I'm not really sure what the "Join Page Screen Captures" function is. I know that PU/TBP posts an image of the Introduction Page for each paysite. Is that what this function is? Or what?
And how do you use this function, other than looking at the picture?
I've used PU/TBP for a while now, but I keep coming across questions that make me go: "Duh. What?"
I tried to contact customer support at Teen Mega World. This is the first time, I think. But the form that allows contact gives me an error message that either my user name or password is incorrect (required information before you can contact customer support at Royal Customer Support).
I can log in to the Teen Mega World site, and the bonus sites, with my user name and password.
But I can't contact customer support at Royal Customer Support (which is the support for Teen Mega World). This is not the billing agent, but the owner/operator/partner/whatever for Teen Mega World.
A really poor system for customer support, when you can log in to the site, but can't contact customer support.
They say customer support is 24/7. But what good is 24/7 if you can't contact them?
When kiddoc posted in a comment at PU that he could not get in to the new exgfbox site with a membership to Teen Mega World, the webmaster posted this reply, on March 09, 2011:
Stas RC Webmaster "Please write to our tech support, and we`ll fix this problem"
So it seems very clear that the webmaster thought that a membership to Teen Mega World was supposed to allow access to exgfbox.
But it's not that major of a deal. If I can't get in, so be it.
My max download speed is 620-630 KB/s, which is far slower than what you have.
So for me, I regularly hit my max download speeds when downloading files from most of the Teen Mega World sites.
But since you have a much faster connection, my results don't have a lot of meaning for you.
But I am able to use DownThemAll, which is a download manager, at these sites.
I understand the logic of what you are saying: Put out a new site, and unless you join specifically through that new site, do not allow access to that site with membership from an older site.
However, the network didn't follow that route with Beauty Angels or Squirting Virgin. When they opened those two sites a few months ago, they almost immediately included them in a membership of Teen Mega World.
And the Webmaster of the site specifically implied, in a response to a comment by a PU member, that membership in Teen Mega World should give access to this new site, Ex GF Box.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good variety of teen niches: solo girl, girl-girl, boy-girl, group (mainly a three-some), young girl-older man, squirting, she-male, gay
(boy-boy), latina girls. Some niches like she-male and latina girls are tiny sites, so if that's your primary interest, don't join this
site/network for that reason. But it's nice that a few videos are supplied for those niches.
-Large number of sites included in membership. You get around 25 sites.
That's not counting Teen Mega World, which is a gateway site, that doesn't have any content of its own. And it doesn't count WMB Girls, which is
apparently a clone of Teen Mega World.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Easy login.
-Long period before site timeout.
-For most sites, it's easy to switch to a different site in the network, by using a hot link. For a few sites, instead of clicking on a hot link, have to open a new browser window and login.
Cons:
-The cons are mainly minor.
-There are a huge number of photosets, which are a photo capture of a video shoot. The quality of the individual photos is poor. Either get a
professional photographer to take these pictures, or stop posting a huge number of photos of low quality: post a few pictures from each photoset,
instead of 70-150 photos of a photoset which is low quality.
-There are a couple of stunt cocks that I really dislike, because of the way they treat the girls. But the girls apparently like these guys,
because these guys are used in a huge number of videos at this network and at other sites.
-The live chat (with models) is a waste of time, unless you are willing to spend a lot of money paying for private chats.
-The quality of the videos varies. Some videos from a few years back can be low quality, even in the "high" quality version that is offered.
CONS continued in next section.
Bottom Line:
CONS (continued):
-There's little or no buildup to the sex: You get a guy, a girl, and they have sex. Maybe they exchange a few words before the sex, but the words
are pointless.
--You see a lot of these videos, and the action starts to get repetitious. You'd like some variety, some meaning to the sex, some plot or story instead of two people just banging away.
BOTTOM LINE:
-Huge number of teen videos: 2,257.
-Huge number of teen photos: 333,544.
-Most videos are available in 3 qualities: low, medium, high definition.
-Sample stats for a high quality video:
Frame width x height: 1280x720.
Total bitrate: 4224 kbps.
-Most videos can streamed.
-All videos can be downloaded.
-The photos are available in a single size. The file size is usually
100Kb+, but the quality is not good. The photos are mainly a record of individual video shoots, and the photos are more like screen caps than a
regular, professionally shot photograph.
-The photos in a photoset have a zip file for downloading.
The videos from the last few years are basically ok to very nice quality: these are videos of teen girls having sex, and the clarity, lighting, colors, sound are mainly ok to very good.
Bottom line: This is one of the best sites for hardcore East European teen videos.
At $19.95/month (with the PU discount), this network is a bargain.
I've had a Teen Mega World membership for a couple of months, and have never been able to get inside Ex GF Box.
On March 05, 2011, kiddoc posted a comment titled "CANT ACCESS NEW SITE". kiddoc indicates that he is a Teen Mega World member, but he can't get into the Ex GF Box site.
On March 09, 2011, the Webmaster (Stas RC) replied to kiddoc's comment, indicating that a Teen Mega World membership should give access to Ex GF Box.
But as I wrote, I've been a member of Teen Mega World for at least 2 months, and I've never been able to get inside the Ex GF Box site.
TBP says only 1 site is included with the membership. I assume you got a package deal that includes a number of network sites with your membership. Is that a public offer, where anyone can join this network and get access to a number of different sites, or what?
It gets expensive very quickly when the price to join a single site in the network is $25-$30/month.
Nubiles has a mix of softcore and hardcore, photosets and videos. If you're not into hardcore, then the value of Nubiles is sharply reduced, and a $200 yearly membership would be truly expensive, and not worth it.
Metart has a huge amount of softcore photosets. No hardcore at Metart. I think it's the best softcore site out there, and when you consider the low membership price ($20/month, or $99/year), it's truly a bargain. Metart also has the biggest daily update rate of any photosite I know of.
Metart has a large number of softcore videos (but still smaller than the huge number of softcore photosets). But the videos, in spite of the lovely models, are almost uniformly boring. A wasted opportunity of filming these gorgeous creatures. I don't know anyone who likes the videos.
I find many of the photosets to be lovely, erotic, fine photography. If you are into softcore photos, I definitely think Metart is worth a 1-month membership, if only to see what the site has to offer. No one can look through the entire site contents in one month, because the site contents are so huge: number of models, number of photosets.
Metart is my favorite site. It's not to everyone's taste, but it hits the spot for me. Many of my favorite models have one or more lovely photosets at Metart.
Regional pricing can be a real pain. There's a lot in life that makes you realize some people love to take advantage of others. It's how they get ahead. Or get their jollies. "Fuck you, buddy, 'cause I'm King of the Road" kind of thinking.
The price for a 1-year membership to nubiles is $199.00 (recurring). So from that standpoint, if you're willing to pay the $199 for nubiles, this offer will include the metart site as well.
But I agree that it's a disappointing offer. It would have been nice to get both sites for $99.00 for one year. That would have been much better.
I only watch good porn, the kind that is stimulating to both my body, mind and soul. That's 3 parts of me that have to be satisfied. So when I download porn, I have an automatic filter that checks for the quality of the porn being downloaded. 99th percentile and better is what I require. My standards are firm but fair.
To be 100% honest, I think the poll question is one that all PU members should reflect upon.
Can you look yourself in the mirror after an all-night session with your porn product and state that you've been 100% satisfied? If not, you need to join the porn site I've been thinking of starting, which will include only the best, 100% real-beef porn product, that has been certified by the major religious and political houses in the Western Hemisphere. An Eastern Hemisphere site will be opening, as soon as I master the theory of mosaics and Oriental zah-ouch-ahhh sounds that these Oriental ladies make to express their delight at the sexual experience.
I mainly focus on reviews when giving out trust ratings, more than comments or posts. But only occasionally do I mention a specific review by that person. Although I have read a lot of reviews that were interesting, informative, humorous or really a pleasure to read.
If you run out of attractive Caucasian women, you might look at Oriental, especially Japanese or Chinese. Those are some of the most gorgeous women in the world. But the Oriental porn style is often different and takes a little getting used to. I don't like the mosaic, and I don't like the funny noises the Oriental girls make when having sex: they sound like they are being abused, even if they are supposedly enjoying the experience. Or maybe I don't really understand the mind-set, and the idea is that they are being abused, and that they don't enjoy the sex. You don't see much smiling from the girls during sex, or even from the stunt cocks. Maybe Oriental sex (especially porn) is a serious business that requires too much concentration to smile or laugh?
What I really enjoy are the photosets, where the girls can smile and look lovely.
Depression, or tiredness or illness means less energy to do the activities we enjoy, or even need, such as eating, exercising, etc. I thinks that's natural. You can sometimes see young children who are running, jumping, yelling and screaming for no reason except an excess of energy. Besides wishing those kids were better behaved, I sometimes wish I had a fraction of their energy. I mean, kids will be kids, but who needs kids in public, at a store or movie theater, who are running around and making loud noises?
I will agree with Maines Own that it's a good review, even if my opinions are not as firm or bold as his. Might be the bracing Maine weather that creates such strong-minded individuals.
Lolly is a cute girl.
But last update to the site was apparently 2010-08-20.
And like you wrote, it's cheaper to get this site by joining one of the other network sites. I'm a member of Teen Mega World for $19.95/month, which includes full access to the Lolly site and over 20 other sites (with the PU discount).
Joining through Lolly Hardcore directly costs $29.95.
A very twisty review. Maybe yes, maybe no, maybe yes, maybe no, maybe maybe... My brain feels like a pretzel after reading your review, even if the site contents don't appeal to me in the slightest. Lol.
I'm happy that you think the review has some worthwhile details. Looking at the site, I thought it was a waste of time, since it was so small. But I tried to review it as a regular site, with pros and cons. But the cons far outweigh the pros on this one.
Thanks, Capn. I'm kind of ambivalent about the badge. I don't think of myself as truly hardcore, but I will try to wear my badge proudly, as a member of the PU fraternity. :)
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Zip file for photosets.
-Multiple choice for video download quality: high, medium, low
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Can download entire site contents in a few hours (11 videos + matching photosets is the entire site contents).
-Long period before site timeout.
Cons:
-Tiny site. 11 videos with matching photosets.
-Expensive price. $29.95/month if you join site directly. But join through Teen Mega World, for $19.95/month, and you get Latin Shemales included, with over 20 other sites as well.
-Archive site. Apparently not updating. Don't know if it ever did update, because you only have 11 videos total (with matching photosets).
-Default file name for dowloading video files is high, medium or low (depending on which you choose: high, medium or low quality-definition). So need to rename file by date or model if want to save these files.
-No streaming option.
-No model bio information given, except for the age of the tranny, which is listed as 18 or 19 for each tranny. Which I find suspect, because these trannys look older than 18 or 19.
-The language is South American, not English. But there isn't a lot of conversation, it's mainly action. Some kissing at the start before getting
into bj and other things.
-No search.
CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION:
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
-Unlike other network sites, there is no link to transfer to other bonus sites in this network. You have to open a page, with the URL in the address bar, and re-enter your login information to get inside a different site in the network.
-There is a link for "bonus sites" at Latin Shemales, but it only opens a page with an advertisement/hot link for a gay dating service. It does not provide any links to the other network bonus sites you get by joining this network.
BOTTOM LINE:
This niche is definitely a different offering by the Teen Mega World
network. Many of the network sites have content that could be interchangeable, but shemales is a niche that is different from the usual pornsite offering.
This is hardcore tranny action: doing whatever a guy and tranny can do to each other. The guy does the tranny, the tranny does the guy, so the
tranny is definitely not just doing the woman's part, but acting like both a man and a woman, and the guy is acting like a bisexual, except he's
getting his action from a tranny instead of a man and a woman.
The action is not rough or gonzo style. It's actually friendly sex. Both partners are having a good time and enjoying themselves. No fake screams and moans. These aren't models who are just putting on a show: they are getting paid and also having a good sex experience.
High quality videos:
Frame width x height: 720x406 or 640x480
Total bitrate: 6064kbps or 3064kbps
Video runtime: 18-21 minutes
Number of videos: 11
Photosets:
Number of photosets: 11 (each photoset matches one video).
Number of photos per set: 58-111 photos, most sets are 62-77 photos.
Photo size: 30-56 KB.
Width x Height: 640x480 pixels.
Horizontal x Vertical Resolution: 96x96 dpi
The photos are low-quality screen caps.
On the TBP review page, it states content count has not changed since December 2006. That was 11 videos.
Site currently has 11 videos. So apparently the video posting dates are not accurate. Because 3 videos are dated 0000-00-00, and 3 videos are dated 2011-04-02 (today's date).
A tranny lover would probably not join this network because the contents of the one tranny site are so small. But if you belong to the network anyway, then it might be worthwhile glancing over what the site offers. Or maybe not. I looked at all the videos at this site, because there are only 11, to get an idea of the video quality of the videos. The video quality
is basically very good: clear focus and definition, good lighting, good sound, good colors of skintones. The trannies are ok-looking to nice-looking.
Bottom line: Because the site is so small, even a tranny lover will not get much satisfaction from the site. If you like tranny, you will probably like the videos, but there are only 11 of them.
Maybe I'm not reading it right, but the poll question and answers seem more like something you would ask an addict - drug user, alcoholic, cigarette smoker.
I enjoy porn. I enjoy eating. I enjoy going to the movies. I enjoy breathing.
Am I addicted to breathing? Am I addicted to eating? Am I addicted to movies?
I prefer to think I enjoy those activities, not that I am addicted to them.
But if I stop breathing, I know that I will have a serious problem. So maybe I am addicted to breathing. But I still prefer to think of it as an activity I can enjoy, and not an addiction.
The same with porn.
If I had to admit it, I am probably more addicted to breathing than I am to porn.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Multiple choices for downloading a video: High, medium, or low quality.
But the quality of the "high quality" video is not very good.
-Content is dated.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Easy login.
-Very easy switching between network sites (Do not need to re-enter your login information, just click on a hot link).
-Long time before site timeout.
Cons:
-Archive site. Last update was 2009-02-07.
-Small site.
-Models are not named in the videos.
-No model bios.
-Default filename for downloading videos is "high", "medium", or "low",
for high, medium or low quality selection. So have to manually rename videos for sorting or saving.
-But that's not a big problem, because due to low quality of even the "high" quality videos, who wants to save these videos anyway? The models
in the videos are not named, the videos are poor quality (in terms of erotic quality and video technique). I'm watching one video with a guy and
a girl, and it's not until 4 minutes after the video starts that you can easily see the face of the girl. Until then, the heads of both the guy and the girl are mainly cut out of the frame, and it's not until the 4 minute mark, when the girl drops to her knees to give the guy a blow job, that you can clearly see the girl's face.
CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
-The site design has a hot link for each video, named: "Watch Picture Gallery", which is what the site calls the photoset. But every video link that I clicked on to see the "Watch Picture Gallery" led to a Picture Gallery with no pictures. So I do not think this site has any photosets. Which is OK, because I was expecting the photosets to be low quality anyway, based on the rest of the network offerings for photosets.
-Videos are supposed to be viewable in flash stream. But some links to watch the video in flash stream don't work. I kept waiting for minutes for some videos to load and play, but all they did was keep loading, without playing.
Again, this is not a big problem, because I was just testing the site to be able to write this review, and I already decided the site was basically worthless. If I had really wanted to watch these videos, I might have been frustrated.
-Slow download speeds. This is the first site in the network where I did not get my maximum download speed. Instead, I was often getting about one-half of my maximum download speed of 620-630 KB/s.
BOTTOM LINE:
The site theme is voyeur porn. The girls and couples are supposedly unaware they are being captured on film. So if that idea/niche turns you
on, maybe you will get extra satisfaction from the videos. I would prefer videos that are erotic, or well shot.
Because these are supposed to be voyeur videos, many of them show the girl apparently in the distance. She is only a small part of the frame. So you often don't see her close-up, in good detail. I guess this is supposed to add to the voyeur-sexiness of the filming, but I would prefer to see the standard closeup of the girl, where I can clearly see her face and body, instead of seeing some person in the fucking distance.
These are really cheaply made videos. Most of the videos are shot with the model by herself or with a guy, in a car, at a lake or meadow. The choice of shooting the model in a car makes for lousy camera angles, terrible framing of the girl (head or other body parts often cut out of the picture). Or the car seat or roof blocks your view of the girl. The lake and meadow locations are very windy, so there's a lot of microphone noise. Controlling lighting for an outdoor scene is more difficult than for an indoor scene. The girl's face and body goes in and out of shadow constantly, so you don't get a really clear view of the girl.
Video specs:
High quality:
Frame width x height: 1280x720
Total bitrate: 4320 kbps
The bitrate is very high, and would support high definition video. But I would classify these videos as "crap" videos. Pardon the French. Lousy
video technique. Not naming the models in the videos. Minimal erotic appeal.
Number of videos at site: 44
Videos run from 5 minutes to about 17 minutes.
-Bottom line: the site can be considered a bonus site as part of your Teen
Mega World network. But the site itself has little value. It would be better if they just eliminated the site.
You are right, the site has a huge number of photos, but there are very few, if any, that are worth keeping.
The photos are like screen caps of each video shoot. Or maybe they really are screen caps. I can't tell the difference from looking at the photos, except that I do know the photos are just not very good, or very erotic, or appealing. Which is a shame, because they have such a huge number of them on the site. Which I think is a waste of time and space.
The value of the site definitely comes from the videos, and not the photos.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
