| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1026
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Having been a member for a few days, I can't say that my experience gets better from what I described above. There's a lot of really mediocre stuff here, the vids don't look very good when you finally download them, numbers of vids can't be downloaded and they don't respond to e-mails. Whoof!
|
05-23-09 10:17am
|
Reply
1027
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
It seems like this site is aiming to overtake VideoBox - that kind of competition is a great thing for porn fans. I'm still on a one-month join of this site and keep comparing the updates to this site as compared to the updates at VideoBox. This site wins the Update Challenge for my tastes every single day. They're making a run in quantity of DVD's too - they just announced that from May 25-May 29, they'll be uploading 6 DVD's a day.
They need to fine-tune the quality of the vids, in my opinion. They need to add some kind of voting or comment area. VideoBox will still have their clip feature - and I'm not recommending that this site copy-cat VideoBox to that extent, but they probably ought to think about what fun proprietary feature they could develop to take them out of the real of just another DVD site - or they could just concentrate on having the very best DVD's available and leave the other stuff alone.
They're doing a lot right.
|
05-23-09 10:13am
|
Comment
1028
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
05-22-09 09:11pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
1029
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
|
05-22-09 06:30pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1030
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Hbe22bbm's Review
As others have said, this review is lacking anything that makes it a review
Definitely best bang for the buck - why? what makes it so good?
Great search engine - really? what about this search engine makes it so good?
Good video quality (premium) - good - not excellent? For a 98 score? Does it look good full-screen? Is it DVD quality?
Fleshing out the things that you do say, however minimal they are, would make your review more valuable to other people that read it.
|
05-22-09 06:16pm
|
Reply
1031
|
Spears Fever
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Absolutely - that Susana Spears workout vid set at Twisty's is one of my all-time faves of her. I don't recall ever coming across The Next Girl - sounds like great material of that beauty.
|
05-22-09 06:10pm
|
Reply
1032
|
Spears Fever
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I wish Susana had done more work with ALS Scan - she's usually being posed all serious and dour and ALS Scan had her laughing and smiling and looking as delightful as her fantastic bod - but they only did one masturbation vid along with the great body-painting scene with her - and I believe that she's had a boob job since then, so that puts her out of the picture as far as ALS Scan is concerned.
She's done a LOT of great stuff with Action Girls, though it's very much in the serious/dour mode, except for a few scenes - one where she was a drunk Superwoman and a scene where she's a goofy redneck, for example.
I haven't checked out this site that you're posting about.
|
05-19-09 10:32pm
|
Comment
1033
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
|
05-19-09 10:25pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
1034
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
05-17-09 12:00pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1035
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Models are almost always going to play with their hair color - it helps keep them interested - seeing themselves in different "looks" - if they look good and engaged and interested and sexy, then I'll be happy.
|
05-17-09 11:16am
|
Reply
1036
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
Oh, yeah - I've gotten those "your accounts been suspended because of unauthorized usage" things, but the sites couched the language in ways where they avoided saying that I'd deliberately share information - I think the worst accusation that I got from a site was that I had kept my user/login in an unsecure way. These days most sites are pretty aware of the hacker issue, so they're smart enough not to accuse their members of anything untoward. The most inconvenience I've had recently was with Twisty's, where I couldn't get access for multiple days and had to come on here to complain to get the problem solved - by the site's owner. The regular C/S people didn't ignore me, they just didn't diagnose the problem correctly in that case.
|
05-14-09 07:04pm
|
Reply
1037
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
All true - and the quality downloads from this site are the best I've found - I don't know, 15 gb limits doesn't seem like it's some crazy draconian restrictions to me so it's hard for me to go along with the outrage about them. I never had a problem when I was a member and I'll probably join this site again someday.
|
05-12-09 06:32pm
|
Reply
1038
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I've tried them - you know what, they're not very erotic.
|
05-12-09 06:46am
|
Reply
1039
|
Premium Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Reply
The world's a funny place when you have to talk to a PC technician just to be able to log in to a porn site - I still haven't figured out how to make my IE start saving my log-in info on my sites again. It's not keeping me out, it's just a pain.
I admire your perseverance, nostromo.
|
05-12-09 06:44am
|
Reply
1040
|
N/A
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
With Regan Starr, it was not just a matter of things getting too extreme, it was a matter of the film-maker & male performer having no care about her well-being as far as she was concerned, which is, in the end, the only thing that matters. She was the performer who I referred to in an earlier post in this thread that, at the same time that she was exposing the assholes that abused her in Rough Sex 2 with Max, who she had done rough scenes with, but who she felt had always shown respect for her well-being during the making of those scenes.
In all consensual rough sex there are ethical standards about safe words, signals and other things so that the people engaged in the rough play feel protected by their partners - Regan Starr was not being protected by the shit-heads that made that Rough Sex vid, as far as she was concerned. She was being abused - and that's just bull-shit - and ought to be eligible to be criminally prosecuted.
Max doing his rough fantasies with consenting performers and sold to consenting adults should not be criminally prosecuted. Shit, John Stagliano's on trial - and the performers in John's stuff look positively gleeful much of the time.
|
05-11-09 09:25pm
|
Reply
1041
|
Premium Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Reply
Congrats on figuring out the fix - So how did you find it?
|
05-11-09 08:22pm
|
Reply
1042
|
Club Kayden
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Amazingly enough, I actually am aware that this is the month of May - OK, I tried to follow the same path I had followed last night and it still worked. I had liked Holly Randall's work and got a really low-cost offer to join her site, so I had done that. She was having a free chat last night so I had clicked on the "Live Chat" link from her site. In the upper right hand of that "Live Chat" page was a link to "Club Kayden". I clicked on that link and came to Kayden's site. I clicked on "Join Now" just to check out the price and it still shows 3 options:
1) $14.95/Month - March 1st Sale - 50% Off -Don't Miss It!
2) $11.11/Month - 55% Off! (Bills Every 3 Months @ 33.33)
3) $10/Month Fan Favorite (Bills $60 Every Six Months!)
I'm copying word for work, exclamation point for exclamation point - as to whether you can get these deals by just clicking on the site from PU's link to the site, I have no idea, to be honest - since several people had tried, I guess not. I just saw it, thought it was a deal worth noting here and did so. Sometimes sites offer deals that you gotta be a magician to find, I guess.
One of my favorite things to do when I want to join a site is google the site name and "special" and see if I can find old or new offers that are better than what's being offered by clicking directly - I've found great ones!
|
05-11-09 06:16pm
|
Comment
1043
|
Club Kayden
(0)
|
|
05-10-09 08:33pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1044
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Yep - all true. If you enjoy softer nude stuff well-presented with gorgeous babes - updated daily, this sites's pretty awesome.
If you're looking for boy/girl stuff or harder solo stuff, this site will frustrate the hell out of you.
I would highly recommend Nubiles.net for people that are frustrated by Met Art but like the type of girls that they post. Nubiles.net also has multiple updates a day, lots of great HQ masturbations vids, some boy/girl vids - and you can be delighted to find girls that went on to be notable porn babes who did great stuff here early in their careers.
|
05-10-09 06:04pm
|
Reply
1045
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
What's interesting about the "his first movies were great, then he went south" comments is that I've read more comments about him being abusive by performers that were in his earliest stuff - like Stephanie Swift - than by performers that were in his later stuff. Performers who did other rough stuff and complained bitterly about how their well-being had been dis-regarded by those other porn producers and performers, said that Max treated them well and made sure that they were OK.
What's on-screen definitely doesn't tell the full story.
|
05-10-09 05:56pm
|
Reply
1046
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
The "community standards" argument is a farce. There were people on the jury that were very upset that they felt they had no choice but to vote the way they did, either because they felt rail-roaded by the judge, or rail-roaded by the other members of the jury. The case was all based on the material having been sent to a place where Max and his company did not send the material to. That was confirmed by the distributor that DID send the material to - and the distributor wouldn't have sent the material if the postal inspector didn't order the material and request that the material be sent there. In my opinion, if anyone violated "community standards", it was the postal inspector, who had more of a basis to understand the "community standards" than anyone else involved here - so if anybody should have been jailed, I would vote for the postal inspector.
|
05-10-09 08:35am
|
Reply
1047
|
Finest Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
My biggest complaint about this site - most of the Tila galleries are gone - I found the site pretty lacking when I did a one-month join a while ago as well as having lots of glitches like vids that didn't download - so many that it wasn't even worth sending them a note, in my opinion. I just knew that I was only going to be there a month. Frankly, as soon as I saw how much Tila material was gone, I felt ripped off. They do have some hot photo sets, though, including new ones.
|
05-09-09 08:02am
|
Reply
1048
|
X Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Dmander6's Review
As with your review of Teen Core, your review here is lacking in information that would be helpful to other members. It's all based on your humiliation fetish thing. If the girls are being anally and orally abused and in obvious discomfort, then you think the site is great, if the girls are not being anally and orally abused, then the site sucks, in your opinion.
But that does not make for a good or useful review, frankly.
You say this site has "Great teen girls" but you give it a review of 50 because there's not enough humiliation and pain for you? That doesn't seem fair to me.
Once again, you don't give any info about frequency of updates or amount of material updated or quality of pics or vids or anything else that would be very useful to other members here.
|
05-09-09 07:57am
|
Reply
1049
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Dmander6's Review
100 on a site with no daily updates? According to PU guidelines, 100 is reserved for sites that could do little to improve. I understand that the impulse for newbies is to first do reviews that they like the most - that's what I did when I first joined and I also gave my favorite sites unreasonably high ratings.
But it's helpful, when you're going to review a site to look at the guidelines that are given about ratings, take a breath and think what rating the site REALLY deserves.
Besides that, to be honest, there's not much to your review. It doesn't give me any reasons why this site is so much better than Nubiles.net, which you're clearly acquainted with.
You say "no daily updates", but you don't give any indication of how often they do update - or if they do - or how many photo or vid sets are posted when they update - or how large the pics or vids are - or how long the vids are - or how many pics are in a photo set.
I understand that you really like the site, but you didn't give anybody else much info with your review, I'm afraid, and your rating doesn't seem to meet PU guidelines.
|
05-09-09 07:51am
|
Reply
1050
|
Finest Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Comment
It's a pain-in-the-ass bait and switch site anyway - doesn't have a lot of the material that they most prominently advertise
|
05-07-09 07:45pm
|
