Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : lk2fireone (0)  

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203)

Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1751-1775 of 2840 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1751
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Reply

For a while I was getting into Japanese flix, and I even bought the following DVDs:
Ichi the Killer (Takashi Miike)
Audition (Takashi Miike)
Gozu (Takashi Miike)
Shark Skin Man and Peach Hip Girl (Katsuhito Ishii)
ZATOICHI: THE BLIND SWORDSMAN (Takeshi Kitano )

And a bunch of others. Some of these are very bloody. Actually, the ones I listed are extremely violent and bloody.

But I haven't seen any Japanese flix for a while. I guess I was hoping Met-art would provide the blood and guts stimulus I needed. :)


05-03-10  08:13pm

Comment
1752
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)

Met-art videos getting more creative?

Most of the past Met-art videos were boring. Very pretty girls for subjects, but videos were boring and a waste of time to watch. This last video I saw, "FIRST MOVIE" BY RYLSKY, with the model Guerlain A., release date 04.25.2010, was slightly more interesting. The model is pretty, which is nothing new for Met-art, but I kept expecting the model to turn into a monster or creature, or for someone to jump on her and start slashing away with a knife or axe or something. Partly it was the lighting and the slow way the camera focused on the model, partly the music. Still a boring video, but maybe in part 2 they will add the monster/creature/slasher part for greater excitement.

05-03-10  03:44pm

Replies (2)
Reply
1753
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

From Sophie's blog:
http://blogs.myspace.com/sweetsophiemoone
-----------------------------------------------------
Thursday, January 22, 2009

News
Hello everybody! It's been ten years since I'm modeling and for almost three years we're doing my personal site. It was a wonderful three years, I never imagined I'd get so many friends and so much love. I had a fantastic team and gorgeous girls to 'work' with. But I decided it's time to move on. I want to start my own business and be more than a pretty face for who knows how long. You know, modeling is not something you can do for twenty years :) So I want to thank you all for your support and love. You are the best, guys and girls!




Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Beginnings
So I am back and had first shoot on Monday. It was a very strange shooting, for Szilvi's new site nudefightclub.com. You know it is a vry strange style on this website, models are very natural and they wrestle and who wins will have sex :) It is no posing and no glamour and I don't do any regular sport to be very active here. Fortunately I was with Cindy Hope and she is soo crazy girl, I love her! So it was not hard to fight. When she put me on the floor she always whisper 'You allright? Is it okay?' :))) Yesterday shooting day again... the girl was late because of Lufthansa strike, so I had scene in the morning, solo, then scene in the evening. In between I just sit and wait, wait, wait... I was very tired when I got home!


04-02-10  02:47pm

Reply
1754
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

The last porn update to her site was back in December 2008.
Then in January 2009 she posted she had retired from the business.
But in February 2010 she posted she had returned, and there would be new material for her site, as well as appearances at other sites.
So the Met-art photo set is just part of the new material on Sophie that will be available.
A lovely girl. Glad that she is back, but also slightly sad that her retirement apparently did not work as she wanted it to.


04-02-10  02:36pm

Comment
1755
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)

Sophie Moone back from retirement.

Met-art has a photoset that posts tomorrow of a new model named Sophie D. She is better known as Sophie Moone. Back from retirement, she is still a great-looking woman.

04-02-10  01:13am

Replies (3)
Reply
1756
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of squirrel's Review

I agree that the videos are mainly a waste of time.
But you get a huge amount of photosets of yummy knockout babes.
You also get a huge number of contributing photographers, so the differing styles of the photography, while not wildly different from each other, should give most softcore teen fans of photosets plenty to find satisfaction with.
This is the best teen softcore site on the net for photosets, based on quality of photosets, quantity of photosets, the huge number of contributing photographers, the huge number of attractive models.
The large number of free live-cam hours for the models (part of the membership) is just a bonus.


01-04-10  06:59am

Reply
1757
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of picdude's Reply

There's no problem if you want to sign up for 1 month. Just sign up for the 1-month recurring membership for $19.99, then cancel your membership before the month is over.

11-02-09  08:40am

Reply
1758
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of asmith12's Reply

IMHO, personal taste varies, which is part of what makes it personal. :)

One problem with Playboy, for me, is the models use too much silicone for the boob jobs (or maybe it's saline, for some of them).


11-02-09  08:28am

Reply
1759
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

Drooler, I wouldn't mind reading one of your reviews on Met-art. You usually manage to come up with something worthwhile to say.

Mbaya posted a couple of days ago that "The reviewers I respect the most are Exotics and Gcode. I feel their reviews are simply awe inspiring and wish I could write as well. The two reviewers I find most helpful as their tastes are similar to mine are Drooler and Denner."

I would put Drooler and Toadsith at the top of my list for the reviewers I respect the most. Though some other PU members come close.


07-09-09  07:59am

Reply
1760
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Reply

It continuously surprises me how much personal tastes can differ.
I was thinking the models of the last year were not up the the previous standards of attractiveness. There were a good percentage of lovely young girls in the past, and I've found very few that I really liked this past year.

We agree on the videos, though, but I don't know what they can do, since Met-art is strictly softcore. I find that Femjoy videos are more watchable than Met-art videos, but not by much.

If the videos went very high-definition, that might help a little. Better music background would help a little. But the main problem is the girls don't do much of anything: they walk, they sit, they lay down, stand up. If there was some story to the video, that would help, but these girls are not actresses. And the photo people are not writers that would be able to write a short plot that makes sense and holds interest.


07-09-09  01:52am

Reply
1761
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of oogles's Review

Solid review with nice details and opinions.
But if you were able to get through the massive photo content of this site in three months, you must have been spending a huge amount of time here. And that's if you skipped the video content, which I think is almost all skippable, anyway. :)


07-08-09  07:37am

Reply
1762
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of Worm's Comment

I think Met-art is the best softcore teen site on the Internet.

I intend to rejoin Met-art in the future.

But until then, what underwear catalogs do you recommend for viewing fancy models?


02-09-09  07:39am

Comment
1763
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)

Best teen softcore site on the Internet.

Haven't been a member of met-art since Sep. 2008, but they keep trying to make the site better.

Now they advertise "Read the full model bio" (for newest photo set updates). The older model bios were extremely limited, basically name, country, physical characteristics (age, height, weight, plus a few others).

Another new feature is allowing members to make their own photo galleries from pics they select from met-art photo shoots.

01-21-09  10:34am

Replies (0)
Reply
1764
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of bacardiancoke's Review

Nice solid review of met-art. Welcome to PU, from one newbie to another.

01-16-09  06:25am

Reply
1765
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment

I've been looking at Ulya G since 2005 at met-art. Her face kind of reminds me of Catherine Zeta Jones (the actress married to Michael Douglas).

But the only sites I've seen her on are met-art and metmodels.


12-20-08  05:08pm

Reply
1766
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Reply

Mr Fountain, nice to meet a fellow softcore teens fan.

In my opinion, metart is the best in class in softcore teens:
-quality of gorgeous young models
-quantity of gorgeous young models
-quality of photosets
-quantity of photosets
-low annual membership of $99

There are other worthwhile sites that come close, that I've joined.
I've been at 5 out of 13 of the sites you've reviewed. I enjoyed them all.

Metmodels is metart lite, as Hondaman noted:
-Similar quality as metart, but much lower quantity in terms of models and photosets.
-Metart updates with 4 photosets per day.
-Metmodels updates with 1 photoset per day.
-So the difference in quantity will only get even bigger over time.
-(Metmodels is actually a sister site of Metart)

For the same price, Metart wins over Metmodels hands down.

Join Metmodels once a year with a monthly subscription, where you download all the photosets/videos that you haven't seen yet.

I'm more into pics than vids, because of bandwidth and hard drive storage concerns, but I can't help falling in love with the pics of these gorgeous girls.


11-21-08  01:12pm

Review
1767
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)

97.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Best site on Internet for softcore European models.
Huge selection of models.
Many of the models are lovely/gorgeous/beautiful: really, some of the prettiest models I've seen on
any porn site.
Many different erotic photographers have contributed to the site.
Most models have multiple photosets.
Most photosets have 100+ pictures of the model.
The photosets are of very high quality (except some from the early years of the site).
With a membership, you get a large number of hours of live webcams per day.

For years they have been posting 3-4 new photosets per day. That is a huge number of updates.
They are constantly coming out with new models, as well as with new photosets of older models(not in age, but as in previously viewed models).
Most models appear to be in their late teens or early 20s.There are many different physical types of European girls: breast size: small, medium, large. Most girls slender, some medium, a few large (not heavy, just big beautiful girls).
Cons: Met-art has made an art of posting boring videos of beautiful young girls.
Sorry, but that disappoints me.
The videos are a very minor extra, hardly worth watching.
The models are almost all European. There are very few Asian or African or others. To see other types of models, go to a different site.
This is softcore only. If you are looking for hardcore, go elsewhere. No boy-girl sex. No boys at all. A little girl-girl touching, but so mild you wonder why they bother.
Met-art has a posted schedule for the livecam shows. If a model does not appear for her show, you don't find out about the change until you are waiting for the model to appear live, and maybe there is a replacement model, or maybe no show at all.
The same model can have different names. This is a porn problem, but why can't they give a girl a name and remember it?
Search feature for model sets is OK, but could be easier to use.
Bottom Line: If you like soft-core pictures of beautiful European girls, this is the site to join. The annual fee of $99 is a bargain.

This site (in my opinion) offers, for the same or less money, so much more than competing sites such as:
metmodels: (a sister site to met-art) that has fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets.
hegre-art: fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets. No livecams. No variety of photographers. And is more expensive than met-art.
domai: a nice softcore site, but again: fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets. No
livecams. And the photosets do not have the great quality of the met-art sets.

11-14-08  01:21pm

Replies (3)
Reply
1768
Visit MetArt Network

MetArt Network
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment

$60 is a great price. But like you say, there aren't enough hours in a day (or week, or month) to spend at these sites.

{I'm switching to capital letters, because it's easier for me to see and read. I know it not proper etiquette, but fuck that. I am tired of squinting and trying to read the tiny letters.)

A BETTER APPROACH IS TO SIGN UP FOR THE METART NEWSLETTER. YOU CAN SIGN UP AT METART DOT COM FOR FREE.

IN THE NETSLETTERS, THERE ARE SOMETIMES OFFERS TO JOIN ONE OF THE SITES IN THE NETWORK FOR A REDUCED PRICE. SOMETIMES AS LOW AS $10 FOR THE FIRST MONTH.

JOIN ONE OF THE SITES, THAT YOU THINK YOU MIGHT LIKE. FOR $10 OR WHATEVER.

ONCE YOU HAVE JOINED ONE ONE OF THE SITES IN THE NETWORK, YOU CAN NOW JOIN ANY OTHER SITE IN THE NETWORK FOR $10/MONTH, RECURRING.

THAT WAY, YOU ARE TRULY GETTING YOUR MONEY'S WORTH, BECAUSE YOU NOW HAVE THE TIME TO EXPLORE EACH SITE, AT YOUR LEISURE.

BELONG TO ALL THE SITES IN THE NETWORK, OR 8 OF THEM AT ONCE, JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE BECAUSE YOU CAN ONLY DO SO MUCH IN A DAY. UNLESS MONEY IS NO CONSIDERATION.

METART IS MY FAVORITE PORN SITE. I'VE BEEN A MEMBER MANY TIMES. BUT NOT EVERYONE LIKES IT. IT'S TOO SOFTCORE FOR SOME.

THE VIDEOS AT METART ARE BORING. REECENTLY, SOME OF THE VIDEOS HAVE GOTTEN TO BE A LITTLE MORE EROTIC. BUT YOU CAN SPEND HUNDREDS OF HOURS LOOKING OVER THEIR VIDEOS, AND THE ONLY THING YOU WILL THINK IS: WHAT A WASTED OPPORTUNITY OF THESE LOVELY YOUNG MODELS.

LIKE PAT SAYS, A LOT OF THE SITES HAVE SIMILAR MATERIAL. SO IT'S PROBABLY BETTER TO IDENTIFY THE SITES YOU REALLY WANT TO JOIN, INSTEAD OF JOINING ALL OF THEM.

LIKE I SAID, METART IF MY FAVORITE. HIGH QUALITY PHOTOGRAPHY. MASSIVE CONTENT OF PHOTOSETS, NASSUVE NUMBER OF MODELS, YOUNG TEEN, MAINLY NATURAL, WHITE, ETC. BUT VERY SOFTCORE.


06-29-13  09:55pm

Reply
1769
Visit MetArtX

MetArtX
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Reply

METART IS BASICALLY SOFTCORE.
EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE, YOU FIND A METART MODEL IN ONE OF THE METART SISTER SITES IN A HOT PHOTOSET OR VIDEO THAT GIVES YOU A NEW APPRECIATION OF THE MODEL.
OR, EVEN RARER, YOU COME ACROSS THE MODEL IN A COMPETING SITE, THAT IS HARDCORE, AND YOU DEFINITELY SEE THE MODEL IN A NEW LIGHT.
MAYBE I'M SLOW, BUT WHEN I VIEW THE METART PHOTOSETS, I THINK OF THE MODELS AS BASICALLY INNOCENT GLAMOUR MODELS.
WATCHING THE SAME MODEL PERFORMING HARDCORE PORN MAKES A DIFFERENCE. SOMETIMES THE DIFFERENCE IS JUST HOW HOT THE MODEL CAN LOOK. OTHER TIMES, I THINK THE MODEL IS WASTING HER OPPORTUNITIES APPEARING IN SUCH LOW-GRADE PORN.
BUT THAT'S JUST ME.


09-16-17  05:46pm

Reply
1770
Visit MetArtX

MetArtX
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Reply

MOST METART SITES USE MANY OF THE SAME MODELS.
WHICH CAN BE GOOD OR BAD: DEPENDING ON WHETHER YOU LIKE THE MODELS.


09-16-17  06:14am

Reply
1771
Visit Michael Ninn

Michael Ninn
(0)
Reply of Nasos's Review

An excellent review. Easy to read, gives lots of details on the site, lots of your personal impressions. Covers both the inner details of the site, and the overall structure, as well.

For a first review, or a hundredth review, this is really impressive.

Hope to read a lot more of your reviews in the future.

Welcome, to PU.


08-16-13  09:03am

Reply
1772
Visit Michael Ninn

Michael Ninn
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Reply

My guess is that Ninn is partnering with MetArt for greater exposure, especially with the current economic downturn that has hurt so many porn sites.

And the MetArt network is still expanding, with quality partners and new offerings.


01-14-13  03:15am

Reply
1773
Visit Michael Ninn

Michael Ninn
(0)
Reply of tangub's Reply

As you know, the MetArt Network offers discounted memberships if you are a member at one of their sites.

But the promotional offers they send out can be even better. I received an email offer to join SexArt for $8/month on January 10.


01-13-13  11:19am

Reply
1774
Visit Michael Ninn

Michael Ninn
(0)
Reply of Capn's Reply

Can't really disagree.

I've never been a member. But from the preview area, I think I prefer X-Art or Diesel Access (the Diesel network) for this type of erotic video. That's just a guess, because, like I say, I've never been a member of this site.

But if you are a member of any of the MetArt sites, you can usually get a discounted membership to any of the other sites in their network. So that's a good thing to remember.


01-12-13  04:14pm

Comment
1775
Visit Michael Ninn

Michael Ninn
(0)

Just added to the MetArt Network.

The newest addition to the MetArt Network, MichaelNinn.

01-12-13  03:57pm

Replies (8)

Shown : 1751-1775 of 2840 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.52 seconds.