| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1376
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
On 10/31/12, they posted a vid that was clearly labelled "licensed from Viv Thomas". That was the post of the day, so I wouldn't regard it as bonus, but it is clearly labelled as to whose material it was originally. This site has never mainly done original material, in my experience.
|
11-01-12 08:18pm
|
Reply
1377
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
enigma's Review
I agree with you about the lack of surprise with this site. Even though it has numerous models, like Caprice, that I just LOVE, I have never found this site exciting in the least. It's like watching paint dry to me. Other people that like the style of this site probably find it admirable for its consistency.
|
07-06-11 06:55pm
|
Reply
1378
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
wawwynutmeg83's Review
I'm on a current month-long join for the first time in a long time. My previous impressions were that the site just is devoid of "zing", but I decided to try it again since it had a fair amount of Caprice aka Little Caprice aka Lolashut.
My impression now - it's boring. It's a site with great-looking women pretty much wasted, somehow, because their material is just not exciting.
It reminds me of my first join to Nubiles.net. I had the same feeling - no spark of excitement, nothing to make me go "Wow".
Nubiles put effort into changing that situation and their site got shoots where the models were a lot more engaged. This site - not.
I recommend 21st Sextury's lez material - much more exciting than the material here - and I'm always a big fan of ALS Scan's girl/girl action.
And actually Twisty's recently posted a mind-blowingly hot girl/girl scene of Tanner Mayes and Sandy of Club Sandy.
All that stuff makes this site's material look like drying wallpaper in comparison - too bad, because they do have hot women performing for them. But, then, so did Nubiles in the days when their stuff was boring.
|
03-02-11 07:03pm
|
Reply
1379
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
It's a matter of taste. I have been a member on 2 occasions - both times because the girls are cute and the site is held in such high esteem by so many - but I find their material really boring. I consider the girl/girl material at ALS Scans to be the best on the net and I find the material at Lez Cuties to be much hotter than anything at this site. Lez Cuties is only updated once a week, I should add.
|
08-07-09 07:23am
|
Reply
1380
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
moby dick's Review
Stay away from 21st Sextury sites with this English Only perspective - I quite agree with you that Sapphic Erotica is boring - there is lots more exciting les action to be found on the internet - the points you make as to WHY you find it boring are different than anything I would have come up with, though - lol
Funny review.
|
07-18-09 03:49pm
|
Reply
1381
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
juicylucy's Review
Just to lend a dose of cold water here. I think this site is definitely a taste-tester with some, like juicylucy, obviously loving it. I've been a member a couple of times and find it just terribly boring - I don't think the pics have anything exciting about them, I don't find the models all that attractive, in the main or very engaged in what they are doing and I find the interaction between the models incredibly mechanical and flat-out boring. I let my membership lapse after 1 month with no regrets whatsoever.
Enjoy your membership, though, jl - it's always good to find a site that you enjoy thoroughly.
|
07-02-08 07:48pm
|
Reply
1382
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Getreal's Review
I don't know how exclusive their content really is. Paul Markham does a lot of their content, I believe, and he has his own site.
There's a churn-it-out quality, I find, to a lot of their content, and I found myself quickly bored, but that's a matter of taste.
|
08-17-07 09:36pm
|
Reply
1383
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Porn fans wanting to be PC - seems like an oxymoron
I'll stick with the webmaster/mistress - it's kind of fun
|
02-01-11 06:29pm
|
Comment
1384
|
Secretease
(0)
|
|
01-31-11 11:36pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1385
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks for clarifying.
|
10-24-10 10:32am
|
Reply
1386
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
You're really complaining about $1 difference due to currency conversion? To be fair, a site would be hard pressed to get the costs closer given the ups and downs of currency conversion.
|
10-24-10 10:23am
|
Reply
1387
|
Selena Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
FYI - A better deal can be had by joining one of this company's premium sites - Karla Spice, Gigi Spice, Tania Spice or Pacino's Adventures - all of which include all of the 8 sites listed above as bonus sites. Karla Spice is a topless site, the others have hard-core content.
Gigi Spice's content is limited, I should say. I don't know how much more updates this company has in storage, but as of the beginning of November, pics are out and about of this model with enhanced boobs and a more mature look under the name Caroline Alverez - so when the current stash that they have has been posted, there will be no new material from "Gigi". I suspect that they will make it another bonus site shortly thereafter.
|
12-30-09 06:16am
|
Reply
1388
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
The deal I got was all of their sites - the whole catalog - for $29.99/month - pretty sweet. Now I can check out everything that Daisy Ducati has done for them - mmmmm - and Skin Diamond - and Asa Akira - and...
|
10-30-15 11:09pm
|
Reply
1389
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Let me ask one question - Do you want these sites to stay open?
If so, just accept it. Even in "harder" BDSM-themed comics, like those produced by Fansadox, they have disclaimers at the beginning these days.
|
11-06-11 12:14pm
|
Reply
1390
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
BostonPJR's Review
I think Kink.com is putting the "I did this intense stuff consentually and enjoyed it" disclaimers as a way of protecting themselves legally. It would at least be more difficult for a jury to find them guilty of brutality or whatever charges some DA wanted to bring against them if they saw that, in the end, the performers were hugging and smiling.
|
07-05-08 04:34pm
|
Reply
1391
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I won't say anything more about it except download it and enjoy it.
By the way, I saw Skin Diamond feature at my local strip club this past Thursday night. As hot as I thought she was before, I had no idea! This woman is staggeringly beautiful. She's got that model can't take your eye off her thing and her bod is just stunning!! Watching her on stage was a total thrill. I only wish I were a large Black or Latino guy, since those are the guys she most gravitated to and virtually every large Black and Latino guy sitting stage-side - and there were several ended up with their faces deep in her pussy.
|
08-27-12 07:37pm
|
Reply
1392
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Evil Angel is a GREAT site! If you haven't already seen it, I HIGHLY recommend the "Nacho Vidal Sexual Messiah" scene with Skin Diamond being trained by Nacho and Sandy of Club Sandy fame. It's hands-down my favorite porn scene of the past year.
|
08-21-12 06:46am
|
Reply
1393
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Yeah, I was not excited by this site, I have to say. There is some nice photography and they're using some models that I really like, but it's too "cool" for my tastes. I want hotter and kookier and more silly and more unpredictable generally. I like Met Art because with all the variety and with all the depth of history in the site, there's always something to enjoy. This site is just a bit too "meh" for me.
I'm not a big fan of X-Art either, which is probably a close parallel to this site.
The Kamikaze Love stuff was probably some of my favorite stuff on this site, because, while it was formulaic, it had a very definite mood - and, with the exception of John Stagliano, who is posting "Voracious" in excerpts at EvilAngel.com - nobody else is doing full feature material of this sort on a web site. Brazzers dabbled a bit in it a couple of years ago, would have done well to have continued to do so.
|
08-15-12 12:17am
|
Reply
1394
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Abel Semen's Reply
I actually find that Zalman King series quite erotic - but I really liked the original Red Shoe Diaries film as well with Brigitte Bako - mmmm - and this series has that same feel.
|
04-19-12 09:23pm
|
Comment
1395
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
|
12-12-09 07:02am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1396
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Reply
And I question your addition
Babelicious = 75 (according to you) plus SexyBabes.tv, which you say is a decent site plus other sites in the network = 69?
It's a strange method of scoring a site IMHO
|
11-11-08 09:18pm
|
Reply
1397
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Reply
Every member of this forum is, of course, entitled to their own method of scoring a site, but it's hard for me to understand how this network of sites gets a 69 from this user when Babelicious as a stand-alone site would earn a 75, and the user says that SexyBabes.tv is also a worthwhile site - and you get the whole of both sites, not a teaser of one or the other - so I would think that you would then have a base of 75 plus whatever should be given for the addition of SexyBabes.tv - and then you've got some bonus sites as well. It's hard to see that not getting you to 80 at least.
I agree with Exotics that, while you can find stuff in this network that has been posted elsewhere, sometimes in the same week, the higher quality posting of the set is in this network of sites as compared to, say, Twisty's.
The worst thing about this network of sites in my opinion - the navigation between the various sites - the whole thing would be SO much better if they connected it up in a more cohesive way, which they have mentioned as a possibility.
|
11-11-08 08:52pm
|
Reply
1398
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
MrHappy's Review
I don't really get the complaint about limited content. This site alone has 5 full photo-set updates and 1 full vid update consistently every week. The archive is also fully available and it pretty dang extensive. The content of the updates tends to be about 1/3 hardcore, 2/3 softer stuff.
Then the fact that it's part of a network of sites means that you're getting multiple updates on most days and at least one update every single day.
That's not terribly limited.
|
05-22-07 09:00pm
|
Reply
1399
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick C's Reply
Glad to do so, Nick - I thoroughly enjoy Babelicious!
|
03-17-07 09:03am
|
Review
1400
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of high quality pics and vids
Hot babes, including most prominent porn stars and adult models
Great network of related sites that members have access to
Downloadable zips of pic sets |
| Cons: |
Non-exclusive content
Structure of site creates lots of open windows to deal with
Many photo sets are overly photo-shopped |
| Bottom Line: |
I've always enjoyed this site, despite the "cons" of the non-exclusive content and the navigation issues - the windows that open every time you click somewhere are a pain the butt. I much prefer a site where you go to where you click without another open window.
But the recent addition of a new "bonus" site - Babelicious.com - really raises the value of this site. There are now 4 sites in the network - that you have access to - that update at least 5 days a week - and Babelicious.com is a great site in and of itself - and members are being told that it will not be cut loose from the network. And while the photos at Sexy Babes TV are less that 1000 px, and the older sets tend to be overly-photoshopped, the photos at Babelicious.com are up to 4000 px and delightfuly free of that unnecessary photo-shopping - and when you've got huge pics of gorgeous babes like Amy Ried and Penny Flame, who would want that crap?
SexyBabesTV was a very good site before, now, with the addition of Babelicious.com in its network, it is a fabulous deal. |
|
01-20-07 03:55pm
Replies (3)
|
