| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
Club Red Light
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
I see from the reviews that there's a silent drm on this site. As I'm more of a picture guy I'm wondering how big the pics are and about how many photo sets there are across the site. Thanks.
|
05-14-09 11:46am
|
Reply
352
|
Virtual 3D Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yeah, the dudes on the preview page are pretty over the top in comparison to the girls who are only mostly over the top :) If this type of animation gets better and they can start making movies the only job pornstars are going to have is doing the 'screaming O' voice overs while leaving us pervs with a completely warped sense of reality.
|
05-14-09 11:40am
|
Reply
353
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
Not sure how to answer this one because I don't believe that I have but websites have told me otherwise on occasion.
I have joined several sites in the past where I've gotten blocked for allegedly password sharing or other evil deeds but that was a problem on their end of things, not mine. Some sites seem to have a history of problems with this and I'm not sure why that is. I suppose someone could have randomly hacked in using my password and the like but I find that unlikely because I use unlikely spellings and characters in my passwords. I'm spyware free and my antivirus is up to date so I don't know what to think about this one.
|
05-14-09 12:22am
|
Reply
354
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Reply
That's good to know. I haven't been a member there in years because they jacked the price. Looks like I'll have to put it back on my list of places to check out again.
|
05-13-09 11:39pm
|
Reply
355
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Dmander6's Review
Let me finish up here. I see that you changed the score on the site from "100" to "85" without adding any additional information to the review. Now, all that tells me is that you're just changing the score so you won't catch any more sh*t from others here. Now you're just being a hypocrite. Sorry if it seems like we are all jumping on you but you aren't starting off on a good footing here.
|
05-11-09 11:45am
|
Reply
356
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
As some have mentioned, this site is definitely more on the artsy side rather than the erotic. If Met-Art branched out and did some shoots with toys and actual lesbianism it would score out at a 98 on a review for me. While the girls are amazing and there's tons to see it's just a tad too softcore for my long term viewing tastes despite my love of pictures over videos.
|
05-11-09 11:41am
|
Reply
357
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
This one got some treatment in the forum if you want to read more about it: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=119.
|
05-11-09 11:37am
|
Reply
358
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Dmander6's Review
Let me start by saying welcome to PU. I see that you've been busy the last day or two posting comments and reviews. While I respect the right of people to say what they want here, you need to be doing a better job than what you are. For example, you gave this site a "100" score even when there are no hi rez pics or zips. I can assure you that this site does not merit a 100 score.
I understand that everyone has personal preferences (your love of anal sex has been made clear) but when it comes to review scores you need to be more objective and provide more information. For example; how many vids / photo scenes are there, what size are the vids and pics, how often does it update, what is the search function like, etc. Most of your comments and reviews to date lack this info and are merely statements regarding your personal preferences. That does not help others who might read your reviews and comments when trying to decide whether or not to join a site. My advice would be to read some of the reviews posted by long term members to get a feel for what we're looking for. Otherwise no one is going to take you seriously here and you're going to start getting a lot of negative trust ratings warning others that your reviews and comments need work.
|
05-08-09 03:23pm
|
Reply
359
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Reading this sort of made me think about how porn has evolved/devolved over the years. Heck, even a decade ago this was something rarely seen. Now, if you got a MFF thing going it's almost standard operating procedure. At this point, it's more of a gimmick for me so I'm pretty much indifferent.
|
05-08-09 11:34am
|
Reply
360
|
Brooke Lee Playmates
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I would suggest posting this topic about winrar's as a forum thread so more people have the chance to figure this out when they come across them. I haven't heard of them before this so its good info to know.
|
05-06-09 02:41pm
|
Reply
361
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
... photoshop some cute animal head onto her body ;)
|
05-06-09 02:26pm
|
Reply
362
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mediafan's Comment
I just don't understand why they split up mofos and brazzerspass to begin with, especially if they're just going cut back on the updates for both of the networks. I guess it's mostly marketing to generate more $$$ but since they're putting themselves out there as a megasite(s) they need to a lot better than a few updates a week. In the end I think it's just going to cost them customers instead of making them money.
|
05-05-09 10:06pm
|
Reply
363
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I think GCode pretty much nailed it. I have to say that it would be nice to have the 4 reviewers have a bigger presence either here at PU or at TBP. I'm sure they're pretty busy but it would be nice to find out a bit more about them and here what they have to say either in the forum or elsewhere.
|
05-05-09 02:44pm
|
Reply
364
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Overall, I would have to say Duke. He usually scores the lowest of the 4 (and I tend to be conservative on my scoring as well).
|
05-04-09 11:23am
|
Reply
365
|
Lietuva Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Sounds like you were generous with the scoring on this one. I know the webmaster has popped up in the forum (his English definitely needs some work) so don't be surprised to catch some flack on this review. Anyway, I did glance at the site a while back and suspected that it was a very amateur Eastern European slap together job. Suspicions confirmed.
|
04-30-09 03:42pm
|
Reply
366
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
The tease stuff is OK but for repeated viewing I guess I prefer a little pink on the palette. Most tease sets aren't done that well to me anyway so I guess I want a bit of an edge on what I do see most of the time.
|
04-30-09 03:39pm
|
Reply
367
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
drummstikk's Review
Glad you like the site but your review says nothing. I appreciate humor in reviews but when that's all there is the review is worthless. We want to see specific information about the sites (pic sizes, vid sizes, numbers of sets/scenes, download options, etc.) so that we can make an informed decision about a site before joining. A "100" review pretty much says that it's biased and, like most "100" reviews we see around here, have little to no information about the site. As it stands now, no one is going to take you or your review seriously. Thus, as Badandy hinted at, what is the point of the review?
|
04-29-09 08:26pm
|
Reply
368
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
Thanks for the tibbit o' porn there. After all, who doesn't like free porn. After looking at the signup page, I note that you have to call an 800 number in order to cancel (don't know if that's entirely true or not but it's what the fine print says). Still, sounds like it might be worth checking out if the trial is not limited (no mention of full access on the signup page).
|
04-28-09 04:59pm
|
Reply
369
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I've gone months without joining sites but only a few weeks without surfing for even the free online porn stuff or looking at my stash. My hat goes off to those who claim they've gone 6 months or more; clearly people who can "take it or leave it", at least when it comes to surfing for porn.
|
04-28-09 04:50pm
|
Reply
370
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I saw somewhere that Ron Jeremy's penis already has a twitter account going. Which, when you think about it, probably has more intelligence than anything he could post.
|
04-27-09 02:15pm
|
Reply
371
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I guess I don't really see the point. I use PU for the reviews and the forum. If the reviews are recent, I look at those first. If people are active in the forum, you know when they're around or not.
I guess the only point for having a "last visited" note is for people who want this place to be more of a social networking site. Is PU really missing out on that demographic? Call me old school but I guess I don't really care when someone last stopped by or not.
|
04-27-09 10:49am
|
Reply
372
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Makes one wonder how pathetic porn must be for blind people. All you're stuck with is the soundtrack ... all the endless moaning and lawn mower level shreiks for minutes on end. Probably makes the neighborhood late tom cat fights sound more erotic.
|
04-24-09 12:46pm
|
Reply
373
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Hunting in the jungle is fine ... so long as you don't have to listen to Axel Rose sing about it the same time you're doing it ;)
|
04-23-09 05:32pm
|
Reply
374
|
Cougars In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
Cooter37's Review
First off, welcome to PU. Unfortunately that't the good news. The bad news is that if you want your reviews to be helpful to other PU users you need to include a lot more information in them. Some site specifics (amount of content, vids / pics, search engine, etc.) would be greatly appreciated. As it is, no one is going to take your review of "99" seriously with the information you have provided so far.
|
04-22-09 12:56pm
|
Reply
375
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
billyinc1's Review
Dude, just wanted to say welcome to PU but that you need to put a little more effort into your review(s). By your account, this site has no flaws so why didn't you score it at "100"? You don't have any site facts in your review. In fact, your review reads more like a comment in that your review really has nothing in it other than the fact you like the site.
|
04-22-09 12:52pm
|
