| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1751
|
Sasha Fucks Dasha
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Easy login.
-Long period before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Zip file for photosets.
-Content is dated.
-Photosets and videos default filename for download is the posting date. |
| Cons: |
-No streaming option.
-Only 1 definition for video download, a low-quality.
-Only 1 definition for photoset download, a low-quality.
-Very few models at this site. You have Sasha and Dasha, and a very few other models.
-Archive site, no updates since July 2007.
-No search. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is part of the Diesel Access network.
This is an archive site: the last update was July 2007.
Most of the content features two models: Sasha and Dasha. There are a few other models also featured. The contents are videos and photosets that show the models in an amateur home-style shoot: one or two girls relaxing or playing with each other. The feel is strictly amateur: the site is an example of amateur home-style photo and video capture of two girls relaxing, playing, taking a shower, making out with each other.
Number of videos: 120.
Number of photosets: 210+
-Video updates: last video update was July 2007.
-Photoset updates: last photoset update was July 2007.
Videos only have 1 definition download option: a low-quality WMV file.
Photosets only have 1 definition zip file option: a low-quality photo.
The sex action is solo girl, or girl-girl. No boys at this site. There is very little sex action. What you get is brief nudity. Some kissing (is kissing or nudity sex action?).
The videos are short runtime, maybe 5-10 minutes.
87 MB for a 5 minute 30 second clip.
Frame width x height: 852x480.
Total bitrate: 4258 kbps.
The bitrate would support high quality video. But these are strictly amateur-style videos: poor definition, view often slightly out of focus,
no attempt at glamor-style shoot, the videos and photosets are a real home-style shoot of one or more girls just playing around.
The photosets are small, about 30-40 photos.
Individual photos are about 50-70 KB in size.
Width x height: 852x480 pixels.
The photos are more like screen caps than professionally shot photos.
Many of the photos are out of focus. The framing is poor. The photosets are a photo record of a video shoot. And the video shoot is very free-
form: the video guy just turns a video camera on one or two girls and captures whatever they happen to do. There is nudity involved, but it's a really amateur home-style shoot, in style and content.
Does the site have any value? Maybe for someone who is desperate to see one or two girls who are naked sometimes. |
|
05-09-11 02:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1752
|
Real Slut Party
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Great review. Makes me want to join this site. But if I do join, will you be sending me a donation so I can afford a new hard drive? I like to download the high quality files, even if I can't really tell the difference between high and medium quality. But 5 GB for a single video?
A regular DVD (for a commercial movie) is around 700 MB. So why are the file sizes so large? You certainly don't get any massive improvement in video or audio quality that I can see to justify the huge increase in size. Is it really just an inefficient use of file size?
So be warned: My bill (asking for donations) will be sent automatically if I do decide to join this network.
|
05-09-11 04:37am
|
Reply
1753
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
fredv's Reply
I find Met-art much more of a "must-see" than Hegre. Or maybe I just mean that I appreciate Met-art more. Obviously it depends on personal taste, because some people will find little to like at either site, but I think that Met-art is much the better value because of the huge quantity of photosets, the different photographers that are on display, the endless number of lovely models, etc. And what is also important, is that Met-art is priced as low or lower than Hegre.
I read your Met-art review. I think you were overwhelmed by the sheer amount of material to look through, and that turned you off. Also, you stated that you didn't find any of the material erotic.
Perhaps you find the material at Hegre more to your taste. I did like some of the material at Hegre, but I found much more at Met-art that I really enjoyed.
I think you might have stopped looking at the Met-art contents before you would have found material that you enjoyed. Because I think that Met-art has material that is similar to what is found at Hegre, and a lot more besides.
But that's just my opinion. If you saw too much that you didn't enjoy at Met-art, then that seems to have spoiled the experience for you, just like eating something tasteless or unappetizing could spoil a fine meal (I'm trying to express a psychological idea about enjoyment or pleasure, and doing a lousy job).
Obviously, you are not a cat lover, because reading that Petra has 3 cats should have made you fall instantly in love with Petra and her photosets. I will agree that the Met-art videos can be extremely boring, I much prefer the photosets.
|
05-09-11 04:07am
|
Reply
1754
|
Ero Berlin
(0)
|
Reply of
t9chome's Comment
Like you, the cheapest price I see for US customers is $24.95 for a 1-month non-recurring membership.
Either PU needs to fix its link to a discounted price, or PU needs to correct the price it shows for membership.
|
05-08-11 06:28am
|
Reply
1755
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
fredv's Review
Excellent, well-written and thoughtful review. Welcome to PU. Hope to see more reviews from you. Your first review (of Petites Parisiennes) was also good. I've never been a member of Petites Parisiennes. But I have visited X-art several times, and your review captures the flavor of X-art extremely well.
|
05-07-11 04:32pm
|
Reply
1756
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Your written English, as posted at PU, is as good or better than anyone else's. So are you implying that we write a dumbed down English at PU?
I think it's great that you have learned to speak fluently a second language. Even if it's Czech, which is probably not spoken a lot of places besides Czech-land.
Is Slovak a separate language? I know it's now a separate country.
|
05-07-11 11:05am
|
Reply
1757
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
Excellent review.
Skinny white girl is the gold standard for teen porn models. Very few US or European sites deviate from this.
There is a large number of very attractive girls at this network. But the videos (and the poor photos) do little to show off the girls to their best advantage.
|
05-06-11 06:54pm
|
Reply
1758
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think my original language was baby talk, which I am now re-learning as I get older. With a drooling accent, unless I remember to keep a napkin handy or to keep my mouth closed. Getting old is not a pretty sight or sound, as the case may be.
|
05-06-11 08:03am
|
Reply
1759
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
For what it's worth: For paintings, I prefer Pinkie and Blue Boy over Picasso. So I prefer non-nude paintings over Picasso nudes.
|
05-04-11 04:43am
|
Reply
1760
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's not clear what "art nudes" refers to. But Metart and MPL Studios and similar sites are my favorite type of site, which I'm guessing would fit into the "art nude" category.
|
05-04-11 04:39am
|
Reply
1761
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
haagar's Review
Welcome to PU.
Nice details in your reviews, but even more details/opinions would make the reviews even better.
|
05-03-11 09:46am
|
Reply
1762
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Excellent review. This site is on my to-join list.
|
05-02-11 08:34am
|
Reply
1763
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
I'm not on tweeter or facebook. But maybe some PU members are. So I don't see any problem linking PU to those services. But since I know almost nothing about tweeter or facebook, there might be problems or issues I'm not aware of. For example, paypal has a policy that discourages paying pornsites with a paypal account, I believe.
|
05-02-11 05:02am
|
Reply
1764
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
A site's score is often a guesstimate of how much a reviewer likes a site. Or it could be a more objective rating of the site's contents: quality, quantity, ease of use, plus price.
I'm more interested in the details and personal opinions of the site than in the exact score.
But also, whether I join a site depends on whether I think I will enjoy the site contents: there are many sites that get a high score that I won't join because the contents are not to my taste.
|
05-01-11 10:08am
|
Reply
1765
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think they are irritating. I paid to get a membership, now I have to look at advertising as well? If you're going to have advertising, put it on a separate page, where it's easily ignored. Some sites place the ads so it's hard to tell what is part of the site and what is advertising for other sites, which makes the pages really cluttered.
|
04-27-11 06:32am
|
Reply
1766
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The recent free ones I've seen have been a waste of time. And the pay ones can get expensive very fast.
|
04-24-11 05:16am
|
Reply
1767
|
18 Stream
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
"Can a tripod be an unaffordable luxury?"
I don't know if most guys shooting porn have discovered the tripod yet. But the videos at this site are less herky-jerky than at some sites which can almost give you motion sickness.
I gave you a positive trust rating on 02-19-09 with the following comment: "Good reviews, more recent ones with lots of details."
So I don't think there's anything wrong with your reviews. I think they provide a good flavor of the sites you write about (details and opinions beyond the basic site statistics).
But thanks for the thumbs up on my review.
And I also agree with your idea that most East European models are getting paid peanuts compared to what American models make. That's a good part of the reason why there was such an explosion of porn coming out of East Europe: the cheap production costs.
But what I am really thankful for is the number of physically attractive young models. Some of them are truly lovely. More on the softcore side, but a number in hardcore as well.
|
04-15-11 10:34pm
|
Reply
1768
|
Third Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Comment
People have different standards for rating download speeds.
But 17 kps would be horrible for anyone with broadband.
When I had dial-up for many years, I would get 3-4 KB/s as my normal download speed, sometimes slowing to 1 KB/s.
Upgrading to DSL, I got 120-130 KB/s.
I recently upgraded my DSL to 620-630 KB/s.
But to download a full-length movie in decent quality would take over 24 hours for 17 kbs. (I don't know how long it would take exactly, because it depends on the quality, but many movies are around 700 MB or more). Video clips from porn sites can be 1 GB or more.
Anyway, people have complained about the download speeds at this site before, off and on. Sometimes the speeds are fast, sometimes they are slow. But never this slow before.
You should email the site and ask for a refund or free extension of your membership as compensation for the poor service you have gotten.
That is only reasonable. And right.
If you don't get a free extension of your membership, you should demand a refund, from your billing agent. Or credit card company. Or whoever.
17 kbs is ridiculous (unless you are on dial-up, which I assume you are not).
Edit: You aren't on dial-up, because you mention 200 kbs speed.
|
04-15-11 05:21am
|
Reply
1769
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
"a couple of the movies I have downloaded have the most ridiculous watermark I have ever scene - a solid Wicked smack in the middle of the video."
I don't remember ever seeing that before: a large watermark in the middle of a video.
Those might be collector's items some day. I suggest downloading all you can, and storing them somewhere safe. And if the videos themselves are any good, you can always show them at the porn parties you put on for your friends.
I know that I have seen old porn novels from the 1970s and 1980s advertised on the Internet. Those novels originally sold for $2-$4 each. The current prices can range from $25-$50-$100 each for a single copy of those $2-$4 novels, depending on the condition of the novels (which are paperbacks).
That gives me hope for the re-sale value of our porn stashes. Except that we would have copyright issues that don't come into play when re-selling an old paperback that we own.
|
04-15-11 05:00am
|
Reply
1770
|
Tricky Masseur
(0)
|
Reply of
Rotterdam854's Reply
Rotterdam854, thanks for the reply to my review.
I wouldn't characterize your review of Tricky Masseur as basic. I thought it was well written, and very complete. A lot of nice details and opinions.
My review was not based on either Fucked Hard 18 or Massage Room Seduction. I mentioned them because I have seen videos from those two sites that I thought were done much better than the average video at Tricky Masseur. I'm not currently a member of either of those two other sites. Even if I were a current member, I usually pay little attention to a blog at most sites, or check their responsiveness to email support.
I do agree that the Teen Mega World network is more into anal recently. That seems to be the general trend in hardcore now. I would prefer less anal, but we don't control what is being made. All we can do is search to find things we do like.
|
04-15-11 04:10am
|
Reply
1771
|
Gaping Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Fine review, as usual. Lots of nice details and overall summary. Impressive.
|
04-14-11 11:35am
|
Reply
1772
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks for the explanation and the helpful link, Khan.
I guess that's part of why they call him Wittyguy, because he's sharp and stays on top of things. Like knowing about interesting features at PU. I practically sleep here, but I guess my brain's almost sleeping at times, and new features just slip past me. Until I get a thunk on the head.
But at least I wasn't alone in not knowing about this new feature.
|
04-14-11 11:26am
|
Reply
1773
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
You and I both got a personal response from the webmaster. I was told that access to Ex GF Box would be added in the nearest week. (I think he lives outside the US, which probably explains his English).
But you got a personal invitation to write to him directly.
I'm jealous. Lol. Especially when I was the one who was complaining about a problem, and all you did was say I would probably get a response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
------------
Stas RC (6)
Webmaster REPLY TO #1 - slutty :
Hi!
Please write to me directly: stas@royal-cash.com
|
04-14-11 11:15am
|
Reply
1774
|
Ex GF Box
(0)
|
Reply of
Stas RC's Reply
Stas RC (Webmaster), thanks for the prompt answer. I'll be interested in exploring this new site from your fine network.
|
04-14-11 11:05am
|
Reply
1775
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Comment
I agree, useful information.
It would be nice if PU/TBP highlights temporary/short-term sales at paysites in a special section.
Or would that be too hard to do with software, or make the PU/TBP page too cluttered with different information?
|
04-14-11 03:09am
|
