I'm not a person who understands the finer points of photography.
I look at photos and videos on a low-priced laptop.
Even if I had high-end monitors and expensivwe computers, I don't know if my eyes would notice a measurable difference from what I'm seeing today--because of advancing age, etc.
I respect the people who can appreciate the higher qualities of photos or videos, but it's not my thing. I'm not trying to be rude or disrespectful. I'm just stating that experience (to be able to view and enjoy artwork at a higher level) is beyond me.
Open a browser window.
Paste into the address bar the following: metartx.com/
This brings up a metartx page for visitors.
The page has thumbnails of this week's videos and photo sets.
However, if you click on any of the thumbnails, instead of getting a short video or sample gallery, you are re-directed to the Metartx signup page.
My guess is that the visitor page is very elementary, and just has the introductory page with a few thumbnails, that leads to the join page.
Maybe in the future they will expand the visitor page with actual sample videos and sample galleries.
But unless one of the Metart staff lists the content statistics of Metartx in a reply on the comments section or blog, I don't know how you will determine what the contents of Metartx are.
And since the join prices of Metartx are very high, I think it will be expensive to join, without having a clear idea of what you are paying for.
MetArtX features models in masturbation photosets and videos. So it's a little harder than MetArt. But many of the models should be familiar from the MetArt site.
Since it's a new site, the membership fees should be smaller than a membership to one of MetArt's older sites which have larger content. But apparently they are charging the same - or more - than what you would pay with a PU discount for the older sites.
About a year ago, I tried to join a porn site, and I was declined by 3 different credit cards.
Using a fourth card, the join was finally accepted.
It was frustrating.
I don't remember if any of the credit card accounts were frozen on that particular day. Because my memory is not great. But all the credit card accounts were valid, in good order, and the payments were still declined automatically, when I hit the accept the payment link on the join page.
You might not have been black-listed by CCBILL.
Instead, it might have been the credit card company that blocked the transaction from going through.
I've had many of my attempts to join a site declined, because the credit card I was trying to use declined the payment. Many credit card companies view a payment to CCBILL or Epoch or any payment processor that works with porn sites as suspect.
Either they will automatically decline the suspected payment.
Or they will freeze the credit card account for possible fraudulent activity.
Not only have I had many of my credit cards declined by Epoch and CCBILL, but I've also had many of my credit card accounts frozen, and I had to telephone the credit card company itself, and state the attempted charge was a valid transaction (even when the transaction was not approved).
This can happen, even when I have a monthly charge to Epoch or CCBILL on that particular credit card. If I try to add another charge to Epoch or CCBILL to a credit card (through a new join to a paysite).
Credit card companies view almost any payment to CCBILL or Epoch as a red flag, and can refuse payment, freeze the account, or do both at the same time.
Micky D charges about $1 for their coffee or iced tea. With free refills.
So if you add a lot of sugar, it's OK to drink.
Except I've been reading lately that sugar is bad for your health. Bad for blood pressure and other problems.
The older I get, the fewer things I find that are good for you. Except porn?
I've started commenting on some of the photo sets at Met-Art recently.
But I almost never rate the photo sets/videos. For any of the paysites I join.
And I pay almost no attention to the scores for the photo sets/videos, since they have almost zero value for my appreciation of the photo seta/videos.
Using the PU link to Goddess Nudes, and then hitting the join page link, you see the prices:
$29.99/month recurring
$39.99 for 1 month (non-recurring)
$99.99/year recurring
This is a big jump for the monthly price, which used to be $9.99 (recurring).
I was a member 1 or 2 years ago (my memory is getting terrible as I get older), and they had a banner on the site that counted off the days before I would have access to all three sites.
As i wrote in my review:
1. Join Teen Mega World directly (through PU link) for $14.95. That gives you access to NylonsX as well.
2. If you join NylonsX directly (through PU link), that costs $19.95/month.
I gave NylonsX a high score, because I was really giving the score to Teen Mega World. NylonsX is a small site, stopped updating years ago.
Do not expect a lot of content from NylonsX. Do not expect videos that focus on nylons, women's underwear, strip tease, or eroticism.
The girls start out wearing nylons or some underwear, but little attention is paid to the nylons or underwear--it's just a gimmick to create a new site. Teen Mega World has many different sites, and they try to supply material for most niches, as a marketing tool.
If you like Teen Mega World, and I do, it's because of the attractive young models. There are lesbian videos (and at least one lesbian site) at TMW, but most of the content is Boy-Girl.
There are no lesbian videos at NylonsX.
There are 2 videos of a female model masturbating by herself.
But all the other videos are Boy-Girl sex.
Join Teen Mega World for hardcore teen sex. On a more bread-and-butter style than the Diesel network.
But with your membership to Diesel network, you already have access to a ton of high quality teen hardcore sex, that is usually more glamorized than Teen Mega World. And the models at Diesel can be stunning to lovely.
If you haven't explored the three sites you have access to at Diesel, you really should.
All three sites, as far as I can tell, have the same basic focus: attractive teens in softcore or hardcore sex. Years ago, there were many more sites in the Diesel network, but then they merged the sites into 18 Only Girls (they dropped some of the old sites completely, and dropped some of the content from the sites they did merge).
But you really should examine each Diesel site, because there is a ton of worthwhile content at all three sites.
It used to be that if you stayed a member of 18OnlyGirls, WowGirls, or WowPorn for a certain amount of time, you automatically became a member of all three sites.
Is that still the way it works?
And how long do you have to stay a member at one of the sites, to automatically gain access to all three sites?
There was a separate method of gaining access to all three sites, if you paid a higher membership fee.
Or if you paid an upgrade fee after you joined one of their sites, to get access to all three sites.
I assume, since your membership is over 3 months, that you now have access to all 3 sites.
Correct?
The girls at the 3 sites are extremely attractive. And the videos, as you wrote, are top quality, as well.
I think fans should choose what appeals to them.
However, I pay almost no attention to porn awards.
And even though I sometimes watch the Academy Awards, I pay little attention to them regarding what movies I watch.
Because my enjoyment of a particular movie bears no relation to its Academy Award performance.
Also, my enjoyment of a particular movie bears no relation to its box office performance.
I use Firefox exclusively, and DownThemAll is also my exclusive download manager.
So your comment holds extra meaning for me.
If a site has streaming problems, that obviously makes it less attractive for me.
I'm not a member of Sexy Hub or Dane Jones.
Lately, I seem to have playback issues with smooth streaming at some paysites I do belong to. I suspect it's because I have too many programs running on my PC, or because I've overloaded my drive too much, and it needs more free space to run streaming smoothly.
I am not a member of Club MetArt.
I am a member of MetArt.
The preview page for Club MetArt gives very little information.
But what the preview page appears to show includes the 4 galleries for today's update at Club MetArt.
Those 4 galleries are the same 4 galleries for today's update at MetArt.
So I don't understand what the reason is for Club MetArt to exist.
Or why anyone would join the site - because the membership price for Club MetArt is higher than for MetArt, and Club MetArt gives you far less content.
Separately, what is your normal download speed? Just curious to compare it to my download speed.
I know you told me before, but my brain has trouble retaining facts (and ideas).
Just one of the benefits of growing older, I guess.
Still more separately: You state in your review you scored MetArt high.
You gave it a score of 88.
In my last review of MetArt, I gave it a score of 99.
In my first review of MetArt, which was also my first review at PU, I gave it a score of 97.
I've said that, in my opinion, MetArt is the best softcore photo site on the internet.
I paid for a lifetime membership to MetArt. Because I was tired of paying a monthly or yearly fee to join.
But you gave an excellent review of MetArt, and I can certainly understand why you scored it 88. And you were being generous, because, as you explained very clearly, the site contents did not appeal to your tastes. But your review of MetArt was detailed and informative, and clearly spelled out its strengths and weaknesses.
Excellent review.
Interesting read that gives the flavor and essentials for the site.
Completely agree that Reiley Reed and Alex Grey are stunning models, who are seriously hot in their sex scenes.
I'm not a member of this site, but I've seen plenty of videos of them at other sites.
I don't know why the file sizes are so big. They should have a better encoding, where the file size won't take up so much space.
A maximum of five downloads per month seems like a deal-breaker to me.
The truth is, I download a lot of scenes from different sites that I am a member of, but hardly ever watch my downloaded videos.
So I don't know why I think that downloading is so important.
But I guess I am a packrat, who like to collect videos and galleries.
If you are a member of Teen Mega World, you don't have access to Tiny Teens 18.
However, my impression is that the videos at Tiny Teens 18 are available in the Teen Mega World network.
For example:
Looking at the "Schoolgirl Fucking" from Tiny Teens 18, you have the same thumbnail, same title "Schoolgirl Fucking", at the Teen Sex Movs site (part of Teen Mega World network).
I'm not going to bother searching for other matching videos, but I suspect that all the videos at Tiny Teens 18 were first posted to Teen Mega World.
The MetArt network has done a similar move. They started a site called "Love Hairy", which features models who have pubic hair. Their sets and videos were and are featured on the MetArt sites, but some of the same content is also featured at the "Love Hairy" site.
So you can call this a marketing move.
So if you are willing to take the time to search, joining Teen Mega World is probably the better choice, since for a few dollars more, you get access to a huge amount of good hardcore teen videos, versus joining Tiny Teens 18.
No.
This site is part of the JAV HD network.
In every site in the network that I've looked at, none of the videos or photos are pixillated (have the mosaic effect) for censorship.
I assume that if you join any site in the network, you get access to all the sites.
But the best way of joining is to join through the JAV HD site, since that shows on sign-up that you get access to all the sites in the network.
Agree there's no need for a long logo at the start of a scene.
But that seems to be a common practice with sites.
Maybe it's intended as a form of advertising, or to protect the content from unlicensed use?
Whatever, it can be annoying.
Just like the large logos that are on the photos of some sites, that can block parts of the photo.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
