| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
326
|
Slaves In Love
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I'm not a member anymore (may re-join in the future), so my comments are about 3-4 months out of date.
> but was turned off by the poor main page which gives very little
> imformation (no update info, no quantity of product info, no models
> info), just random photographs.
You're right, but inside it is MUCH better than outside :-).
> Also, there was no reply to my e-mail questions about the site (usually > a very bad sign).
Probably because they're Russians (that's for sure) and could have problems writing in English. Usually it's better to stay away from Russian sites, but this one is an exception.
> Is there lots of content?
Yes; most updates are photos (decent quality), but even my video collection (not full) is more than 100 of their clips (5-10 minutes length each).
> How often do they update?
I think twice per week (or maybe once, don't remember exactly), but updates are either photosets, or quite small parts (older about 5 min, newer 10min or so) of larger videos (some videos span up to 10 such updates, and there is usually a VERY good script behind the video).
> I thought there used to be a lack of videos. Is that improved now?
See above.
> What is the quality of the videos?
The most recent ones were VERY decent 640x480 WMVs at 800-900kBit/s.
Bottom line: if you're into this theme (on milder side, with more of psychology than physics and even less brutality), you should try it (obviously that's assuming that they didn't turn to worse during these few months I'm not a member).
PS If you decide to join, please tell me how it goes - I might re-join too :-).
|
05-13-08 07:33am
|
Reply
327
|
Society SM
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Well, let's hope they will hear you :-).
|
05-16-08 10:48am
|
Reply
328
|
Society SM
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
> even 2 scenes per week would be a great improvement
Sure it would be, but (taking into account that NOBODY does it for this niche) is it realistic to expect it? Among other things, it would increase their cost 2-fold but will it bring them 2x more customers? I doubt so.
|
05-16-08 10:34am
|
Reply
329
|
Society SM
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Review
> it really bombed out on update frequency
IMHO once per week is definitely not bad for this kind of content. Same SexAndSumbission and FuckedAndBound you're referring to have 1 update per week too (SexAndSumbission sometimes gives "BONUS UPDATES" out of schedule but they're as they sound - irregular bonus updates once in a while). Or "Society SM" has it less frequent than once a week?
|
05-16-08 08:59am
|
Reply
330
|
Spicy Roulette
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
I deny any responsibility in the matter ;-).
|
01-29-10 05:19am
|
Reply
331
|
Spicy Roulette
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Obviously it's a critical question, sorry that I didn't mention it in review (got used for this stuff to be covered by TBP :-)); I was able to find 8 games on the site, each about an hour of video. For me even $30 they're asking for is not THAT much for such original content, but obviously opinions can vary :-). There are 2 bonus sites thrown in too (MyDrFeelGood and PrivateHandjobs), but I cannot comment on them.
|
12-28-09 04:22am
|
Reply
332
|
Stephanie Cane
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Comment
FWIW: for me it also opens cing.com.
|
05-03-11 08:31am
|
Reply
333
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
> everything is rubbish i have seen until now :(
Exactly my point :-(.
|
06-16-08 06:41am
|
Reply
334
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
> are the games playable
No.
> and is ther a video strip poker content?
Not sure what exactly you mean, but I think site doesn't have videos at all.
> do you know a good site withe strip poker content?
Finding attractive girls strip-dancing on video is a challenge these days :-(. Finding it in "strip poker" setting is even bigger challenge :-((. Please let me know if you know/find some.
|
06-16-08 06:17am
|
Reply
335
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
> From signing up for ANY more sites for the next 9 months.
IMHO one site (regardless how poor it is) is NOT worth giving up completely for such a long time (after all, there are tons of decent sites out there). Just my humble opinion though.
|
10-18-07 01:48am
|
Reply
336
|
Taste My Own Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Not going into discussion on personal tastes (personally I don't care much about A2M), I want to comment on "clang of iron". There were times when producing (and even watching) of ANY porn would have caused to hear the clang of iron; for some reason I don't really miss that times :-). So my personal motto is: "I don't care as long as all the activity is consensual activity between consenting adults". If somebody wants to see eating shit and somebody wants to produce this kind of stuff - I don't care though I think it's REALLY disgusting; it is outlawed in certain places, but I think laws prohibiting it should be thrown away (which already happened in many - but not all - places to other laws outlawing such things as anal sex or being gay). Why somebody (especially government) should care about things that happen between consenting adults?
|
12-11-07 06:20am
|
Reply
337
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Good idea, but it can possibly help only if somebody really reads e-mails (which is not guaranteed :-( ).
|
11-22-07 03:28am
|
Reply
338
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
You really think that you'll get better support for $10 site? I REALLY doubt it. Adult site support stinks regardless of price, that's it :-(.
|
11-21-07 08:47am
|
Reply
339
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
!#*!&^@!*&^! I hate sites with non-existing support :-(. Unfortunately, in adult most of the sites are like that :-((.
|
11-21-07 07:50am
|
Reply
340
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
And what does their support say?
|
11-21-07 06:04am
|
Reply
341
|
The English Mansion
(0)
|
Reply of
SteveWebslave's Reply
> Frankly, what you personally think I have the right to do or mention is completely irrelevant.
It is indeed very relevant to this site that you should comply with your own privacy policy, and I'm not sure your posts here are in compliance. What you did post may (or may not, depending on jurisdiction and other factors) constitute "individual user personal information", which your site claims to protect.
> When somebody blatently lies in a public forum and slanders a
> reputeable business,
And what exactly this "blatant lie" was? That you didn't issue refund? You agreed yourself it's truth. That he's unsatisfied customer? I tend to trust him on this one. So could you please mention what was the alleged lie?
> the truth should be aired and I have every right to state the
> absolute truth.
Do you really pretend to know what the absolute truth is?
|
10-30-07 10:25am
|
Reply
342
|
The English Mansion
(0)
|
Reply of
SteveWebslave's Reply
> no, we would not refund somebody who joined our site, downloaded a gallery, then said they didn't like it
It means that all the references to Josh's e-mails are completely irrelevant, so I'm not even sure that you did have a right to mention such potentially sensitive information in public forum (especially as in this case you seem to be bound not only with publicly available privacy policy, but also with your contractual obligations with JoshP).
Bottom line: as I've already said, my understanding is that support did an extremely poor job in handling this situation. Furthermore, I'm sure that allowing refunds in such cases of 'hate on the first glance' (sure, not after user downloaded 20G of content) would be beneficial for all the parties involved.
|
10-30-07 08:23am
|
Reply
343
|
The English Mansion
(0)
|
Reply of
SteveWebslave's Reply
> You talk about my interpretation as if there is some ambiguity here as to who was in the wrong.
Sure there is some ambiguity and some of your interpretation; first of all, there is no way to identify person reliably on the Internet (except for digital certificates, but I really doubt they were involved).
But this is not that important, what is more important is your answer to the following question: if somebody (without any e-mails which you would interpret as coming from him) will subscribe, then come in, download one gallery and say that he's not satisfied, asking for a refund - what would you do? Will you refund or not? If no, then all the references to Josh's alleged e-mail are irrelevant, if yes, then the whole thing just didn't make any sense from business point of view - cost of time and efforts (not to mention loss of goodwill) spent on this pretty specific case has already exceeded the refund amount many-fold.
PS > Why you are blindly jumping to this guy's defence is puzzling?
It's very simple and you should expect it on the Internet, especially in places like this one: I'm a customer too, and dealing with unscrupulous merchants all the time (see for instance my comment 'Swindling alert'). I can imagine that you're dealing with fraudulent customers all the time either, but fortunately that's not my problem :-).
|
10-30-07 03:30am
|
Reply
344
|
The English Mansion
(0)
|
Reply of
SteveWebslave's Reply
> Keeping customers happy, is actually something we are very proud of and something we do very well...
No comment.
> It appears from your comments that you are condolning somebody joining a pay site, downloading what they want and then demanding a refund by getting their bank or credit card company to dispute the transaction. You seem to be suggesting people should commit fraud?
That's only the way you prefer to read it. What I've said is that if there is a conflict between VISA customer and VISA merchant (and it doesn't matter what is the reason of the conflict: fraudulent charge or service so poor so it wasn't really possible to use it), one of the ways (which seems the most convenient to me) is to bring this conflict to the customer's bank to solve, that's it. And then it will be the bank who will decide how to deal with the matter. I should mention though that as far as I know, historically VISA/MC tend to like their customers much more than their merchants, so in case of doubts conflicts tend to be resolved in customer's favor. Any other questions?
> After all, this is what Josh P did...
Again, this is just your interpretation, and given the way you've interpreted my own words, personally I tend to doubt this your interpretation too. Still, in case of conflict it shouldn't be decided by me (and even less by you as you're the party of the conflict) but by appropriate conflict resolution body (like bank in the case of VISA-related conflict).
|
10-30-07 02:29am
|
Reply
345
|
The English Mansion
(0)
|
Reply of
SteveWebslave's Reply
Not sure that you're listening out there (your reply was posted way too long ago), but on any account your support did an extremely poor job. First of all, keeping customers happy is a cornerstone of doing long-term business (opposed to hit-n-run businesses), and deviating from it have already cost you lots of customers (for instance, myself - I won't join the site with such a comment and such a webmaster reply).
Second, to make their customers happy, both VISA and MC have policies which allow to challenge any credit card charge quickly and efficiently (and which can be barely argued in case of website subscription with no goods physically delivered); I wonder why JoshP didn't come to his bank and say "I want to dispute the transaction of $XX.YY which appear on my statement on DD MMM 2006. I wasn't satisfied with service provided and wasn't able to solve it contacting the merchant" - usually this is enough to get full refund via your own bank (takes a few weeks but eventually does work).
PS Or maybe support is run by one of site dominatrixes? That would explain attitude, but still is a very poor way of doing business.
|
10-28-07 08:50am
|
Reply
346
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Sure it isn't a big deal, but as a perfectionist I prefer everything to be in order :-).
|
09-25-08 02:42pm
|
Reply
347
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Sure, no problem, I just was a bit confused about different numbers on different pages :-).
|
09-25-08 01:22pm
|
Reply
348
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Thanks for explanation; as for talking to Khan - he reads it anyway (to approve), so if he agrees it's a problem, he will probably fix it sooner or later.
|
09-25-08 11:40am
|
Reply
349
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I've read that, but shouldn't it also be reflected on "Feedback History" page? Click on "Feedback History" link - it shows very detailed calculation (obviously aiming to explain how the rating was calculated), but end-result is DIFFERENT from the rating shown on the main page.
|
09-25-08 04:19am
|
Reply
350
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
Currently it's not that small that it used to be, and IMHO is currently worth the visit if you're interested in the idea.
|
04-14-08 12:27pm
|
