| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1401
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I think Joymii and Sexart are going for a similar "arty" erotic style. But I don't think any of those sites puts much emphasis on anal.
|
08-19-12 06:11pm
|
Comment
1402
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
08-19-12 11:08am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1403
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Glad you like it so far.
For soft hardcore, or erotic porn. I think it's one of the better sites available.
And many of the models are drop-dead gorgeous.
|
08-19-12 10:18am
|
Reply
1404
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
I think graymane speaks for at least some of us elder PU members.
|
08-18-12 09:48pm
|
Reply
1405
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
Maybe I'm getting jaded, but fellatio and cunnilingus often appear boring.
|
08-16-12 03:38am
|
Reply
1406
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I tried getting a refund on a pre-checked cross-sale site. But didn't get one.
|
08-14-12 03:18pm
|
Reply
1407
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
What tangub said. It's a good thing I like skinny white chicks. Japanese models are some of the most beautiful in the world, but I don't like the mosaic blur.
|
08-10-12 05:52am
|
Reply
1408
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
"Have you ever seen any exif data in a MET set?"
I'm not technically inclined.
I look at a photo (or video) and see whether I enjoy it or not. I pay very little attention to the technical specifications, although I do realize they can have an impact on my enjoyment.
I usually like photos that are clear and in focus. The same with videos.
|
08-09-12 06:14pm
|
Reply
1409
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
I was merely trying to make a comment (and joke) that a few models barely seem to age over a period of 5 years or more. Most models do age quite noticeably once they are no longer teenagers.
But your explanation of a photographer shooting multiple sets of a particular model and then those sets being posted over a long period of time seems reasonable.
Occasionally I will find a new set of a model I like, and realize it was photographed years ago, because the model appears so much like she did when she was just starting out. The posting date of the set might be recent, but the set was photographed much earlier. That is different from when a site re-dates a set because they are trying to show they are posting new content, which is a lie.
When sites give a content date, that should normally mean the date the content was first posted at that site.
But even here, it's not always simple. Because some sites, when they give an updated version of some content, because it's in higher resolution or some other form of improved version, will re-date that content to the date it's currently posted.
I feel like a dog chasing its own tail.
I admire your way with words. Clear and to the point.
|
08-09-12 06:05pm
|
Reply
1410
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the fast response.
I posted a comment on All Gravure a couple of years ago. I wasn't a member, but from looking at the preview pages, and knowing something about some of their featured models, a lot of the pictures would be non-nude, because those models are non-nude models. They are idols, which in Japan means they have a fan base.
And a lot of the photos are non-exclusive. Apparently, this site collected photos from photo-books of Japanese models, and posted the photos at this site.
|
08-09-12 09:35am
|
Comment
1411
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
08-09-12 09:17am
Replies (11)
|
Reply
1412
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
What Japanese site or sites do you think are the best value?
I think Japanese models are some of the most beautiful in the world.
And their photography is first class.
But I don't really appreciate the mosaic blurring in their videos.
|
08-09-12 08:00am
|
Reply
1413
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
You're right.
I was being very approximate.
Several years ago I used to buy photo-books from Amazon.co.jp.
At that time, the rate was very close to 100 Japanese yen per US dollar.
|
08-09-12 07:54am
|
Reply
1414
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
op9527's Review
Interesting review. Your wife seems to sum up the site quite well: "Too little for too much time and money"
|
08-09-12 07:25am
|
Comment
1415
|
Graphis
(0)
|
|
08-09-12 07:19am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
1416
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Mostly I go for the slender East European teen models. But normal-sized is good, too. Even the voluptuous. But I don't usually prefer models that are seriously overweight.
|
08-08-12 03:20pm
|
Reply
1417
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Review
Excellent or superb review (both adjectives apply).
Can I hire you to ghost write my reviews in the future?
|
08-06-12 04:06pm
|
Reply
1418
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I don't pay a lot of attention to the height of a model.
Maybe it would be more important if there was real-life interaction. But even then, unless the model was under 2 feet tall, or over 10 feet tall, I don't think height would matter very much.
|
08-06-12 07:20am
|
Reply
1419
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
English is my native language. But the older I get, the more I struggle with it.
|
08-04-12 10:28pm
|
Comment
1420
|
Exclusive Teen Porn
(0)
|
|
08-03-12 02:42am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
1421
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
|
08-02-12 06:42pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1422
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Dreams. Or fantasy. I kinda doubt I would have the chance.
|
08-02-12 06:10pm
|
Reply
1423
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
awrite's Reply
Done.
|
08-02-12 06:05pm
|
Reply
1424
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think BadMrFrosty's reply makes sense. If POV is done well, it can be good. But it's also nice to have other views as well.
|
07-31-12 05:16am
|
Reply
1425
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Condoms take away the fantasy element. But it's better for the performers. So I'd rather see them being used.
|
07-29-12 04:23pm
|
