Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : PinkPanther (0)  

Feedback:   All (1643)  |   Reviews (49)  |   Comments (197)  |   Replies (1397)

Other:   Replies Received (941)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1601-1625 of 1647 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1601
Visit Crissy Moran

Crissy Moran
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Crissy is hot!
While Crissy is now retired, the site is still adding 1 photoset a week
Nice variety of Crissy material - a whole section of her fetish material - several bondage photosets - plus lez and some material of Crissy having hetero sex - seeing her incredible bootie bouncing while she's being fucked is a sweet sight!
Lots of bonus sites - LonnieWaters.com, NataliaCruze.com, AmateursGoneBad.com & GlamourGirlsGoneBad.com
Cons: Crissy is retired. When it comes to a site focused on a particular model and that model is retired, well the level of interaction with that model is going to be nil - of course, that is the case with this site.
b/g Hard-core material is limited - 6 photosets and 2 vids
Non-exclusive content. There is not a lot of exclusive content in this whole collection of sites. Probably the AmateursGoneBad.com stuff has been seen the least - and they have some hot stuff there - Nautica Thorn for example
Bottom Line: If you've got a jones for Crissy and you haven't been a member of sites such as Twisty's or SexyBabes.tv, you're going to be more impressed than if you have seen her work at those other sites, because you'll have seen a lot of the stuff here before.

But with the sheer quantity of quality content available through joining this site, I've got to give it at least an 80 - If you've got the mind-set where bonus sites count to value, there's quite a bit of value here - I was happy to see the number of porn star shoots included in the AmateurGirls site - these are sets with lower production values, of course, but when you're talking about babes as hot as Nautica Thorn, for example, it's fun to see her simpler photo sets.

On the other hand, the lack of exclusive content is keeping me from staying past 2 months - virtually everything here is out there far and wide on other sites - for people who aren't members of other sites, this is a fine place to find it.

Navigation is simple - very few bells and whistles. Some links on Crissy's site are glitchy.

If Crissy ever decides that being a devout Christian and showing us her fine bod aren't a huge contradiction or she just misses being naughty, I for one will welcome this hot babe back with completely open arms. Crissy is hot!

05-28-07  10:46am

Replies (4)
Reply
1602
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of 4nic8's Review

Expensive? That depends on how long you want to join for - at $99/year, it's damned inexpensive - especially when you consider the amount of content that they put up.

05-25-07  07:45am

Reply
1603
Visit Next Door Nikki

Next Door Nikki
(0)
Reply of nygiants03's Review

I've been a member at various times - Nikki's damned hot, though I have to say that I'm not as hot for her these days as I was at one time - the main justification for the price is the size of the site - she's been doing this for a few years and with weekly updates at least, most of the time, there's a lot of Nikki material here.

My biggest complaint about the PF sites is the zip sets used as upsell - the prices of the regular sites is high enough that they really ought to include the zip material in the regular site - that's my opinion, anyway.

That's an issue throughout the NN-model world, though it's a trend being bucked by models that are doing a lot more full-nudity and even HC material in their (formerly) tease sites.


05-23-07  07:04pm

Reply
1604
Visit Aria Giovanni

Aria Giovanni
(0)
Reply of SnowDude's Comment

Good question, SnowDude - it would make a good poll, in fact

How would you define hardcore?

This came up on the NNBoards forum the other day. Naughty Girl Sandy has decided to put all her goods out there for her members - full nudity, including pussy display, with scorchingly hot masturbation and girl/girl photo sets and vids. She did a cam show last night that blew my mind with her pussy sitting on top of the cam, basically, while she thrust her fingers deep inside.

To me, that was hardcore - and she's calling it hardcore. For other people, unless a guy is drilling her ass while choking her, it's all softcore.


05-22-07  09:12pm

Reply
1605
Visit NS All Access

NS All Access
(0)
Reply of exotics4me's Review

Agreed - this is a really juicy site that is held back by a hideously poor navigation system. New Sensations has had most "name" porn babes coming through their hands at one time or another, but finding all the good stuff on their site is a struggle and a half. Once you find it, though, there is a lot to enjoy, though I found their vids rather repetitious after a while.

I'm often tempted to go back for more diving through their archives though and probably will at some point.


05-22-07  09:05pm

Reply
1606
Visit Sexy Babes

Sexy Babes
(0)
Reply of MrHappy's Review

I don't really get the complaint about limited content. This site alone has 5 full photo-set updates and 1 full vid update consistently every week. The archive is also fully available and it pretty dang extensive. The content of the updates tends to be about 1/3 hardcore, 2/3 softer stuff.

Then the fact that it's part of a network of sites means that you're getting multiple updates on most days and at least one update every single day.

That's not terribly limited.


05-22-07  09:00pm

Reply
1607
Visit Babelicious

Babelicious
(0)
Reply of Nick C's Reply

Glad to hear it, Nick - I continue to enjoy this site a lot and look forward to seeing it get even better.

I like the navigation of this site - I like the way the site uses members' ratings to push and pull you to check out other hot stuff.


05-17-07  06:14am

Reply
1608
N/A Reply of Jay G's Poll

Models are definitely most important, but the other factors can't be neglected either.

I was a member of Jannah Burnham's site for one month. As soon as I became a member and realized that the site wasn't allowing members to save any pics, I knew I wouldn't stay a member no matter what else was going on.

Then there's resolution of pics and vids - quality standards at many sites are quite high, so all sites that are charging more than a nominal fee better be paying attention to this - there's just no excuse for posting pics and vids that aren't high res and expecting anybody to pay for it at this point.

Then there's "heat" and this is very subjective. The best example, for my taste, of a site that gets the Great Models and High Res parts right and the "heat" part neglected is InFocus Girls. I don't seem to be the only one since most reviews mention that this site is just lacking that "oomph" or "heat" factor - a deal-killer for me, despite the other things they get right.

Price - yeah, price is a factor - if a site is going to be charging a premium price, they damned well better be delivering premium content and lots of it. But, personally, I'm not going to stay a member of an inexpensive site if I don't find myself excited by what I find there.


05-17-07  06:10am

Reply
1609
Visit Mya Diamond

Mya Diamond
(0)
Reply of exotics4me's Review

It's funny - I found more tech issues with Eve Angel's site than this one during my short membership (1 month) at that site and I found very little involvement by Eve as compared to Mya, who is sporadic but there. I never saw any real involvement by Eve - I guess that must have changed.

05-15-07  06:49am

Reply
1610
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

For me it depends on the site. I'll watch vids full screen if they look great full screen. If they are going to look better smaller, I'll watch them smaller.

05-09-07  07:24am

Comment
1611
Visit Playboy Plus

Playboy Plus
(0)

Classy Treatment of Trial Members

Since I posted a comment about a miserable rip-off experience I had with a trial membership at Kat Young's website, I figured I ought to post about an excellent experience I had with a trial membership at PlayboyPlus.com. I've gotten trial memberships here a few times - a nice deal $2.95/5 days and you get to look at all the juicy stuff they have, save hot pics, watch their vids, etc.

Just now I called to cancel a trial membership that I had created a couple of days ago and asked about the difference between this site and the Cyberclub - the customer service rep set me up with a comp 3-week membership to the Cyberclub so I could see for myself - now that's classy!

05-07-07  07:04am

Replies (1)
Reply
1612
Visit Sweet Models

Sweet Models
(0)
Reply of Denner's Review

I agree - for me it was a teaser for 1-by-Day. I enjoyed a brief membership at Sweet Models enough to try a 5-month membership at 1-by-Day, which is a much better run site, being the flagship and all.

I found periodic links and other technical issues at Sweet Models, though problems would be cleared up in a day or two.


05-06-07  11:21am

Reply
1613
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

To me, it's a question of keeping my interest more than anything else. I like cam shows, so a site like Phil-Flash.com, which I rated extremely high, that has frequent HOT updates, adds bonus material to keep me glad that I'm a member and has lots of cam shows, which are events that you have to be there for to get the full effect, well I ain't leaving.

ALS Scans uses a different incentive - their vids are only available for 1-2 months, then they're gone for quite a long time, so since I love their vids I maintain my membership on an ongoing basis.

If a site gives me no special benefit to maintain membership on an ongoing basis, though, I'm more likely to leave and come back when the mood strikes me again.


05-05-07  06:43pm

Reply
1614
Visit Asshole Fever

Asshole Fever
(0)
Reply of cakeweasel's Review

So THAT's how they're making money with these sites!

I've got this site as part of the network available through my membership to DP Fanatics. My sex-site-spam definitely increased considerably after I joined, but I didn't have the means that you did to connect the dots in any clear way.

I like the network of sites, though I can't say that I've spent much time in this one.


05-05-07  06:36pm

Reply
1615
Visit Kat Young

Kat Young
(0)
Reply of exotics4me's Reply

I wouldn't join now with someone else's money, never mind my own!

As far as I'm concerned this site is a complete rip-off - they didn't even have the decency to respond to my e-mail to them - join at your own risk, that's what I've got to say about this site!

And I still don't see the reviewer's special being offered - I just did a clean-up of my system this morning, so I dunno what's up. I wouldn't be interested in taking advantage of it anyway, after finding out what a rip-off their trial membership is. Why would I expect to be ripped off less if I gave them more money?

My view - if a site is going to limit access in their trial memberships, they ought to spell those limits out clearly, otherwise it's a flat-out rip-off and is a site to be avoided like the plague, in my book.


05-05-07  06:09pm

Reply
1616
Visit Lisa Boyle

Lisa Boyle
(0)
Reply of BostonPJR's Review

Wow! I just clicked on Lisa's site for the first time in a helluva long time and it's changed big-time - new name - now www.flauntgirls.com, new price, new look, looks like a bunch of new content.

Good for her, the old site was sliding into the abyss for a while.


05-04-07  09:55pm

Comment
1617
Visit Kat Young

Kat Young
(0)

Special Price Not Working

The note says that there's a special price being offered of $17.99/month, but I don't see that option.

I am going to try this site out for $2.95/3 days because Kat is so freaking cute!

Aaaaaannd - now that I bit on the trial offer, let me tell you that it's a complete ripoff!! You can't download anything, you can't view anything - all you can do is "Browse" and see 10 second teasers - less than what you see at the home page without pay 1 cent - what a complete ripoff!!

I let them know that they better refund me in full or expect a chargeback to my credit card company.

05-04-07  07:21pm

Replies (3)
Review
1618
Visit Mya Diamond

Mya Diamond
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Consistent, Daily Updates
Great quality photosets & vids (usually alternating days)
Pics are huge (1365X2048) and vids are sumptuous enough to be great to watch full-screen while not being too ravenous on your hard-drive - a typical 15 minute vid is about 150 mb
Great price for such a wealth of material
Some interaction with Mya at forum
Some HC shoots & vids
I like the roaming camera style in the vids that allows you to explore My's great bod from all angles.
Cons: With solo-girl sites, since it is about THE model, I crave a bit more interaction, would love a periodic cam show to be added to the features of the site - this is more a wish-list item than a real con, since the site isn't advertising this feature.
Bottom Line: Mya Diamond is a unique looking woman - I always say she reminds me of a sexy vampire with that long face, prominent jaw, very distinctive Eastern European nose and eyes.

She's got a fantastic bod - GREAT legs, wonderful tight ass and really nice, natural boobs.

I love the way she moves. It's no wonder she is a top adult model in Europe because her every move is conscious and very sexy, though I think her facial features are too unique for her to achieve the same success in the US.

This is Mya's site and she obviously is engaged with it, does a periodic blog, periodically posts in the forum. There are about 30 other models that have had sets on the site also, some with Mya, some solo or girl-girl without Mya.

I think this is a better site than Eve Angel's site, which sometimes was inconsistent in the updating and doesn't have the same level of engagement by Eve as this site does with Mya.

There's a lot here, given the daily updates and its all quite high quality, so if you like Mya's distinctive look, I would highly recommend this site. I've never seen better material with her elsewhere, including in the Private films I've seen her in.

04-27-07  07:39am

Replies (4)
Reply
1619
Visit In Focus Girls

In Focus Girls
(0)
Reply of iporn's Review

I agree about the lack of passion, sensuality, imagination - I felt like I should have been a lot more excited about it than I was.

04-23-07  06:33pm

Reply
1620
Visit Danni.com

Danni.com
(0)
Reply of King's Review

When were you last a member? For the last few weeks, this site has been hyping a picture of an open lock in their member's area with "Goodbye DRM" underneath the pic.

I believe that DRM's are a thing of the past at this site.


04-17-07  12:00am

Reply
1621
Visit Fassinating

Fassinating
(0)
Reply of wiild1's Review

I'm a member of DP Fanatics, which is part of the same network. When I joined that site, I thought that they were pretty clear as to what I would be getting right away and what I would have access to later. I'm definitely happy with how that has gone, since I really like the 21st Sextury style and especially their pics.

But after reading your review, I checked out the "Join Now" page of this site. I couldn't make heads or tails out of what they're saying to understand what I would and would not be getting - lots of options, none of them very well spelled out.


04-14-07  03:39pm

Review
1622
Visit Master Speaks

Master Speaks
(0)

69.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Daily Updates

Great Variety of material - leans towards BDSM and Hentai, but there are other kinds of updates, including old Tales From the Crpyt comics, Heavy Metal comics, celeb-based comics, etc

There's a section of photo-sets that are quite good, mainly because of the hotness of the women
Cons: Navigation - there is none, basically. New updates are added onto a single comics page with no rhyme or reason and only vague descriptions.

If you're looking for a particular type of material, or a particular artist, or a particular set that you liked before, you've got a chore ahead of you - nothing about this site makes it easy to locate anything.

The live-model photoset section doesn't seem to be updated any longer.

The quality of the images varies - some good, some average.
Bottom Line: Navigation is a big deal with many members of this forum - if it's a big deal for you, stay away from this site - it would drive you insane.

If you've got the kind of brain that finds appeal in a jumble, that finds enjoyment in digging in and discovering what's there, this site is kind of fun.

For me, the bottom line is % of hot stuff, and I find the % of hot stuff here to be about 40%, which is not bad because there's a lot here and with a little digging - looking at the various sets, I always find something that's a real turn-on.

The biggest frustration to me is the quality variation. The price of $19.95/month is perfectly reasonable for a site with multiple daily updates and I would be inclined to stay longer, and would certainly give it a higher rating if the quality of the images was consistently excellent.

In fact, the quality rarely gets above good, in terms of size of images, etc, and sometimes it is lacking, mainly in size, so the dialogue balloons can be difficult to read, not a good thing with a comics site.

But I like this site in a lot of ways, especially the multiple daily updates and the variety being posted, so I hope they make improvements in quality and navigation.

04-13-07  10:51am

Replies (0)
Reply
1623
Visit Dream Kelly

Dream Kelly
(0)
Reply of troglodite's Review

Thanks for the heads-up. I'm glad to hear that they're doing some good things with this site. I had thought that it was dying.

Kelly's gorgeous - I've seen candids of her at internet model conventions and she is as hot or hotter when she isn't posing.


04-09-07  07:35pm

Reply
1624
Visit 1 By Day

1 By Day
(0)
Reply of Denner's Review

Agreed - this is a really nice site and is getting better. I've been a member for about 2 months and they have lots of hot models and I like the fetishes that they tend to focus on (like nurses and they did a really hot police interrogation piece recenly).

I would like the vids to be even bigger so that they look good full screen. The vids currently look a bit small to me and don't look good zoomed to full-screen.

The other criticism I have is sylistic. The way that they choose to photoshop their pics give things a shellac-like surface that I find off-putting.

On the definite plus side, they are VERY responsive to comments. Any comment e-mail that I have sent and any other needs that I have had to contact them have been responded to within 2 or 3 days.


04-07-07  09:46am

Reply
1625
N/A Reply of Denner's Reply

I agree with this - being a recipient of two mis-trust ratings and wondering where that comes from.

It would be helpful to us users that are doing the reviews to see why other users thing that we are not to be trusted.

Hopefully the comments would be good, constructive criticism.


04-07-07  09:39am


Shown : 1601-1625 of 1647 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.55 seconds.