| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1976
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Review
Where did you find the $19.95 price - I couldn't - my fault, probably. But guess I'd like to join again at that offer.
Fine review, BTW. And agree with your point about the missing variety in the vids - but it's a heck of a site for photosets.
|
06-15-08 08:09am
|
Reply
1977
|
Prime Cups
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Hey ace, that's a high score (no critisism intended)
But maybe after beeing a member of all the DEV8-sites (see CO-profile at TBP) for more than once, I think these sites are getting a bit boring and the video-content too static. All the videos of all the sites are filmed/edited following the same concept - again and again...(still the models - most - are just great)
Hope they'll consider to renew their filming/editing-style...and do something about their price!
But that does NOT do anything about your fine review, ace.....just not agree with your score.
|
06-15-08 07:51am
|
Reply
1978
|
Babe Centerfolds
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Like some newspaperfolks talk about: News you can use!
This is a review you can use.....preview looks fine and I could easyly be tempted.
But I'll save my money on this one.
Thanks, Drooler!
|
06-15-08 07:41am
|
Reply
1979
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
deadelvis's Comment
This needs a reply from the webmaster!
Let's have it - for the sake of all, here....
|
06-12-08 12:07pm
|
Reply
1980
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
I guess this kind of trafic is getting more and more common - in spite of pop-up blockers and what do I know...
Anyway just browsed the new teen-offers at Real Network Teen (Serena 18, Paulina 18 ect.) - when you leave - they come up with offers at pop-ups - or whatever its called. The deal is to get all the sites for the same price...and that's ok.
On the other hand - I browsed a new Triple X Media-site (Selina 18) - she's a doll. But here it was NOT MORE sites included - but alternatives - something like 9 other sites (Lupe among them) but NOT the original site that I browsed (Selina 18) - very confusing setup.
|
06-11-08 08:35am
|
Reply
1981
|
Only 3X
(0)
|
Reply of
matyko's Reply
Thanks for your answer, matyko.
As I understand it you're somewhat new as webmaster at Only 3X - I respect that, and it looks like new standard for the site towards paying members/costumers.
Bottom line - change of staff does in general not entirely excuse a companys former missteps or policy. Still, it's good to hear about the new ways.....I may even consider to join again, because the content is not bad at all.
|
06-10-08 02:03pm
|
Reply
1982
|
Only 3X
(0)
|
Reply of
matyko's Reply
Well, good you as webmaster of Only 3X reported this trap-issue - finally.
But you - or your billing-co. should have been aware of the issue many months ago!
When I got into that "trap" I mailed both the site and the billing-co. - several times.
Never got an answer!!!
- and ended up paying much, much more than I intended. Ok, I got a longer membership - but the deal/price was a lot higher than originally promised - even compared to the stated offer of 1 month membership....
That was one heck of a hoax I'll always remember!
|
06-10-08 12:45pm
|
Reply
1983
|
Candice Cardinele
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks, Khan
I understand your position here...
Will do some more research and then consider a thread
|
06-10-08 06:08am
|
Reply
1984
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
When I was young - yes, sure. Guess it was a part of the sexual experiments - and it was always the girl doing the masturbation - before the more serious sexual act. Just good memories here.....
Once met this cute, slim brunette and found a dildo in her bed - I asked her to use it before the sex - and it was just great.
But, man - like Merle Haggard said in a song:
"They say life starts at 50....
Well, you've been lied to, my friend.
I wish I was thirty again"
And:
"Youth should be saved for the last
But it's wasted on the young and the fast"
(from the album: Chill Factor)
|
06-08-08 07:06am
|
Comment
1985
|
Busty Ones
(0)
|
|
06-08-08 06:46am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1986
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
YUP, mr smut - just could not resist...
Going for the EM too!
And a sincerly good luck to Germany (I'm NOT a fan of Sweden) - and we in little old Denmark got a knockout - so my hurray/hopes is for Deutchland!!! (and of course you'll take Poland tomorrow)
|
06-07-08 09:05am
|
Comment
1987
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
|
06-07-08 08:33am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1988
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm what you'd consider a middle-aged person.
And I'm not blind yet!
But are we getting to a point of lacking good polls?
Like DivBZero, I too ask:
"And the point of this question is?......"
So, fellow PU's: Let's go for some serious polls, here....and let our fantasies run wilder...
But by all means. TBP has to have a new poll quite often, so let's give them a hand - for the benefit of all.
|
06-07-08 07:52am
|
Reply
1989
|
Oye Loca
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
Hey uscue
Your're right about the fine amount of content in general - which include the bonus sites - like Innocent High. (BTW: Just not my cup of tea (Innocent High). But we all got our preference...
After I got my irritation of bad previews off my chest, I browsed the whole content- also bonus sites. And some is NOT bad at all.
BUT, uscue - when you go for a specific site - like Oye Loca (and for this user: not regarding the bonus sites, which has less interests to me) - in search for what you believe is some special content - you feel a bit annoyed when you do NOT get what is prommised at the preview - Well, see you agree with me on that point.
So: I do not understand why they don't give you the entire "works" that you see in the preview.
PU's should tell them that....
|
06-07-08 07:38am
|
Reply
1990
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
Thanks for the congrats, bro.....
And - Inessa - she's a doll - but I know for sure she's in quite a few sites - right now I simply cannot remmember her other alias'es.
Or which sites....
I bet the Drooler can help you there!!!!
|
06-07-08 06:21am
|
Reply
1991
|
Candice Cardinele
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks, Kahn - well, this is quite a new site - and I think they do some market research here - and change the deal continuously....
BTW:
Can you guys figure out how the (real) deal is at Foxes.com (the motherload)
At TBP it's stated that the monthly is $10,-
When I brows the site, I can only find a way to "buy" access to one video or one photoset at the price of 9.95 - I'm generally a bit confused about it (the terms) - want to join, but do not want to pay 9.95 for access to ONE video.......
|
06-07-08 06:02am
|
Reply
1992
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
Exactly, mr smut....It's amazing - in the negative meaning of the word - that this site still carpet-bomb former users with statements of how great the site is - and the reality is completly in another neck of the woods....
And agree - some very fine models here in exclusive video/photosets - but - bottom line - we can find the same models elsewhere. (Lucky, for one - at for exampel 1ByDay - and I've seen her in some b/g hc too - do not remember where right now....
|
06-07-08 05:53am
|
Reply
1993
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Tnanks for that one, my honorable "brother-in-arms"......!!!!!!!!
|
06-07-08 05:23am
|
Review
1994
|
Candice Cardinele
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Great looking model - solo site
Exclusive all the way
Ok looking, very new and rare videos of this doll
Ok photosets (small in size, though)
Zip for photos |
| Cons: |
Small selection even for a solo-site
A bit prizy - not $14.95 as stated at TBP, but 24.95 - at the moment "special price: 19.95
Video-quality COULD be a bit better
No interaction
No zip for "girl-friend"- photosets
Softcore only - no real masturbation - no lez |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this rather small site with a slim amount af content because the girl, Candice Cardinele is a great looking girl.
Followed her for some years where she mainly appears on photosets from Foxes.com - those photosets that is well know for preview on the net - and I think, wellknown for their rather small size, though foxes-photosets have been made in huge amount.
Here at her new own site Candice (under Foxes.com) has complete new stuff:
But: Only 10 videos (again not bad, because the amount of videos with her is slim in general):
WMV and Mov. or stream for both.
Download for full videoclips or parted in three.
Average size: 80-110 Mb, 720x480.
Photosets: 21. (Plus 11 sets of socalled friends - no zip here, strange)
Size only: 850x566 - but still good viewing quality.
If you also think Candice is great there are two ways of preview: At her own site the preview video gives you a pretty good idea. No previews for full size-photos.
At Foxes.com there are two other fine preview videos of Candice - but I never quite figured out the membership-deal with Foxes.com - it looks like you "Buy" one video-download for $9.95 - but maybe other PUs know more about this Foxes.com.
But Bottom Line: Even if the amount is slim this latin-type doll is simply sexy and I spend my $19.95 with pleasure - 'cause I can return to this girl again and again.
Still: No more than a score of 75 - even from a fanatic.
The site needs a lot of improvement.
Had to downgrade.
Way to few updates
No Zip now! |
|
06-07-08 05:20am
Replies (5)
|
Comment
1995
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
|
06-07-08 03:29am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
1996
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
It looks like this site has grown better lately, thanks for that review.
BTW: Guess you know Ivana Fukalot has her own website.....
|
06-07-08 02:24am
|
Comment
1997
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
|
06-03-08 10:01am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1998
|
My Lovely Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Zauber's Reply
Agree - a lot of licensed stuff here - a little better at bonus sites.
But the updates are certainly not swell - that the reason I just cancelled rebill. Still some good videos at two of the bonus-sites, too
|
06-03-08 05:15am
|
Reply
1999
|
Matrix HD
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
Good tip, atrapat....
|
06-02-08 12:12pm
|
Reply
2000
|
Club Micah
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Agree - she's cute.
But this review I'd consider as a warning and a well founded one.
Just great that fellow PUs also do a serious reveiw on these traps.
Had my eyes on this - won't go there even for the low trial price - better to buy a cold beer...
Good review, pat362 - and why make it any longer?
|
06-01-08 11:01am
|
