| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2001
|
Killergram
(0)
|
Reply of
jbgild's Reply
Hey... get you're drift...
Of course you should have written that comment - Me personally - I think the comments (contrary to reviews) is what you feel here and now...great!
And, man, I know how hard it is to "cool-off" when you find a site that really turns you on...
Keep it comming, bro.....and BTW: good to have a new devoted PU here, welcome....
|
05-30-08 11:47am
|
Reply
2002
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
joekerr1's Review
Good first review here at PU - welcome...
I certainly agree about some of the niches with too small an amount of videos.
Then again - I do not quite agree with the Hi-Quality Downloads. Even if you go for HQ in membership - most videos are not crisp - but comes out just the same in fullscreen as the socalled standard resolution.
But anyway there's still some kind of reason why TBP and a lot of PUs have a high score on this site...
Keep it up, joekerr1
|
05-30-08 08:24am
|
Reply
2003
|
Third Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
Another great review...
BTW - "long time no see".
JB, this new added bonus-site Black Ice? Tried to browse a little. Is it just US/Euro "black" girls or is there latin "black" girls too?
|
05-30-08 07:06am
|
Reply
2004
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm beginning to.
But only because I'm starting to feel a bit like a veteran in this field - among others thanks to PU and all fellow PUs.
I'm not taking any bullshit anymore - it's my money.
So yes, I've started a more frequent feedback to webmasters. Two reasons:
1) Like I'm fed-up with hoax in some sites.
2) Webmasters should be aware that we at PU is not to be fooled around with!
On the other hand - I also do SOME feedback to webmasters when I'm really happy about a site - It has to be both ways.
|
05-30-08 06:46am
|
Reply
2005
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Fine review, there...
Just my problem with this in many ways great site - the vids are far from the quality/erotica-feeling of the photosets.
And as a video-freak, it's too bad - because the photos are no less than GREAT.
BTW: Gave you a new trust....
|
05-30-08 05:27am
|
Comment
2006
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
|
05-30-08 05:12am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2007
|
Killergram
(0)
|
Reply of
jbgild's Comment
Well, jbgild
There's always a time to cool-off - as we discussed here earlier.
When I first joined Killergram, I was "drooling" - wauw, what girls, what fine quality videos (see my review)
But after the third join I'm certainly "cooling" off. No need to go into why here (but you can still see other PU-reviews). And by all means, enjoy the site while it's still new to you...
|
05-29-08 12:15pm
|
Comment
2008
|
Oye Loca
(0)
|
|
05-29-08 09:32am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
2009
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Try it if you dig what you see in the preview ... but do not only go for the hc - it's generally not very good in editing...
|
05-29-08 02:54am
|
Reply
2010
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hey, buddy....guess John, Poul or Ringo may have had some great times with Ukraine girls (even if it was a methaphor, what do we know)
And abolutly: It almost knocked me of my (do not remember the phrase) to watch her (Viktoriya) in a hc b/g video-scene (strange they do not make photosets here). She do not do bj in any of the hc-scenes (strange) - but the way she rides is just great.
Anyway, I think you can do with the quality of the photosets, after all - downloaded a few - and they are not bad.
BTW: Forgot something in my review:
A bit slow download - never got over 350 Mb/sec.
|
05-28-08 12:48pm
|
Review
2011
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent quality in videos and photosets
Some great looking models - teens of (only) easteuropean origen. A few more average looking teens.
TEENS: sexy outfits: high heels, neglige and nylons (no socks or whatever)
Zip for photos (photos: 1549x1033)
Videos: AVI only (576x320) - but crisp! (full screen)
Updates looks ok for now - very new site
Updates seems to come almost dayly.
90 vids - a little less photosets
Most softcore - some hc
Good preview
Easy navigation - layout a bit simple.
Exclusive material |
| Cons: |
Softcore videos/photosets has the upper hand
HC secondary - HC mainly in videos
Hardcore sets (video) are a bit strange - (great quality), but a little weird editing - like old softcore fucking-films. BUT some of the videos with everything, bj, threesome, fucking, closeups and so on.
BUT nok like any other average easteuropean site - this one has it's own style.
Download is mostly a bit slow: My average has been 350 Mb/sec. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was taken in by the preview - thanks!
This site (even if it's US-based) has some of the most fine looking easteuro-teens. Some of them has only been seen at FM Teens - and they are just great!
A small, naughty blond: Viktoriya is a soft-star at FM Teens. But here she's doing hc b/g in 2 videos (I'm still thrilled here) and a great vaginal-balls video (6 videos of this doll)
What's great too is, that you do not get disapointed about number of videos compared to photosets - it ads up.
There is now about 90 vids, most softcore, but all in great quality - man, even if the average size is about 200 Mb.
NB: My foremost liking for this site is that these teens are not pseudo-look-a-like with mosyly pigtail and small cotton-socks.
These girl are in high heels and /or nylons - sexy, if you ask me!
This is a new site and the amount is still just average for what we PU's are used to at more qualified sites at around $30.
But it looks like they do a good job in updates - by all means not every day - but ALMOST! And the updates is always with videos - and sometimes with photosets from the same video.
I've "cooled off" here after a week of membership, but I can recommend this site for lovers of euro-teens in sexy outfits in fine quality videos
And the photosets are really fine too (Drooler: you may disagree).
Bottom line: Great site - a bit like FM Teens but without all the pseudo lez-thing. And those solo-videos are among the best in this field of east euro-teens. |
|
05-28-08 12:10pm
Replies (12)
|
Reply
2012
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I got mad at a site I felt was pure hoax/fraud upon the user, so I choosed "Fraud" at CCBill.
Obivious they (CCBill) regard that choise as Credit Card-fraud - and in the following loooong periode NO billing service would accept that card..first and last time I picked that reason.
And you're sure right: it's not clear.
|
05-26-08 11:00am
|
Reply
2013
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Well, honestly.......sometimes I do not care...
Exept with sites who now or before has treated me with some sort of respect as a customer/user...
Alas, there are still quite a few sites out there, that do not give a damn about the paying customer. No answers to mails, no nada...
Still: I once made an error, where I felt the site was a fraud. And I answered "Fraud" as a reason for cancel (CCBill) But that resulted in a block of my creditcard for a long time at any billing co (and BTW: No charge for that site). But ok, that was back years ago - now I choose between: "Other" - "satisfied customer" - or "didn't like the site".
But bottom line: Do anybody at those sites take notice??? Do not know myself.
|
05-25-08 09:07am
|
Comment
2014
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
|
05-23-08 06:19am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2015
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Smiling and naughty eyes looking directly at the camera is alomst a must. In both soft and hc.
|
05-23-08 03:09am
|
Reply
2016
|
Czech Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Of course, the Drooler is right.
On the other hand: if this site has moved upwards lately, it would be great with new comments/reviews - because the girls here are just top-class.
|
05-22-08 08:55am
|
Reply
2017
|
24 Main Street
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Great you agree....Drooler
BTW: I got some fine stuff (videos most - from Playboy)) with this very sexy and beautifull US-girl, Divini Ray (as mentioned) - any idea where there is more???
|
05-21-08 02:52pm
|
Reply
2018
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
Good tip here, Vegas Ken - could not resist - fine price - just joined......(again)
|
05-21-08 02:47pm
|
Review
2019
|
24 Main Street
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Exclusive photosets and videos
Some fine looking girls/women - mostly US-asians
Cheap full trial
Ok quality for newer photos (1024x685) - but just ok! |
| Cons: |
No zip for photos
Small sized videos (2-5 minuttes)
Weird navigation
A little older videos poor quality
Lousy updates
Number of videos: approx: 100 - but some only 5-6 Mb. - and most NOT good quality |
| Bottom Line: |
I went for this site because it seemed to have some girls/women in the category of Playboy-style.
And some stuff with Divini Ray.
And the full trial at only $3.95.
Well for that small price you get full access, allright.
But the content is pretty slim and in general the quality is less than average:
Even if some of the videos are at 640x480 there's absolutely nothing crisp here - AND way too many videos are old at 320x240 in blurred standard - all wmv and only wmv.
TBP states 95 videos - could not count that many and a lot 3-6 Mb - short and bad quality.
Been here before one and a half year ago or more - and man, do they NOT deal in regular updates..
Most stuff seems to be from 2005 and 2006.
This is primarily a photosite - becuase the video section is simply too bad to make it a serious porn-site.
The navigation is strange, to say the least: Mainly you can search for photosets and videos (that's what most of us are into) - but you have to use some time to get around. Like searching for videos, you have to check out: A place called Drive In - I do not see much drive-in movie here - and for photosets: Curves... but ok, that's their kind of fun.
The worst part is lack of zip for the photos: I hate to download 50-80 photos in a set - manual.
Ok, this review is on a basis of only 3 days membership - but I won't stay...
And bottom line: I do not think this 24 Main Street live up to standards of good sites today - and certainly not sites that gets a score of about 80 at TBP |
|
05-21-08 02:05pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
2020
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Limited trials are normally worthless - with whose sites it's a matter of standard of preview.
BTW: Good previews seems more and more imported in this jungle.
Agree with Monahan - it's a waste of time and money - even for a couple of bucks.
I fell limited trial is a kind of a trap - and that seems like some kind of reason why these sites only have the limited...
On the other hand I do join full trials quite a lot - at sites I never been before. If I like what I see, I normally go back for the full month deal.
But limited trial: Never.
|
05-21-08 08:54am
|
Reply
2021
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Right you are, pal....and nothing to go back for.
|
05-21-08 08:43am
|
Reply
2022
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
Agree - and at that price: $38.80 - it's rip-off...and even the $19.95 via Rabbit is too much.
|
05-20-08 10:42am
|
Comment
2023
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
|
05-20-08 03:18am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
2024
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
No - if it was work, the fun would probably be gone...
|
05-19-08 09:58am
|
Reply
2025
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks - jolly good tip, exotics4me
I'll let you know about things - if I join.
|
05-19-08 02:35am
|
