Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
Totally Undressed
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Sorry, didn't check (stills are not really my cup of tea), but I doubt they're worth it even for fans of stills.
|
04-17-11 08:06am
|
Reply
352
|
Totally Undressed
(0)
|
Reply of
Orb Ltd's Reply
Thanks a lot! If you could post it in site news here when subtitles are ready, it would be even better :-).
|
04-17-11 07:51am
|
Reply
353
|
Totally Undressed
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
There are photosets, but they're nothing special IMHO. You can't see much emotions from them, and quality is mediocre (500px larger side), though they IMHO do not look as a screencaps.
|
04-17-11 07:49am
|
Reply
354
|
Totally Undressed
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I think they're playing "just one more step" game, going VERY GRADUALLY (stand up - take off shoes to measure height without them - a few commands to turn - now take off blouse - etc.) but for this kind of mind games it becomes absolutely important to know what they're saying.
WE WANT SUBTITLES! WE WANT SUBTITLES!! :-)
|
04-15-11 04:52am
|
Reply
355
|
Truth Or Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
troglodite's Comment
Thanks a lot for the warning, though IMHO it is more of "Outright Fraud" rather than "Buyer Beware".
|
05-29-09 12:10am
|
Reply
356
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
> If you've watched a lot of porn, a little unpredictability is a good thing.
Exactly, that's probably why I like it too.
|
04-20-09 10:32pm
|
Reply
357
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I'm not a member myself now, but the most recent videos I have from them (maybe half a year ago or so) is 960x540 @920kbit/s, and quality is good for these parameters.
As for re-joining - if it is your cup of tea, it should be worth it, but on the other hand I shall tell that even these days things like anal are quite rare, so personally I prefer to join once in a while (probably will do it again soon), grab more intensive content (especially tag teams), and then unsubscribe.
|
04-10-09 08:20am
|
Reply
358
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Have you seen their "Tag Team" matches (2-girl teams)? They have been added not so long ago, and IMHO they have made a HUGE difference for the site. And if Amber is losing, it often leads to DP, though I agree that more anal overall definitely wouldn't hurt :-).
|
04-10-09 02:33am
|
Reply
359
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
Are you sure it's a good idea to put that low rating for the site just because it's not your cup of tea? I mean that all "cons" in your review (except for the first one) are HIGHLY subjective and there are will be LOTS of people who have an exactly opposite opinion. Personally I'm at least trying to avoid setting low (especially THAT low) ratings to the sites which just aren't my cup of tea, at least if inside member area they provide essentially the same stuff as advertised on the tour pages.
|
04-03-09 06:49am
|
Reply
360
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
> even though the winner was obvious after the first 60 seconds.
Yeah, was exactly my feeling too, but with tag teams it doesn't feel that "one-way" even if one team is outclassed (when there are 2 wrestlers from one team against one from the other, obviously they dominate regardless).
|
01-29-08 09:46am
|
Reply
361
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
Thanks. A nice change in the world where things tend to change from bad to worse.
|
01-16-08 06:37am
|
Reply
362
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Personally I've never hit it, but I won't be surprised if they do. As most of really good sites, kink.com has technical stuff who're not on par with content to put it mildly. See my comments about their login system, which is one of the most annoying ones in the industry.
|
01-14-08 09:50am
|
Reply
363
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
About poll on Aug 9 - as there wasn't more relevant poll one at the time, I've used this one. Let's wait for results of poll I've suggested if it ever comes.
> you are not a voice for the millions of internet users
I'm definitely not, and you're not too BTW. All I write is my opinion only, and I am really surprised the lengths you are going to to make me change it. I've made my point (the one that I strongly disagree with paying that much attention to this kind of criteria) and made it clear to others, that's what this whole site is about, or it isn't? Therefore, I don't see that much to discuss here.
> I ran out of room at the end and couldn't explain it all
Cannot help to say that for me it sounds way too close to infamous "My dog ate my homework" :-).
|
10-21-07 01:08am
|
Reply
364
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
> my comparison is flawed though it is based on a monthly bill
Nope. Your analogy is fundamentally flawed because (as I strongly suspect) you're paying your power bill according to power usage, not at a flat rate. Do you really think any site would bother with DL limits if they could charge you per-megabyte downloaded (similar to power companies charging per-kW-h)? Come on.
About your test - it is completely irrelevant; as I've said before, it is not about amount you can _download_ in that hours, it is about amount of video you can _watch_ within these hours. According to my calculations, at 1MBit/s amount you can watch in 1.5*30=45 hours is about 20G, which is still higher than 10G limit, but as I really doubt somebody spends all his 'porn' time just watching videos from single site, in practice it shouldn't be a substantial limitation for most users. Still, all of these are just speculations; let's wait and see whether a poll I've submitted ("How much porn do you download per month?") is accepted and then see the results.
> On the trust rating, ask yourself this, did I post anything false in > the review? All the information about the content, quality of, was
> true.
> So what is not to trust? A number?
Exactly. As I've seen other trust ratings, it is pretty common on this site to put 'no' trust rating for people because they're (as the person who sets rating thinks) are consistently inflating or deflating their ratings, despite that nobody questioned information provided or honesty of reviewer; as I understand it, the same logic should apply perfectly to the case when reviewer consistently applies wrong (as I think) criteria to his/her reviews.
|
10-20-07 04:23am
|
Reply
365
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
> First, I write reviews to give my opinion.
Sure. And I write replies to give my opinion.
So to re-iterate my opinion: I strongly disagree with a concept to get all you can, whether you really need it or not (which you seem to imply in "Nobody said anything about being able to watch all of it. I just want my money's worth. ").
As for your analogy with power bill - I think it is fundamentally flawed. I'd say that downloading the stuff you cannot possibly watch is much more similar to coming to all-you-can-eat buffet and taking all the food you can put on all the plates you can find (but not being able to eat it, which means that they'll need to throw it away); while I've never seen such a thing in real life, I'd expect that somebody doing it most likely will be moved away, and most likely with no refund.
The only potentially valid point you IMHO have is that they should tell about it in advance; but are you sure that you've read their Terms and conditions carefully enough? (sorry, but I'm way too lazy to do it).
About the poll - I've already suggested a poll asking how much people download per month (and those who download less than 10G, shouldn't care about the limit).
As for the 'No' trust - yes, I do think that your reviews are useless for me as they're based on criteria which as I think are completely irrelevant, so yes, I don't trust your reviews, and won't take into account your ratings when choosing the site; it is my opinion and I don't see why I shouldn't tell about it; that's what 'No' trust is for, isn't it?
|
10-19-07 11:40am
|
Reply
366
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Can't agree that 10GB/month is a really bad thing; ok, I can reach downloading speed of 10GB/day too, but when I will watch all that stuff (10GB is more than 20hours of video @ pretty decent 1Mbit/s, so I won't get any life besides watching porn, not even enough sleep)?
Also according to poll on Aug 9, most of the site visitors (84%) spend 1-2 hours/day or less watching Internet porn (definition is a bit vague, but most likely it also covers previously downloaded porn), which essentially means that vast majority of this site visitors most likely won't really care about this kind of limit; as the idea of the site is to make reviews useful for others, punishing site that bad for a thing which doesn't really matter for most site visitors is just plain wrong IMHO.
|
10-19-07 10:00am
|
Reply
367
|
Ultra DVD Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
bobtheelephant's Comment
Good luck in your fight with them. See also my comment here:
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=18002
- if you complain about fraudulent charge to your bank, it will be a good thing not only for you, but for community as a whole (scammers don't like to be fined or their license revoked).
|
05-12-08 02:43pm
|
Reply
368
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
> your own opinions should be included.
ESPECIALLY your own opinions.
|
05-22-09 12:06am
|
Reply
369
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Frankly, I wouldn't be so satisfied with this response. I think that if they have something as "Coming Soon" in member area, they should NOT advertise it in preview. Ok, as a former member who didn't have problems there, I can give them benefit of doubt and agree that they might not do this deception on purpose, but in this case I'd expect them to apologize and pull this stuff from preview area ASAP.
P.S. There is an interesting recent trend, with webmasters replying here on PU more eagerly then to support e-mails. I think next time I have a problem on any site I'll post it as a comment, it seems to have MUCH more chances to be solved this way.
|
02-23-10 08:30am
|
Reply
370
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Wait, I didn't compare VideosZ and VideoBox - maybe VideoBox is even more "same old", I didn't try it yet.
And what I've meant when I've wrote that VideosZ is "same old" is more about the overall sad state of adult DVD industry, where 90% of the scenes look exactly the same: fade in - one guy (maybe 2) and one girl (maybe 2) are coming into the motel room - crossfade - she sucks him - crossfade - they're fucking - crossfade - position change - crossfade - he's masturbating to cum on her face - fade out. IMHO, best www sites (and especially networks) currently provide MUCH better variety then average DVD stuff which is all over VideosZ (yes, you can find something good on VideosZ too, but it takes time and effort, and unfortunately there isn't enough of it there).
|
06-24-09 06:14am
|
Reply
371
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
The sad (at least for me) thing is that from my searches, about 80% of the DVDs are EXACTLY THE SAME for VideosZ and VideoBox :-(. Not sure about updates and where it goes, but at this point I don't think they're that much different :-(.
|
05-24-09 12:33am
|
Reply
372
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
> When the so-called "gonzo" genre began, there was a lot of creative stuff going on really. But now it's more liekly to be a schmoe with a camera copping a cheap feel off the hired actress.
Well, this is a natural process: when somebody is successful in "gonzo" (or whatever else) genre, immediately lots of guys begin to think "oh, gonzo is the way to make money", and obviously AVERAGE quality goes downhill. But the same natural way they will understand pretty soon that there is NO "easy money" in that genre anymore, and really creative guys will be able to make decent money again (I just hope they didn't leave industry during those difficult for them times).
|
05-21-09 12:28am
|
Reply
373
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
> but I doubt they really care about the product they put out.
I think THIS is the primary reason for the sad state of US porn, but I hope it will be cured rather quickly (in a matter of a few years) when profits from poor porn will drop to zero, and only the creative and unique DVDs and sites will be able to survive (up to now anybody who wanted to shoot porn, was able to make money, now it's about to change).
|
05-20-09 01:34am
|
Reply
374
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
> Seems like a unique thing, something I feel I need lately!
BTW, I'm in the same quest to find something unique most of the time, and I've just checked, 9 of my own "top sites" are unique in one way or another, so please feel free to check :-). While some maybe not "your cup of tea", you MIGHT be able to find something, as they're pretty diverse.
|
09-27-08 08:42am
|
Reply
375
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
> To you which do you prefer the buying the girl you want or the $15 option?
Both :-). Buying a bunch of girls is good to make initial collection, but then $15 option is nice to keep things interesting without much effort.
|
09-26-08 12:02pm
|
|
