| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1351
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Reply
Dunno - They'd need to contact the record companies - they license music for non-porn movies.
|
07-19-10 05:50pm
|
Reply
1352
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Reply
Short-sighted and dumb of RK. They may have a difficult time defending this case. I remember hearing Harvey Levin of TMZ explain TMZ's lame-ass jingles by saying "We have no money to license real music so we have to make up our own ridiculous crap."
RK should have recognized the same reality.
|
07-19-10 06:44am
|
Reply
1353
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I was on another site and saw an ad for Reality Kings at an 80% discount - I clicked on it to see what the offer was and it was an offer for $9.95/mo or $70 or so for 1 year - amazing offer.
So I would expect that the offer that you received is real - it's pretty clear that a bird in the hand is worth more to these sites than 12 in the bush.
|
09-19-09 12:12am
|
Reply
1354
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
morgentau's Comment
Yeah - it's too bad. I was hoping that they would do things honestly and counter Brazzer's despicable bait-and-switch wait-6-months-before-you-can-see-them HD vid practice - but noooooo.
Instead we just get a straight-out lie from Reality Kings
|
08-22-09 12:03am
|
Reply
1355
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Yep - "Is now shot in Full HD" might mean - "We just got our cameras, but we're promoting HD anyway." Hopefully it doesn't mean, "We're not really doing anything in HD - but everybody expects it so we're putting up there anyway."
|
07-19-09 07:30pm
|
Comment
1356
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
|
07-19-09 10:48am
Replies (7)
|
Reply
1357
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
I have never received anything other than that auto-response from Reality Kings. That's their Customer Service for you.
|
03-22-09 06:55am
|
Reply
1358
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Customer Service at Reality Kings? There is not Customer Service at Reality Kings. There's a canned e-mail that repeats over and over again regardless of how much you try to get someone to address an actual issue.
If you join and have no problems, well good for you. If you join and have any problems, you're up shit creek cause they have no Customer Service.
|
12-08-08 09:34pm
|
Reply
1359
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
morecumplay's Review
My problem with the site was keeping logged in. If I were just going to the home page and downloading the newest content, I was fine. If I wanted to go to one of the individual sites and look around and download any of the material that wasn't the newest, my membership wasn't recognized and it was "start all over again" - uchhh!
I get lots of offers to join at great prices, but for me this site was just too much work.
|
11-22-08 05:20pm
|
Reply
1360
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
joeyhart1's Review
I had a 1 month membership and I had a helluva time navigating and maintaining recognition of my membership status. If I were just downloading the newest updates, no problem, but if I started looking around at sites in the network, it would ask me for my membership info again and then not recognize it. - and their e-mail "Customer Service" was crap - just a repeated canned response. Soured me on this site totally, though there's a lot of good content here.
|
09-08-08 11:14pm
|
Reply
1361
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
shooterbo's Reply
Hmmmm - nope, don't see it - oh, well.
|
08-21-08 06:49am
|
Reply
1362
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
shooterbo's Comment
Where are you seeing this? I don't see this deal at all.
|
08-20-08 09:51pm
|
Reply
1363
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Julian4's Review
I tried it for a month - it's got some good stuff, for my tastes, We Live Together, Pure 18 are probably the best parts of the network.
I found major problems having the site recognize my username & password in IE - I'd log-in OK but if I were surfing the various sites within the network, very quickly I would hit a spot where it would need me to login again and NOT recognize my username and password.
I found their e-mail Customer Service to be pure shit. They sent me a single canned response over and over. I was able to maintain consistent access using Firefox, but I really don't care for Firefox much. I won't be sticking around more than 1 month.
A site that has great stuff but where access is a pain in the ass is a site that is a pain in the ass, in my book.
|
08-14-08 09:03pm
|
Reply
1364
|
Rocco Siffredi
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Have you clicked on the site? If so, I'm wondering why you're asking the question, because when I click on the site, the "Latest Updates" are very clearly displayed.
|
11-11-11 10:44pm
|
Reply
1365
|
Rocco Siffredi
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Not too surprisingly, the Staglione-directed Fashionistas trilogy is available on Staglione's site, Buttman.com.
Rocco was the male lead, but that was Staglione's project, from the beginning and on through the subsequent Las Vegas stage show. All rights are in the hands of Staglione, as they should be.
The Fashionistas material (at least some of it) is also on the EvilAngel.com site, which also has Rocco's Evil Angel material - lots of it.
|
12-26-10 11:14am
|
Reply
1366
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
Jent's Comment
At least you get to listen to his interviews with the models and hear him give his sage advice about what a bad idea it would be for them to do hardcore and "fuck n****rs." I wouldn't rejoin this site again on a bet.
|
02-24-13 05:23pm
|
Reply
1367
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
brixze's Comment
Yeah, but on the plus side, you get to hear Ron Harris's annoying talk, talk, talk on the vids, including his racist bs when he tells models like Jana Jordan "Don't ever let them talk to you into getting fucked by a n......, no matter how much they're gonna pay you."
Needless to say, I agree with your comment - all the sites that you mentioned are superior to this one.
|
12-13-11 10:18pm
|
Comment
1368
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
|
12-27-10 05:55pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1369
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
No, they were sexy aerobics vids - but to tell you the truth, having downloaded them when I was a member of this site a long time ago, I would rather watch Met Art vids than Ron Harris' "sexy" aerobics vids - and Met Art vids are the Gold Standard of boring vids.
Unless you really want to see old soft-core stuff - and not the best soft-core stuff that you could find either - I don't recommend joining this site for the crusty old "sexy" aerobics vids.
|
07-14-10 06:40pm
|
Reply
1370
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
PosterDude's Review
This site does some great stuff, but has some real negatives for me:
1) The excess photo-shopping/painting of images - frequently takes all the erotic charge out of the pics
2) Ron himself ruins many vids. He's not a guy that tends to get women to want to get sexy. He has sexy models and if he just turned on the camera and pretended he didn't exist and focused on the camera work, the site would be hotter than it is. Nobody - including the models, it seems - wants to hear him talking.
|
12-05-07 05:36pm
|
Reply
1371
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
This is another one of those sites, like Pier999, where the painting in the pics is so extreme as to completely do away with the eroticism for me. I found the vids to be the aspect of the site that I liked the most because vids don't offer the same opportunity for messing with a woman's appearance and cause he gets in nice and close. But Ron H doesn't have nearly the skill that Alex of ALS Scan/ALS Angels does at bringing out a models' personality - watch vids of the same girls shot by both guys and 9 out of 10 times, the model is much more vibrant and sexy and FUN when she is being shot for the ALS sites.
I'm tempted to re-subsribe to this site for just a month for the vids, but then I think "Naaaaaaaa" and don't regret it.
|
06-28-07 09:01pm
|
Reply
1372
|
Sandra Shine Live
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Cruising Girls is now open - oh, and for Sandra fans - you might want to be aware that she posts - fairly often - at Freeones' message board - just search for her name and you'll easily find the thread where she posts.
I just downloaded an amazing vid of her at ALS Angels - Sandra close-up in full-screen squeezing her awesome boobs in my face is one beautiful sight, let me tell you!
|
07-16-07 08:31pm
|
Comment
1373
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
|
07-02-11 01:03am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1374
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I just did my review of the site - check it out. I'll be interested to see yours.
|
01-22-09 06:14pm
|
Review
1375
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Frequent updates - they aim for Monday-Friday. This can be a combination of new Sandy photosets, Sandy's vids, Sandy's archives of cam shows, candid photosets and friends's sets - basically photsets from other models' sites
All material is zipped - all photosets and vids.
The site design is pretty and navigation works pretty well.
For people who crave harder material from their sologirl sites, Sandy has advanced beyond teasing to showing her full bod, doing lots of girl/girl and masturbation scenes with toys, etc
Sandy is pretty involved in the site - she posts at the forum sometimes and does 1, or sometimes 2, live cam shows in a week when she's not travelling
For people who want to see Sandy sans photo-shopping, there is a good deal of material where you can see her un-Twisty-ized |
| Cons: |
I've got to say that the excitement level of the site is decreasing for my tastes. For me the issue is this - Sandy is a great tease! Sandy is not a great sexual performer. Sandy's stuff when she's wearing the craziest sexiest little outfits that show off her scrumptious bod and doing her Brazilian dancing and all - that's the hot ticket there - and if she did that mainly and then threw off some OK sexual performance, I'd be more happy than the direction that she's gone where the tease is not as present and the sexual performance is more present - and she's a much better tease than she is a sexual performer.
Navigation is mainly good, but for a solo-girl site to not have the ability to arrow "next" through a photo-set is a problem, in my opinion
Pics could be bigger - They are 1500 X 1000
Some areas of the site don't exist - there's a Bonus area - that the other reviewer thought was really hot that is empty
The VIP section of the forum was last updated 10-08 |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a well-run, professionally-run site with a good level of involvement by the model. There are frequent updates. The people who run the site are cool and care about the site and its members.
They've got 310 picture sets, 98 girl/girl sets, 43 candid sets, 106 guest sets, 206 vids, 77 web cam archives & they update with something 5 days a week.
If you've seen Sandy at ALS Angels or Twisty's and you're hot for her, you should join for a bit - 30-90 days - and you'll probably find a lot to enjoy.
Maybe this is crappy to say, but I found her hotter a couple of years ago and I preferred the softer direction, mainly because she was better at that stuff.
There are great girl/girl sexual performers - think Nella. Sandy is nowhere near that class, unfortunately.
On the other hand if she were wearing the hottest craziest booty shorts and dancing like mad to show off her Brazilian sense of rhythm and her juicy ass, I'd probably be pretty freaking entranced. Seeing her stick a dildo in her pussy for the umpteenth time is not all that entrancing. |
|
01-22-09 06:13pm
Replies (0)
|
