If you could confirm that the girl in question really had her tramp stamp done in kosher ink, that might help qualify the site to legally claim the name of Jewish Porn Girl Sex.
But the truth is, like you, I am holding my breath for the time when "BaptistBlowJob.com" will be coming out.
Definitely delete it. If you bring your PC in to a shop for repair, and someone at the repair shop reports you for porn on your PC, you could go to jail. Or if someone visiting your house looks at your PC without permission, and finds porn, they could report you. The police could search your PC, because you joined some online porn site or for some other reason which might be legal or non-legal.
I've read that PCs (notebook PCs) were seized by customs police from tourists returning from Canada. Don't recall the specifics, but the police kept the notebook PCs of tourists returning to the US from Canada.
That's really a worthwhile warning. Many of the bonus sites have little to no value (my personal opinion). There are around 5 sites in this network that have almost all the value (worthwhile videos), and if you don't get those sites as part of your membership, the value of the membership goes way down.
I think it's irritating the way this network does not clearly spell out the sites that are included in each membership. The site owner/provider should simplify the membership network and make every site in the network available with a membership in any of the sites.
If you join this site and find you don't get access to all the primary (worthwhile) sites in the network, and you realize this fact (because you joined before or you read reviews explaining which of the network sites have the most value), you would be disappointed and feel the network had basically cheated you and was not giving full value.
End of rant. But I feel the way the provider slices and dices access to the primary bonus sites is disappointing.
Only if they make me the star of the porn production. Considering the way I look and that I couldn't last beyond 15 seconds of hardcore action, maybe I should start off as a softcore starlet, but I'm a little old to be a starlet (and the wrong sex).
I'm waiting for when we can get replacement bodies, because my own is wearing out, but I doubt I will be around long enough for that to happen for me personally.
I agree there are plenty of worse sites out there. Like you say, if you take the time to dig through the site you will find some nice pictures of attractive models. But as I get older, I'm less willing to spend a lot of time digging through the trash; I want quality photos (or videos) put on display where I can easily find them.
My suggestion of a score less than 70 for this site is really more of a quibble than a serious disagreement. I basically agree with the points you made in your review. I personally find it difficult to come up with a score for sites, because I believe a site score is very subjective. That's my belief, but I recognize that some people appear to believe their scores are written in stone and are based on immutable factors that should be obvious to all (I am not including you as part of that camp).
Switching from European or American porn to Japanese porn, there is a change in the mind-set, the ambiance, the mind-set. Change can be nice, it can refresh the mind and allow you to enjoy the same basic thing (sex or porn) more than the same-old, same-old thing.
I don't appreciate all of Japanese porn, especially the mosaics, but it makes for a nice change of pace. And there are some truly lovely Japanese porn models/actresses.
But tastes differ. If you are bored by Japanese porn, then look elsewhere for something that you can appreciate.
It hasn't come up. Thankfully, we don't live in a police state where we have to fill out a daily questionnaire on our sex habits. But maybe that would be a great idea to require for our grammar/elementary school students. Kick the perverts out of school and stop the contamination.
Personally, I think the model Tatyana is as good as you get. She's gorgeous, in my opinion, and the best thing at the site.
Her photosets alone are worth a 1-month membership, in my opinion. But if the models don't appeal to you, or you don't care for the photographs, then the site is a waste of your time and money.
I think the photographs are high quality. Yes, some of the photographs are too dark, but that's a flaw you find at almost all sites, on some of the photographs (poor lighting, poor focus, poor this-or-that).
But if you didn't find anything worth downloading, that must have been a real disappointment.
Sorry your membership turned out to be a waste of time and money. As you pointed out recently, there's always risk when joining a site.
To each their own, which means personal tastes differ, I think.
My own preferences are softcore over hardcore, pix over vids.
But I will look at hardcore, and at vids, hoping to find something I like.
It's just that there's more softcore that appeals to me than hardcore.
Also, I think it's easier to make good photos than to make good videos, for a lot of different reasons, and it's easier (takes less effort) to search through pix than to search through vids (less time-consuming, and less expensive). And vids take up much more room on the hard drive than pix.
The important factors of a site to me are quality and quantity and price. I don't require a huge amount of material if the material is highly appealing. But based on the short preview of the site, and your review, this site appears to have little material that is extremely appealing to me, so I will give it a pass (a do-not-join). Someone else might find the models or photos or videos extremely attractive, but there are other sites that I think offer more value for the price (I'm not saying the site has no value, just that it doesn't appear to offer high value to me.).
Or to quote you, in a simple summary of what I've said: "To each their own =)"
Good review. Gives overall site description. I also like the preview area of the site, which gives a good intro to the site itself. I'm into softcore pix, but the site seems too small to be worth even a 1-month membership. But that's just my personal taste, based on your review and what I see from the site preview.
When you find a model you really like, and you want to see what she has been in (photosets + videos), it can be really frustrating to do a search when the same model is given different names at different sites. To make it worse, the same model can have different names at a single site. There is the additional problem that different models can have the same name.
I agree that the videos are mainly a waste of time.
But you get a huge amount of photosets of yummy knockout babes.
You also get a huge number of contributing photographers, so the differing styles of the photography, while not wildly different from each other, should give most softcore teen fans of photosets plenty to find satisfaction with.
This is the best teen softcore site on the net for photosets, based on quality of photosets, quantity of photosets, the huge number of contributing photographers, the huge number of attractive models.
The large number of free live-cam hours for the models (part of the membership) is just a bonus.
This is a minor point that is probably too minor for most people to pay any attention to; but, in the "preview" amateur free gallery, there are 6 photos of a cute blonde girl. I saw one of the photos years ago, never saw a full set.
Cute girl, stuck in my memory.
My quibble is that the photoset (of 6 photos) is dated 05 Nov 2009.
I wish the sites would be more clear or accurate about these dates. 05 Nov 2009 is probably when the 6 photos were posted on the site. But the photos themselves were taken years ago, because, like I say, I saw one of the photos of that set (partial set?) years ago, and have seen that same photo many times since.
I'm also a little disappointed that the quality of the photos isn't higher (better definition or resolution). I wonder if maybe the site is deliberately offering a lower-resolution picture to add to the "amateur" or "reality" effect.
These are just quibbles on my part. Easily ignored.
I agree that the site preview is terrible, in that it does not show short clips of at least some of the site videos or photos.
The preview area states you get full access to over 25 bonus sites, but does not name any of the bonus sites.
I would give the preview a rating of "shit" or "shitty", which would have been a failing grade back in the day.
However, if you haven't been a member of this site or any of the Royal Cash sites, and if you are into teens, you might want to join for a 1-month membership. The network is primarily a teen video site. There are photosets, but the photosets are low-quality pictures that are basically screen-caps of the videos.
There are about 4 sites in the Royal Cash group that have hot teen videos that are the main attraction of a membership: fresh young girls, most models you have not seen elsewhere, in straight-fuck videos with little to no storyline. Straight-fuck means no story, but there is bj, anal, vaginal, whatever, mainly boy-girl, but some girl-girl, some threesome, at the different sites.
A great photographer can capture all of a model's beauty, including her accent. Future photos will include soundtracks as well as smelltracks as well as feeltracks, for a better transmission of the model, as well as foreign language translation.
But the New York spoken word will not be cracked for another 3 centuries, due to its harsh and grating sound.
I seem to recall a similar poll question being asked before. Or else it was discussed in a forum thread.
Anyway, for me, an accent can sometimes add a little to the video, as long as the speaker is understandable. It depends. But I don't find New York accents erotic.
When I'm a member, Met-art is one of the few sites I log into every day, because of the large update schedule, and I just like searching the huge archives. But most sites are not worth a daily visit. When I first join a site, I spend time trying to find the prime material, then spend less time after that because few sites update with material that I really like on a daily basis.
I agree that the Just Teen Movie site is a disappointment. They started out with high-quality short videos (8-17 minutes run time) of lovely models. The videos were mainly boring, in spite of the attractiveness of the models. I say high-quality videos because of the high definition of the videos and the other technical aspects (good lighting, good color for the skin tone, etc.)
But it's been over 15 months since they added a new video. Anyone joining that site for over 1 month is wasting his money. You can download the entire site contents of Just Teen Movie in 2 or 3 days. They only have 42 videos. And most of the videos you probably wouldn't want to watch a second time, anyway, because they are mainly boring.
A real shame. They had a good idea of a high-quality video site of lovely young models, and then didn't follow through on the updates.
I guess you just have to take the good with the bad.
JTS just posted a photoset of Linda named "Merry Xmas", dated 2009-12-23. This Linda is named Masha F at Met-art. She's one of my favorite models. Gorgeous girl. Linda is wearing a Santa-type hat in many of the "Merry Xmas" photos. There's also a border of fake snow around many of the photos to set her off and to remind us of the Christmas season.
Truth be told, the photos would have been better without the fake snow.
But this is a gorgeous girl, and the photoset is worth keeping.
She also had a recent photoset at Met-art, dated 2009.10.28, named "PREXIOSI", under the model name of Masha F.
This site gives multiple models the same name. There are currently 4 Masha models, 3 Linda models, etc. The site should give each model a unique name, to simplify the search. Even if it's just Linda_01, Linda_02, Linda_03, or Linda_A, Linda_B, Linda_C.
American Vice has "a series with midgets and some deformed guy". That's what I would call a really specialized niche. Personally, I prefer regular boy-girl videos, or even girl-girl videos, to watching a midget or some deformed guy.
In spite of a number of attractive models, because of the high membership price and other negative factors of this site, it's not worth joining. So what is a reasonable score for a site that's not worth joining? Individual preferences vary wildly, but I think any score of 70 or above is too high for this site. That's just my opinion, of course, but I think that more emphasis should be put on making the score reflect the attractiveness/value of a site, as to whether the site is worth joining or not.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
