| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1076
|
Burning Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Definitely not. Too bad too because so many of the models are really beautiful.
|
12-01-12 07:41pm
|
Reply
1077
|
Burning Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
You and I have a lot of similar tastes so my guess is that you'd like this site too. There is a lot of Joanna Angel stuff on the network. She also does a lot of anal here too.
|
11-25-12 05:28pm
|
Reply
1078
|
Burning Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Nope... the next thing might be acceptance of boob jobs. I was watching a Madison Scott scene earlier today and found myself okay with her massive pump-up - from A to DD. But I don't think that I'll be heading off to any big-breast sites (real or fake) any time soon. The tattooed models that I like are still young and petite.
|
11-25-12 05:27pm
|
Reply
1079
|
Butt Formation
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
This is a great review, and not only because you saved me some money. I had never heard of this site before reading your review but by the name alone it is something I'd be interested in. The preview pages make it look like a great site. Based on that I'd probably join - and be dissatisfied. I regret that you had to be the Guinea Pig here, but thanks for steering me away from this site.
|
11-23-17 03:41pm
|
Reply
1080
|
Butt Formation
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks! (Apart from decency we do share some other common traits. Like being Canadian and being the same age. I remember reading your posts early on and thinking 'could this guy be my long-lost brother???' :-)
|
09-30-17 04:12am
|
Reply
1081
|
Butt Formation
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Agreed. We may have a few differing opinions on some things but we're a lot more alike than we are different.
|
09-29-17 08:40am
|
Reply
1082
|
Butt Formation
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
Hmmm... I may need to rethink my objection to joining... Thanks Amanda!
|
09-29-17 08:39am
|
Reply
1083
|
Butt Formation
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
You're not a very good salesman! :-) I'll avoid this network.
|
09-27-17 02:13pm
|
Reply
1084
|
Butt Formation
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for that additional information. I suspect that after I looked at the other company sites and realized that I don't know any of them after years of porn buying that would be another red flag. Anal, butt-centric or not, I'll stay away.
|
09-26-17 03:25pm
|
Reply
1085
|
Butt Man
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
No need to explain, I understood what you meant. And I agree that Stagliano was able to produce bum-oriented movies that still focused on the who woman - including her personality. A lot of modern directors don't or can't do that.
|
10-12-13 07:21pm
|
Reply
1086
|
Butt Man
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
Great review, sir.
Like you, I'm a big Butt Man fan. John Stagliano is one of the directors who invented gonzo porn but he was also able to produce some great features. "Butt Man's Wet Dream," as an example of his gonzo work, is still one of my all-time favourite movies. The scene with Heather St. Claire, Tom Byron and Steven St. Croix is probably in my top ten favourite scenes. While I'm not a big fan of feature porn, Stagliano's "Wild Goose Chase" is one of the best in the genre. The story is great (Joey Silvera is great in his role) and the sex is hot. I don't like feature porn mostly because so few attempts get both a good story and hot sex.
As you obviously know, Buttman has taken a different approach these days with his "Stretch Class" series. At first I wasn't a fan, but after watching some of it I became a convert and download whatever I can buy.
I'm also a big Mike Adriano fan, but I can see why some people don't like his stuff. But I also think that he and Stagliano can't really be compared since what they do is so different.
|
10-12-13 01:13pm
|
Reply
1087
|
Butt Man
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I recall reading a recent post at Adult DVD Talk from the producer of the stretch class series. I don't remember a lot of details, but I do recall that he seemed to think that he had just invented something cool and game-changing like a jet pack or something. It seems that this may be the 'new' Buttman for a while.
Don't get me wrong though, while I do wish that Stagliano would do more than this series I am quite content to watch a lovely young lady stick things in her bum for hours on end. The only thing that could make the concept better is if it started out as a women's beach volleyball game that turned into wall-to-wall bum insertions.
|
03-04-13 03:48pm
|
Reply
1088
|
Butt Naked In The Streets
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Glad to help. Give Teasers VOD a look. They're the best I've found.
|
09-17-12 05:54pm
|
Reply
1089
|
Butt Naked In The Streets
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I find that I generally don't rely on a raw number score that a lot of sites give, including TBP and our own reviews here. With TBP and the detailed reviews here I much prefer an explanation about the site. I figure that I might score a site low just because I don't like a particular niche but another PU member might score it high because they do like that niche. I try to remain objective in assigning a score. I've reviewed sites that I really didn't like but that had high-quality videos and pictures, decent download speeds and were well laid out. I still scored them high because they were good sites regardless of the fact that I didn't personally like the material.
And I agree - PU is a great place to hang out. This is probably among the most civil user-driven sites on the internet!
|
09-17-12 05:53pm
|
Reply
1090
|
Butt Naked In The Streets
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I've been a member at Teasers VOD twice and highly recommend them. For me I prefer certain elements in public nudity: 1) stars I know, 2) U.S. settings and 3) not too much editing. The reason for 2 and 3 is because I think a huge part of the allure for these sites is how nervous the model is, and a model in Budapest is likely to be less nervous than a model in Los Angeles just because in the U.S. the risks are higher. Teasers has all three of these elements. But there is one warning - if you want to join Teasers I recommend that you do it soon. They've stopped updating due to a cease-and-desist order from the City of Los Angeles. There is still a lot of material though that makes the $30 fee an excellent value. Part of the reason I recommend joing now is that another site, Nude in L.A., shut down completely. That site had my #1 and 2 requirements but the shoots were edited in such a way that the nervousness was gone so the shoots lost a lot of 'heat.'
Another choice is ALS Scan. They haven't done any public nudity stuff in several years, and admittedly they did shoot that in Europe, but some of the shoots are great. I especially like the shoot with Ashley Bulgari - she is SO nervous. It's a fun shoot to watch. ALS Scan isn't a public nudity site, so I wouldn't suggest that you join just for the public stuff, but ALS Scan is one of the best porn sites on the 'net so the public stuff is just icing on the cake.
Public Flash is also good, It has my #1 and 2 preferences but can be a little more tame with usually just flashing rather than full nudity.
FTV Girls usually has some public stuff in each scene, and some of them can be pretty daring, but they're usually more tame than Teasers.
There's also Public Disgrace. This site is in a league of its own in combining BDSM, public nudity and public sex. If you're looking for degradation and humiliation (but with full consent) along with the public nudity I'd definitely try this one.
I've reviewed all of the sites I've recommended so you can get more details there. I've also reviewed a few I didn't like too so that may be of some use to you too.
Good luck!
|
09-17-12 05:46pm
|
Reply
1091
|
Butt Naked In The Streets
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
Thanks for the comments, gaypornlover. This was clearly my own fault given that there weren't many positive comments about the site from anyone. I got burned, but I don't feel too bad since I knew that I was likely to get burned. I had a recent experience where I signed up for a site expecting to be able to download scenes and learned it was streaming only. That site, including the Terms of Service, was pretty vague so I did feel cheated there.
I'd guess that a serious disadvantage that you have, as one of the few gay PU members, is that you're breaking the trail more than the rest of us. For most of the sites I've joined some other PU member has likely been there before. I probably haven't said this loudly enough, but I'm glad you stick around and contribute as much as you do. I may not have any personal interest in the sites you review (but I always read them!), but I am interested in your perspective and you write excellent reviews that will form a great basis for new gay members as they join PU.
|
09-17-12 09:11am
|
Reply
1092
|
Butt Plays
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Interesting review... I think it might be time that I finally join this network...
|
02-01-13 02:39pm
|
Reply
1093
|
Can She Take It
(0)
|
Reply of
Harry Kuntz's Review
Thanks for this review. I'll give this what is probably the ultimate thumbs-up - based on your review I think I'll join the site.
|
09-18-10 06:47pm
|
Reply
1094
|
Candy Girl Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Whadastudd's Review
" THE SITES WITH THE BIGGER NAME GIRLS LIKE ASHLEY SAGE HAVE INCORRECT LINKS TO THE ZIP FILES WHICH BRING SOME FILES OF VERY SMALL BREASTED GIRLS INSTEAD OF THE MONSTER TITS YOU ARE EXPECTING."
You know, there are some of us here who would consider that a good thing!
Seriously though, this is the first time I've ever heard of a site even denying that it has download quotas. Download caps really piss me off anyway, but to have one hidden and then declared a technical difficulty would probably make my head explode.
Thanks for the great review and welcome to the site!
|
06-03-11 04:10am
|
Reply
1095
|
Casting Couch Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Great review of what looks like a great site even with the shortcomings you pointed out. I suspect I'll give it some consideration, but for now I probably won't join thanks to two simple words in your review: "no anal." Thanks for that detail. I'm sure I'm not the only member here who like to see at least some anal on a large site.
|
11-08-11 04:11am
|
Reply
1096
|
Casting Couch X
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thank you for the glowing assessment, Sir.
One obvious problem with comparing me, as a "Butt-lover" to Roger Ebert, is that when I give two thumbs up, just what (or who) are those thumbs up in?
|
10-25-13 03:41am
|
Reply
1097
|
CFNM Show
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
There is a thread on another adult video site that seems to have been started by Bang Bros itself where they ask members to give them suggestions as to how to improve their site. I haven't read anything on the thread in a while but when I last read it there were maybe ten pages of comments and I was really surprised to see that not one reply mentioned their questionable billing practices. I've said this before, but with a network this large and the porn this good I wonder why they have these kinds of practices. I'm sure a fairly high percentage of PU members have their own stories of BB scams. I know I do...
|
06-24-16 04:37am
|
Reply
1098
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
"Awful customer service"... sadly that seems to be a very common thread among porn sites...
|
07-28-11 03:21am
|
Reply
1099
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yup... defintiely something fishy.
|
07-27-11 01:05pm
|
Reply
1100
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
I know some people prefer photos over videos, but I highly doubt that there were any 'user requests' to stop shooting videos. That's pretty fishy...
|
07-26-11 04:09pm
|
