| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1701
|
Marie McCray
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Yeah, I heard those stories about her later days in the business. She always seemed like a model who had here head screwed on pretty straight. Some girls seem flaky right from the beginning and Micah wasn't like that.
|
08-22-12 05:09pm
|
Reply
1702
|
Marie McCray
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Interesting... I wouldn't have pegged Marie as a BDSM model. But I've had other surprises like that too. Seeing Micah Moore in some BDSM was a bit of treat too.
|
08-21-12 03:26pm
|
Reply
1703
|
Marie McCray
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
You're probably right. Most of her stuff is fairly tame and she doesn't do anal either. I was really surprised to see her in a scene on Device Bondage.
|
08-20-12 05:38pm
|
Reply
1704
|
Mary Alicia
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I'm mixed on it. I don't like it because I'd like to see it, but it does add to her allure. I suspect that for straight versus gay porn it might be different though since vaginas are pretty much all alike whereas penises are quite differnt from guy to guy. A solo female model could do this, but I doubt a solo male model could get away with it.
|
11-05-11 06:23pm
|
Reply
1705
|
Massage Creep
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Interesting review - thanks for posting it. This was one of my favourite sites on the network. It may have been that I only downloaded certain scenes, but I don't remember the focus being on big-breasted women. And I say that as someone who considers anything above a B cup to be be big breasted, so maybe you're a lover of small breasts too.
I was surprised at how well done the site was because it could easily be boring but it isn't. I'm not familiar with fuckedhard18 and have never had a membership there, but based on your comments I've added it to my list of sites to join. Thanks for that tip.
One thing about the site and the whole network that was a personal dislike was the lack of anal sex. One the whole network there are probably less than a dozen anal scenes. No big deal for someone who doesn't like or is indifferent to anal, but for an anal fan, it is definitely noticable by its absence.
|
10-09-11 05:44am
|
Reply
1706
|
Massage Creep
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I agree, but most networks usually have a couple of sites that tickle my fancy and I suspect that is the case with most subscribers. With this network, I joined for Jurassic Cock and everything else was just gravy. So I was pleasantly surprised to find that some of the 'gravy' was pretty damn good.
For me, a lot of it comes down to price. If I'm joining a network for one site then the price better be reasonable. Sometimes, as in this case, the price was very reasonable when I discovered Massage Creep.
Now if they could just persuade the girls to do more anal...
|
05-23-11 04:49pm
|
Reply
1707
|
Massage Creep
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
I agree. I don’t think I downloaded anything with the fake penis. And don’t forget that there are several sites that rely on huge quantities of fake cum. At least they use so much of it that they aren’t even trying to hide the fact that it is fake. But for its few shortcomings, I was surprised at how good some if it is. Jurassic Cock and Massage Creep really impressed me. They could stand alone. 18 Years Old, Disgraced 18 and Teen BFF are also quite good. I downloaded everything from Public Violations, though it is all staged and most of it is quite silly. And not having an anal-themed site is unusual for a network.
|
05-18-11 03:21am
|
Reply
1708
|
Massage Rooms
(0)
|
Reply of
Willard's Reply
Willard - I liked your comment very much. I wrote about the one that you called "Their server is very delicate"
|
03-01-14 08:05am
|
Reply
1709
|
Massage Rooms
(0)
|
Reply of
Willard's Comment
Willard, I mean no disrespect by this, as I suspect that English is not your first language, but the way you both wrote and formatted that comment made it very poetic. I think this was one of the best posts we've had in a long time!
|
02-27-14 03:16pm
|
Reply
1710
|
Massive Access
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
When I can't see everything that a site has to offer it usually makes me suspicious. What do they have to hide? And for me, it is often finding a few stars or scenes that I've been looking for that will tip the balance to me joining. I really hate it when a site (especially a large one) has a couple of generic tour pages and then drops you at a join page. I suspect sites like Videobox wouldn't be so successful if they had a tour page that told a prosepctive member that they had thousands of DVDs and then expect you to join on that alone. What harm can full access to see a site do?
|
11-23-11 06:02am
|
Reply
1711
|
Massive Access
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Good news on the updating pricing. I agree that a better preview would be a good idea, but at the discounted price you really can't go wrong. I figured all I really wanted was access to one site so the rest woudl be gravy.
|
11-21-11 06:11pm
|
Reply
1712
|
Mature Reality
(0)
|
Reply of
Onyx's Reply
Thanks! I will.
|
02-19-18 04:34pm
|
Reply
1713
|
Mature Reality
(0)
|
Reply of
Onyx's Review
This isn't a site I'd join but I have to weigh in and say I really like your review format. Maybe it's time I rethought my own format... Or lack thereof.
|
02-19-18 10:54am
|
Reply
1714
|
Max Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
jd1961 - I wasn't just copying you, but like you I think that is the key to the pros and cons. Max isn't for everyone. Max isn't like anyone else on the 'net. If someone likes Max then that is probably the biggest 'pro' and if they hate him, that's probably the biggest 'con.' Because you reviewed the site favourably I'm assuming that like me, you're a Max fan. I find the contrast between his older stuff (like stuff with Tammi Ann, Vixxxen, Anastasia Blue) taped in the early to mid 1990s seems almost tame now compared to his newer stuff when in its day it was pretty extreme. I remember being blown away when I saw Tammi Ann gagging on Max's cock in Hitchhiker 1 when it came out in 1993. That was so much more extreme than anything else then. But now gagging is common and Max continues to push the envelope. I'm not sure how much more envelope-pushing I can take though. Or how much more envelope-pushing the US government will tolerate. But there is obviously a big market and fan base for Max because he's still in business and I assume he's pretty well off.
BTW - I liked your review a lot. It could stand as the only Max Hardcore review but i wanted to add in my 2 cents worth so any Max fans would know that at least two of us give it pretty similar reviews.
|
11-14-07 09:28am
|
Reply
1715
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Damn! To make matters worse, I see they have pics of Sasha on the preview pages both before and after her implants. That sort of highlights the issue. At least they aren't cartoonishly big, but she looked almost perfect before them and didn't need new breasts.
|
07-21-13 08:11am
|
Reply
1716
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
taken4granted's Comment
Look at the bright side though, if law enforcement raids your house for porn usage all the rest of us PU members will be in jail too. It'll be like a Pornusers convention!
Seriously though, I'm glad to hear you got your access back. Met Art seem to be a reputable site so anything less would be troubling.
|
06-19-13 05:32pm
|
Reply
1717
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Review
I'm a bit late to say this, but welcome to the site. I hope you stay around and continue to participate.
|
12-23-12 07:15am
|
Reply
1718
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
No idea. But... if you happen to find out that you're right would please let me know who the manufacturer is. Just out of curiousity, of course. Not because I want to order the "Gloria" model or anything like that...
|
08-09-12 10:36am
|
Reply
1719
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Yeah, after I thanked you for steering me away from the site with your review it seems odd that I'd join. But the offer was good. I think if I were really a fan of the site I'd need to spend a much longer time there to apprecaite it. And regardless of hardcore or softcore preferences, I think it's safe to say those of us into hetro sites are all into beautiful women. And Met Art has them by the hundreds.
One thought that kept going through my mind was "where do they find all these stunning women and how do they get them into nude modelling?" Obviously a big draw here is that these women aren't being asked to stick baseball bats up their bottoms, so that increases the potential number of models right there. As for the site size, I assume that based on the type of material they also pay less and therefore can shoot more.
But I'll admit that I was surprised at how much I liked the site. It certainly does well at what it does.
|
01-11-12 09:34am
|
Reply
1720
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the comments. I agree if you like softer, glamour-style photos and some videos this site could keep you busy for a long time. It's an excellent value at full price and even better when the offer a discount.
|
01-11-12 09:23am
|
Reply
1721
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Reply
I don't know why, but I just can't go for animals in a porn. If they producer needs more living creatures, throw in another 20 year old chick!
|
01-10-12 04:23pm
|
Reply
1722
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I was surprised that I like Met Art as much as I did. I probably should join Bound Gangbangs or something in case I start going into hardcore withdrawl. The strange thing is that I'm only moving mildly to hardcore after that with a membership at Nubiles. I haven't been a member for years and I'm looking forward to seeing what's new.
As for animals, I find their use in erotic photography to be distracting and even disturbing. That might say more about me than it does the photographer...
|
01-10-12 04:22pm
|
Reply
1723
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I understand that subjectivity makes up a big part of any score, but... what makes a better review is when the writer explains the reasons for those biases. You definitely did that. Met Art is one of the most respected sites out there but thanks to your clear explanation of why you don't like it I'm 99% sure that I wouldn't like it either.
I'll take a peek at Juliland. Thanks for the tip.
|
12-31-11 06:53am
|
Reply
1724
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
otoh (and I mean no disrespect for the other members who also reviewed this site), but this is the best Met Art review I've read! Like you, Met Art has been on the list of sites to consider but regularly got bumped down by something else. But thanks to your review I'm going to remove it permanently from the list. You succinctly and clearly build a case for why I shouldn't join, but you also build a case for why someone may want to join. I prefer harder sites but have nothing against soft sites, but when I read your line that the site "seems to be to emphasise the beauty of the models at the expense of any sexuality" that really made your point clear. And when you wrote "there is little teasing, no touching, and rarely even a lewd glance" that finished any interest that I may have had in the site.
I'm sure there are many people who would love Met Art's style of porn, but I'm not one of them. Thanks for saving me $30!
|
12-30-11 12:31pm
|
Reply
1725
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I don't recall that I've ever had a membership at Met Art so this is a good chance to try it. I'm mostly into mainstream American b/g hardcore, but lately I've been trying some new stuff. It's paid off in a couple of cases and not so much in others. Met Art is highly recommended around here so I'm looking forward to it.
|
11-23-11 04:51pm
|
