| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
1351
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
|
07-19-09 10:48am
Replies (7)
|
Reply
1352
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
I have never received anything other than that auto-response from Reality Kings. That's their Customer Service for you.
|
03-22-09 06:55am
|
Reply
1353
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Customer Service at Reality Kings? There is not Customer Service at Reality Kings. There's a canned e-mail that repeats over and over again regardless of how much you try to get someone to address an actual issue.
If you join and have no problems, well good for you. If you join and have any problems, you're up shit creek cause they have no Customer Service.
|
12-08-08 09:34pm
|
Reply
1354
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
morecumplay's Review
My problem with the site was keeping logged in. If I were just going to the home page and downloading the newest content, I was fine. If I wanted to go to one of the individual sites and look around and download any of the material that wasn't the newest, my membership wasn't recognized and it was "start all over again" - uchhh!
I get lots of offers to join at great prices, but for me this site was just too much work.
|
11-22-08 05:20pm
|
Reply
1355
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
joeyhart1's Review
I had a 1 month membership and I had a helluva time navigating and maintaining recognition of my membership status. If I were just downloading the newest updates, no problem, but if I started looking around at sites in the network, it would ask me for my membership info again and then not recognize it. - and their e-mail "Customer Service" was crap - just a repeated canned response. Soured me on this site totally, though there's a lot of good content here.
|
09-08-08 11:14pm
|
Reply
1356
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
shooterbo's Reply
Hmmmm - nope, don't see it - oh, well.
|
08-21-08 06:49am
|
Reply
1357
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
shooterbo's Comment
Where are you seeing this? I don't see this deal at all.
|
08-20-08 09:51pm
|
Reply
1358
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Julian4's Review
I tried it for a month - it's got some good stuff, for my tastes, We Live Together, Pure 18 are probably the best parts of the network.
I found major problems having the site recognize my username & password in IE - I'd log-in OK but if I were surfing the various sites within the network, very quickly I would hit a spot where it would need me to login again and NOT recognize my username and password.
I found their e-mail Customer Service to be pure shit. They sent me a single canned response over and over. I was able to maintain consistent access using Firefox, but I really don't care for Firefox much. I won't be sticking around more than 1 month.
A site that has great stuff but where access is a pain in the ass is a site that is a pain in the ass, in my book.
|
08-14-08 09:03pm
|
Reply
1359
|
Rocco Siffredi
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Have you clicked on the site? If so, I'm wondering why you're asking the question, because when I click on the site, the "Latest Updates" are very clearly displayed.
|
11-11-11 10:44pm
|
Reply
1360
|
Rocco Siffredi
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Not too surprisingly, the Staglione-directed Fashionistas trilogy is available on Staglione's site, Buttman.com.
Rocco was the male lead, but that was Staglione's project, from the beginning and on through the subsequent Las Vegas stage show. All rights are in the hands of Staglione, as they should be.
The Fashionistas material (at least some of it) is also on the EvilAngel.com site, which also has Rocco's Evil Angel material - lots of it.
|
12-26-10 11:14am
|
Reply
1361
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
Jent's Comment
At least you get to listen to his interviews with the models and hear him give his sage advice about what a bad idea it would be for them to do hardcore and "fuck n****rs." I wouldn't rejoin this site again on a bet.
|
02-24-13 05:23pm
|
Reply
1362
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
brixze's Comment
Yeah, but on the plus side, you get to hear Ron Harris's annoying talk, talk, talk on the vids, including his racist bs when he tells models like Jana Jordan "Don't ever let them talk to you into getting fucked by a n......, no matter how much they're gonna pay you."
Needless to say, I agree with your comment - all the sites that you mentioned are superior to this one.
|
12-13-11 10:18pm
|
Comment
1363
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
|
12-27-10 05:55pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1364
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
No, they were sexy aerobics vids - but to tell you the truth, having downloaded them when I was a member of this site a long time ago, I would rather watch Met Art vids than Ron Harris' "sexy" aerobics vids - and Met Art vids are the Gold Standard of boring vids.
Unless you really want to see old soft-core stuff - and not the best soft-core stuff that you could find either - I don't recommend joining this site for the crusty old "sexy" aerobics vids.
|
07-14-10 06:40pm
|
Reply
1365
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
PosterDude's Review
This site does some great stuff, but has some real negatives for me:
1) The excess photo-shopping/painting of images - frequently takes all the erotic charge out of the pics
2) Ron himself ruins many vids. He's not a guy that tends to get women to want to get sexy. He has sexy models and if he just turned on the camera and pretended he didn't exist and focused on the camera work, the site would be hotter than it is. Nobody - including the models, it seems - wants to hear him talking.
|
12-05-07 05:36pm
|
Reply
1366
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
This is another one of those sites, like Pier999, where the painting in the pics is so extreme as to completely do away with the eroticism for me. I found the vids to be the aspect of the site that I liked the most because vids don't offer the same opportunity for messing with a woman's appearance and cause he gets in nice and close. But Ron H doesn't have nearly the skill that Alex of ALS Scan/ALS Angels does at bringing out a models' personality - watch vids of the same girls shot by both guys and 9 out of 10 times, the model is much more vibrant and sexy and FUN when she is being shot for the ALS sites.
I'm tempted to re-subsribe to this site for just a month for the vids, but then I think "Naaaaaaaa" and don't regret it.
|
06-28-07 09:01pm
|
Reply
1367
|
Sandra Shine Live
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Cruising Girls is now open - oh, and for Sandra fans - you might want to be aware that she posts - fairly often - at Freeones' message board - just search for her name and you'll easily find the thread where she posts.
I just downloaded an amazing vid of her at ALS Angels - Sandra close-up in full-screen squeezing her awesome boobs in my face is one beautiful sight, let me tell you!
|
07-16-07 08:31pm
|
Comment
1368
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
|
07-02-11 01:03am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1369
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I just did my review of the site - check it out. I'll be interested to see yours.
|
01-22-09 06:14pm
|
Review
1370
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Frequent updates - they aim for Monday-Friday. This can be a combination of new Sandy photosets, Sandy's vids, Sandy's archives of cam shows, candid photosets and friends's sets - basically photsets from other models' sites
All material is zipped - all photosets and vids.
The site design is pretty and navigation works pretty well.
For people who crave harder material from their sologirl sites, Sandy has advanced beyond teasing to showing her full bod, doing lots of girl/girl and masturbation scenes with toys, etc
Sandy is pretty involved in the site - she posts at the forum sometimes and does 1, or sometimes 2, live cam shows in a week when she's not travelling
For people who want to see Sandy sans photo-shopping, there is a good deal of material where you can see her un-Twisty-ized |
| Cons: |
I've got to say that the excitement level of the site is decreasing for my tastes. For me the issue is this - Sandy is a great tease! Sandy is not a great sexual performer. Sandy's stuff when she's wearing the craziest sexiest little outfits that show off her scrumptious bod and doing her Brazilian dancing and all - that's the hot ticket there - and if she did that mainly and then threw off some OK sexual performance, I'd be more happy than the direction that she's gone where the tease is not as present and the sexual performance is more present - and she's a much better tease than she is a sexual performer.
Navigation is mainly good, but for a solo-girl site to not have the ability to arrow "next" through a photo-set is a problem, in my opinion
Pics could be bigger - They are 1500 X 1000
Some areas of the site don't exist - there's a Bonus area - that the other reviewer thought was really hot that is empty
The VIP section of the forum was last updated 10-08 |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a well-run, professionally-run site with a good level of involvement by the model. There are frequent updates. The people who run the site are cool and care about the site and its members.
They've got 310 picture sets, 98 girl/girl sets, 43 candid sets, 106 guest sets, 206 vids, 77 web cam archives & they update with something 5 days a week.
If you've seen Sandy at ALS Angels or Twisty's and you're hot for her, you should join for a bit - 30-90 days - and you'll probably find a lot to enjoy.
Maybe this is crappy to say, but I found her hotter a couple of years ago and I preferred the softer direction, mainly because she was better at that stuff.
There are great girl/girl sexual performers - think Nella. Sandy is nowhere near that class, unfortunately.
On the other hand if she were wearing the hottest craziest booty shorts and dancing like mad to show off her Brazilian sense of rhythm and her juicy ass, I'd probably be pretty freaking entranced. Seeing her stick a dildo in her pussy for the umpteenth time is not all that entrancing. |
|
01-22-09 06:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1371
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I added a comment to the review that you're commenting about. Something about the review flat-out stank, in my opinion, so I double checked since my membership to this site is about to eclipse.
This bit about "bonus stes have been added" - where? Click on the "Bonus" page on this site and it is completely blank.
I asked the reviewer to ezplain the comment, but I don't expect him to. I think it was a BS advertisement and not a review, which is too bad, since this is a good site and deserves to be given kudos for it's actual merits and not to be overly hyped by BS advertisements posing as reviews.
|
01-20-09 05:50pm
|
Reply
1372
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
KWH1071's Review
One thing I've got to point out that adds to the questionable nature of this review is the comment about "bonus sites and other features have been added."
I'm currently a member. My membership is about to elapse. There is a "Bonus" page, but when I click on it, it is blank - there is no "bonus" content. Please explain what you mean by your comment.
Otherwise I've got to conclude that this is a BS advertisement instead of an honest review.
There is a lot good about this site and it doesn't need to be overly hyped.
|
01-20-09 05:46pm
|
Reply
1373
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Yes - as a member of her previous site, I received an e-mail when she started this site. A lot of the material being presented in the new site is licensed material that she did for other sites, such as Ron Harris' sites and Suze.net and FTV Girls. The only site that does really unique material that I have not seen re-presented on this site is her ALS Angels material - ALS are pretty into having their material on their sites being 100% exclusive.
She is also doing some unique material for this site, but not a large amount. The material she is doing more is more hard-core than what she used to do, but also frequently not that interesting.
If you like Sandy, I would say that it's worth a short-term join to see what all is here. I'm not going to claim that you're going to want to stay for many months, though.
|
06-04-08 10:59pm
|
Reply
1374
|
Sandy's Fantasies
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Given 21st Sextury's comments about their DOS attacks coming from their main competitor, I wonder if there is a little porn war going on between 21st Sextury and DDF. What was the reason for this site except for DDF to prove that a bunch of the 21st Sextury material was produced by DDF?
That's OK if DDF was going to keep this site as a real updated site. Now - not having updated the site for almost 7 months, it just makes DDF look lame. They ought to shut it down or give it as a bonus to people that join the premium DDF sites.
|
05-03-08 09:39am
|
Comment
1375
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
|
09-19-15 06:05am
Replies (0)
|
