| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1051
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
I did a month join a few days ago. I'm unimpressed. I thought that the vids downloaded at Videobox looked better - that ought to be the only reason needed for being unimpressed.
But I'll go on:
Download speeds aren't all that for me - I'm getting slower d/l speeds than I did at VideoBox, which I had tried for a month.
They don't have the "make your own clip" feature, which was rather fun to play with at VideoBox - especially if you had a great scene of Jenavieve Jolie walking away from the camera and you could find other ass clips of her - mmmmm!!
They don't have the reviews as VideoBox does, which are entertaining - sometimes annoying - sometimes helpful.
They don't have as large a selection as VideoBox, though with over 5,000 DVD's, there's no doubt that there is more than you can gather in a single month.
|
05-05-09 06:07pm
|
Comment
1052
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
|
05-04-09 11:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1053
|
Karla Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
Yeah, Karla's looking better all the time, in my opinion - and while they've gone further in the photo-shopping "let's smooth out her skin tone to where she looks like a sand woman" in some sets, they seem to have backed down on that lately - the newest set is sensational.
Pamela Spice is Colombian, I believe, and a real jewel - though the updates aren't dated, so I believe that it's now a dead site.
Cierra is damned cute and Serena has a great bubble butt and is generally very sexy.
|
05-03-09 04:47pm
|
Comment
1054
|
Karla Spice
(0)
|
|
05-02-09 08:12am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
1055
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
|
05-02-09 07:51am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1056
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I enjoy fully clothed tease if it's the right girl in the right clothes, filmed the right way, etc.
There are certain celebs I can think of that can get me off just walking around in short skirts.
I'm a fan of pro wrestling and was watching a match the other day from 1999 or so and Pamela Anderson accompanied one of the wrestlers to the ring - OMG!! Just watching her walk around in a very low cut slinky white dress that had slits for her legs and caressed her ass was incredibly arousing.
At the same time, I like all kinds of levels of sex stuff if it's done right.
|
05-01-09 07:00am
|
Reply
1057
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Biggest con from my 1-month membership experience - even more than the plethora of fake-cock sites - they need new or additional servers - download speed was mainly atrocious.
|
04-21-09 06:13pm
|
Reply
1058
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I'd follow the great American tradition - I'd go buy an assault rifle and go on a murderous rampage!
And before anybody gets all upset, let me assure you - I'm kidding - totally kidding!
How do I know how I'd react? It hasn't happened yet. The thought of it hasn't caused me to black out in terror, but that doesn't mean much until it really happens.
|
04-20-09 06:54pm
|
Reply
1059
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I do believe that you are correct. Looking at comments on her site, it was noted that the site opened January 2007, but the site currently shows the first update dated July 2007, so it looks like they chopped off the first 6 months to use as "new" updates.
|
04-19-09 08:36am
|
Reply
1060
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Balibalo's Reply
It's not your fault - The company that run these sites are a pack of thieves presenting old material as new - any shame is on them, not you.
|
04-18-09 06:44pm
|
Reply
1061
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Balibalo's Review
This site and Mya Diamond.com are both dead sites - they just recycle the old material over and over again to produce "new" updates. If you go to Freeones.com and look under Eve Angel and Mya Diamond, you can see samples from the sets that they continuously recycle with their original copyright dates.
|
04-18-09 06:21pm
|
Review
1062
|
Evil Angel Network
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mammoth Network - I joined through the JonniDarkoXXX.com - that's not listed at PU, which is why I'm doing my review at this site's listing - there are individual sites for most of the active EA directors, Buttman.com is Stagliano's site, and they also have sites geared to particular niches - cockjugglers, euroangels, etc - which collect the same material along those niche lines
Frequent updates to the network - many of the sites are updating once a week, Buttman.com is now updating 3 times a week, every day there is something new to see and it's not crap - it's really good stuff
Video quality is pretty good. EA directors tends to favor a raw style, so their stuff is not as "clean" as Jules Jordan, for instance, but I watch the vids at 200% on a large monitor and it looks good to me - dimensions show as 640 X 480 - Buttman.com is posting some HD vids
New feature - zips of all photos & vid grab sets
Recently had first webcast |
| Cons: |
There's an unweildy quality to the network because of the multiple forms of organization - by niche and by director. They seem to be working to get this under control - they're just now trying to get performers' names on all vids so you can search by performers' names across the network - but it doesn't work perfectly at this point. I give them points for moving in the right direction
Getting a handle on updates can also be confusing - what shows as most recent updates on one site might not be the same as what shows as most recent updates on another site - so for maximum enjoyment, you have to be open to that kind of exploration.
Exploration is also needed to get the best price for the network. I joined through JonniDarkoXXX, as I said - If I had known, I could have joined through Buttman.com and probably gotten a better deal - they just lowered the multi-month price there, so perhaps I would have missed it anyway - but again, this is an example of the unwieldiness. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like Evil Angel's balls-to-the-wall style, this is a great way to get access to a wide range of their stuff - and if you join on a mutlti-month basis, they make it a great deal.
For whatever reason, this network seems to be a current focus of EA - so they're working on making significant improvements - the labelling of vids has gotten much better within the last week or two, the photo & screen grab zips just began this week, they just did their first webcast event on 4/10/09 - and they had the archive up for viewing within a few days.
Excitement factor of the material, generous updates and forward motion quality-wise of the site are 3 key factors to me. If they go to higher res vids across the network, label the HD vids more clearly and work out some of the glitchy and unweildy aspects, I would rate them higher.
Just to lay out the amount of material here:
JonniDarko's site - 20 scenes plus - updates weekly
Nacho Vidal's site - 120 scenes plus - updates a bit more sporadically
Buttman.com - 220 scenes plus - updates 3 times a week - usually 1 exclusive scene for the site a week
AssJazzDuro - 20 scenes plus - updates sporadically
Jay Sin's site - 40 scenes plus - updating multiple times of the week - Jay Sin's stuff was the real "find" for me - candy-colored fantasy filth - very innovative, arty, new - very exciting
Manuel Ferrara's site - 60 scenes plus - updating weekly - great stuff here - gorgeous women!
Justin Slayer's site - 140 scenes plus - updates sporadically
John Leslie's site - 140 scenes plus - updates sporadically
Joey Silvera's site - 240 scenes plus - updates weekly more or less - a chunk of his stuff is she-male material - though not recent updates
Christoph Clark's site - 220 scenes plus - updates weekly
Jake Malone's site - 60 scenes plus - updates weekly
Rocco Siffredi's site - 300 scenes plus - no updates since 7/16/08
So hopefully this gives a picture of this pretty large network - unlike other networks, there's not 1 or 2 quality sites and the rest is dross. There's hours of quality porn to check out here.
I don't use a download manager, and I'm not a site vacuum-cleaning guy, so I can't comment on how that technology would function with this network - I've never run into download limits here, but I download a couple of scenes a day, so I'm not exactly testing the limits.
There is a page to send comments and while I haven't received personal responses to all comments that I've sent, it's clear that they are reading them and paying attention to member comments and upgrading the network accordingly.
John S is the only director that I've seen making himself directly accessible to members to comment on Buttman.com and he's very interested in member feedback, though he's got his own obsessions that he's going to follow through on - which is as it should be, in my opinion. |
|
04-18-09 09:11am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1063
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
Given that their vids have natural sound and don't have the sound of clicking cameras or directors, I think that "yes, they do the vid and photo shoot separately - same location & outfits - I'm sure they have dupes when there's messiness involved." If there's anyone here that knows more the methodology of doing these kind of photo/vid shoots, they ought to chime in.
|
04-17-09 09:06pm
|
Reply
1064
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
This decrease in updates wouldn't be as bad if a) they stopped advertising 2 updates per day, b) they added an extra update when one of their "Jokes" sets was the set posted, or c) they added an extra update when they posted an ALS Scan set posted - I've got to give props once again to ALS Scan - when they post a set from 1 By Day, it's an extra - it's not a replacement to the ALS Scan material that would be posted that day. In my view if a site is going to a flag-ship site - as ALS Scan is - as One By Day is - and if they're going to charge premium prices - you have to join One-By-Day for a full year to bring the monthly price below $20/month - then they ought to be held to quite a high standard of performance.
If they've got one main guy as they photographer, and he's stretched doing work on their other sites, they ought to do what Suze Randall did and cultivate a group of contributing photographers - have those others fill out the updates on the site to give more value to the members.
|
04-17-09 07:30pm
|
Reply
1065
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Review
Screen stills? You think so? I don't. I think that they are photo sets that go along with, but are separate from the vids. They don't give the appearance of screen stills to me.
I would compare them to the photosets that you see at Pix & Video or One By Day - both of those sites have vids that go along with the photo sets, but the photo sets are not screen stills. For comparison, there are bonus sites to Pix & Video where they do have screen still sets - which look quite different - and much lower quality.
|
04-17-09 05:52pm
|
Reply
1066
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Man, that's the weakest excuse I've ever heard - "some reviewers at Porn Users are saying bad things about our site so we're going to cut our updates by half!" I can't imagine that they would be so petty or dumb. It's a premium-priced site and the flagship of their brand, so it doesn't seem like a wise move - but perhaps they looked at how going to 2 updates a day had affected their membership and just didn't see a difference between joins at 1 update a day and joins at 2 updates a day - so why not save the money and cut back to one a day?
|
04-17-09 06:58am
|
Comment
1067
|
Premium Pass
(0)
|
|
04-15-09 04:18am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1068
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
insomniacxxx's Review
The other negative about this site is the download speed. I tried it for a month and my first download was at quite a decent speed - after that -blecccchh!! This sites average download speeds are horribly slow
|
04-14-09 11:09pm
|
Reply
1069
|
Butt Man
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
It looks like they changed their pricing completely from the TBP-listed pricing. The pricing stated now is:
29.95 first month - recurring at $14.95
95.50 year-long join (7.95/month)
|
04-12-09 10:47pm
|
Reply
1070
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Damn - stupid thing to do with a network that needs more sites and scenes rather than less - at this rate, Mofos is going to take a year or more to be worthwhile
|
04-12-09 05:54pm
|
Reply
1071
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
It's hot generally, though when they have Eastern Europeans speaking English phonetically, as in some Private productions, that just sounds silly & a bit distracting.
|
04-11-09 07:25pm
|
Reply
1072
|
Evil Angel Network
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
That was probably the most amazing web cast I've never seen - 2 1/2 hours of a shoot that was invaded early on by Aiden Starr and then by various EA folks who couldn't keep their hands off Dana Dearmond - can't blame them. John Stagliano is a genius - get the right girls - get them going crazy and ask nicely for what you want, but mainly let them use their imaginations and filthiest initiative - and then just enjoy it. Lots of face-slapping, hair-pulling, spitting, boob-grabbing, face-sitting, clothespin-pussy-displays and the most body-rocking orgasms I've ever seen. The two women who came in with complete intensity ended looking totally stoned, smiling and utterly relaxed and lovely - loved it!
|
04-10-09 07:33pm
|
Reply
1073
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mediafan's Comment
Yeah, a was a member for a month when they first opened and had a $10/month deal - when they opened, they started with a bunch of good stuff, but then they really didn't add much great stuff - it's the kind of site that would be worth joining once a year for a month.
|
04-09-09 06:06pm
|
Reply
1074
|
Hardcore Max
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Did you notice the location of the website? Cyprus - ha ha - that's appropriate.
|
04-08-09 09:54pm
|
Comment
1075
|
Evil Angel Network
(0)
|
|
04-07-09 08:43pm
Replies (1)
|
