| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
476
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Glad you like it! I'm generally more into softcore, but the heartcore genre has won me over a little - this site remains by far my favourite so far.
I find it has a bit more personality than X Art, which is a bit too perfect-teens-dreamy for me; I especially like the camerawork at Joymii (although I find the photography lacking in atmosphere comparison to the video direction). For me it as the right balance - is a bit arty and sensual but not too seriously or at the expense of actual excitement or fun.
I'm currently a member at Babes.com - it's good, but still has half a foot planted in more typical porn. After that, my next one will be Dane Jones, perhaps?
|
04-15-13 03:37pm
|
Reply
477
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
I've not joined Sex Art, but have been a member both at X Art and at Joymii. They are very, very similar sites, so if you liked X Art, you should like this. But for my money, I prefer Joymii - the difference is subtle, but the photography just seems better - the sets, colours, angles are a bit different, a bit more interesting.
|
02-24-13 01:12am
|
Reply
478
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Sadly no feedback from them, elephant. However, I did somehow manage to subscribe at $19.95! I don't know how, I tried again and the CCBill form showed me $. After subscribing, I tried again and it was back to £. YMMV...
|
04-25-12 01:51am
|
Reply
479
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I'm figuring/hoping it's a mistake - when at the Femjoy joining page, not only does it happily offer me the $19.95 price, it also offers (actually pre-checks :|) Joymii @ $15 - or the equivalents if I change to £.
Still no reply from the webmaster, though...
|
04-17-12 10:10am
|
Reply
480
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Well, I'm not quite as principled as you on the topic, Cap'n; eg your recent comment on Watch4Beauty, the couple of extra dollars is annoying but not enough to keep me from subscribing - the $15 PU price is already good, so I'm not complaining too much about it being $17.
In this case, though, equating $ with £ is too much...
|
04-16-12 09:20am
|
Reply
481
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for a comprehensive answer :) They are fairly similarly positioned, and your details confirm that; I was trying to figure out why I'm drawn to one rather than the other. I think it comes down to:
* Purely aesthetically, I like the colours and the camerawork I see on Joymii more;
* X-Art seems to be very focused on models 18-20 with very few outside that range; Joymii seems to be slightly broader which again appeals to me a bit more
I'm definitely looking for something with a little b/g material - they both look good sites, but Joymii is the one on my list to join!
|
03-21-12 08:47am
|
Reply
482
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I concur - I'm not generally into hardcore but like it occasionally and this site is high on my list. From what I've seen, I agree with you about the lighting and colours - it has a clean, modern feel which sets it apart from much other porn.
I guess this is similar to X-Art but for some reason I am more drawn to Joymii, it seems to have more character - have you joined both?
|
03-19-12 08:56am
|
Reply
483
|
Juliland
(0)
|
Reply of
tboy's Comment
Looks like there are about 10 photo sets and 5 movies. The latter will likely be just DVD size rather than HD, since they are from a few years back.
It's all solo material - there is some g/g at Juliland, but little, if any, b/g. Suits me :)
IIRC she does have some hardcore material at Holly Randall, if you've not been there yet?
|
11-23-11 04:09am
|
Reply
484
|
Juliland
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Not at all - I'd say it's roughly 2:1 Photo sets to videos. The size of the sets doesn't bother me at all - Ellen Stagg does similar size sets at Stagg Street, a favourite site. It just means the photographer has spent some time editing the set down to the best shots - with a good photographer you respect that decision and the sets are better for it.
And here especially, the pictures are quite stark - I feel they would lose the edge if there were too many of them in a set. The sets are zipped, but only go up to 1600px; I'd have preferred a bit higher res.
I'm liking this site far more than I'd guessed!
|
11-23-11 12:22am
|
Reply
485
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Agree about the recent updates - in the last year or so's material, I think they've tried to include more natural girls, and lose some of the daft outfits and cheesy settings in favour of nice clothing and natural looking sets. And I agree that there's so much material, it doesn't really make sense to worry over the bits we don't like! (BTW another reply to you under my PP review)
|
01-21-11 04:16pm
|
Reply
486
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Sounds like you found it much the same as I did! Perhaps something for everyone, but spread a little thinly. As you said, not much in the way of (nice) lingerie there, you know where I'll send you for that ;)
If you need a little inspiration, I found fun videos from the following models with good personalities: Darcy Tyler, Helena Handbasket, Holly West, Robbye Honeck, Kimberly, Liz, Megan
Of course, YMMV :)
|
01-20-11 10:07pm
|
Reply
487
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Hmm... a quick tally from my admittedly inexpert eye (some are quite convincing!) makes me think probably just under half - 40-45%? - of the models here have fake boobs.
That sounds like a lot - but again, this is a big site, with hundreds of models - so you'll likely find some that you like, and there are some good strips, teasing and lingerie, followed up by showing what's underneath.
If you've joined either of the other two sites mentioned, I'm pretty sure you'll see similar content to here. For me there are just enough natural girls here to warrant a one-off subscription.
|
01-19-11 02:39pm
|
Reply
488
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Your review of All Over 30 was interesting, thanks - and I think I know what you mean by 'mainstream glam' - (actual) pearl necklaces and the like :| Do you think I'd find much else there that I didn't here?
|
01-09-11 02:21am
|
Reply
489
|
Katie K Official
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Review
Thanks for the review! I'm quite fond of this model too, for the reasons you state - she has a cute girl-next-door appeal, combined with a knack really filthy chat :) Looks like the site needs a bit of time to develop; one to bear in mind but it sounds like I'm probably better off joining other sites where she features for now.
|
10-24-11 12:04pm
|
Reply
490
|
Katie K Official
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Well, I'm not so much into the male-bashing thing - femdom/humiliation doesn't really work for me. But I just find a bit of racy chat in a solo video - eg the girl talking (graphically) about what she's doing, what she likes etc - is far more exciting than the bland music they usually throw over the top instead.
|
02-21-11 11:11pm
|
Reply
491
|
Lacy Nylons
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm a bit more egalitarian about nylons. I absolutely agree with everything you say about the allure of stockingtops and suspenders - although I enjoy porn, my first love is pinup, and if you look up eg photographer Viva Van Story and model Mosh, you'll see what I mean.
But... I also think pantyhose are a very different, but exciting kind of tease; when worn with no panties, the sheerness both hides and shows what's underneath - and specifically when a model is unshaved, I find that very appealing.
|
02-08-12 03:23pm
|
Reply
492
|
Lacy Nylons
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Hey messmer... another good review, thanks. Further to your last reply, I'm a bit more lenient with nylons, I like both tights and stockings, but as a bit of a pin-up and retro fan there's no denying the allure of stockings, suspenders, girdles and the like (and I'm not even fifty!). But just a shame that the videos here don't have much tease - that's surely what this kind of thing is about.
|
02-07-12 12:40am
|
Reply
493
|
Latex Style
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Review
Thanks for the review, which I read with interest, although my own interest in latex is a little milder and doesn't go as far as the full body and face variety. But looking at this site, and some others you've reviewed, I can see the appeal...
|
02-25-11 02:47pm
|
Reply
494
|
Layered Nylons
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Thanks for another great review, tangub - this site has popped up on my radar as I'm a big fan of nylon, either tights or stockings, and the idea of both is actually an interesting novelty.
However, it sounds like it would be too frustrating... sure, I like a tease but I prefer it to go somewhere! And although seeing the model's pussy through sheer nylon works for me as well as full nudity, it sounds like it's the exception here.
A shame... I'm still looking for a good, erotic, nylon-themed site.
|
02-04-13 12:17am
|
Reply
495
|
Layered Nylons
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
It's hard to tell from the previews, but it looks like Layered Nylons might at least have models with nothing under sheer nylon - which actually really works for me, as much as nude.
There's also Art Lingerie which is nude - I find the preview material a little too glossed over but it's tentatively on my list...
|
05-13-12 12:20am
|
Reply
496
|
Layered Nylons
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I think at least some of the sites show a little more? Eg Only Secretaries shows some toplessness on their home page, but I'm not sure if it goes any than that. I love teasing but agree that it would be frustrating if we didn't get to see some naughty bits eventually...
|
05-13-12 12:16am
|
Reply
497
|
Lethal Lipstick
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
Well, the concept sort of works for me - I suppose it's a submissive fantasy of sorts - but that the site is non-nude doesn't.
If you're into girls and guns, there is plenty of material in film, manga, TV etc... the added bonus here should be naked girls with guns, - but it's not. Hmm.
The company seem to have a number of interesting fetish sites - in terms of bizarreness, I prefer the premise of (although am unlikely to subscribe to) Tiny Fetish Fun - and Ripping 4 Fun also appeals.
|
02-15-11 04:42am
|
Reply
498
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I like your definition of softcore and midcore! I think that should be officially adopted to readily tell the difference :)
|
08-05-11 11:04pm
|
Reply
499
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the reply, tangub. I'm still not quite sure about the site, but for the price it's perhaps worth a try, I'm still keen on some of the models... but there are a couple more in the running too (which brings me to another comment). Your review was, as ever, most helpful :)
|
08-02-11 03:37pm
|
Reply
500
|
Manhandled.com
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
^ what tangub said. I've also joined both those sites without a problem.
|
09-14-12 12:19am
|
