Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Ultra Films
(0)
|
Reply of
avgazn86's Reply
Send me a short note to:
LAREN00 @ YAHOO.COM
The characters after LAREN are zeros, not the letter o.
I will send you an email, with the attached email that offers a low-priced sub to the 4 sites.
$9.95/month
or
$69.95/year
The email works for me.
You might have to clear cookies on your computer.
Or not.
But the email that has a hot link that opens a page at Ultra Films.
There's a hot link, upper right corner, "Join Now", that opens a new page with the low prices.
On the first page, it says the offer is for the 4 sites.
But on the join page, it only shows Ultra Films.
So you should contact the billing agent, to make sure you're getting all 4 sites.
The billing agent is Vendo.
Call them on the phone, or if there is live chat option.
I used them once, and they were helpful.
But the join page only shows Ultra Films.
So check, before you join.
You send me an email, I will have your email.
The PU email system is not reliable.
Messages I sent, or should have received, got lost.
|
03-31-22 07:48am
|
Reply
277
|
Ultra Films
(0)
|
Reply of
avgazn86's Reply
Thanks for the compliment.
I sent you the link to join the 4 sites:
$9.95/month, or
$69.95/year.
Check your email. I used the PU internal email system.
If you don't get the email (sometimes the PU internal email system does not work), reply to this message here, and let me know.
I'll send you the link or email a different way.
On second thought, tell me whether you get the PU email or not.
And if you joined.
I think $69.95/year is a fine price for access.
You should have gotten a refund from the sites.
Other people I spoke with said they got all 4 sites.
|
03-30-22 07:50am
|
Reply
278
|
Ultra Films
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
i did not think your reply was demeaning in any way.
Just a wish that the site/network hadn't deleted a lot of old content.
And, in my opinion, a lot of the old content still held value.
I think they deleted the old content for housekeeping reasons: less content means less to manage.
Stay well.
|
03-27-22 10:59am
|
Reply
279
|
Ultra Films
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
I agree that they deleted a lot of content produced years ago.
And, depending on each person's tastes, some of it was worth keeping.
My best guess is they were trying to upgrade the network by dropping older content that they thought was of lower quality: lower definition or less popular or whatever.
But I still feel the network is worth joining, as one of the best hardcore teen networks, because of the attractiveness of the models.
That's my opinion, of course.
I'm impressed by the low membership price they've offered: $70/year for 4 sites.
I was paying $120/year for the 3 sites.
Plus, I forget the exact figure, but Ultra Films cost me around $90/year for when I joined.
And these porn companies don't reward you for loyalty.
If you are stupid enough to keep renewing at your join price, they will charge you that, even when they are offering new members a far lower price.
So I think I was paying over $200, for the 4 sites, when I read that you could get the 4 sites for $70/year.
Which made me realize how stupid I was by just renewing my membership automatically. How much money I was wasting.
But that was my fault. Other people will often take advantage of you, if you don't watch out. That's reality.
So I think that $70/year is a bargain.
A lot of great content has disappeared in internet heaven, by porn companies who've gone out of business.
Again, that's life. But there is also a lot of what I think is good to great content that is being produced today.
Some of these models are cute or attractive or lovely or gorgeous.
So if some older content is no longer available, you have to find newer content that you find appealing.
The internet is huge. There's a ton of content that should fit your tastes. Whatever your tastes.
|
03-27-22 08:00am
|
Reply
280
|
Ultra Films
(0)
|
Reply of
Avory's Reply
My thanks for a very complete reply to my review, which came out of the blue.
I'm jealous. I've been a member of the Wow sites for years.
And never got an email discount offer anywhere near as good as what you got.
You're getting 4 sites, that I am a member of, but I'm paying a much higher price for access.
I'm definitely going to look around, to see if I can find a similar offer.
But thanks for letting me know, that such offers exist.
|
11-24-20 04:43am
|
Reply
281
|
Ultra Films
(0)
|
Reply of
aerius's Comment
When I joined Ultra Films, I believe the biller was Vendo.
Their customer support telephone number is supposed to be 24/7. 24 hours per day, 7 days a week.
Customer Support 18777773758
Call them, and see if they can solve your login problem.
You should find the confirmation email that you received on joining, with your login details and any other information they will need, to prove you are a member of the site.
I haven't contacted the Ultra Films support directly.
But when I used the same ticketing method for Wow Girls (run by the same company), they didn't bother to reply to my question.
So I can understand your frustration.
|
02-16-20 08:23am
|
Reply
282
|
Ultra Films
(0)
|
Reply of
wrdlprmf11's Comment
I would recommend keeping it simple.
Tell Ultra Films you paid for a trial membership, and were never given access.
That you contacted customer service explaining the problem several times, but the problem was never fixed: no site access.
So you want a refund of your membership fee.
The site should give you the choice of a full refund, or a free trial period to the site.
That only seems fair.
I'm currently a member of Ultra Films, and have never had a problem with the site, so I've never contacted customer service.
But I know some sites (the Wow sites, and All Fine Girls) do have a ticket system for customer service, which seems cumbersome.
But these sites should stand behind their product, which is giving access to paying customers.
So I suggest standing firm, sending a customer ticket and saying you paid for a trial membership, and were not given access to the site, and you want a full refund.
|
07-07-19 05:08am
|
Reply
283
|
Unlimited MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Excellent review.
I really like your cons. Think they're important, at least for me:
-Slow update rate.
-Poor search capability.
-Too many breast-implant models.
-Porn-valley look (great phrase to describe models' looks).
|
06-06-21 08:13am
|
Reply
284
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
Go to the PU page:
https://www.thebestporn.com/review_billing.html?id=44
That has the contact information for Rocketgate.
Their phone number. Which is active, and gives you a choice of contacting billing
Also, there's a link to customer service to cancel a membership.
Rocketgate is a reputable payment processor.
I've had one account with them for a Metart site for years.
I never contacted customer service, because I never had any problems with the membership.
But it should be fairly easy to cancel a sub.
Let us know if you have any problems.
If you do have problems, reach out to the PU staff, for assistance.
In the past (prior owners), they were more than willing to help PU members who had a problem with billing or membership issues.
When I say it should be easy, I don't mean it's easy. Rocketgate is not as easy to cancel a membership as CCBill or Epoch, which are easier to use.
But keep trying. It's frustrating to be billed for a service you don't want. I've been stung in the past by sites that didn't deliver the service they promised.
|
02-14-23 04:37pm
|
Reply
285
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Dan Tanna's Comment
The staff at PU (Porn Users) used to help members who had a problem with a site.
Freddie is the staff member at PU who interacts with most of the members.
The hot link to send her an email does not work at the PU site.
But her email address is:
freddie@thebestporn.com
If she's back from holiday (it should be any day now), she should be able to help with your cancellation.
And if the membership was renewed, she should be able to get you a refund.
The rocketgate site is not as easy to cancel a membership as CCBill, Epoch, or Vendo.
But send her an email, you can copy what you posted in this comment, to her.
She should help fix the problem.
|
01-03-20 12:06pm
|
Reply
286
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
I got a similar email today.
The offer is to join all 6 sites, or any one of the 6 sites, for a discounted price,
Maybe my link works better than the one you got.
https://members.vixen.com/videos/?utm_so...aign=V-6S-21-05-29-A
The link I got opens a page (the URL above) that seems to offer your choice of joining all 6 sites, or any sites of your choosing, for a discounted price.
Hope this helps, if you want to join.
I've got too many subs already, to want to join these choices.
|
05-29-21 04:50pm
|
Reply
287
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I remember visiting the Netherlands and Denmark in the early 1990s.
As a tourist, we were charged higher prices than what our tour guides were paying, for the items. I thought it was a rip-off, but we were on a tour, and that's the way it worked.
Unfair, but when we were in a group at some stops, that's what happened.
But I've read in the past, that PU members in Europe often have to pay higher prices, because of regional pricing. Which could be because of the credit card company, or the pay site processor, or some other reason.
But if there is some legal way to get around it, it would be helpful to know, for our European members. To get better prices.
|
04-21-20 08:18am
|
Reply
288
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jjrabbit's Review
The prices you quote seem very high to me.
They are far higher than what a person in the United States (USA) pays.
Are those the prices you see when you use the PU link to go to the join page at the Vixen site?
If so, can you use a VPN to change the location your computer shows?
Year-long memberships to a VPN can be very cheap.
And with a VPN, you can choose a location in the US, as the computer link location.
And I would assume you would see much lower membership prices.
I would assume, but not really sure, that your credit card company (if that's how you fund your membership) would charge a small premium for converting your payment to US dollars, but it should still be far less than the prices you are quoting in your review.
I'm not a lawyer, so I assume what I'm suggesting is legal.
But you seem to be paying far too much for this membership.
Are there special taxes you pay, in addition to conversion rates, for a membership to pay site, and that's why your fees are so high?
The normal PU discount is:
Monthly: $24.95 the first month (recurring recurs at $29.95/mo.)
Year: $99.95 (recurring)
And there are often holiday specials, when the price can drop to around $10 or $15 for the first month,
I suggest checking out what a good, cheap VPN would cost for a year or multi-year membership.
Most of them give a free trial of a few weeks or more.
VPN means your computer is safer from hacking.
But some services don't allow you to be connected to a VPN while you use them.
For example, Netflix will not allow you to use a VPN to connect to their service.
Just a suggestion.
But the prices you are paying for Vixen (and maybe other porn sites) seem very high. Much higher than what US customers pay.
|
04-20-20 08:14pm
|
Reply
289
|
VR Bangers
(0)
|
Reply of
Anth's Reply
Thanks so much for the generous advice.
Oculus VR devices seem to be in high demand, maybe because of the coronavirus.
Best Buy and Walmart (local stores) are out of the different versions of these devices.
And Amazon is charging a premium of maybe $80 to a few hundred dollars or more for used versions of these devices.
I guess this is price-gouging at its finest.
I live in Los Angeles County, California, but there don't appear to be any sites where I can try these devices. Again, maybe it's the coronavirus that is part of the problem, but there are no local stores or sites that have these devices within a 70 miles or more, as far as I can tell.
I'll probably go for the Oculus Go, but I really wish I could try it out first.
But if I can get it for $150 or so, for the 32GB version, it seems like a nice entry-way into the VR experience.
Trying for the more expensive Oculus Rift S seem chancy, because my PC is not a gaming PC, and the device probably wouldn't work well (if at all) with the desktop PC I have. Which is a low-end, non-gaming PC.
I'm not into games anyway. I don't think I've ever played a computer game (what are called computer games today). Never bought a computer game. Though I've seen hundreds of ads for them.
But thanks again for the advice.
Note: at Best Buy (an electronics chain in my area), it says the Oculus Go is not available within 250 miles of my location.
There are cases for the Oculus Go that are available in my local area at Best Buy, but it doesn't make sense to buy a case to hold something I don't have yet, anyway.
LOL.
|
05-06-20 11:42am
|
Reply
290
|
VR Bangers
(0)
|
Reply of
Anth's Comment
Thanks for the warning.
I'm not into VR yet, lack of funds, but oldfizzywig gives it a high recommendation and some other PU members also seem to be into it heavily, as a great advancement in porn.
So if I get some extra money, and gain some courage and the needed equipment, I will give it a try.
I'm sorry you paid such a high price for a disappointing VR site, but warnings like yours can be very useful to the rest of us, even if we aren't into VR yet.
There are a few other PU members who comment on VR sites, but most of them don't comment or review very often.
For whatever reason.
I think PU member participation at the site has dropped considerably, from the days of Khan. A shame. But it's still a useful site for valuing porn sites.
And the raffle is a nice feature, even if it's only once a month.
|
05-05-20 03:42pm
|
Reply
291
|
Waitress POV
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
I'm being nit-picky.
So please excuse the objection, if you want to.
You write "This network was a complete ripoff."
I think you meant to write the "site" was a complete ripoff.
Because you gave the network (Team Skeet) a score of 95, and previously wrote that Team Skeet is one of your favorite networks.
But it's obvious that this part of the Team Skeet network is poor.
And has lots of problems that need to be fixed.
Which are useful objections.
Broken links, non-exclusive content, download limits that are troubling for 4K users, cancellation problems.
So a score of 60 is fair.
And the review serves a worthwhile purpose in pointing out the site problems.
|
07-28-20 03:07am
|
Reply
292
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
Sir, thanks for checking up on me
My health hasn't been very good lately, so I have been spending a lot less time at the PU site. Getting old, I guess. I'm close to 80.
But a pretty girl is still able to make my heart beat faster.
LOL.
Take care of yourself.
You don't appreciate how important good health is, until it starts to go away.
But I hope I have a few good years left for me, to enjoy the world of porn.
|
05-08-24 06:03pm
|
Reply
293
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Sorry.
I didn't mean to offend or say anything negative about other PU members.
The point I was trying to make is that other PU members have a different opinion on this site.
But I will try to avoid mentioning any other PU members in the future.
I thought I was being complimentary when I used your name and pinkerton, but evidently my intention was not make clear.
Again, I apologize for any misunderstanding.
Also, I have mentioned Teen Mega World many times in the past, usually with a compliment. I've been a member of that network many times. Not currently a member now. The same with the Wow sites, except I am currently a member.
I don't consider myself a shill, even though I do express high opinions about Teen Mega World and the Wow sites.
I'm not being paid for those opinions. My only connection with those sites was as a member, not an employee or shill.
But I do understand that my opinions can cause friction in other PU members.
Again, that is not my intention.
Sorry for any misunderstandings.
I meant no offense.
|
08-05-21 07:32pm
|
Reply
294
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
REVIEW(CONTINUES):
There are no download limits.
The content is exclusive.
The content does not appeal to me.
The models are teens, which are my favorite type of models.
When I stream a video, the definition of the video seems low: it's like I'm watching a 360p video.
The images are not clear and crisp.
I can watch videos at all of my other paysites, and get clear, crisp images.
But at Wet and Puffy, the videos seem like they were shot by an amateur.
The videos are not sharply focused.
I can appreciate the videos at the Wow sites, the Teen Mega World sites, but not at the Wet and Puffy site.
So even though other PU members have found a lot to appreciate at this site, I regret my join.
I only paid $9.95 for one month, but one month was enough for me.
However, the $60 for 1 year price is very attractive, if you do enjoy the site.
I would rather pay a higher price, and find a site i enjoy more.
I don't like the clarity of the videos.
I don't like the photo sets.
I don't like the content.
Giving the site a score of 79.
If you enjoy the videos and photosets, as other PU members seem to, then you would rate the site much higher.
|
05-20-20 05:20am
|
Reply
295
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
brixze's Comment
Different people can have wildly differing opinions of the same site.
The same with a movie: a critic can say a movie is wonderful, a different critic can say the same movie is disappointing.
That's why I used to try to find a critic that I could try to depend on, because his/her reviews of movies were in alignment with my opinions of movies.
Some PU members scored Wicked Pictures very high. Other PU members thought the site was poor. Other PU members thought the site was good, but not great.
Different strokes for different folks.
Do you believe a site has an intrinsic value that shines through the same for everyone?
I think you're being harsh when you question the value of The Best Porn site.
It's a good source of information about porn sites.
Some information might be wrong, and the score is only a guide.
I find the PU reviews to be more useful, to get a feel for what a site offers.
But that's just me.
But before I join a site, I usually like to read TPB and PU reviews, to see if a site is worth my money.
|
06-06-21 05:54am
|
Reply
296
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Maybe I should add that Pure Taboo (one of the Adult Time channels) is probably my favorite story-based porn.
Some of the stories can be interesting. Even though they often border on the un-believable or strange, the stories can add meaning to the sex, and the sex can be hot. It also helps that the models can be attractive.
So I don't mind if a scene spends a lot of time on the set-up, if the set-up is done well.
|
04-10-20 08:42am
|
Reply
297
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Excellent review, as usual.
But I don't agree with with one of your cons.
"The only major con is that the sex scenes themselves are often too short with the bulk of them being under 30 minutes and nearly 1500 of them being under 15 minutes."
This is not a criticism of the review or your ideas.
But I personally find that sex scenes that go over 15 minutes start to get boring or repetitious for me.
I like the idea that there is a setup to the sex scene to give the sex more meaning than 2 or more bodies slapping together.
But when the sex goes on too long (and I think 15 minutes is plenty long for a sex scene) then I start to lose interest. Maybe it's my mind just doesn't appreciate all the details of sex, but I don't usually consider sex an endurance contest, and, while I can admire some of these models for their stamina, I personally prefer a much shorter version where the models start slow, then build up to a climax. A sex scene that goes 15 to 30 minutes usually indicates multiple orgasms for the female, which doesn't turn me on. Get the model hot, get her off, then cuddle or show appreciation, or don't show appreciation, whatever fits the scene.
That's just me.
Other people can have different ideas or appreciations.
|
04-10-20 08:28am
|
Reply
298
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Zerp40k's Comment
I'm a current member of the Wow Girls site.
Not on their staff, just a regular member.
I have no idea why you are being blocked.
My suggestion would be to have a live chat with Vendo.
The Vendo website has live chat 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Live chat is immediate, you don't have to wait for an email response.
Also, you can get a written record of what they say, if you copy and paste the chat to a text file.
Anyway, the live chat URL is:
https://secure.vend-o.com/customers/support/requests
Click on the "live chat with support" hot link, and a popup box appears.
Fill in the information, and you should be connected with a live chat operator within a few minutes.
Since you don't have a sub with them yet, just give your name, and your email address you want to use.
Vendo also has email support and telephone support, but I've used their live chat, and you get a fast response, within a few minutes or less.
Explain your problem, and see if they can solve your problem.
Separately, on the join page for Wow Girls, there are 2 pre-checked cross-sales for other sites.
Make sure you uncheck those pre-checked cross-sales, or else you will be signing up for a trial to 2 other different web sites, and the trials turns into very expensive subs that you can get much cheaper elsewhere.
|
07-03-20 01:54am
|
Reply
299
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
If you look at the Beata Undine page at Indexxx.com (a free database of porn stars), you will find that Beata has been featured in a large number of porn sites.
https://www.indexxx.com/m/beata-undine
If you want to find additional material for her, it should be very easy.
The indexxx.com page shows the sites she has be featured at, as well as the number of appearances at each site.
|
03-16-20 03:02pm
|
Reply
300
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
Diamond status refers to the old system of membership, where there were different levels of membership.
If you had diamond status, you had access to the three sites:
All Fine Girls
Wow Girls
Wow Porn
Under the current system, you are automatically given access to those three sites, if you join any one of the sites.
As far as I know, there is no natashashy.com archive.
The All Fine Girls site was created by using the 18 Only Girls site, plus a small amount of content from some other sites. Most of the content from the other sites was dropped, and the site names were dropped/ended as well.
That happened several years ago.
As far as I know, there are no archive sites in the 3 sites I mentioned.
However, there are non-member sites that hold some photosets and videos from the 3 sites, that might hold some other content that was dropped.
You can also find some of the 3 sites' content on tube sites.
|
03-15-20 12:22pm
|
|
