To be honest I doubt it, but there were some really nice Russian Amateur models featured at this site way back in the 1990s. They were shot by a Russian photographer who emigrated suddenly, re-appeared for a few years, but has gone to ground again for the last year or so. Very enigmatic! :0)
What prompted me to ask the question was the recent comment about LezCuties where the same bunch of models were featured in its early material.
I really can't recommend this one.
Photos only...Well fair enough, you might expect that!
Tour pages infer classification of updates. There is none.
Model index?...Forget it! There is none.
There is a page of text links to numbered archives & that is it.
No zips are available.
'Remastered' content is still woefully outdated. Images are still poor quality & small.
Your review of All Over 30 was interesting, thanks - and I think I know what you mean by 'mainstream glam' - (actual) pearl necklaces and the like :| Do you think I'd find much else there that I didn't here (Karups Older Women)? /Quote
Any reference I usually make to 'mainstream glam' refers to the typical outfits young models are asked to wear, play uniforms, gaudy skimpy outfits & the like. All of which I feel, look a little sad on a more mature model.
I haven't been a member since my last review.
Since then, my earlier comment here, dated 12-01-09, still holds true for me.
BTW It is always worth reading folks replies too for extra perspective.
Looking at the sites 'Recent Updates' masturbation, toy play & hardcore still seem to feature pretty large, so I suspect things generally haven't changed much.
Unless there is a current member able to update me?
Am I right in thinking that on the whole the outfit selections are largely unchanged?
I am always hoping for more appropriate mature attire:
Formal, smart casual , real uniform etc which I do appreciate there is as well, but I still see a few tacky play uniforms featured in recent update section.
Does that impression hold true in the members area?
I have been a member on and off for a few times, but could never put my finger on why I was always dissatisfied.
I think this is it.
A mature site should concentrate more on the elegance of a mature woman....not dress her in glam clothes that make her look a bit cheap and sad. :0/
...or make her perform like a mainstream porn star.
Have her dressed prim & proper either formal or casual...
It gives the impression she wouldn't dream of stripping naked for the camera. It then adds a lot to the eroticism when she does. ;0)
Flagged up by D's detailed review, I took a look at this site.
Intermittent nudity in photosets is a frustration.
Why not have a fixed policy on this?
At the very least make it clearer which items feature full nudity?
That situation is all the more puzzling, given the featuring of the use of dildos & cucumbers in the tour area.
Once again we have this blurring of softcore into midcore issue on content.
There is some OK stuff up there in softcore striptease, but if the site has gone static, they might at least have the decency to say so on the tour pages.
I'm just pleased I didn't go for the 3 month option.
Well, it appears after a long time havering, this site has made a decision on its content.
Confirming my earlier concerns about the weighting of the content, the subtitle of the site banner has changed to:
Hardcore Mature Women of Interest.
So at least now we know where we stand with it.
Another one off my rapidly slimming potential join list.
I appreciate it is obvious where the bias of this site will be, but I would just like to ask a couple of questions about the format of their photosets/videos.
Do they ever start fully clothed?
Do they ever reach full nudity?
( I have a pretty rigid definition of nude. Wearing a garter (suspender) belt and or hose & shoes is NOT nude ;0) )
I know I posted about this a month or so ago, when Advent said they were a couple of weeks away from the 'Big Bang' event! :0)
I replied to an earlier comment asking for an update but it must have got missed.
If the Archive site featured content from ALL the ATK sites.
Personally, I think the argument that a lot of content does not appeal to all users is a moot point.
There is already a lot of content featured on this site that does not appeal to me.
That said there is a fair amount that does, & featuring more varied eclectic content from all sites would probably increase the proportion of the featured content that I actually enjoy.
I actually cancelled my membership here.
Whilst there has been the odd time in the past I have let it lapse due to financial constraints, this is the first time I have cancelled through choice.
It is actually a relief.
I was getting to dread looking at most of the updates, both in terms of the models used & the gynaecological photography.
Time was it was a taseful site with truly natural usually amateur ladies displaying eroticism.
Unfortunately, times have changed & not for the better.
I'm taking it that Advent will read this! ;0)Now there are a quite a few different sites in the network, how about offering discounted membership on additional sites?
I am not just talking about a package deal on all sites, I'm thinking how about a sliding scale of additional discount based on the number of ATK sites you currently hold membership to?
I can see it might not be viable but I think it would be a good angle to increase membership across the sites.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
