| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1376
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I just did my review of the site - check it out. I'll be interested to see yours.
|
01-22-09 06:14pm
|
Review
1377
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Frequent updates - they aim for Monday-Friday. This can be a combination of new Sandy photosets, Sandy's vids, Sandy's archives of cam shows, candid photosets and friends's sets - basically photsets from other models' sites
All material is zipped - all photosets and vids.
The site design is pretty and navigation works pretty well.
For people who crave harder material from their sologirl sites, Sandy has advanced beyond teasing to showing her full bod, doing lots of girl/girl and masturbation scenes with toys, etc
Sandy is pretty involved in the site - she posts at the forum sometimes and does 1, or sometimes 2, live cam shows in a week when she's not travelling
For people who want to see Sandy sans photo-shopping, there is a good deal of material where you can see her un-Twisty-ized |
| Cons: |
I've got to say that the excitement level of the site is decreasing for my tastes. For me the issue is this - Sandy is a great tease! Sandy is not a great sexual performer. Sandy's stuff when she's wearing the craziest sexiest little outfits that show off her scrumptious bod and doing her Brazilian dancing and all - that's the hot ticket there - and if she did that mainly and then threw off some OK sexual performance, I'd be more happy than the direction that she's gone where the tease is not as present and the sexual performance is more present - and she's a much better tease than she is a sexual performer.
Navigation is mainly good, but for a solo-girl site to not have the ability to arrow "next" through a photo-set is a problem, in my opinion
Pics could be bigger - They are 1500 X 1000
Some areas of the site don't exist - there's a Bonus area - that the other reviewer thought was really hot that is empty
The VIP section of the forum was last updated 10-08 |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a well-run, professionally-run site with a good level of involvement by the model. There are frequent updates. The people who run the site are cool and care about the site and its members.
They've got 310 picture sets, 98 girl/girl sets, 43 candid sets, 106 guest sets, 206 vids, 77 web cam archives & they update with something 5 days a week.
If you've seen Sandy at ALS Angels or Twisty's and you're hot for her, you should join for a bit - 30-90 days - and you'll probably find a lot to enjoy.
Maybe this is crappy to say, but I found her hotter a couple of years ago and I preferred the softer direction, mainly because she was better at that stuff.
There are great girl/girl sexual performers - think Nella. Sandy is nowhere near that class, unfortunately.
On the other hand if she were wearing the hottest craziest booty shorts and dancing like mad to show off her Brazilian sense of rhythm and her juicy ass, I'd probably be pretty freaking entranced. Seeing her stick a dildo in her pussy for the umpteenth time is not all that entrancing. |
|
01-22-09 06:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1378
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I added a comment to the review that you're commenting about. Something about the review flat-out stank, in my opinion, so I double checked since my membership to this site is about to eclipse.
This bit about "bonus stes have been added" - where? Click on the "Bonus" page on this site and it is completely blank.
I asked the reviewer to ezplain the comment, but I don't expect him to. I think it was a BS advertisement and not a review, which is too bad, since this is a good site and deserves to be given kudos for it's actual merits and not to be overly hyped by BS advertisements posing as reviews.
|
01-20-09 05:50pm
|
Reply
1379
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
KWH1071's Review
One thing I've got to point out that adds to the questionable nature of this review is the comment about "bonus sites and other features have been added."
I'm currently a member. My membership is about to elapse. There is a "Bonus" page, but when I click on it, it is blank - there is no "bonus" content. Please explain what you mean by your comment.
Otherwise I've got to conclude that this is a BS advertisement instead of an honest review.
There is a lot good about this site and it doesn't need to be overly hyped.
|
01-20-09 05:46pm
|
Reply
1380
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Yes - as a member of her previous site, I received an e-mail when she started this site. A lot of the material being presented in the new site is licensed material that she did for other sites, such as Ron Harris' sites and Suze.net and FTV Girls. The only site that does really unique material that I have not seen re-presented on this site is her ALS Angels material - ALS are pretty into having their material on their sites being 100% exclusive.
She is also doing some unique material for this site, but not a large amount. The material she is doing more is more hard-core than what she used to do, but also frequently not that interesting.
If you like Sandy, I would say that it's worth a short-term join to see what all is here. I'm not going to claim that you're going to want to stay for many months, though.
|
06-04-08 10:59pm
|
Reply
1381
|
Sandy's Fantasies
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Given 21st Sextury's comments about their DOS attacks coming from their main competitor, I wonder if there is a little porn war going on between 21st Sextury and DDF. What was the reason for this site except for DDF to prove that a bunch of the 21st Sextury material was produced by DDF?
That's OK if DDF was going to keep this site as a real updated site. Now - not having updated the site for almost 7 months, it just makes DDF look lame. They ought to shut it down or give it as a bonus to people that join the premium DDF sites.
|
05-03-08 09:39am
|
Comment
1382
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
|
09-19-15 06:05am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1383
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
On 10/31/12, they posted a vid that was clearly labelled "licensed from Viv Thomas". That was the post of the day, so I wouldn't regard it as bonus, but it is clearly labelled as to whose material it was originally. This site has never mainly done original material, in my experience.
|
11-01-12 08:18pm
|
Reply
1384
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
enigma's Review
I agree with you about the lack of surprise with this site. Even though it has numerous models, like Caprice, that I just LOVE, I have never found this site exciting in the least. It's like watching paint dry to me. Other people that like the style of this site probably find it admirable for its consistency.
|
07-06-11 06:55pm
|
Reply
1385
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
wawwynutmeg83's Review
I'm on a current month-long join for the first time in a long time. My previous impressions were that the site just is devoid of "zing", but I decided to try it again since it had a fair amount of Caprice aka Little Caprice aka Lolashut.
My impression now - it's boring. It's a site with great-looking women pretty much wasted, somehow, because their material is just not exciting.
It reminds me of my first join to Nubiles.net. I had the same feeling - no spark of excitement, nothing to make me go "Wow".
Nubiles put effort into changing that situation and their site got shoots where the models were a lot more engaged. This site - not.
I recommend 21st Sextury's lez material - much more exciting than the material here - and I'm always a big fan of ALS Scan's girl/girl action.
And actually Twisty's recently posted a mind-blowingly hot girl/girl scene of Tanner Mayes and Sandy of Club Sandy.
All that stuff makes this site's material look like drying wallpaper in comparison - too bad, because they do have hot women performing for them. But, then, so did Nubiles in the days when their stuff was boring.
|
03-02-11 07:03pm
|
Reply
1386
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
It's a matter of taste. I have been a member on 2 occasions - both times because the girls are cute and the site is held in such high esteem by so many - but I find their material really boring. I consider the girl/girl material at ALS Scans to be the best on the net and I find the material at Lez Cuties to be much hotter than anything at this site. Lez Cuties is only updated once a week, I should add.
|
08-07-09 07:23am
|
Reply
1387
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
moby dick's Review
Stay away from 21st Sextury sites with this English Only perspective - I quite agree with you that Sapphic Erotica is boring - there is lots more exciting les action to be found on the internet - the points you make as to WHY you find it boring are different than anything I would have come up with, though - lol
Funny review.
|
07-18-09 03:49pm
|
Reply
1388
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
juicylucy's Review
Just to lend a dose of cold water here. I think this site is definitely a taste-tester with some, like juicylucy, obviously loving it. I've been a member a couple of times and find it just terribly boring - I don't think the pics have anything exciting about them, I don't find the models all that attractive, in the main or very engaged in what they are doing and I find the interaction between the models incredibly mechanical and flat-out boring. I let my membership lapse after 1 month with no regrets whatsoever.
Enjoy your membership, though, jl - it's always good to find a site that you enjoy thoroughly.
|
07-02-08 07:48pm
|
Reply
1389
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Getreal's Review
I don't know how exclusive their content really is. Paul Markham does a lot of their content, I believe, and he has his own site.
There's a churn-it-out quality, I find, to a lot of their content, and I found myself quickly bored, but that's a matter of taste.
|
08-17-07 09:36pm
|
Reply
1390
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Porn fans wanting to be PC - seems like an oxymoron
I'll stick with the webmaster/mistress - it's kind of fun
|
02-01-11 06:29pm
|
Comment
1391
|
Secretease
(0)
|
|
01-31-11 11:36pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1392
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks for clarifying.
|
10-24-10 10:32am
|
Reply
1393
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
You're really complaining about $1 difference due to currency conversion? To be fair, a site would be hard pressed to get the costs closer given the ups and downs of currency conversion.
|
10-24-10 10:23am
|
Reply
1394
|
Selena Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
FYI - A better deal can be had by joining one of this company's premium sites - Karla Spice, Gigi Spice, Tania Spice or Pacino's Adventures - all of which include all of the 8 sites listed above as bonus sites. Karla Spice is a topless site, the others have hard-core content.
Gigi Spice's content is limited, I should say. I don't know how much more updates this company has in storage, but as of the beginning of November, pics are out and about of this model with enhanced boobs and a more mature look under the name Caroline Alverez - so when the current stash that they have has been posted, there will be no new material from "Gigi". I suspect that they will make it another bonus site shortly thereafter.
|
12-30-09 06:16am
|
Reply
1395
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
The deal I got was all of their sites - the whole catalog - for $29.99/month - pretty sweet. Now I can check out everything that Daisy Ducati has done for them - mmmmm - and Skin Diamond - and Asa Akira - and...
|
10-30-15 11:09pm
|
Reply
1396
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Let me ask one question - Do you want these sites to stay open?
If so, just accept it. Even in "harder" BDSM-themed comics, like those produced by Fansadox, they have disclaimers at the beginning these days.
|
11-06-11 12:14pm
|
Reply
1397
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
BostonPJR's Review
I think Kink.com is putting the "I did this intense stuff consentually and enjoyed it" disclaimers as a way of protecting themselves legally. It would at least be more difficult for a jury to find them guilty of brutality or whatever charges some DA wanted to bring against them if they saw that, in the end, the performers were hugging and smiling.
|
07-05-08 04:34pm
|
Reply
1398
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I won't say anything more about it except download it and enjoy it.
By the way, I saw Skin Diamond feature at my local strip club this past Thursday night. As hot as I thought she was before, I had no idea! This woman is staggeringly beautiful. She's got that model can't take your eye off her thing and her bod is just stunning!! Watching her on stage was a total thrill. I only wish I were a large Black or Latino guy, since those are the guys she most gravitated to and virtually every large Black and Latino guy sitting stage-side - and there were several ended up with their faces deep in her pussy.
|
08-27-12 07:37pm
|
Reply
1399
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Evil Angel is a GREAT site! If you haven't already seen it, I HIGHLY recommend the "Nacho Vidal Sexual Messiah" scene with Skin Diamond being trained by Nacho and Sandy of Club Sandy fame. It's hands-down my favorite porn scene of the past year.
|
08-21-12 06:46am
|
Reply
1400
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Yeah, I was not excited by this site, I have to say. There is some nice photography and they're using some models that I really like, but it's too "cool" for my tastes. I want hotter and kookier and more silly and more unpredictable generally. I like Met Art because with all the variety and with all the depth of history in the site, there's always something to enjoy. This site is just a bit too "meh" for me.
I'm not a big fan of X-Art either, which is probably a close parallel to this site.
The Kamikaze Love stuff was probably some of my favorite stuff on this site, because, while it was formulaic, it had a very definite mood - and, with the exception of John Stagliano, who is posting "Voracious" in excerpts at EvilAngel.com - nobody else is doing full feature material of this sort on a web site. Brazzers dabbled a bit in it a couple of years ago, would have done well to have continued to do so.
|
08-15-12 12:17am
|
