Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
pros:
-a lot of content is exclusive to this site
-multiple downloading formats: divx, windows media player, ipod, quicktime
-The videos are in high definition, mainly clear focus, good lighting, good color
-hi def video is listed as 1280x720
-hi def pics listed as up to 2900x4300
-Very attractive European teen models with lovely faces and slender bodies
-Content quantity- Huge number of pix sets and vids.
models : 620
photos : 101282
HDV films : 179
(The HDV films are really video clips of the models, these are not hardcore or softcore movies with a storyline.)
-No DRM
-No downloading limits
Cons:
pros (continued):
-secret word is easy to read.
-small, unobtrusive watermarks.
-updates: a new photoset or vid every 1-2 days.
Cons:
-expensive. $34.95 (recurring) monthly fee. This gives you membership to 2 sites, justteensite and justeenmovie. But the justteenmovie site has tiny content, that you can download entire site in a few days, if you think any of the content is worth downloading and keeping. There were no updates at justteenmovie in the 30 days that I belonged to that site.
-advertise friendly support, but I sent email asking for help over 30 days ago, never got a response.
-basic site navigation is OK, but could be much easier to use. Met-art has more models and picture sets, but it's easier to find models and picture sets at Met-art than at Justteensite.
The search feature could be improved a great deal.
-jitter in some of the HDV vids. While you get very sharp images, it's annoying to see the images jittering on the screen while you watch the video.
Bottom Line:
cons (continued):
-minor annoyance-Timeout disconnected from the site and have to re-login.
-no resume support for zip file downloads of picture sets. These are large zip files, so if you get disconnected, have to restart the download from the start.
-zip files for the high resolution pic sets only. No zip file for the low resolution pics in a photoset.
-model bio data can often have errors or fantasy. Age of model is often given as 18 or 19, because
this is a teen site. But I've seen models who are in their 20s listed as 18 or 19 (these are
models I've seen on other sites or in pornstar databases). Also, country of origin can be wrongly listed. The site is selling youth, so don't let the facts get in the way, as for age. As for country, I've seen Russian girls listed as being from Argentina at 1 site. Porn is fantasy anyway, so why not Argentina?
Bottom line:
This is a major teen softcore site. Huge number of very attractive models, photosets, videos. Well worth a 1-month membership if you've never belonged to it.
Also it's worth revisiting the site after a 6-12 month absence to catch up on the updated photosets and videos.
Maybe a lawyer should answer this topic, but I would guess that you could be cited for reading a porn magazine in a bar. In some areas you could be cited for smoking in a bar. You do drugs in a bar, you could be cited.
I don't think you could be cited for driving a SUV to a bar, unless you broke some law while driving.
I also don't think you could be cited for wearing a "Jesus Saves" jacket in a bar.
Those are my opinions, but I am not a lawyer.
So when you say that porn is socially tolerated, you are speaking very broadly. Porn is not socially or legally tolerated in many public areas.
I think porn is more tolerated today than back in the 1960s. But how far have we really come, as a society? America is still uptight and ready to police your neighbor for any and all activity outside the mainstream. And porn is definitely outside the mainstream.
Even tho past polls are archived and can still be voted on, a current poll, even if it's basically the same idea as a past poll, just seems fresher and more relevant. A few current votes on a past poll would have little effect on most people. How many PU members actually go over past polls every few months to see what was voted for, and to see the results?
This is the stupidest porn site I've seen so far. (I have not seen the inside of the site, but the idea of watching a girl pick her nose is truly a bizarre fetish.)
Definition of porn: writing or pictures or films etc. of no literary or artistic value other than to stimulate sexual desire.
I think Playboy (and softcore sites like Met-art and others) have nude pictures, but the pictures have value beyond sexual stimulation. Porn is a derogatory word, like smut. I don't think Playboy or Met-art is smut. That's my personal opinion.
But there's also nothing wrong with sexual stimulation. You look at a picture of a beautiful or attractive woman, you don't feel some desire or appreciation, maybe you're more dead than alive.
A lifetime membership for $175 fee sounds like a great deal. My major question would be: how long does a lifetime last? Some of these porn sites go out of business after a few years, or stop updating their material. So who knows how long Ten.com will be around?
Also, I go to their site, and do not see the lifetime membership offered at the membership signup page. Where do you find that option?
I am based in United States. When I check the web site Jim Slip, I see a sign-up rate of euro 19.95, approximately USD 27.76.
The prices that are displayed to someone in Italy could be different, because of something called regional pricing (I think that's the proper term). For the same item (a membership, whatever), you can be charged different prices, depending on where you are located. Sector pricing seems unfair, and stupid, but it's another way for some people or businesses to make more money off of people.
There has been some discussion of sector pricing on the PU threads, and a lot of people are really angry when they think they are being charged higher prices than some US customers are paying for the same membership.
It doesn't make a lot of sense, but I've found that met-art, with its huge collection of models, photosets, and videos, is easier to search and find what you're looking for than sites that have far less content.
Met-art has the basic search engine, which lets you search by model name, photographer, etc.
And it also has a complete, alphabetical listing of the models, with a thumbnail of each model beside the name, that you can browse.
Simple tools, but really effective.
One quibble is that the same model can have different names for different photosets.
The primary factor for me is lack of quality content, then price, then ease of use. Bad reviews, no zip files, drm protection mean I should look for a better site to join.
The penalties for porn are often harsher than the penalties for stealing or falsifying thefts of hundreds of millions of dollars in the business world.
4 girls at once would be my fantasy. Why not make it my top 100,000, as long as we're dreaming? Somebody would have to freeze me, because there's no way I could last that long, but what a way to go.
It looks like Amour Babes uses EPOCHEU.COM, which gets a lot of complaints about poor service, wrong charges, etc.
But it's worth calling them (if they have a toll-free number) to explain you have been denied access to a site even tho you still have a current subscription.
You might get a refund.
Or, if you paid for your subscription with a credit card, explain to the credit card company that you paid for a service you did not receive (membership to an internet site). The credit card company should reverse the money you paid (give you a refund/credit).
One problem is quantity. The site appears to have quality softcore pix, but a limited amount of content.
I realize it's a dream for each photographer who wants to start his own site, but it would sure be more economical if some of these photographers agreed to form a ring where membership to one site would entitle you to access to other softcore photographers' sites.
Quantity at Sweet and Nude:
models: 20
sets: 46
photos: 11,183
Maybe I'm getting old, and trying to be careful with my porn dollars, but I wouldn't join this site unless someone I really trusted (and likes the same kind of pix I do) wrote a glowing review of this site and gave it a high score.
The free tour of the site (with it's lack of nice-sized sample pix) is a turn-off for me.
I want to see if the models inside are really attractive, and the free tour gives very little basis for knowing what the photosets will look like.
I voted for "one of my siblings".
That is based on my guess that Playboy magazine is/was considered porn. The Playboy magazines belonged to my older brother.
Actually, I was wondering whether Playboy is considered porn by this thread. That was before I read Drooler's reply, where he questioned whether Playboy is porn (proof that great minds do think alike).
If Playboy is not considered porn, then my vote should have been "No-one, I'm stealthy ".
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
