| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
501
|
Marie McCray
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
Not as such - but it's part of Premium Pass, so check the reviews on the other sites there - it very likely follows the same formula. They all seem to have rather mediocre TBP scores, which is a shame - there are a few stars included in it who I like, eg Katsuni, Tori Black, Alexis Texas.
|
08-20-12 06:23am
|
Reply
502
|
Martha's Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
Thanks for pointing this site out - a new one to me so although no longer updating, I'll definitely add it to my list - pinup girls, and other retro-themed smut is very much my thing!
|
10-28-12 12:54am
|
Reply
503
|
Massage Parlor
(0)
|
Reply of
Gasperdian's Review
Thanks for the good, helpful review - this genre sort of appeals to me. But when you say Soapy Massage is disbanded - do you mean it is is no longer updating? The site seems to work OK - I assume all the older scenes are still there and available? And are they included in the membership here?
|
09-10-12 03:21am
|
Reply
504
|
Massage Rooms
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
Many thanks for this great review! I've never joined a massage site, but I have been tempted - I like the idea of the tenderness in the sex. This certainly looks like one of the better ones too - but as you suggest, may be worth waiting a little while for more content.
|
03-12-13 06:07am
|
Reply
505
|
Melina.com
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Thanks for another great review, tangub :) This had long been on my list due to the diversity of models; but it is a shame that diversity doesn't extend to age. I certainly don't mind the 18-21 group, but would get bored if the whole site was centred on it. Still, one to keep an eye on!
|
04-30-13 05:13pm
|
Reply
506
|
Melina.com
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Hi tangub - thanks for the tip here. This is a site on my list - the broad range of models they seem to have is quite appealing and some of the sets look fun. But it seems like the kind of site that would have somewhat dull videos anyway (?) so the lack thereof wouldn't be a deal-breaker. Either way, look forward to your review!
|
04-28-13 02:26pm
|
Reply
507
|
Men At Play
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Review
Another good review, manholelover. You'll have to forgive me being so amused/curious to learn of all these niches in gay porn, even though I guess they should be obvious! I mean, I like material featuring girls stripping out of businesswear, so it shouldn't really be a surprise that there are guys doing the same...
BTW gaypornolover - sorry to hear you had trouble with some sites on the Mac, I haven't had any issues - the only thing I can imagine is DRM as you suggested, but I wouldn't subscribe to a DRMd site. For anyone on Mac (or Windows and Linux) it's worth downloading VLC, since it plays pretty much anything.
|
09-21-11 01:22am
|
Reply
508
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
This is quite an interesting development. I find Met Art largely unerotic; this isn't specifically down to the lack of explicitness but more a lack of any lewd intent from either the models or the photographers.
Maybe they have taken a tip from their stablemate TLE - who manage to be significantly more erotic even with some of the same models and photographers. Anyway, worth keeping an eye on!
|
04-20-13 12:27am
|
Reply
509
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Review
Good review - and welcome here. Met art is a very divisive site - like you I find the lack of any actual erotic behaviour rather frustrating. I've seen more exciting, yet less explicit stuff; I'd much prefer a girl with her panties on and her hand inside them, than off but not doing anything about it!
|
12-22-12 03:01am
|
Reply
510
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I agree with your assessment - on one hand it's not a bad deal, but on the other, that's a huge amount of smut to get through in a month!
|
05-14-12 12:22am
|
Reply
511
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
gyang79's Comment
Met Art seems to be a very divisive site! You can't argue with the amount of material or the beauty of the models but I have to agree with you. It's not so much the level of explicitness; just that in most cases they just don't have much in the way of seductiveness or tease.
FTV is on my list; I could also recommend Breath Takers or Petites Parisiennes if you want to stick to fairly soft material but with a bit more personality; or if you want a bit more but still glam and well-produced, perhaps Digital Desire?
|
04-16-12 09:26am
|
Reply
512
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Excellent review, tangub - I'm glad you found Met Art a little more exciting than I did! Also glad you noted Jenya D - probably my favourite model there, her sets have a bit more of a spark and more eroticism than most - I found many lacking that, even sets from models who do harder stuff elsewhere.
|
02-19-12 10:24pm
|
Reply
513
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Wasn't expecting to see a review from rearadmiral on this - but I too am easily swayed by a good offer and I'm glad you liked the site!
Perhaps as a hardcore fan it's more a breath of fresh air to see softcore; whereas I tend to soft/midcore material so found this lacking in tease/playfulness a bit; it's not even the nudity levels since I've found non-nude material that I find more exciting. Agree with Ergo Proxy in that their better stuff seems to be from a while ago; many of the sets I downloaded were a good few years old.
I'm glad you expanded on the technical aspects of the site; I didn't stress enough that it just can't be faulted in size or features.
And definitely concur about the animals :| I am fond of animals, but not in that way; I prefer my smut without any at all!
|
01-11-12 01:03am
|
Reply
514
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks readadmiral & Denner for your replies. My opinion is of course very subjective - some folk may find the stuff here exciting and sexy - but my tastes are generally pretty tame and this just doesn't work for me at all.
I would, though, again recommend my previously reviewed site Juliland - possibly art, but creative, exciting stuff.
|
12-30-11 04:27pm
|
Reply
515
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Thanks for the reply, Cap'n. I agree about the thumbnails; it's not at all easy to find anything that leaps out from the sea of them while browsing.
After discussing the site with a friend, one other point occurred to me about the 'Met Art' look - that, by somehow desexualising the models, it somehow objectifies them even more; which bothers me slightly, since like I hope most folk here do, I have a huge respect for all the girls we ogle over. Would you agree, or am I just overanalysing? :|
|
12-30-11 07:15am
|
Reply
516
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Jayz's Reply
Jayz, many thanks for the reply, much appreciated. 76! I will definitely be signing up a little later in the month when budget allows :)
|
01-10-11 11:02am
|
Reply
517
|
Michael Ninn
(0)
|
Reply of
Parsnip's Reply
Actually, I don't mind artsy nonsense... as long as it's not at the expense of actual arousal!
A couple of things you may want to check out too: if you've not joined Babes, it's not quite SexArt or Joymii, but it's still good if you are looking for more similar material.
And if you aren't already familiar with him, look up Roy Stuart - also a bit of an auteur, but the material works better. There's some (very tame) stuff of his on Met Art; but if you want the B/G material, I think it's either the books or his own DVDs.
|
11-18-13 03:03pm
|
Reply
518
|
Michael Ninn
(0)
|
Reply of
Parsnip's Review
Another interesting review, thanks. I've been tempted by this - like you I've received offers, being a member at TLE. I sort of half-dismissed it as overly-stylised artsy daftness - but it sounds harder than I'd suspected. My interest in fetish lies in the glam side, nylons and latex - not so much in S&M and the like - sounds like this would be a turn-off for me at best. Probably one I'd be better off avoiding!
|
11-08-13 01:46am
|
Reply
519
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
Concur with Cap'n - a great and thorough review, Brad. A shame the site is lacking; one thing that appeals to me there is the mix of models; eg I like Asian and Latina models, but wouldn't necessarily join a purely Asian/Latina site; but sadly few sites have a good spectrum of ethnicities. I'm tempted by melina.com which seems good in that area, although it's just a small site.
|
01-09-12 09:11am
|
Reply
520
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
Thanks for the review, Cap'n - this looks a bit more playful/erotic than some art nude sites and there are a few models I like - particularly Mai Ly. But will give it a wide berth for the time being.
I'm tempted to sign up at Digital Desire - have you visited recently/at all?
|
03-27-11 01:42am
|
Reply
521
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Another great review, tangub - of a site which has been on my possible list for a while. I'd kind of dismissed it as a bit too met-art-y, and perhaps the models a bit too young (I usually prefer girls at least in their mid-20s); but am still a bit tempted by your mention of public pics and racier videos than MA. Download restrictions are a bit of a PITA; I doubt I'd hit them, except for the lack of manager support; I tend to use DTA to queue downloads for overnight.
|
07-28-11 07:27am
|
Reply
522
|
Nakedby
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Aha, Cap'n, you are right... the focus here isn't really on full strips. There are some, and most sets do involve undressing, but generally start with lingerie or something flimsy (that often gets wet).
I suspect you'd prefer Petites Parisiennes, which has more (and actually quite a few getting dressed sets). But even more so Breath Takers, which does have a lot of strips from fully dressed, usually in casual wear.
|
07-05-11 11:42pm
|
Reply
523
|
Nakedby
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the comments, tangub & Drooler. I still prefer PP, but it's more a personal choice, I think - if you liked it, there is a lot of material here from some of the prettiest girls there - notably for me, Eva, Hatsumo, Amandine, Laetitia. It's a little expensive, but worth a one-month join.
|
07-04-11 02:24pm
|
Reply
524
|
Nena Blue
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Reply
Aha, yes, it is billed by CCBill, so at least it's easy to cancel. Can't explain the pricing model though; cheaper to just cancel and resubscribe than to stay subscribed.
This is one of those sites that I put up with the shortcomings of for the quality of the material, it's fairly unique; but one subscription is enough for a while! Might visit again in a year.
|
08-25-11 12:34am
|
Reply
525
|
New Nude City
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks tangub - despite its flaws, this is still a great site and well worth $15 - there's something a bit off-centre about the content which I really like. Definitely recommended if you want something a bit different... and if Juliland scares you off a bit :)
|
11-29-12 11:14pm
|
