I also got some "free offers" to join Femjoy by paying $30 to join Femjoy and Nubiles.
That's the beauty of advertising: Create words to describe things in the best, most attractive way. Forget logic and common sense... For $30, you get Femjoy and Nubiles, which is the the list price of Nubiles by itself, so you are getting Femjoy for "free".
Anyway, this morning, I got a Christmas special email offer to join Femjoy for $14.95 for 1 month.
I haven't rejoined femjoy.
But if you send an email to their support, they might give you a few free days of membership in compensation.
I've seen that happen at some other sites when a member has problems accessing a site.
And their tech support might be able to help with the connection problem. Or not.
Even good sites seem to have problems every once in awhile.
Check your in box and spam box for a special offer from Femjoy.
$9.95 for 30 days.
10th anniversary offer.
Just got the email offer this morning in my spam box.
It's been a long time since I was a member of femjoy (I perfer Metart, or MPL Studios).
But for the price, it's worth thinking about a join.
I always preferred Metart over Femjoy. I certainly don't look at every photoset, and I skip most Metart videos without looking at them because I've found very few videos at Metart that I really like, no matter how much I might like their models.
But I haven't noticed any toys at Metart recently. I'm currently a Metart member.
If I do find a Metart photoset with toys, I will try to post this warning to the PU site.
I joined about the same time as you, for the 2-for-1 pricing of $29.95 for 60 days. I have not been rebilled yet, but the offer specified that the renewal price was $29.95 for every 60 days.
I never got an email confirming my membership, or the price that I was supposed to pay, but I did get access to the site the same day I signed up.
Thanks for the vote of confidence.
Some PU members will not agree with my opinion on the models at Femjoy needing more makeup, because it's a matter of individual taste. They view Femjoy as a special, almost rare site that features a very natural look of very little make-up, little photoshopping. But I personally don't mind some make-up or photoshopping, as long as it's not overdone. Until I got a comment about that, I always thought I was the one who wanted minimal makeup and photoshopping, but no matter where you stand, there are always people further out on both sides of any issue than you are. Lol.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
PROS:
-Over 200.000 poster size photos
-All photo series come in up to 4000 pixels resolution.
-Photo sets available in 3 different sizes: hi res, med res, lo res
-Zips for photo sets, for each res: hi, med, lo
-over 700 models, many are extremely attractive
-over 100 contributing photographers
-830 additions per year
-10 new HDV movies per month
-Tiny watermark
-No download limit
-No DRM
-choice of multiple formats and definitions for downloading videos
-special new low price $29.95(USD) for 60 days/recurring
-billing from CCBill, a reliable outside billing company
Cons:
PROS: (continued)
-content 100% exclusive to this site
-updates are dated
-no automatic time-out from site
CONS:
-Basic navigation, could be a little easier to use. To download a photoset or video, select the model, look at the photosets or videos available, select the photoset or video you want, then (if it's a photoset) select the res you want, and download the zip file. At met-art, it just seems
simpler to download the zip files than at femjoy.
-Searching is easier at met-art than at femjoy.
-Site is strictly soft softcore. No hardcore at all. Girls only. Boys not allowed. If a girl
touches herself, or one girl touches another, it is the lightest brush, not erotic at all.
-Don't always prominently list who the photographer is for each photo set or video. So if you want to know the photographer (to keep a personal, manually created list of the photosets, date of posting, title, photographer, etc.), you have to hunt around to see who the photographer was.
Bottom Line:
CONS: (continued)
-Limited to slender white European teen. Site advertises that models are from all over the world, but everything I saw looked to be indistinguishable from teen European. "Our girls come from all over the world - even from Spain, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the US, Scandinavia and not only from Eastern Europe."
Well, from the geography I learned in the Dark Ages (1960s), Spain, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and Scandinavia were in Europe. The US might not be in Europe, but how can you tell a US model from a model who is European? Simple answer: Look at her passport. Duh. Everything I saw at Femjoy was European teen, as far as I could tell.
-Most photo sets are solo models
-A small percentage of photo sets and videos are two female models. But there is no erotic contact
between the models, unless you can sense the Vulcan mind-meld auras within the models.
-Model bios: none
BOTTOM LINE:
This is one of the better/best softcore European teen glamour photo mega-sites.
The site ranks up there with met-art, mplstudios, justteensite, mypreciousvirgins, etc.
The main value is in the photosets. Huge number of models, a large number should appeal to almost
anyone's taste (but almost all models are slender white European teen).
There are a number of short videos, 2-6 minutes long, super softcore, high quality, great focus,
good to very-good color, good lighting, nice soundtrack.
The videos are more interesting than met-art videos, but that is not saying much. You are watching a lovely girl doing very little: she stands up, sits, lies down, smiles, walks. There is no plot to the videos. Another nice factor in the Femjoy videos is how clean they are, in the sense you don't hear a distracting photographer giving directions, you don't have annoying photoflashes going off in the video shoot.
There are a large number of Femjoy member comments inside the site about how great the models look, how wonderful the photography is, how artistic and erotic the photos and videos are, how this is a wonderfully clean site with no dirty, vulgar elements. If you are into super softcore, with models wearing minimal makeup, no tease at all (unless you supply it yourself in your own mind), this is the site for you.
Even though Met-art is very simllar to this site in the softcore approach, I find Met-art photos
much more satisfying: the models at Met-art are better looking because of greater use of make-up,
greater use of costumes, with more effort put into making the photoshoots more individualistic with varied sets and backgrounds.
I think Met-art navigation is simpler and easier to use to search the models available. It is also
easier to download the files at Met-art.
If Femjoy deserves an 87 for its fine photography, then Met-art deserves a 97 for its fine, more erotic photography, plus easier navigation, plus free video cams. There are no free video cams at Femjoy.
OK, I'm expecting a second vote of no confidence from Mr Fountain, on my opinion that femjoy models would be improved by more makeup.
But are there any PU members that agree with me? Or is this too much of a niche/nitpicking idea to concern my fellow PU members?
I don't have anything against natural. But makeup can bring out a girl's beauty. If you compare the photosets of the models below, I think the photosets of those models are, in general, better looking at met-art than at femjoy.
Photoshop is used more at met-art. As long as it's not overdone, it can add.
But that's a matter of personal taste. Just as two people looking at a list of models will probably not rank them all in the same descending order of beauty/attractiveness.
Angelina B(femjoy) aka Indiana A(met-art)
Anina(femjoy) aka Anna AO, Anna AS(met-art) aka Sinner and other names at metmodels
Brigita(femjoy) aka Natalia A(met-art)
Desiree (femjoy) aka Desire A(met-art)
And there are a bunch of other models that are featured at both femjoy and also at met-art, where you could compare the relative attractiveness of the photosets.
Femjoy models need more makeup in their photosets and videos.
This is a matter of personal taste or personal opinion. But:
I've been a member of femjoy about a month now. The site has some great-looking models, that you will see at other teen glamour sites. And the photography is high quality by top erotic photographers. But my gripe is that the models basically need more makeup to bring out their attractiveness. I'm not big on models (or people in regular life) wearing excessive makeup. But with a video or photoshoot, unless you use a minimum of makeup, the model will normally appear less attractive. Met-art usually gets it close to right, and the models usually appear to be attractive to very attractive. Femjoy uses less makeup on their models. The same models, the same photographer, and the photoset will be better looking at met-art than at femjoy. That is partly because of the makeup difference; also met-art allows more variety of costumes.
femjoy is almost entirely nude, very little use of clothing/costume, and any clothing used at femjoy is very simple. Femjoy is going for a very simple, natural style of photography with their models, and it detracts from the presentation of the models. I realize appreciation of a model's beauty is a personal taste, but if you see the models of Victoria's secret, or world-class supermodels photographed without makeup, and in old, cheap un-colorful clothes, it takes away a huge amount of the glamour and allure of the models.
There are a huge number of lovely models at femjoy, but the photosets don't bring out the eroticism of the models. The site is trying to present lovely girls as "the girl next door", with a very natural, simple style, but the style reduces the attractiveness of the models in the photosets.
Even if you are using the "girl next door" theme, which was probably first made popular with Playboy back in the 1950s and 1960s, for nude photography, you still want the model and photos to be as attractive as possible, with an erotic appeal. You don't want to take a good-to-great-looking girl, and produce a bunch of photographs that just look blah and unappealing. Met-art, in general, takes good-looking girls and makes good-to-great-looking photos. Femjoy takes the same girls, and makes photos that are less good-looking. That's a shame.
I see from the comments and reviews that other PU members don't necessarily agree with my opinion on the need for more makeup at femjoy. But I think my opinion has merit, and frankly, I'm surprised some PU member hasn't already expressed a similar opinion.
I just signed up with Femjoy, based on Mr Fountain's comment that a membership is now offered at $29.95 for 60 days. I gave my name, credit card information, etc. to CCBill, and was given a username, password, and subscription number. However, I can't log on to the user area of Femjoy with my username and password. I transferred to CCBill to see if I can find what the problem is, and CCBill shows I have no subscription/membership at Femjoy. I will try to log on at Femjoy later. One problem, besides being not able to log on to Femjoy member area, is the warning at log on that after 3 attempts to log on to member area, "you will be ...". (It doesn't say what you will be, other than dotted 3 times, but I suspect I will be barred from being able to log on for a number of hours, or maybe barred for 1 day.
Not a good start to my membership. Even tho CCBill shows I do not have a membership, after I gave my credit card and other information, I was then given a subscription ID, so I think I do have a membership, even tho it's not working properly.
Edit 1: OK, checking back at CCBill, it now shows I do have a membership at Femjoy, which started today.
Switching back to Femjoy, try to log on, and still can't get into member area. Will try again later. Hope that I am not barred from site because of prior attempts to sign on.
Edit 2: A side note: I used to get confirmation emails whenever I joined a pay site. I did not get any confirmation email yet from CCBill for this membership (recently I also did not get any confirmation email from another paysite membership).
Tried to log on to Femjoy member area, still can't get in.
Is it too much to ask for that once you pay for a site membership, you should be able to log on easily?
Edit 3: I can now get into member area of Femjoy. I still have not gotten any confirmation email of my membership, but as long as I can get into site, that's the main thing. Some of the models are gorgeous.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Uncensored Japanese porn (no mosaic effect to hide the genitals).
-$19.95/month with PU discount.
-Epoch is the biller. A trusted name.
-Can stream or download the videos.
--Each video gives you streaming choice of 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-Each video download gives you choice of 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-The codec for the files is extremely efficient. The file size for a download is amazingly small.
For example, a video with a runtime of 12 minutes 48 seconds, has a file size of:
240p 56 MB
480p 102 MB
720p 195 MB
1080p 377 MB
-Each video has a matching photoset.
-The software mechanism to view all the photos in a photoset online is easy to use.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sell on the join page.
-Poor search engine. If you enter a model's name, it returns her name and many different names.
-No zip file for any photo set.
-Some of the photos are not well-focused. Not well cropped. I'm assuming there is some software that creates a photo set from a video, and that is how the photo sets are produced--instead of using the traditional method of shooting a photo set with a camera, you shoot a video, and use software to create the photo set from the video. That is my guess on how the photo sets are created at some porn sites. This makes a better-looking product than the older style screencaps.
If anyone has knowledge about this process, I would certainly appreciate either denial or confirmation of my theory.
-Download speeds average 1 to 2 MB/sec. Not terrible, but could be improved.
Bottom Line:
Site themes: blowjobs. facials. cum swallowing. asian models. uncensored (no mosaic) hd porn.
Site statistics: 1,138 videos.
There's not a lot of variety in the scenes.
The videos are mainly a girl giving a blowjob to one or more guys.
You have one girl doing one guy, two guys, three guys, a bunch of guys.
Personally, this is not my favorite niche. I don't care how cute the girl is, it's hard for the girl to look cute or attractive when she has one or more cocks stuffed in her mouth. That's just my opinion.
You have over 1,100 scenes of models giving blowjobs. To add a little variety, you can throw in some masturbation with toys. Also some fucking.
In one scene, a Japanese schoolgirl is playing a video game on her cellphone, and licking an ice cream cone. She is so engrossed in the game, that when a boy pulls down his pants and puts his cock against her lips and against the ice cream
cone, she starts licking the cock as well as the ice cream.
Then the boy takes the ice cream cone away from her, and she continues licking his cock, while still staring at the cellphone game she has continued to play. Finally, the boy pushes his cock against her lips a few times, and she seems to notice his cock for the first time, and says "What are you doing?" (I'm guessing at what she says, because the language is Japanese.)
She pushes the boy away, lays down on the couch, and continues playing her cellphone game. The boy and another guy come back, touch her ass. she ignores them while playing the video game. The two guys use vibrators on her pussy, and undress
her, and she gives one a blow job.
There's almost a zen-like quality to the video. The first guy, who puts his penis against the girl's mouth while she is licking the ice cream cone, seems almost simple-minded.
However, the girl is almost simple-minded as well, because when the boy puts his penis against her mouth, she continues to lick the ice cream cone, as well as the boy's penis, and she seems unaware that she is licking a penis.
It's not like she is being naughty or mischievous, she is acting as if she's completely unaware there is a penis on her tongue, and she is totally focused on the cell phone game she is playing (as well as the ice cream cone she's licking).
I think the porn director is referencing George Lucas' Jedi wisdom, that states "Your focus is your reality".
The girl's reality is the video game, plus the ice cream cone. And the penis does not intrude.
I can't say the video is that hot or sexy. But it can be amusing.
For one thing, you wonder when the girl will wake up and notice she is licking the guy's penis. Even when he takes the ice cream cone away from her, she continues playing the video game, and licking his penis, but pretending the guy is not there.
Only when he pushes his penis against her, trying to force it into her mouth, does she seem to wake up and realize what is going on, and she tells the guy and his buddy (the buddy has been watching the action) to get lost.
The two guys leave the room momentarily, then return while the girl is stretched out on a couch still playing the game.
The guys remove the girl's panties, use a vibrator on her, and she finally wakes up to what they are doing, protests, but then is forced (with no violence) to give one a blowjob while the other guy fucks her with a vibrating dildo.
This is a strange or amusing video, but it's not really hot. It's more like: What the fuck????
If you like watching blowjobs or facials, this might hit your button.
Otherwise, the site gets boring very fast.
As I said, I don't think it improves a girl's allure when she has one or more penises stuck in her mouth. I much prefer traditional fucking.
Let me compare this site to Rocco Siffredi site. Almost all the Rocco Siffredi videos feature some cocksucking or blowjobs, along with vaginal and/or anal fucking, plus ass rimming. The Rocco Siffredi videos can be very hot. The sex is forceful. The videos are professionally shot, but with an amateur feel. The lighting and colors and camera work are just OK, but far below what you can get at sites like X-Art or ferame. But that is deliberate, Rocco Siffredi is trying to give you an atmosphere of "You are there, watching the action". And the action can be intense. It's not as cruel as Pierre Woodman, but the girls are definitely feeling some pain when the stunt cock (mainly Rocco Siffredi) rams his cock down their throat and makes them gag. Or pushes his penis into their ass or vagina with force.
Whereas ferame is almost entirely cocksucking. But on a much milder level than Rocco Siffredi. So there's less heat in the ferame videos.
Giving the ferame site a score of 70. That is very subjective. If you are a fan of blowjobs or facials, this site probably deserves a much higher score. You get over 1,100 videos, professionally shot, well lighted, good camera-work, good sound control. The video quality is excellent, but the content gets boring fast.
Impressive review.
Covers the details and site overview.
If there was a prize for best review of the month (which was discussed, but nothing came of it), I'd nominate this review for the reward.
I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one that's disappointed in life.
LOL.
Time to get over it, and move on.
Easier said than done.
Any other good stories I can relate around the campfire? While sipping my hot egg-nogg.
(I stay indoors, it's warmer, but the idea of a campfire sounds nice and cozy.)
Also, I am allergic to egg-nogg, but the idea of sipping a warm drink around a fire sounds like good cheer in this holiday season.
(Lactose intolerant.)
DISPUTE THE CHARGES WITH YOUR CREDIT CARD COMPANY, TELLING THEM YOU'VE TRIED TO CANCEL YOUR SUB AND WERE GIVEN THE RUN-AROUND.
MOST CREDIT CARDS I'VE DEALT WITH WOULD ASSUME I WAS HONEST, AND CANCEL ANY FURTHER CHARGES FROM THE SITE.
AND THEY MIGHT CANCEL THE MOST RECENT CHARGES, AS WELL.
"They need time to sharpen their pencils to write the cancellation order ;)."
Excellent joke.
I've never used jet.com.
I'm a loyal Amazon Prime member.
They give great service. Good prices.
So it's worth the membership fee. (Currently, around $100/year, I think.)
Also get a lot of free movies and TV shows for Amazon Prime members.
I'm surprised about the double authorization. You would think the credit card/bank would charge extra for that.
Thanks for the warning.
I've never joined a site that required 30 days notice before cancellation takes effect.
Must have been a porn business-genius who thought up that one.
The site models seem real amateurs, and the low current price seems attractive. I certainly don't recognize any of the models I saw in the preview pages. :)
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Small site. 110 videos + matching photosets. But this is part of the Teen Mega World network, and membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites in the network.
-Teen Mega World network (TMW) has over 5,000 hardcore teen videos.
-TMW has over 1,300 teen models. The models are young and attractive. They are not glamorized with heavy makeup or glamorized costumes or photoshopped, but most of the models are attractive, some of them are extremely attractive, and they appear to enjoy showing off their bodies and enjoy getting fucked. Which can make for some hot videos.
-TMW has over 30 separate sites, which cover most of the hardcore niches. So anyone who enjoys hardcore teens should find plenty to watch.
-No limits on downloading or streaming.
-Recent videos (the last few years) include 2160p.
Cons:
-They did a network update a few years ago. This made navigation harder. Instead of being able to enter the different sites, you are tied to your join site, and can only partially enter any of the other sites. This makes navigating the other sites (except for your join site) harder.
-Also, the search is limited to the site you joined through. Even when you switch to another site, you are still logged in to your join site, and the search results are limited to your join site.
So, do yourself a favor and join through the Teen Mega World site.
-The network updates with 1 video and photoset per day. But with over 30 sites, any one site will update, at best, slowly.
-Many sites have not updated in years.
-The older videos and photosets from years ago are of lower quality.
Bottom Line:
First BGG is a teen threesome site. One boy jumping on 2 different girls. (He doesn't really jump, but the guy is getting a real work-out with 2 attractive teen girls.)
TMW and the Diesel Network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) are two of my favorite hardcore teen networks.
That's because the models are real teens (at least when they start out), and they are mainly attractive, with some models very attractive. And the girls seems to get off on the sex. Which can make for some hot videos.
Most teen models that are into hardcore don't have a long career: they seem to last maybe 2-3 years, before retiring. Softcore teen models often retire after 2-3 years, but some can last for years, and are still active after 10 years. I assume that hardcore just wears the girls out faster. Because very few hardcore models are still active after 5 years.
-TMW has spent a lot of time and money and effort upgrading the videos and photosets in recent years
They now offer 2160p videos the last few years: the sets are more expensive, the lighting, sound control, costumes, etc. are better.
You need to join through the Teen Mega World site, to make search and navigation easy:
Otherwise, joining through a satellite site makes finding the content of a model at the network difficult, and then accessing the content is difficult:
A simple example:
I joined through Teen Sex Movs.
Which means my search is limited to the Teen Sex Movs site.
If I am able to find the model's content at one of the other sites (through a cumbersome process), to view the content: I would have to navigate to the specific site her content is at, then page through the site pages looking for the her content, to find her hot links at that site.
And repeat the process for each site her content is at.
The TMW customer service staff was kind enough to give me a free membership to the TMW site, to make using the network easier, since my join site was through Teen Sex Movs.
But they really need to update the site structure, so that all the satellite sites have the same structure as the TMW site: For more complete searches, to easily access the content.
Because navigation (searching for content, and accessing the content) is difficult and time-consuming if you are not a member of the TMW site, but one of the satellite sites.
I don't think the TMW staff realize the difficulty of being a member of one of the satellite sites.
If they did, they would update the network structure, by making all the sites have the TMW structure.
I'm giving First BGG site a score of 90.
That is because I'm assuming you joined through the TMW site itself.
If you joined through one of the satellite sites, because of navigation issues, I would drop the score to 65. Because even though I enjoy the contents of the TMW network, accessing the content would be too much work.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount for $19.95/month if you join the site directly.
But join through Teen Mega World site for $14.95/month, which gives you full access to First BGG and all the other sites in the Teen Mega World network.
-Can stream or download the videos.
-Videos have multiple choices of definition for download.
For download, all videos have low, medium, and high definition. The newer videos from June 2014 on have a 1080p definition as well.
-A major plus is that the models are attractive to very attractive.
These are young, white teenagers from Eastern Europe, slender bodies. Natural. Very few tattoos, little piercing. Almost no fake breasts. Not a huge amount of annoying fake moans and groans.
-There is a gallery to illustrate each video. Gives you a clear, fast idea of what the action is. The photos are crisp, good quality.
-Zip file for each gallery.
Cons:
-Infrequent updates. Recent update rate is one video in a month or in two months.
-Small site. Only 82 videos (and matching photo sets).
-Videos stream in only one definition. No choice of low, medium or high.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics: Site has 82 videos and matching photo sets.
The recent update rate is erratic: maybe one video plus photo set in one or two months.
Site theme: The videos are supposed to be the first time a boy and 2 girls have sex together, at the same time.
So there's obviously a bit of fantasy element here, that these girls are first-timers having sex with each other and a boy, since you've seen these girls in many other videos having sex, and it's not that big a stretch to think these girls
are porn pros who've done it all.
But suspend your disbelief, and enjoy the action. The girls are cute, and they are not shy. They are kissing and petting and fingering each other, and the boy is just another sex tool for the girls to get off. A sex tool they enjoy sharing in creative ways. And the boy is a young stud, who does his best to satisfy both of the girls, as well as satisfying himself.
The first videos at the site are dated April and May, 2009.
The earliest videos have 3 definitions for download: low (for mobile), medium, and high definition. Low definition is 405p, medium definition is 540p, and high definition is 720p.
Starting in June 2014, they began offering 1080p downloads for their newer videos.
The models can be attractive to very attractive.
Sheri Vi, Juliya B, Ada, Angel, Caroline, Grace C, Rebecca, Dora C, Izi, Gabi, Taissia, Inga E, Alice C, Milana Fox, Ariadna and some of the other teens can be featured at sites like MetArt, 18OnlyGirls, DigitalDesire, and other well-known
porn sites.
So the girls are mainly good-looking teenagers.
With firm bodies: firm ass, pert tits, cute faces, and the enthusiasm to fuck-fuck-fuck.
The stunt cocks do a good job with the girls.
The videos are professionally shot. Good camera work, good lighting, good colors, good sound control.
This is not a glamour site (or network), it's bread-and-butter sex, little or no romance to the sex, but the girls are both hot and willing.
The site (and network) is well-designed, to make it easy to use. There is a model listing, with nice-sized thumbnails to show you what the models look like, with hot links to all the models videos. There is a basic search, and an advanced
search.
The site only has 82 videos, but you also get access to the full Teen Mega World network, which has 4285 videos of mainly hardcore teen sex, in many different niches. So you will get a huge amount of content for your money. If you like teen sex, hardcore, without a lot of glamour, this site/network should be a candidate for your porn dollars.
Note: A lot of the sites in the network either do not update or update rarely. This can annoy some members.
Almost all the videos are in some Eastern European language, when the models speak.
The videos at some of the sites are very old, and in poor quality. The models might be attractive, but it's annoying that the video quality is so poor. Because those models retired years ago, and you won't be able to find better quality videos
of those models.
Some members are annoyed by the adds for other porn sites on each page at the site.
Some members are annoyed by the fake cum shots in the videos.
So there can be negative psychological elements about enjoying this site or network.
But: put these annoying elements aside. Enjoy the site and network for what it is. A boatload of hardcore teen sex of attractive girls, for a very low price ($14.95/month if you join through the Teen Mega World site, $19.95/month if you join through the First BGG site).
I'm giving the site a score of 92. Because of the very attractive models. Because of the hot sex. Because you get full access to the Teen Mega World network. Because of the low price.
Add it all up, and I think it's a great value, for your money. That's my opinion, anyway.
Great review, that really gives the essential details and flavor of the site, as usual. I'm a fan of your reviews.
The only thing I wonder about is your comment that "the sex is nothing much". I'm not a member of brainpass.com network or this site, so I haven't seen the specific videos here in their entirety.
But I've seen short clips of a bunch of Pierre Woodman videos.
Personally, I don't like his style of sex in Casting X: it's brutal on the women, and I don't know how or why they seem to respond so favorably to the apparent pain.
Woodman seems to ream them out: mouth, vagina, ass.
My question is: why do you feel the sex is nothing much?
Are we (myself included) getting so blase to sex?
I guess a second question would be: how the hell does he get to pound so many gorgeous girls? I mean, sweet Lord, why is life so frickin' unfair?
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Secure login page (https).
-Secure member pages (https).
-Nice model index.
2 forms of the model index:
1: Pages with about 20 models each, name and thumbnail of model.
2. An alphabetical listing of the model by name (no thumbnail, but hot link to model's page, which has a nice-sized thumbnail of the model, plus links to whatever videos she appears in.
-All content is supposed to be exclusive. This has to be modified: content shot for the site is exclusive, but they also use some content from other sites, such as Wet and Puffy, which is obviously not exclusive.
-No download limits.
-Each video has a matching photoset.
The photosets are nice-quality photos.
The videos can be streamed and/or downloaded in multiple definitions:
-You get a confirming email on signup from Vendo (if that is the payment processor you used) with your billing details:
Cons:
-small site. No bonus material.
-currently 91 models. Most appear to be late teens, early twenties. Mainly white. Mainly slender. Not a lot of tattoos on most of the models.
-There is a small amount of data given for a model:
Name, nationality, age, breast size, weight, height.
-2 pre-checked cross-sales on join page.
-Your login details (username and password) are pre-selected by the site.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: lesbian fisting and twisting (turning your fist in the girl's pussy).
The site design is clean: the scenes are shot in a white room, with white furniture and white sheets on a white bed, making the girls stand out clearly.
There is teasing, kissing and caressing, and the use of different tools to stimulate and widen the pussy. I'm not into lesbian tools, but there are speculums, forceps, dildoes, vibrators.
This is a small site: You should be able to watch all the videos in a month. Or if you pick and choose, you can scan the contents in less than a week.
$9.95 for 1 month then $29.95 every month until cancelled.
The first month is cheap. But why you would want to renew is beyond me. Since this is a small site, with a slow update rate, and no bonus sites to explore.
I'm giving the site a score of 78.
That is because of the small content.
However, the videos are photo sets are good quality, and most of the videos are exclusive.
So if you are into lesbian fisting, it might be worth a join, since the first month is only $9.95.
But I personally prefer sites with more content, or with bonus sites you can enjoy.
The models are mainly slender white teen/early twenties girls, not a lot of tattoos.
But the videos, even though professionally shot, don't have a lot of heat or passion. Not much eroticism.
So I recommend looking for a more satisfying site to spend your membership dollars.
If you are into lesbian fisting, I recommend reading PU member MargulisAZ's review and comments on the site, Fister Twister, since he seems to be a fan of the niche and has written an excellent review of the site and a couple of worthwhile comments.
That will give you a better flavor of what the site offers, it's pros and cons.
My interest is more superficial, and I thought the site was disappointing, in spite of it's low price.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
