| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2751
|
David Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Tatyana's Reply
Tatyana webmaster: Are you the Tatyana model at david-nudes? If so, you are one gorgeous woman.
Also, I read that you are married to David, the site photographer. If that is true, how could you do that to the rest of us?
At least we can enjoy your pictures. You really are a lovely young woman (if you are the model at the site).
Wishing you the best, and hoping your site does well.
|
01-15-09 10:50am
|
Comment
2752
|
David Nudes
(0)
|
|
01-15-09 08:09am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
2753
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I don't know if Angelina Jolie considers porn socially acceptable, but she is supposed to have an email friendship with a porn star.
"Jan. 14, 2009. Los Angeles (E! Online) – Does Angelina Jolie have friends? There is never any mention of her having friends, and there is extensive coverage about her.
—Karen, Los Angeles
Per the New York Post, Jolie has a "girl-talk thing going" with porn star Tera Patrick. The two reportedly like to email each other. Does that count?"
|
01-14-09 03:41pm
|
Reply
2754
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Poll
The major sites already have high res photos. Going to still higher res photos would just take up even more space on the hard drive, so I don't see the point of that, except for bragging rights.
Better videos would be nice. That's different from higher res videos. Videos that are shot and edited better, that are more erotic, would be a real plus.
But the easiest thing to improve would probably be easier site navigation.
|
01-14-09 09:36am
|
Comment
2755
|
Sexy Teen Paradise
(0)
|
|
01-13-09 10:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2756
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Maybe a lawyer should answer this topic, but I would guess that you could be cited for reading a porn magazine in a bar. In some areas you could be cited for smoking in a bar. You do drugs in a bar, you could be cited.
I don't think you could be cited for driving a SUV to a bar, unless you broke some law while driving.
I also don't think you could be cited for wearing a "Jesus Saves" jacket in a bar.
Those are my opinions, but I am not a lawyer.
So when you say that porn is socially tolerated, you are speaking very broadly. Porn is not socially or legally tolerated in many public areas.
|
01-12-09 05:05pm
|
Reply
2757
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I think porn is more tolerated today than back in the 1960s. But how far have we really come, as a society? America is still uptight and ready to police your neighbor for any and all activity outside the mainstream. And porn is definitely outside the mainstream.
|
01-12-09 10:30am
|
Reply
2758
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Even tho past polls are archived and can still be voted on, a current poll, even if it's basically the same idea as a past poll, just seems fresher and more relevant. A few current votes on a past poll would have little effect on most people. How many PU members actually go over past polls every few months to see what was voted for, and to see the results?
|
01-11-09 09:05pm
|
Reply
2759
|
Snot Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
This is the stupidest porn site I've seen so far. (I have not seen the inside of the site, but the idea of watching a girl pick her nose is truly a bizarre fetish.)
|
01-11-09 05:09pm
|
Reply
2760
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Definition of porn: writing or pictures or films etc. of no literary or artistic value other than to stimulate sexual desire.
I think Playboy (and softcore sites like Met-art and others) have nude pictures, but the pictures have value beyond sexual stimulation. Porn is a derogatory word, like smut. I don't think Playboy or Met-art is smut. That's my personal opinion.
But there's also nothing wrong with sexual stimulation. You look at a picture of a beautiful or attractive woman, you don't feel some desire or appreciation, maybe you're more dead than alive.
|
01-08-09 01:30am
|
Reply
2761
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Usually try to cancel within a week, in case there are problems with the cancellation. I've been lucky so far, no problems, no extra billing charges.
|
01-04-09 03:52am
|
Reply
2762
|
Ten.com
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
When I clicked on the join page, I saw 2 options:
3 day trial for $4.95
1 month membership for $29.95
It took me 7 attempts, pasting the URL you gave me, to get a page with the complete pricing options you showed:
3 Day Trial - $4.95
1 Month Membership - $29.95
3 Months Membership - $59.90 (1 Month FREE!!!)
6 Months Membership - $74.99 (Only $12.50 per month!)
1 Year Membership - $99.95 (Only $8.33 per month!)
Lifetime Membership - $174.99 (One Time Charge)
(The browser page kept redirecting me back to the 2 option membership page, until I finally got lucky.)
Thanks for the fast response, and the help.
|
01-03-09 05:29am
|
Reply
2763
|
Ten.com
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
A lifetime membership for $175 fee sounds like a great deal. My major question would be: how long does a lifetime last? Some of these porn sites go out of business after a few years, or stop updating their material. So who knows how long Ten.com will be around?
Also, I go to their site, and do not see the lifetime membership offered at the membership signup page. Where do you find that option?
|
01-03-09 05:07am
|
Reply
2764
|
Jim Slip
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Comment
I am based in United States. When I check the web site Jim Slip, I see a sign-up rate of euro 19.95, approximately USD 27.76.
The prices that are displayed to someone in Italy could be different, because of something called regional pricing (I think that's the proper term). For the same item (a membership, whatever), you can be charged different prices, depending on where you are located. Sector pricing seems unfair, and stupid, but it's another way for some people or businesses to make more money off of people.
There has been some discussion of sector pricing on the PU threads, and a lot of people are really angry when they think they are being charged higher prices than some US customers are paying for the same membership.
|
01-02-09 06:25am
|
Reply
2765
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
It doesn't make a lot of sense, but I've found that met-art, with its huge collection of models, photosets, and videos, is easier to search and find what you're looking for than sites that have far less content.
Met-art has the basic search engine, which lets you search by model name, photographer, etc.
And it also has a complete, alphabetical listing of the models, with a thumbnail of each model beside the name, that you can browse.
Simple tools, but really effective.
One quibble is that the same model can have different names for different photosets.
|
01-02-09 05:35am
|
Reply
2766
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
The primary factor for me is lack of quality content, then price, then ease of use. Bad reviews, no zip files, drm protection mean I should look for a better site to join.
|
01-02-09 05:16am
|
Reply
2767
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Some avatars are really cool, and I have been disappointed when they were dropped. Just my opinion.
|
12-31-08 06:13am
|
Reply
2768
|
Hentai Key
(0)
|
Reply of
Doug62's Comment
The penalties for porn are often harsher than the penalties for stealing or falsifying thefts of hundreds of millions of dollars in the business world.
|
12-30-08 10:34am
|
Reply
2769
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Holidays are family time, while porn is private time.
|
12-29-08 05:34am
|
Reply
2770
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Stopped buying Playboy back in the 1980s, over 20 years ago.
|
12-27-08 03:58pm
|
Reply
2771
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
4 girls at once would be my fantasy. Why not make it my top 100,000, as long as we're dreaming? Somebody would have to freeze me, because there's no way I could last that long, but what a way to go.
|
12-25-08 07:31am
|
Reply
2772
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
Reply of
diablo1967's Review
If you are able to get back into the members area, please let us know.
Or if you never get back in, and try to get a refund, please let us know whether you get a refund or not, and how you did it.
Sorry about your site problems.
|
12-24-08 06:17am
|
Reply
2773
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
No. Want a copy on my PC of worthwhile videos. That's what I'm paying for.
|
12-23-08 09:47am
|
Reply
2774
|
Amour Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Not a member. Just some general advice.
Can you get a refund thru the billing agent?
It looks like Amour Babes uses EPOCHEU.COM, which gets a lot of complaints about poor service, wrong charges, etc.
But it's worth calling them (if they have a toll-free number) to explain you have been denied access to a site even tho you still have a current subscription.
You might get a refund.
Or, if you paid for your subscription with a credit card, explain to the credit card company that you paid for a service you did not receive (membership to an internet site). The credit card company should reverse the money you paid (give you a refund/credit).
|
12-22-08 11:43am
|
Reply
2775
|
N/A
|
Reply of
sitsat's Poll
I dislike them all, think they detract from the attractiveness of the model.
In approximate order of dislike:
Tattoos
Fake breasts - especially the huge ones
Too much make-up
Unnatural hair colour
Tongue-piercing
I put Tongue-piercing at the bottom, because it's the least noticeable.
|
12-21-08 08:53am
|
