Color of hair doesn't really matter, as long as it looks natural.
But a lot of redheads photograph with odd-looking hair color. Don't know if that's something to do with photography, poor dye job, or what.
Natural tongue and fingers are the best toys.
Then maybe a plastic penis.
Natural is better than plastic or phony, less obtrusive.
But for girl on girl, a dildo can fit into the action.
Too much emphasis on toys takes away from the impact of the action.
In your original (updated) comment, you asked that people don't tell you what you already know. So you can skip my reply to you as you like, because I am not an expert on email.
You ask if people have noticed an increase in spam.
Personally, I have not. The increased spam you have seen lately is far beyond what I get in my email boxes.
Even accounting for your 3 email addresses, for public, personal, and business, you are getting a large amount of spam. I've had one main email address for over 10 years, and I don't get anywhere near the spam you are reporting, in sexual, career, or other types of spam.
Somehow your email addresses got into the spam databanks.
So like I suggested before, either you get a really good filter, which will direct almost all the spam to a spam box, or you get new email addresses. I'm not an expert, but my understanding is that once you're in the spam databases, you're screwed, because the spam will not go away in the future, as long as those "infected" or "exposed" email addresses are current.
I still have a few old Playboy and Penthouse magazines. But I don'r really consider them porn. I wouldn't say that I hide them, but then again, they are not out in the open, but put in a closet with no lock.
But as far as spam, that's a personal issue, and a fact of life. Unless you're really good with computers and know how to filter your email, if you've been online for a while and have a regular email address, you're almost sure to get a lot of daily spam.
Some of the spam will be sex-related, other spam will be general junk offers.
Just like what you get in the old-style mail box, except that you don't get sex-related spam in the mail box. And that's only because it costs real money to send the old-style mail.
I'm picky about the porn I like. So most of the porn sites that I would visit as a porn reviewer would not really appeal to me. And I would have a heck of a time trying to score them based on the scoring system that TBP reviewers use. I use a gut feel on my scores, based on content quality, quantity, site ease of use, and price.
That's also the way I try to figure out if a site is worth joining, for me.
As long as the trial is full access to the site, you should be able to write a review of the site. It doesn't take that long for most PU members to judge a site.
You won't see the entire contents of a mega-site in a few days, but you should get the basic feel of the site quality and contents, of the pix and vids offered.
If the review is based on a trial membership, that should be clearly mentioned in the review.
OK, why would anyone pay $14.95 for a 3-day trial, when you can get 1 month for $19.95?
Unless you could be sure to download the site contents in a 3-day trial, you might as well pay the extra $5 for a full month.
But since the site is apparently not updating since June 2008, based on atrapat's reply, and since the site has never been reviewed at PU, I would not pay to join this site.
Haven't been a member of met-art since Sep. 2008, but they keep trying to make the site better.
Now they advertise "Read the full model bio" (for newest photo set updates). The older model bios were extremely limited, basically name, country, physical characteristics (age, height, weight, plus a few others).
Another new feature is allowing members to make their own photo galleries from pics they select from met-art photo shoots.
Without plot, there is no meaning to the story. How can you have two or more people having sexual intercourse without the deepest, most meaningful interaction of two souls uniting?
Perhaps, with solo masturbation, there might be less necessity for a long prelude before the action. Everyone knows that if you don't have to wait for your partner's climax, that you can cum whenever the mood or finger of fate strikes.
This is probably one of the stranger poll questions I have yet seen. I sincerely hope my comment does honor to this issue.
When someone gives a very high score of 95+, most Pornusers members tend to regard the score suspiciously. That's just the PU mentality. The members don't believe in perfect sites. And they have definite ideas on how almost all porn sites could be improved.
To write a review and list no cons is a definite no-no.
Even if you are completely in love with a site, you should still list at least a few minor cons, just for the sake of appearing non-biased. Your review would be better accepted, and be more persuasive to the PU members.
I like your review, and believe it's your honest opinion.
But before posting any more reviews, a good idea would be to read the thread, "What should a PU review include?", especially the post by Toadsith titled: "Porn Users Cheat Sheet".
Toadsith, a PU member, posted a great outline for writing a review that shows what many of the PU members want to see included in a review.
What you write is up to you. But like I say, your reviews will have greater weight if you write a more balanced review, and maybe include some technical details.
Webmasters are human. Can they lose or misplace files? Sure, why not? Not everyone is as organized as efficiently as everyone else. And it's human nature for some people to try to promote themselves, so if they find some older pics and vids, they can say, "Hey, look at this great stuff we found."
On the other hand, they can also promote some pics and vids that were never really lost, but just say that the material was lost.
I know that I lose files on my hard drive all the time. I want to see pics of some girl, I can find some of them, but I know there're other pics of her somewhere. But where?
Need to organize my hard drive better. Just one more thing to do.
Tatyana the model is married to the site photographer, David Weisenbarger. But at least he is willing to share her photographs with us. He does a nice job capturing this lovely young woman on film, along with other young models. Extremely nice photos in the style of met-art (teen/young-women glam photos).
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
