-24-09 10:08pm
|
Reply
422
|
Pantyhose Line
(0)
|
Reply of
Pornviewer's Comment
In response to your question about how to join scenes together, that came up in the forum some time ago. I don't know if it will help you but here's the link: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=194.
While they have some decent content my main beef with the site was that the content only had limited angles. By that I mean, for example, in the hardcore stuff you might only get a couple of positions in a scene. That sort of left me wanting.
It is a good site for those who like women and hosery but it needs help in my opinion before I'd rejoin.
|
02-24-09 10:05pm
|
Reply
423
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Whizz's Reply
I agree with Badandy, if you go back and make some changes we'll cut you some slack being this is your first review.
|
02-24-09 12:05pm
|
Reply
424
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Whizz's Review
Have to admit, this is as close as I've seen to a blatant website advertisement here in a while. Let's see, a member over 6 months ago, no site facts or specifics, and your "cons" section make it sound like there's hardcore boy/girl content on this site when there's not. I'd go on but I'm not going to waste my time.
|
02-23-09 06:31pm
|
Reply
425
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Now that I reflect on it for a moment I guess I primarly use tgp's to look at niches that I happen to like. With so many tgp sites out there it's not too difficult to find one that suits what you're looking for.
Since I'm more of a pic guy, I also use them to look at sets from sites that I might be interested in joining to find out what their pic size is like although this can sometimes be misleading.
|
02-23-09 06:25pm
|
