Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : uscue (0)  

Feedback:   All (255)  |   Reviews (26)  |   Comments (46)  |   Replies (183)

Other:   Replies Received (138)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 251-255 of 255 Page :    < Previous Page

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Comment
251
Visit Gods Girls

Gods Girls
(0)

trustworthy?

I think admins should erase reviews that are obviously untrustworthy, as all of the reviews for this site were done not too far apart by new members with no other reviews and they all say the exact same thing paraphrased. When this happens, you should start the site over with a clean slate rather than skew the ratings and the morals of the P2P rating system.

03-27-07  11:46am

Replies (2)
Comment
252
Visit Ruth Blackwell

Ruth Blackwell
(0)

About 50% Not Updated

Abou 50% of the girls on the preview page are not in the members area at all. Since this is a fairly new site, I'm sure it's because these are videos that were shot but not added yet, but that's false advertisement until they actually put them in the members area. Fifty percent is too high of a promise to not fulfill.

03-26-07  06:27pm

Replies (0)
Reply
253
Visit Banged Moms

Banged Moms
(0)
Reply of spacemanspiff's Review

How many network sites are included? Wondering to see how many sites are included at the $30 price. Also, what are the download options (minute clips, full clips, 3 parts?). I know most of their sites were filmed in Europe...is the language in English?

03-25-07  10:06am

Reply
254
Visit Solo Interviews

Solo Interviews
(0)
Reply of DivBZero's Review

I haven't checked solo interviews yet, but their network sites OyeLoca and InnocentHigh do indeed have high quality pics. Or rather, just to be safe, i'll say they are smaller in size (700x1050) but high quality regarding how they look. They don't look anything like vidcaps or amateur-ish. They look like any other sites High-Res pics but smaller in size. Video quality wasn't DVD quality like some great sites but wasn't worse than any other regular site and I never questioned it until reading the review.

I agree that this site is not as good as the other sites in the network, but does it really deserve a 51? Is that based just on the pics (it is mainly a video site)? I'd think, based on the things you pointed out that they did wrong, that the site would be in the 70's, described as: Average, some things done right, some things done wrong or 60's: does more wrong than right, low recommendation.

51 just seems low for a site costing 17.84 a month with 4 other sites included (over 100 vids all together), has a score of 78 by TBP and five 80's out of seven other sites reviews, no DRM or download limit (not anymore). Even a site with vidcaps only would be at least Average with all those added at that price, but this site DOES have actual higher quality pics, just not as high (pixels) as others which you wouldn't notice unless you used a program that showed pixels like photoshop or irfanview.


03-13-07  10:35pm

Reply
255
Visit BangBus

BangBus
(0)
Reply of roseman's Reply

haha yes for the most part BangBus is great - good quality of pics/videos, huge quantity and probably the best quality of material for a great price. Like i said in the review, the only negatives i really have are that they deleted early material. But if you weren't a member then, then you wouldn't even know, nor does it matter with all of hte material. I do wish that they would add BrandiBelle to the network though. If I have to pick a negative it's that the file sizes are so huge for full videos. But they've even added a feature to see all videos by a star which makes it even better than it used to be. Still 100 :)

03-02-07  11:56am


Shown : 251-255 of 255 Page :    < Previous Page

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.32 seconds.