| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1201
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
I agree with you. I have no idea why they'd choose such a name. I also think that the guys at Diesel need a better name than Skinny Super Girl because 'skinny' is a derogative word and Gloria deserves nothing deroratory. Likewise with "ALS Scan." Yes, it probably made sense when they named the site "All Ladies Shaved" way back when, but if I ever hear the phrase "ALS Scan" in real life I won't treat it as a good thing.
|
12-08-12 08:29pm
|
Reply
1202
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
joekramer08's Reply
It really isn't my kind of network - or so I thought. I joined for one of the niche sites (Wife Writing) and was really impressed with the rest of the network. I'd recommend joining at least once.
|
08-13-12 05:20pm
|
Reply
1203
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thanks for your kind words, graymane. I hope that some PU members might find this useful in making a decision to join or not.
|
08-13-12 05:19pm
|
Reply
1204
|
Dom The Nation
(0)
|
Reply of
DrMercies's Reply
Thanks for your comments and clarifications.
I must have missed the bit of vaginal sex, but you can count me as one of the members who prefers anal here. The scenes lend themselves to it.
I will say that as much as I like Dom the Nation, and I like it a lot as should be evident in the review, Assylum is definitely still my favourite. But as someone who likes both BDSM and scenes filmed outdoors, Dom the Nation can't be beaten.
|
02-05-22 11:21am
|
Reply
1205
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
Reply of
LadyLover's Review
Excellent review. Welcome to PornUsers. I think you'll find that this is a great community of friendly and mostly like-minded serious porn collectors. I look forward to reading more of your reviews in the future.
|
03-18-17 12:36pm
|
Reply
1206
|
Dominated Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Thanks for the comments Jay.
|
03-10-13 02:46pm
|
Reply
1207
|
Dominated Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I agree 100% that interviews at the end are better, but the reason I prefer them there is I like to hear the model's perspective on the actual scene rather than hear about her theoretical likes and dislikes beforehand.
I'm okay with how they do the bondage and torment, but like you, I do wish they'd build in more humiliation and public scenes.
Thanks for the comments! It's good to hear from another BDSM fan.
|
03-05-13 01:40pm
|
Reply
1208
|
Double Teamed Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
I've not seen this network before so I looked at it after reading your review. It has a lot of teen and anal themed sites (and some teen anal theme sites) so I'm definitely interested, but I don't think I could do it based on the concerns that you report.
Thanks for the review.
|
03-16-11 05:53pm
|
Reply
1209
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Graymane, I say this to you as a former Roman Catholic and one who studied to be a priest. The Catholic Church has the doctrine of Purgatory where an otherwise holy person gets sent to be purified before being allowed into Heaven. For the purposes of humor only, I'll deem that you may need a little while in Purgatory and I wonder if your punishment is having to watch anal sex for a few years before being allowed to enter the fullness of Heaven? If it is, please, please, please tell them that I too hated anal sex. And I hated Taylor Rain and Tanner Mayes especially. And the most fitting punishment for me would be a requirement to watch these women have anal sex.
Trust me, when we meet in Heaven, I'll buy you a drink!
|
05-16-14 02:12pm
|
Reply
1210
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Great story sir!
It reminds me of a joke I only partially remember so I won't dwell on it, but the gist of it is that a man dies and goes into the great beyond where things are better beyond all imagining. It's like a harem of beautiful women who look after all his sexual needs and submit to every depraved wish. He finally asks someone what he had done to earn such a high place in heaven. The reply was 'Heaven? You're not in Heaven! This is hell for all these women who did bad things on earth!"
|
05-15-14 05:21pm
|
Reply
1211
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Give it some time, young man! You'll come around! ;-)
|
05-14-14 01:59pm
|
Reply
1212
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
Thanks for taking the time to comment.
Sorry to answer your question with another question, but is it really possible to have too much porn featuring petite and gorgeous EE and Russian women doing anal? ;-)
Two of the bonus sites are pretty good. The biggest site on the network in First Anal Quest and that's pretty much self-explanatory. It has the same pros and cons of Double View Casting and it is fairly large too with 259 scenes available. (But it doesn't have the double-view camera gimmick.)
I also liked Fuck n Drive though it is fairly small. I like the whole cars-and-girls thing (I think it comes from my love of public sex porn). There are 38 scenes with a mix of solo, girl-girl and boy-girl. There is some anal here but not much. Since this is a favorite niche of mine I'm planning a full review in case anyone else shares my interest in it.
There's also Jizz on Teens. That site has 24 scenes and I can't really say anything else about it because I didn't download from it. For one thing all the scenes are b/g/g and I really prefer b/g. Also, none of the model's names are listed and that's something that bugs me.
The final site in the network is Wanted GFs. This is the weakest site on the network. It's touted as an amateur site and seems to have a lot more pictures than videos. And many of the photo sets I saw were of the American porn star Alyssa Hall. I quite like Ms. Hall, but she's no amateur girlfriend! The pic sets are available as zips.
Billing was through Epoch so I had no problems getting the membership or cancelling it.
I hope this helps.
|
05-13-14 02:08pm
|
Reply
1213
|
Download Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
Thanks for the review. I'm always on the look out for sites like this and I've never heard of this one before. Now based on your review I can avoid this and continue looking elsewhere. (And for me, sound and video not being in sync is definitely a killer. That REALLY annoys me!)
|
03-23-12 04:14pm
|
Reply
1214
|
Dream Kelly
(0)
|
Reply of
The Collector's Reply
I'll look forward to it, but based on your comments and the recent review I'm unlikely to join. It doesn't sound like the site is very user-friendly.
|
07-06-11 04:00pm
|
Reply
1215
|
Dream Kelly
(0)
|
Reply of
The Collector's Comment
I'd certainly be interested in seeing a new review. I realize that you use Site Grabber, so if you do a full review please be sure to let us know if the picture files are now zipped. Previous reviews have reported that they aren't. That would be a deal breaker for me, and many other too, I think.
|
07-06-11 03:53am
|
Reply
1216
|
Dungeon Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Great review! Thanks for adding it. Kink always seems to be the Gold Standard for any BDSM niche and this site is no different. I'm really glad that they now offer one price for all-site access.
And others may not agree, but I appreciate you adding "anal in almost every scene" as a pro!
|
03-25-17 06:04pm
|
Reply
1217
|
Dyked
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I've heard horror stories of people who've put some time into writing a review and then lost it if the site crashed. I'm guessing that a lot of regulars here use some form of what we use.
|
05-10-17 05:35pm
|
Reply
1218
|
Dyked
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
I'm a big fan of most of the sites this company puts out but the business model they seem to be using now is for these smaller, themed sites. They often don't offer good value but with a discount it can be worth a membership or, as has happened to me several times, I just like the niche so it's worth it for me to join at full price. Daughter Swap is among my favourite sites these days and Dad Crush isn't far behind.
Based on your review I might be tempted to join Dyked but it really isn't the kind of porn I collect. That's no criticism of the site or of you for liking it - that's just a big advantage of being a member here at PU.
Please don't take this the wrong way: my eyesight for seeing things close up has deteriorated badly in the past couple of years and I'm too stubborn to switch to bifocals. In most cases I find anything I post here is easier to write using Word (or another word processor) and turn up the font size a bit. For me it has the added advantage of being able to edit any post more easily too. That's also how I write all my reviews. I can take weeks to write a review because I'm always going back and reworking it with new things I want to add or things I criticized but rethought my position on. The final advantage is that some PU members have lost their reviews while they're writing them right on the site. That's not a risk I worry about.
|
05-09-17 03:52pm
|
Reply
1219
|
Ed Powers.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
Good luck with that! I can't imagine a lot of that older Quebec stuff would be easy to find. Maybe you could buy used DVDs though.
|
03-09-20 04:59pm
|
Reply
1220
|
Ed Powers.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
You and I share an interest in Cherry Potter and Christine Young. Even though most of the stuff I have with them are low resolution I won't delete them.
|
03-08-20 01:42pm
|
Reply
1221
|
Ed Powers.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
It's disappointing when you find a site with some classic porn and it doesn't offer the best quality or even the entire catalogue. I had a similar experience with JM Productions a few years ago when I joined their site. They have some amazing stuff but not all of it was available there and a lot that was available was so low resolution that it wasn't worth downloading. I recall that I later found a more JM Productions stuff on another site (Bang.com, I think) and they had more of it and it was a better quality too.
I wish more classic porn would be made available. I know I'd buy it.
|
03-08-20 07:27am
|
Reply
1222
|
Ed Powers.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
It's disappointing when you find a site with some classic porn and it doesn't offer the best quality or even the entire catalogue. I had a similar experience with JM Productions a few years ago when I joined their site. They have some amazing stuff but not all of it was available there and a lot that was available was so low resolution that it wasn't worth downloading. I recall that I later found a more JM Productions stuff on another site (Bang.com, I think) and they had more of it and it was a better quality too.
I wish more classic porn would be made available. I know I'd buy it.
|
03-08-20 07:27am
|
Reply
1223
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
gianna's Comment
Thanks for posting this. My last experience with this site was so bad that I'll never join again but the problem is that EA was a powerhouse studio at one time and the site looks great. I hope anyone interested in joining reads the user comments here and saves themselves a big headache and waste of money.
|
01-24-18 01:25pm
|
Reply
1224
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
ccoldmilk's Reply
One of the big advantages that TBP/PU has is that you get the 'professional' side of things, TBP, which can list new sites and give some great information on sites. But then on the PU side you often get a deep dive into a site that normally takes more time than the professional reviewers could devote to a site. For example, I've found download limits because as a user I probably download a lot more than a professional reviewer would. Having both views is the real value here. If any site has a real flaw it’s likely that someone here has found it.
|
10-04-17 03:57pm
|
Reply
1225
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
ccoldmilk's Reply
Thanks for this. This is really useful information.
And welcome to Pornusers. This site has a lot of active members with a lot of good advice. I hope you stick around.
|
10-01-17 04:28pm
|
