shows "(You have 4 of 44 live tickets, 3 chances to win)"
It's no big deal, but there is no way the 3 chances to win could be accurate for 0 live tickets. And I doubt that it is accurate with 4 live tickets, because 4 tickets would represent 4 chances to win, not 3 chances.
Like I say, no big deal. You might want someone to fix/update the software that controls the printout on the page, or not. This is a very minor detail.
This is a great chance for PU staff members to soak up their free time.
They can review each thread and pick the best submissions on each one, then start a new uber thread with the best possible, most informative and witty ideas und answers.
I kind of admire almost all the posts by lk2fireone. He's someone I really respect.
I am not a Fritz Ryan member. But reading the past Fritz Ryan reviews and comments, and going through the model directory:
There are a lot of good-to-great looking girls on this site.
The photosets appear to be natural, not photo-shopped or airbrushed. There seem to be problems using the site: poor navigation, download speeds sometimes poor, other problems.
Why am I writing if the site is not worth joining?
Because there appear to be a lot of yummy-looking girls.
Are there any PU members who have been a recent member of Fritz Ryan that will comment on the quality of the photosets? Hopefully, members who are more into photos than videos.
I never realized how many varieties of porn there were. I sincerely doubt I will be able to sample all the kinds that look attractive to me while I'm still alive. Lol.
I'm sure there are perverts out there planning even better versions of porn. With real touchy-feely-smelly qualities for the computer age.
Just as an aside, the reason given for lack of zipped photosets at Glamdeluxe is basically the same reason messmer said was given by this webmaster: fear of piracy.
Fear of piracy does not make a lot of sense to me, as a reason to not include zip files. Is a pirate going to refuse to download pictures from a web site from some sense of honor or horror because there are no zipped files?
But different people believe different things. That's life. It's certainly easier to have zip files on a site, and most sites I've joined have them.
Maybe if enough members complain, or--to put it more politely--suggest that zip files would be an important feature, that might make a difference to some web sites.
But we don't control the world. Not even the porn sites that we have joined.
If there are no zip files on the site, you could probably use a software program like BlackWidow (nonfree), or a freeware version of the same type of program, to download your picture sets.
Glamdeluxe had no zipped files of its photosets when I was a member. So I paid for BlackWidow to download the photosets. Downloading individual pictures took a large amount of time. After I paid for BlackWidow, I found there are free programs that are supposed to do the same thing, and a couple of those programs are highly rated.
I used to read most of the Playboy articles, as well as look at the pictures. So I know at least 1 person was reading those articles. Haven't seen an issue of Playboy in many years, but back in the 1970s, when I was subscribing, I really did enjoy the articles, as well as the reviews on music, films, books, etc.
I do admit, however, the main interest was in the pictures. Especially the centerfold section.
Personally, I think if the PU members are going to take the results of this poll so seriously, and the PU staff members as well, the poll should never have been posted.
Even tho only 3 people out of 36 voted they had written 1 or more PU reviews without actually joining the reviewed site, I think the reaction of the PU members was to view those unknown voters with suspicion and distrust.
We really have no way of knowing whether the voters who voted they wrote a review without being a site member were stating the true facts, or whether they were being cute or provocative.
At least 1 PU member, Pinche Kankun, appears to have disabled his account because he feels the PU members no longer trust him.
Attitude, nice body, pretty face, nice voice all add to appeal.
How much does nice voice count? In most vids I've seen, girls are either moaning or quiet. When the girls do talk, for most, it takes away from the illusion of what you're looking for. Most girls are not chosen for speaking ability, but for willingness to perform and then body and then maybe looks.
I don't care if content is non-exclusive. There'a a ton of porn I have't seen before, and probably never will. I'm more concerned with quality and content of the porn. Do they have gorgeous girls? Are the pictures worth viewing?
Fake acting is a bummer. But's it's what you get in many porn videos.
Fake moaning, groaning, by the girl (mainly) and the guy. Can anyone believe the girl is so aroused when the guy just barely touches her, that she is already on the verge of orgasm?
As far as not accepting Visa for payment, probably a financial reason. Each credit card company can charge differently to business they are dealing with, and Bosque apparently feels Visa would charge his company too much for the transactions.
It's not simply a financial transaction from member to Bosque's site, but there might be currency translations as well, and that could get expensive.
(Just guessing.)
What really burns Bosque is they not only stole his membership money, they also demanded 2000 euros to install the billing service on his web site.
The gall of some of these thieves is amazing.
I read where some of these Internet scammers in Africa justify their thefts by saying they are only taking a small amount of money from people who can afford to lose it.
I'm surprised there is not a lot more fraud in porn, because there is fraud in commerical businesses, and you would think that porn, with a lot of very small businesses, would have an even bigger problem. Can a small businessman in South America afford to sue someone in Germany or Spain? What would be his chances of collecting anything?
Thanks for positive feedback. I read your review before I did mine, did not want to just echo what you said, so I hope I added a little to what you already reported.
When two people are reporting on the same site, I expect at least some common agreement. Unless the reviewers are totally opposite in type.
Specific site score, for me, is subjective. I don't calculate scores by the grading methods of TBP, because I have no idea how to do that kind of cold calculation. My score is a gut feel or how much I like a site based on what I see (content quality + content quantity + site ease of use versus price).
I actually joined Justteenmovie for the Justteensite, which I belonged to back in early 2006. I wanted to get updates on the huge amount of updated pix and vids at Justteensite. When I belonged back then, the site was small, and I only downloaded a small number of photosets. Now they are a mega-site.
Another annoying feature of the videos that I left out (because of space limitations on the review) was the poor sound track on many of the videos.
They need a new music editor for the videos. The music track on most videos detracts from the video; and the music track volume needs to be set much lower.
Unless you mute the sound completely, it is difficult to turn the stupid music soundtrack down enough on the playback software to a soft level that is not disturbing. Have to go into your PC
"control panel/sounds and audio devices" software to adjust the sound volume. Then, if you play a DVD movie afterwards, you then have to readjust the sound level for the DVD movie.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-content is exclusive to this site
-multiple downloading formats: divx, windows media player, ipod, quicktime
-The videos are in high definition, mainly clear focus, good lighting, good color
-hi def video is listed as 1280x720
-Very attractive teen models with lovely faces and slender bodies
-No DRM
-No downloading limits
-Secret word is easy to read. Some other sites I can't enter because secret word is so distorted.
-Small watermark (watermark is not a pro, but it's small, which is positive)
Cons:
-Very softcore action.
Most videos are solo model, a few have two girls. Most videos I saw were boring. Little emotion shown by the models. Solo videos show a girl moving, walking, lying down, slightly touching herself. A few videos feature 2 girls lesbian action, basically softcore: touching, kissing, licking. Sounds hotter than what it looks like.
Cons:
There are a few erotic videos because of the models, but most of the videos are a waste of time to watch, in spite of how attractive the models are.
-Login in problems: sometimes try to log in to site and username/password not accepted. Get warning message security system will block me if I try too many times. Told (on screen) to contact Support.
But I already sent an email to Support 8 days ago about about other problems and have gotten no reply.
This site has:
-small number of videos (only found 42 video titles)
-no simple listing of number of models
-no simple listing of the model that appears in a video
-no simple listing of number of videos
-no simple listing of video titles
-no simple listing of when the videos were posted
-no simple listing of the photographer for each video
-model bios and interviews: supposed to be on the site, but I can't find them.
-there is no posting date for any video that I can find
-They do not name the model/models in the video.
Bottom Line:
Cons(continued):
-lousy navigation.
-there is no search function to find models, videos, photographer
There are very few videos on the site, and it's not easy finding a specific video by model or video name. You have to click thru each browser page where they show thumbnails for 9 videos per page.
A simple upgrade to navigation would be to use the "Free Tour" updates page, which shows a thumbnail of each video available in the members area, on a single page.
But when you get into the members area, instead of one page where you can look at all 42 videos at the site, you have to search thru 5 separate pages that list 9 videos per page. Showing all the videos on a single page would make navigation/searching so much easier.
-Advertise interviews and bios of models.
Have not found any interviews or bios for the models. If the bio is inside some video, there should be an explanation on a web page that states where the bios and interviews are located, and how to find them.
-Advertise 24/7 support staff. I sent email to support 8 days ago, still no reply. 2 other PU
members reported they sent emails to support and got no replies.
-The video run time is around 8 - 17 minutes.
-The video file size is around 400 - 700 MB in avi format. This takes a huge amount of disk space for each video.
-Updates-Advertise "12 HDV films per month"
(Can't find where I saw the advertisement for 12 HDV films per month, but that is what I wrote down as I was looking the site over. I believe that is what I saw advertised.)
-I found 42 different video titles. That is the same number reported at TBP on 09-21-08. So no updates from Sep 21 thru Dec 7.
Until I saw the TBP data on number of videos, I thought there were sections of justteenmovie that
were hidden from me, because I could not find the advertised model bios, model interviews, and other videos that are advertised that are supposed to be inside the members area.
Bottom line:
You can take the tour, where you can watch a promo trailer for the videos on the site.
If you think the promo trailers are good/interesting/erotic/whatever, then you can join for 1 month to download whatever videos you like.
In spite of hi definition videos with really attractive teen models and nice lighting and good
color, the site is a waste of money, because
-there are very few videos
-most of the videos are boring
When I watch most of these attractive young girls moving or touching themselves, I think they feel
no more emotion than if they were brushing their teeth.
This site is sister to justteensite. You join one, you get the other site included. By itself,
justteenmovie would not be worth joining. Give it a score of 55. Justtteensite is the much more valuable site, and that's where you would spend most of your time.
Justteenmovie is a real disappointment with its current content.
There is very little value in writing a fake review of a porn site. There are also plenty of idiots out there, who can get their kicks from doing just about anything, no matter how senseless. When I read PU reviews, whether I think the reviews are informative or detailed or not, I give the benefit of the doubt to the writers, and I believe the reviews are honest. That's my opinion and attitude.
"My Christmas wish list: no toys, no silicone, no tattoos, no piercing, no talking camera men."
I wish to add really gorgeous models, high quality pix and vids, good, unobtrusive sound track, good lighting, natural skin tones, good acting or believable emotions.
Geez, doesn't anyone appreciate good old fashioned sex?
Or how about 2 girls together, without toys?
You get a bunch of people together supposedly having an orgy, it's hard to focus on 1 or 2 people in particular. Warm bodies by themselves don't really do it that well.
I don't drink too often, but why not lift one or two glasses in honor of freedom of choice? Sounds good to me.
Where do these PU members come up with these polls? I remember prohibition from history classes, but who pays attention to that today? Actually, I remember prohibition more from the Eliot Ness TV series back in the 1960s, and the movie about Eliot Ness with Kevin Costner in the 1980s.
Please believe me, I understand the staff puts a lot of effort into making P-U and The Best-Porn the best it can be.
I was not trying to criticize you or the staff-owners in any way.
I was just commenting-saying that the prices of some of these sites change a lot, and that some kind of active link might be useful to automatically update the current price.
But I don't know programming, so I don't know how easy-difficult that would be to put on The Best-Porn site.
I, and almost all the members of P-U, do appreciate the effort you have put into making PU and The Best-Porn useful and valuable sites for us. (We also like the lottery, even tho I have not won anything yet. But I hope to keep trying until I do win.)
As for regional pricing, until you informed me in a previous post, as I already said, I was not even aware there was such a thing.
I'm not a newbie in porn, but what I do not know is enormous.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
