Maybe I shouldn't say this, but I regularly write reviews of sites I've reviewed before.
As long as I try to give a fresh take or add something new, there's no rule against submitting a re-review of a site.
You have to wait about 1 year before you can submit a re-review.
(The PU site states you have to wait 6 months before submitting a re-review, but the present software system makes you wait about 1 year before accepting a re-review.)
So if you want to submit re-reviews, to add some new ideas or whatever, there's no rule holding you back.
And I agree that exotics4me will be keeping the #1 position for a long time.
As for your dry spell, I don't know if it's from lack of current interest in porn, or if you can't find any sites worth joining.
If you can get a special discount price, I recommend the Adult Time network, LetsDoeIt, or Teen Fidelity (with Porn Fidelity and Kelly Madison thrown in) for your consideration. Wait for a holiday special on them, and any one of the three is worth joining.
I've seen Adult Time discounted to about $9.95 for the first month, and an annual membership discounted to under $100. So don't accept higher prices, wait for holiday specials for the best deals.
But even when you join a great site or network, you still have to find the content that interests you. Except all 3 sites I recommended have some really great hardcore videos. And a lot of stuff that is not so great.
Now you did it.
The last time I checked, you were miles ahead of me on the Users hit list.
But now there's a new guy in town, and I'm gunning for the #2 slot.
Watch out, because I'm smoking hot.
The Teen Fidelity site has some really hot vids.
At $9.95 for 30 days, it's a bargain.
Just joined Porn Fidelity (plus Teen Fidelity plus Kelly Madison) for $9.95 for 1 month.
Not sure what the rebill price is.
Just click on the Porn Fidelity hot link at PU, or the Teen Fidelity hot link, and you should see the price of $9.95 for 30 days listed.
Not sure how long the special price will last.
Thanks for the kind words saying my reviews have some value/utility.
Actually, I do write my reviews in Notepad (a free, more basic word program) and paste them into the review block form sections.
That's because there are times the PU page will disappear, along with any review you might be writing. So you sometimes have to start writing your review from the start, which can take a lot of time.
There are problems with this approach, because the PU review is structured for a maximum number of lines per section, as well as a maximum number of characters per section.
And for a long review, you have to either edit the sections down, or continue the review into the reply section.
Anyway, I have been writing my more recent reviews in lower case. Not that my eyes are getting better, but because I increase font size in the Notepad program and so it's easier for me to read and edit.
THANKS FOR THE REPLY.
ONE TIME I GOT A REPLY THAT SEEMED TO IMPLY I WAS RUDE, USING CAP LETTERS.
BUT THE SENDER SAID IT WAS ALL RIGHT, AFTER I EXPLAINED THAT CAP LETTERS ARE EASIER FOR ME TO READ.
SOMETIMES I STATE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ CAP LETTERS.
OTHER TIMES, I DON'T BOTHER WITH THE EXPLANATION.
I'M NOT SURE IF I SHOULD USE THE EXPLANATION EVERY TIME.
OR JUST ACCEPT THAT A FEW PEOPLE WILL BE ANNOYED WITH MY CAPITALIZATION.
BUT THAT'S LIFE.
SOUND CONTROL IS HIT OR MISS SOMETIMES. THE STUNT COCK OR THE MASSEUSE IS TALKING, AND YOU CAN'T MAKE OUT THE WORDS, BECAUSE THE SOUND IS TOO LOW. EVEN WITH THE COMPUTER'S SPEAKERS AT MAXIMUM, YOU CAN'T HEAR WHAT THE MODELS ARE SAYING.
THE FUCKED HARD 18 VIDEOS ARE MUCH BETTER. BETTER ACTING, FROM THE STUNT COCK. BETTER BUILDUP TO THE SEX. AND BETTER SEX, BECAUSE THE GUY IS IN CONTROL.
BANGABLE. STOPPED UPDATING IN DECEMBER 2016.
YEARS AGO, BANGABLE CONTENT WAS VERY SHORT CLIPS (3 MINUTES RUNTIME OR LESS) OF MODELS IN UNDERWEAR OR SWIMSUITS WHO DANCED TO MUSIC. SO IT WAS A SOFTCORE TEASE SITE.
THE MODELS WERE UNIFORMLY ATTRACTIVE TO SUPER-ATTRACTIVE YOUNG WOMEN, IN LATE TEENS, EARLY TWENTIES.
THOSE CLIPS WERE EXCLUSIVE, I BELIEVE.
THEN THE SITE STARTED UPDATING WITH VIDEOS FROM PARTNER SITES, WHO ALLOWED BANGABLE TO FEATURE THE VIDEOS AS A FORM OF CROSS-ADVERTISING.
THESE VIDEOS HAD A RUNTIME OF 20-30 MINUTES, FEATURED MID-CORE AND HARDCORE SEX.
THE MUSIC SOUNDTRACK OF THE VIDEOS IS ANNOYING, TO PUT IT MILDLY.
THE MODELS ARE VERY ATTRACTIVE.
THE CAMERA-WORK OF THE NEWER VIDEOS CAN BE ANNOYING, BECAUSE IT'S TRYING TO PROJECT AN ARTSY-FARTSY FEELING TO THE VIDEO, WITH THE FOCUS JUMPING AROUND INSTEAD OF SHOWING THE MODEL CLEARLY AND SMOOTHLY, SO YOU GET A SIMILAR SENSATION OF ONE OF THE JASON BOURNE FILMS, WHERE THE CAMERA SKITTERS AROUND, AND AT BANGABLE, THE SKITTERING CAMERA MAKES YOU WANT TO SAY, FIRE THE CAMERA-MAN, GET A TRIPOD SO THE CAMERA SHOWS THE MODEL SIMPLY AND CLEARLY.
EPIC SEX - LAST UPDATE WAS DECEMBER, 2014.
THE VIDEOS ARE NICE, BUT NON-EXCLUSIVE.
IF YOU VISITED TEEN MEGA WORLD OR THE DIESEL NETWORK SITES, YOU HAVE PROBABLY SEEN MANY OF THE EPIC SEX VIDEOS.
WHICH MAKES ME WONDER WHY THEY STOPPED UPDATING THE SITE. SURELY, THE COST OF THESE VIDEOS, WHICH ARE SOLD TO COMPETING SITES, IS NOT VERY EXPENSIVE. NOT ANYWHERE NEAR AS MUCH AS IT WOULD COST TO PRODUCE THEIR OWN, EXCLUSIVE VIDEOS.
A FEW YEARS AGO, PORN MASTERMIND WAS PRODUCING EXCLUSIVE CONTENT FOR THE THEIR SITES.
THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS, THAT STOPPED COMPLETELY, AND THEY STARTED USING VIDEOS FROM OTHER, COMPETING PAYSITES.
BUT EVEN THOSE VIDEOS HAVE STOPPED UPDATING.
I GUESS THEY EITHER RAN OUT OF MONEY, OR THE MANAGERS HAVE LOST INTEREST IN THESE SITES.
PORN MASTERMIND MIGHT BE WORTH A 1 MONTH MEMBERSHIP, TO DOWNLOAD AS MUCH AS YOU CAN FROM THE SITES YOU ENJOY, THE VIDEOS YOU FIND WORTHWHILE.
CONTINUED IN NEXT REPLY:
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-NOTE: I AM WRITING IN CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ, WRITE, AND EDIT. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE.
-NICE PU DISCOUNT $17.95 FOR THE FIRST MONTH. BUT RENEWS AT $29.95/MONTH.
-I USED CCBILL AS THE PAYMENT PROCESSOR. A TRUSTED NAME.
-CCBILL SENT A CONFIRMING EMAIL ON SIGN-UP, WITH LOGIN DETAILS (USERNAME, PASSWORD), PLUS THE TERMS OF THE MEMBERSHIP (PRICE PAID, LENGTH OF MEMBERSHIP, AND NON-RECURRING STATUS).
-THE ATTRACTIVE LEVEL OF THE MODELS CAN RANGE FROM GOOD TO VERY GOOD.
THESE ARE YOUNG, LATE-TEEN OR EARLY TWENTIES MODELS.
THE BANGABLE SITE USED TO HAVE WONDERFULLY ATTRACTIVE MODELS IN SHORT TEASER CLIPS (NON-NUDE, LINGERIE MODELS).
Cons:
-LOGIN PAGE IS NON-SECURE. MY FIREFOX BROWSER HAS A POPUP FOR THE LOGIN PAGE STATING THAT LOGIN DETAILS SENT TO LOGIN MAY BE COMPROMISED.
-THERE ARE 4 MAIN SITES IN THE NETWORK, BESIDES THE PARTNER SITES.
THE 4 MAIN SITES HAVE ALL STOPPED UPDATING.
-IF YOU TRY TO FAST-FORWARD A STREAMING VIDEO, THE SCREEN TURNS GREEN FOR SEVERAL SECONDS, BEFORE THE SCREEN RETURNS TO A NORMAL VIEW.
-CAPTCHA REQUIRED FOR LOGIN.
-SOMETIMES THE SITE LINKS ARE BROKEN. FOR A WHILE, I COULDN'T LOG IN TO THE PORN MASTERMIND CENTRAL SITE, AND HAD TO LOGIN THROUGH ONE OF THE SUB SITES.
SOME OF THE PARTNER SITES ARE HIGH QUALITY, SO YOU GET TO SAMPLE THEIR WARES AND MAKE A BETTER-INFORMED DECISION ON JOINING.
SPECIFICALLY, THE BETTER SITES INCLUDE: JOYMII NUBILE FILMS NUBILES PORN SEX ART WOW PORN
MR SKIN IS WORTH A ONE-MONTH JOIN, IF YOU ARE INTO SHORT CLIPS OF CELEBRITIES.
FUCKED HARD 18 IS MY FAVORITE SITE OF THE NETWORK.
THE THEME IS A GIRL GETS AN EROTIC MASSAGE, THE MASSEUSE THEN HAS SEX WITH THE AROUSED FEMALE, AND LEAVES HER SATISFIED.
THE PLOT IS SIMPLE, BUT EFFECTIVE.
SOME VIEWERS MIGHT COMPLAIN THAT THE THEME GETS REPETITIOUS AFTER A WHILE.
THE SAME SETUP, THE SAME SETTING, THE SAME STUNT COCK.
I THOUGHT THE STUNT COCK WAS A GOOD CHOICE: HE WAS NOT ABUSIVE, HE DID A GREAT JOB AROUSING THE GIRL WITH HIS HANDS BEFORE TAKING OUT HIS COCK, AND HE DID A GREAT JOB FUCKING HER. END OF STORY.
MASSAGE GIRLS 18 - PU LISTS THE SITE AS NO LONGER ACTIVE, OR NO LONGER EXISTS.
HOWEVER, IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF PORN MASTERMIND, MASSAGE GIRLS 18 IS ACTIVE. IT'S AN ARCHIVE SITE
THAT IS NOT UPDATING. THE MOST RECENT UPDATE I FOUND WAS FROM JUNE, 2015. MASSAGE GIRLS 18 IS THE COUNTERPART OF FUCKED HARD 18: IN MASSAGE GIRLS 18, THE MASSEUSE IS A FEMALE.
THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE GIRLS ARE NOT GOOD ACTORS. SO THE PLOT IS THE GIRL IS MASSAGING THE STUNT COCK, GOES TO THE GUY'S COCK, AND THEY HAVE SEX. NO ACTING. JUST SEX. THERE'S NO BUILD-UP TO THE SEX. IF THE GIRLS WERE BETTER ACTORS, AND MADE THE MASSAGE MORE BELIEVABLE, IT WOULD BE OK. BUT IT'S NOT BELIEVABLE. THE SEX LACKS HEAT. EVEN THOUGH THE GIRLS ARE, IN THE MAIN, ATTRACTIVE, THE POOR ACTING AND NO BUILDUP TO THE SEX MAKES THE SITE CONTENTS BARELY WORTH VIEWING.
THE SITE STRUCTURE FOR FUCKED HARD 18 AND MASSAGE GIRLS 18 ARE SIMILAR:
YOU CAN STREAM OR DOWNLOAD THE VIDEO.
YOU CAN ALSO STREAM OR DOWNLOAD SELECTED CLIPS OF THE VIDEO.
IF YOU STREAM THE VIDEO, AND TRY TO FAST-FORWARD, THE SCREEN TURNS GREEN FOR SEVERAL SECONDS, BEFORE RETURNING TO A NORMAL-COLORED VIEW.
CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW:
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Nice, clean site design that makes the site easy to use.
-A large selection of attractive models.
-Random updates from other sites.
-Large thumbnails of most models.
-You can download a full video, or selected clips from that video.
-Can also watch the video streaming.
-Good download speeds. I got over 4 MB/sec with DownThemAll.
-Professionally shot videos: good definition, good sound control, good focus, good lighting, etc.
-CCBill is the payment processor, a trusted name.
-Easy login. On my first login, I had to enter username, password, and captcha. On second login, I just hit the member login link, and didn't have to enter anything else. I was automatically entered into the site.
-PU discount of $17.95 for first month.
Cons:
-Captcha required for first login.
-Not sure about update frequency. Apparently, the site does not have exclusive regular updates for the site itself, but uses updates from other sites.
-Many videos download with generic filename. Need to rename the download file to know what it is.
-Can uncheck pre-checked sales offer. But this is the first one I've seen that gives three-day access for free. The free trial turns into an expensive subscription after the three days, if not cancelled. But you get three days for free. So it's worth trying.
-Navigation could be improved if they offered an alphabetical thumbnail listing of their models. Some models in their videos don't even have a name.
-No information about the models, except for their site name.
Bottom Line:
The site has a large number of hardcore videos of attractive young models. Many of the videos are from partner sites.
All of the videos I saw were professionally shot, with good lighting, camera-work, etc.
The models are uniformly attractive, from very attractive to lovely to just breathtaking. Some of the models are actual movie stars, with nude clips from their theatrical movies.
Bottom line:
The four main sites you have access to with a membership (listed above) make this a worthwhile membership. Plus you also get access to a random selection of videos from the partner sites, that give you a flavor of what those sites offer.
Because of the wide selection of site offerings, you get some tease, light hardcore, heavy hardcore.
If you like good quality videos of late teen, early twenties models, this site offers good value for the money.
If you did not mean to join the upsell, maybe you could email the website customer support or the payment processor and ask for a refund.
It's worth a shot.
Some sites will easily offer a refund.
But I don't know about Porn Pros.
You need to know who your primary billing agent is.
You also need to know at least some of the details/records for when you joined: username, password, sometimes the credit card used (or however you paid), sometimes the membership number.
When I joined the site, it was Epoch.
If you joined through Epoch, you are probably in luck.
They are easy to deal with, reliable.
Go to the Epoch site: https://www.epoch.com/
That is a secure site (https):
Enter 2 pieces of your membership:
member id
email
username
card number
(You should have gotten a confirming email when you joined.)
Or, you should have written down these details when you joined.
I try to keep a record of these details when I join a site.
Once you enter 2 of the membership details at the Epoch site, it will bring up your membership.
Cancelling is then easy.
Hope this helps.
Note: if the Epoch web site is not working, call them on the phone. They are very responsive and willing to help.
There are many sites that give alternate names for porn models.
One of my favorites is: www.indexxx.com
It's free, and easy to use.
You can search by the model's name.
You can also search, under the "Website list" hot link, for the models that appear at a specific website.
(That is helpful for model names that are used by many different models.)
You can also build a listing of your favorite porn models, if you register for a free account.
(I've registered, and have never gotten a bunch of spam from indexxx.com, that I know of.
But I do get a bunch of spam from porn sites.)
If you want to track a model, indexxx.com will list most of the web sites she appears at.
As well as her name at each web site.
Which can be very useful.
Separately, "incest" porn seems to be very popular. By "incest", I mean step- brother, sister, father, etc.
So you can get your fix of old-young from those videos.
Teen Mega World has an Old-n-Young site.
That hasn't updated since October 2015.
But it has about 85 videos.
I'm sure you've been a member of TMW (a lot of the PU members probably have).
If you skipped the Old-n-Young site at TMW, it's probably worth a visit.
Or if you've forgotten the videos you watched.
(As I get older, I watch a lot of videos I've seen before, almost as if it's for the first time).
PU discount is $14.95 to join through Old-n-Young.
Or you can join through TMW PU discount for the same price.
Both memberships give access to all the TMW network sites.
I don't know why, but a lot of the TMW models really appeal to me. They are not made up to appear their best, and in many of the scenes the clothes and sets are cheap, but the girls are young and physically attractive and can give a hot performance.
I just read your recent review of the same network, and it's surprising how well my review agrees with what you wrote.
Years ago, I got a negative trust vote (my only negative trust vote) because the person, Anonymous, wrote:
"Reviews are too much like other members and english prof. would most likely think that you copied some material just makes your reviews a little questionable for me."
But this is the first time that I know of that the negative trust vote comment might seem real:
It surprises me how we both agree on many points in our different reviews of this network.
You mention that Blacked, Tushy and Vixen are producing great porn.
In several of my last reviews, I've mentioned that Blacked, Tushy, (sometimes Vixen), and X-Art are producing great glamcore porn.
Are you sure we aren't related? Or sharing the same telepathic thoughts?
LOL.
I do appreciate your reply. Years ago, reviews seemed to get replies more often.
It lets the writer know that someone is reading the reviews.
Which is useful positive confirmation.
In spite of the large amount of content, and the large number of attractive models, my main negatives are:
-Being charged for a pre-checked trial subscription, when I unchecked the trial subscription, meaning I said no.
-The jerky editing, which destroys the flow of the videos.
-The lack of heat of the videos. These are fine-looking girls, having hardcore sex, but it doesn't hold my interest, or passion.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Primary billing agent is Epoch. A major plus, because Epoch means you can easily cancel your membership, and offers help if you have a billing problem with the site.
-Nice assortment of teen, hardcore sites. You get access to 22 sites (listed in the "Bottom Line" section of this review).
-Many of the models are late teens, early twenties. Mainly white, mostly attractive.
-Professionally shot videos: OK or good camera work, lighting, sound control, etc. But poor editing.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Allows download managers. I use Down Them All, a free, easy to use download manager.
-Good download speeds. I get around 3-5 MB/sec. My max download speed is 6.25 MB/sec.
-Can stream videos in high definition or standard definition.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
Warning: I unchecked the pre-checked cross-sale on the join page when I subscribed, but found that I was charged for the cross sale anyway. I had to contact the biller to reverse the charge. The biller was Epoch, who allowed me to cancel the "fraudulent" sale, since I told them I had unchecked the cross-sale.
-$69.95 one-time charge to upgrade your membership to access all the sites in the network (as long as you keep your original membership open).
-You have to click through/decline the $69.95 upgrade page to enter your paid membership sites each time you log in to the site. Which is irritating.
-Only one definition (1080p) is offered for downloading many videos. Which is surprising. I've seen very few sites that offer such a limited choice to download a video.
-Even though the downloaded video is listed as 1080p, when you download the video, and check its specs, you find: frame width: 852 frame height: 480.
Based on those specs, I would assume
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
the video is not 1080p, but 480p.
Since I am viewing the video on a 14" laptop (that's a few years old), the videos are nice and crisp images.
But if you were watching the videos on a large-screen monitor, you might be disappointed with the quality since these are 480p videos.
-There's not a lot of buildup or plot to the videos: they are basically hardcore sex. There might be some kissing before the bj and fucking, but it's minimal. Most videos are just basically hardcore sex. A little plot would add to the videos. Even though a lot of the videos feature attractive models, the sex can get repetitious. If I were new to porn, just looking at these naked, attractive models having sex would be a real turn-on. But I'm not new.
Sites like Blacked and Tushy offer high quality models and a glamcore style of shooting that makes the videos much more appealing than the straight hardcore videos at Porn Pros.
-The editing is very abrupt: there are missing jumps in the action where the girl is naked by herself, then a guy is eating her pussy, then he is fucking her, and the action is jerky because they delete the intervening motions. The action is not continuous, but disconnected, which is poor editing.
The porn pros network is basically a collection of teen sites.
The network is mainly hardcore videos.
You also get a matching photoset for most videos. The matching photosets are quality screencaps of the video shoot. The software program used to make the screencaps from the video does an excellent job--far better than the screencaps that used to accompany hardcore videos from years ago.
Since many of the models are really attractive, many of the photosets are worth collecting.
This is not categorized as a photo network, but the quality of the screencaps is impressive.
This is a large network: you get access to over 3,000 videos.
For $17.95/month with a PU discount, you get your money's worth.
Many of the models are attractive young women. Engaged in hardcore sex.
If the videos had some plot to give the sex more meaning, it would increase the value of the network.
Even though sites like Blacked and Tushy and X Art have less content, I enjoy the videos at those sites more, because those sites make an effort to:
-select the most outstanding attractive models
-present the models in the most visually attractive way (with excellent camera-work, outstanding lighting, make-up, etc.)
-base the sex on some plot to make the video more erotic than just hardcore sex.
I'm giving the network a score of 83. That is very subjective.
If you are new to porn, the videos would have more of an impact on you, and you would rate the network higher.
But in the last few years, I've joined a number of paysites, and have seen so many attractive young models, that I want videos that have more plot or variety than straight hardcore sex. An element of eroticism.
Sites like Blacked, Tushy or X-Art are high quality glamcore sites.
But you can find gonzo sites that can have an element of eroticism, or strong visual appeal.
If you watch the videos at Rocco Siffredi, which is mainly gonzo hardcore sex, some of those videos have a potent effect because the sex seems real. Those videos do not have the ultra-refined camera-work and lighting and colors compared to Blacked, Tushy or X-Art, but some of the Rocco Siffredi videos can be very hot in spite of the lower quality, because the action/plot is so strong.
I also give Teen Mega World a higher rating, another teen hardcore network, because many of their videos appeal to me.
I signed up for PornPros today.
I unchecked the cross-sale box for the trial offer on the join page.
But I got two confirming emails:
Email #1: I signed up to PornPros.
Email #2: I signed up for a $1 trial to bang.com.
I called Epoch on the phone. I could not use the Epoch chat, because the Epoch chat had the notice:
ERROR for site owner:
Invalid domain for site key
Anyway, I was lucky I was using Epoch, and not SegPay.
Epoch is a trusted name, that gives excellent service.
The Epoch agent was able to cancel my $1 trial subscription, and told me I would get a refund for the $1 in a few days.
$1 is not much.
But I was lucky, because Epoch sent me two separate emails:
1 to tell me about the PornPros sub.
1 to tell me about the trial sub.
If I didn't get the trial sub email, I would not have realized I was signed up for the trial, because I definitely unchecked the trial sub box.
So thanks to Epoch for the excellent service.
$1 for the trial is little money. But the trial would change to $40/month sub in 2 days. To a site I did not want anyway.
With PU discount, you can get a $17.95/month membership, recurring.
But if you choose a longer term membership, you will pay a higher monthly price:
They offer a 3 month membership for $0.65/day, which works out to $19.50/month.
So not only would you be locked into a 3 month term, instead of a 1 month term, but you would be paying a higher monthly fee as well.
I really like the X-Art style, and their models are really attractive. But Joymii is the only other site that I can think of with the X-Art style and attractive models.
What other sites are out there with the X-Art/Joymii style and lovely models?
RB, I've been getting a big increase in the number of spam emails the last few days as well. I can't prove who the source is, or the cause. But I can say that the spam emails I've been getting from AmateurMatch are almost certainly from my partial signup at porn pros.
So my feeling is that the rest of the increased spam came from the same source, my partial signup at porn pros.
Have you been getting any emails from AmateurMatch as well? It wouldn't prove anything, but it would be an indication that your signup at porn pros was the cause of some of your increased spam.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
