| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
226
|
Tokyo Group Sex
(0)
|
|
11-18-07 01:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
227
|
Old Man Tales
(0)
|
Reply of
Shakermaker's Review
So is the trial membership full or limited/restricted?
|
08-15-07 08:04pm
|
Reply
228
|
N/A
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Poll
I prefer Paycom. Their customer support and site search features are lightyears ahead of CCBill. But I will also join CCBill sites but that's about it for high priced sites. Lower priced sites (19.99 or less), then I can experiment.
|
08-13-07 08:00pm
|
Reply
229
|
Monsters of Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Comment
I joined one individual site - Bang Bus - and have access to 15 different sites: big mouthfuls, bang bus, monsters of cock, ballhoneys, milflesson, assparade, blowjob ninjas, bang bros clips, big tits round asses, spring break, tugjobs, moms anal adventure, bang bros worldwide, boobsquad and mr. cameltoe.
I don't know what happened in your situation...did you e-mail them and tell them the problem? When I first joined my user and pass didn't work for the first day, but then I e-mailed and got my access and the 15 sites (some great, some can do without) are worth the price.
|
08-09-07 07:14pm
|
Reply
230
|
Porn Oasis
(0)
|
Reply of
OUMarcus's Comment
Haven't been a member in a year. The video quality wasn't anything you'll find on a big/network site or anything mainly because it really is just Oasis with her husband filming and maybe a sound guy or two. However, there is tons and tons of content - pics and vids. In the event you decide to try, you should also give Cathy's Cravings a shot, although the content type is slightly different. They often feature each other in sets on each other's websites because they're friends outside of the business, but Cathy's I would say is a better value. Both are very affordable though, under $15
|
08-06-07 05:21pm
|
Reply
231
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I don't agree that reasons should be moderated...other users can look at the reasons and judge for themselves if they think it was warranted enough of a reason or not. There should just be mandotory "no" reasons to help out the users being rated.
|
07-14-07 02:31pm
|
Reply
232
|
Freaks Of Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Comment
Agreed. I hate the concept/execution of this site.
|
07-13-07 07:52pm
|
Reply
233
|
BangBus
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
I've actually given that alot of thought since that initial review (which was one of my firsts). While I can't change that review, I can give it a follow up review and change the score. I actually went to do that today until I saw the help guidelines for ways to score websites when I saw:
"100 Perfect Site is perfect, could do little to improve. Top recommendation."
While I know 99% of people will believe (as I normally would have) that no site deserves a 100, the review guidelines show that some sites in fact do merit a 100, which in this case Bang Bus does. Actually, the network deserves the 100 b/c it's simply so much content with so many download options and picture options and the ability to save your favorite scenes for later, they keep adding new sites to the network and it's still cheaper than alot of sites that only give membership to one place.
All that coupled warrants in my mind the 100 because there is little they can do to improve (some things maybe like a Next Week's Update) but that's all I can think of. The network deserves a top recommendation but I just happened to do it all for bang bus instead of reviewing each individual site.
|
06-27-07 07:29pm
|
Reply
234
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
Like earlier, I think that a "Yes" trust rating is fine as is...if someone trusts you then you don't need much more reason. If there's a "No" trust rating, they should be required to fill out a comment telling why, but the author of the comment (and the rating itself) could still be anonymous. You don't need to know who rated/gave you a comment, users would probably just like to know why they received a certain rating/comment to help them in their later reviews.
|
06-25-07 12:44pm
|
Reply
235
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I'm still in favor of a mandatory anonymous comment if someone votes "no" on your trust rating. This helps users understand the community and what it is that makes people not trust their reviews so they can improve in the future.
Maybe it's also because I've received two "No's" recently without having written a review in the past month. I have no idea why I have no's, and therefore I can't fix it with my next reviews.
|
06-23-07 06:33am
|
Reply
236
|
Ox Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
That's what I thought. Thanks for the official; I don't think someone believed it when I said it
|
06-17-07 03:23pm
|
Reply
237
|
Ox Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Boobs4ever's Comment
While obviously you can join these different names, I've always been under the impression that they were run by the same people and are essentially the same network. No matter which one I've joined (because I can't remember which one but I've been a member of the networks various times) I've never had a problem logging in to any of the sites. I pretty much just think they're the same thing, just different names which is good marketing because it gets it out there that much more.
|
06-16-07 10:58am
|
Reply
238
|
Naughty At Home
(0)
|
Reply of
BostonPJR's Review
Stumbled across a preview for this today and it definately looks like a very good site. I'm an avid fan of Cathy at Cathys Cravings but based on the reviews I may have to try Des...although the price is twice as much as Cathy.
|
06-05-07 09:46pm
|
Comment
239
|
Squirt Hunter
(0)
|
|
06-05-07 05:17pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
240
|
Brazilian Facials
(0)
|
|
06-01-07 09:52am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
241
|
Hush Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Woodruff's Review
Do you remember if vids were streaming only or if there was a mix of stream/download? I like the concepts of a lot of the sites but I just don't join streaming websites.
|
05-25-07 04:31pm
|
Reply
242
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
forddk's Review
why's the 3-day trial a waste of money? what do you get, is it limited or are you saying there's too much content and not enough time?
|
05-24-07 10:57am
|
Reply
243
|
Naughty Bookworms
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
I was a member of this site twice: once years ago when the whole Naughty Universe network was still up-and-coming and again after they were as big as they are now. One thing is for sure - Naughty Bookworms or Bookworm Bitches as it used to be called - was great when it was BWB. The girls back then were either completely new girls or fairly new pornstars without many scenes yet like Cherry Poppens and Lisa Marie, it had a true amateur feel and was grainy as if the camera really was hidden. Now, as Naughty Bookworms, it's completely a production feel - the videos are better than perfect quality, the dialogue and scenes don't give it any type of "true" feel, and the girls look like pornstars with glasses like you said.
Pretty much, yeah, it used to be a great site with a great concept and believable girls and storylines, really playing on the "I'm a college student and don't want an F, what can I do?". Now it's just a big production and in my mind not worth it, unless you want to join the whole network which is huge and obviously worth the price.
|
05-10-07 02:19pm
|
Reply
244
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
tech101's Comment
Obviously everyone's experience is different, but I haven't had a problem with any downloads from Videosz or xmovies. I only download WMV files and haven't been a member for two months not, but my vids are still working perfectly. Not sure what the difference is between both of us. Has anyone else had problems? Just wondering if I got lucky and all my videos worked fine or if maybe something weird happened for you.
|
04-26-07 05:07pm
|
Reply
245
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I like the daily polls because if I have nothing to do during the day I can just pop on to here and answer a poll or two that I missed. Polls are fun, bottom line
|
04-22-07 08:41am
|
Reply
246
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The only sites I joined without trying the trial first were Brazilian Facials and Cathys Cravings. Both sites were excellent and I think they would do even more business if they offered a two-day, full access trial, although Cathy's website is cheap enough to not need one. But Brazilian Facials is still pretty much unknown and could do better if they let people sample it first. Trials are the easiest way to determine if to join a site - I've decided against really bad sites after sampling the area and stayed on others (videobox, bangbros) for over four months thanks to a trial.
|
04-22-07 08:33am
|
Reply
247
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
DRM protection or stream-only websites. I don't see the point in joining a stream-only site
|
04-22-07 08:29am
|
Reply
248
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
It seems that alot of things can be taken to make the trust meter better for the whole. I don't think it should be limited to members with a certain number of points (maybe at least 1 rating posted though), but I also favor an anonymous comment section that a user has to madatorily fill out for a "no" vote. This is so that the users learn what about their reviews caused someone to be skeptical, and also ensures that people who vote "no" contribute to the community by their input.
The main reason why there should be an anonymous comment section is to help keep the community active. If a user gets six no votes without knowing why, that could discourage them from participating in the site if they begin to think that what they say isn't worth anything. However, useful comments for "no" votes are a way to keep them interested in posting rather than feeling too personal.
|
04-07-07 11:58am
|
Reply
249
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Oasis's News
Sounds good! I was a member a while ago but unfortunatly haven't been a member for about a year now. Seems to be about time to catch up on my favorite Arizona woman again
|
04-01-07 09:19pm
|
Reply
250
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
DRM
|
04-01-07 09:15pm
|
