Not a member, but I have seen a couple of videos from the site. The videos I saw were clean and sharp, the models are young and attractive. But $29.95 for 1 month to a single site seems expensive. This is part of a network. Obviously, if they included membership to a number of their other network sites in that price the membership would be much more attractive.
Excellent review, as usual.
There is some duplication of material at TMW and the Diesel Network. But the duplicated material is offered at higher definition at the Diesel network. And I think the same videos are, at least in my opinion, better quality (brighter colors, whatever). So I didn't mind the duplication.
They eliminated a few of the dead sites a while back, the ones that had the least value (very poor quality of videos).
The main draw for me is large number of really attractive models the site offers. I realize many of same models are at other sites (TMW, whatever), but Diesel offers nice videos and photosets of lovely girls in softcore and hardcore.
If you are interested in searching for the material offered on a particular model, a site such as: ndexxx.com
might be useful.
It's not as easy as using a better search box at Diesel, but it offers you the chance to see what sites the model appears at, for both videos and photosets.
And you can also search by specific sites, using the Website list hot-link, that lists the models that have appeared at individual sites.
Diesel simplified the login page across all their sites recently. Now, after your first successful login, you won't need to retype 4 captcha numbers anymore, while you are using their services from the same IP you used for your first successful login.
When you change your location, though, the system will require you to fill in a captcha again for one time and record your new place so your second login from your new location will be without captcha again.
Here is a reply by the webmaster at Diesel Access to a comment:
10-15-12 09:33am
dieselman
Webmaster REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :
Thank you lk2fireone!
Indeed, when you buy a membership of 5 months access, you will get access to all our sites in DieselAccess network. You can also join with TBP montnly discount link and after staying a member with us for two months, you will get access to all our sites at no additional cost.
WowGirls is a separate site but we will release soon a loyalty access for it as well.
Now, get there and enjoy the girls and the content :))
Hopefully, the webmaster of the site/network will respond to some of your questions. He does answer questions at PU from time to time.
I am a current member with access to all the sites in the Diesel Access network. But I don't see any listing at the network that shows the membership options with prices other than what is shown at PU. But if you are a member at one of the sites, they often show discounts for joining one of their other sites, or some outside site.
The only way to get access to all 14 sites in the Diesel Access network currently is with the 5 month membership for $99.00. I don't know if the offer that by extending your membership to Young Legal Porn or 18 Only Girls for some time period, you will gain access to the rest of the network. That might be a rumor, a hope, or hot air.
I agree with you that it was much better for subscribers when PU offered a discount.
Also, it was much better when you had the opportunity to join the 14 sites on a monthly basis, by paying $10.00 more versus a membership to only a single site in the network.
Sometimes c and e are also hard to distinguish at some sites.
It's fairly easy to read the captcha at this site, but there is some error in the software, that makes the submitted captcha entry incorrect on the first try.
There are a few sites where, because the captcha letters and numbers are so distorted, that I give up trying.
Whenever I log into the site, I have to first give a captcha number through the Diesel Access page. But the first number I give always returns an error message, stating that either the captcha was wrong, or that my browser does not accept cookies.
The second time I enter a different captcha number, the captcha entry is accepted, and I am able to log in.
No big thing. But I wish they dropped the captcha entirely.
By the way, have you seen Candice Luca. aka Candice Love, Kaylee, Lennox A?
She's only been around starting this year, but she's got photosets over a large number of websites. Some of her photosets are really good. And her videos are definitely worth watching, as well.
I'm still a member of the Diesel network with access to all their sites (excluding Wow Girls).
Normally, I'm more into pix than vids.
But some sites and networks emphasize vids over pix. And that's my take on Diesel.
The pix have improved quite a bit in the last few years at Diesel. But the vids are the main reason to join this network.
The vids and the incredibly cute teens they feature.
I agree the photosets could be improved. Especially where they waste a lot of time on pussy closeups. Maybe that's due to popular demand, or what they think is popular demand.
But like I say, I join Diesel for the vids. For pix, there are much better sites. Except there are a number of photosets of models that are worth viewing, and keeping, as well. Because the models are gorgeous.
Here's another bit of irony. I signed up for Young Legal Porn today, because of the comment/question you posted yesterday.
I like the site/network, and was a member back in December of last year. Normally I would wait a while before re-joining. But I like the Diesel videos (and the lovely models), so instead of joining a new site I might like or dislike, I went with a site that I knew to be good.
I just signed up today for YoungLegalPorn. I was a member before a few times already. I wrote a review on 2011-03-08 where I said, "The photosets are more in the style of an amateur-shot photo series done at home, except that I have seen many amateur photos that have much better photo technique than the photosets at this site."
But the newest photos I am seeing today are really improved. I posted a site comment today, stating that their videos are sharp, their models are lovely, and that I've seen some of their newest photosets that are really worthwhile.
This is mainly a video site. But if they can post outstanding photosets in the future, as they seem to be doing now, this will be a photo site as well.
This site, and the Diesel network, has fantastic-looking teens. That's been true for years now. And the videos are really outstanding, as well. What has changed is that the photos have improved. The photos I've seen recently are really outstanding, and compare to what you could get at Metart or MPL Studios, two sites that specialize in high-quality photos.
There have been 3 reviews about this site in the last 2 weeks.
If I didn't know better, I would think the site itself was paying for the reviews, since the reviews are generally positive.
However, since I wrote one of the three reviews, and I got no payment for my review (except for tickets from PU), I think the reviews are honest and well-meaning.
And all three reviews were excellent, including yours.
It just struck me as unusual, because this is not a site like MetArt or Nubiles, which usually attracts a lot of attention.
But the site (and network) does have some lovely models. So I think the attention is warranted.
Khan, when I use the PU/TBP links to Young Legal Porn, I see the $19.99 and $29.99 for single site and network access.
But when I use the PU/TBP links for 18 Only Girls, I see the $29.99 and $39.99 for single sites and network access.
I tried clearing out my cookies, but I don't know if I did a good job, because my PC froze up on me partly through the process. And then I had to reboot the computer.
But, just to check, if you use the hot links for 18 Only Girls, what you do see?
The $19.99 and $29.99 for signup?
Or the $29.99 and $39.99 for signup?
It used to be that you could join Young Legal Porn for $19.99 monthly single subscription, or $29.99 monthly for complete network access, using the PU/TBP links for discount.
If you joined through 18 Only Girls, you would pay $29.99 month single subscription, $39.99 monthly for complete network access.
So if you wanted complete network access, save $10 and join through Young Legal Porn.
The prices advertised at PU/TBP for 18 Only Girls are now shown at $19.99 month, recurring. But when you used those links, you see a sign up page that shows $29.99 month, recurring, for single site access, or $39.99 for network access, recurring.
So PU/TBP has to contact the site to straighten out whether the PU/TBP discounts will be honored, or whether PU/TBP should change to page membership back to $29.99 per month, recurring.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Lovely young teen models.
-The videos have crystal sharp definition, good lighting, good sound control (no random, loud, extraneous background noises). Some of the older
videos have some extraneous background noises and the photography is not always sharp. But the newer videos are well shot photography.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Easy login to the site - with the DieselAccess network.
Cons:
-The cons are minor. rearadmiral and tangub have reported problems with the site (such as poor downloading speeds occasionally), but I have not.
-They should have some posting if the Live Diesel model is late for a public show, or if the show has been cancelled. A simple notice stating
the model has been delayed, and when she might appear online. Or if the show has been cancelled, simply stating that.
-A few videos or photosets might be from years ago, but you couldn't tell it from the posting date. For example, the model Odessa is familiar from years ago. She is also known as Priscilla, Anna, Lily, Yana, Chrissy, Lusy, and Melissa. And she has appeared on more than 25 pay sites.
Anyway, in a video on 18OnlyGirls (a network site to YoungLegalPorn), Odessa states her name as Anna, not Odessa. And she says her age is 18.
She has been doing porn since 2002. The video is dated/posted as 2009-10-07. So the age she states is wrong, or the videos is from years ago.
Bottom Line:
Cons (continued):
But the posted date is a minor problem.
-Some photosets have only one option for downloading, others have 3 options for downloading: 4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px.
-In the updates section, I wish they would clearly identify each set as "video" or "photo set". Instead, you have to click on the set to find whether it's a video or photos.
-The search (or listing for a model) is specific to each site only. The model Samantha, for example, shows as one set on YoungLegalPorn. You have to transfer to 18onlygirls to see that she also has a set at that site. It would be easier if a single search returns all the sets for a particular model at that network, with each site being listed with the sets for that model. Instead, you have to visit each individual site and do a search to see if the model appears at that site.
-The rearadmiral reported that he had a problem gaining access to all sites in this network even though he paid for all network sites. But that was straighten after a few email. I did not have that problem.
-Also, rearadmiral reported that he connection to the network was very slow at times. My download speed maxes out about 630 KB/s, and I did not have any problems with my download speed. But admiral has a faster connection than my own. And he was using the connection longer than I was. But rearadmiral saw sustained download speeds of less than 20 KB/sec. The Webmaster replied to rearadmiral's comments on PU, and said there was a technical problem and the problem seems to be fixed.
The Webmaster should be giving credit for responding to PU comments so fast, and with an open attitude of trying to fix those complaints.
-Bottom Line (summary):
-Web site features teen girls. Doing masturbation (1 or 2 or more girls). Doing lesbian sex (2 or more girls). Doing sex with a boy (1 or 2 girls, 1 boy). The girls are OK to very attractive.
-videos:
high quality:
width x height: 1280x720
total bitrate: 11013 kbps
802 MB/13 min 46 sec runtime
The newer videos have a high definition option, 720p, along with 480p and 360p.
The older videos from several years ago only have a standard definition option 480p.
photosets:
4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px on some photosets. But the file size for the 4000 px photoset can be 148-250 MB.
-There are live chat sessions with Diesel models that are free with a paid membership, named "Diesel Girls Live".
There are also, separately, chat sessions with other models. The chat sessions with other models can be free. There can also be a charge for the other model chat sessions, in one of two modes: a non-public mode which is open to all members who pay the fee; a separate private chat which would be a one-on-one session with yourself and the chat model.
I think the site is worth a 90. But if you have the problems that rearadmiral or tangub are having, the site is worth far less. The sites has some great looking models. The recent videos are crystal sharp. The photography is ok, showing improvement over time, but not up to standards of MetArt or MPL Studios.
It's probably better to delete your email address from a public post, or you might be opening yourself to spammers.
Write a note to PU if you can't delete the email address from the post (because of time limit, you can't change or edit a post after 10 minutes or a reply to that post, which is part of PU rules).
You don't want a good email address published in a public area.
I get a ton of spam every day, and I've tried to keep my email address private.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
