| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
576
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Great stuff - very thorough review. This sounds like the sort of site that leaves me totally cold.
|
12-07-08 08:30am
|
Reply
577
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Yeah I go with Messmer. I only voted "no, plain tubes are okay," because I don't really care one way or another. I find sex toys really boring.
|
12-06-08 07:11pm
|
Reply
578
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
Another good review Jay. There aren't too many of us on here interested in this sort of thing, so it's good to hear an informed opinion. Be interesting to see what the few of us consider to be the best "niche" sites. Probably we'd all go for entirely different ones. Maybe have to start a thread on that.
|
12-06-08 07:28am
|
Reply
579
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
I thought it worth mentioning because there is a difference for some consumers between condomed and non condomed porn, in the same way there's a difference between hardcore and softcore porn. A lot of porn consumers don't mind condomed sex at all, others do. I just thought it was worth mentioning though, because some may subscribe to a site they wouldn't consider worth the money.
|
12-04-08 12:20pm
|
Reply
580
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
What puts me off this site is the same thing that puts me of John Root as a porn producer. His clips nearly always feature condomed sex. If you don't mind that, then fine, you may enjoy the clips. I just wont pay for condomed sex scenes as I find them a total turn off.
|
12-04-08 11:41am
|
Reply
581
|
Homemade Uncensored
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
Nice review. I hadn't heard of this one at all but it looks quite interesting.
|
12-04-08 11:29am
|
Reply
582
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
It seems to me this is happening more and more. I don't think it's imagination. These conversion rates are just set for rip off. If it's poor value or a relative rip off, I'm just not buying.
|
12-02-08 03:48pm
|
Reply
583
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
This site looks to be totally new and separate from all the other sites on the network, so I don't know what the deal is. It would be strange if this site alone, out of all the network sites, does not gain you access to all the others, but at first glance it appears that it doesn't.
|
11-30-08 02:55pm
|
Reply
584
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Hmm good question. I'll check it - No it doesn't look as though you do.
|
11-30-08 10:53am
|
Reply
585
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
This is part of the network which includes "Gag N Gape" that Pat362 reviewd 3 weeks ago. The network looks quite good.
|
11-30-08 08:47am
|
Reply
586
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Great - thanks very much for the info!
|
11-29-08 07:33pm
|
Reply
587
|
Gag N Gape
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Ah yes - you're right it is quite late. It's half past midnight. But as a Baseball and American Football fan I am sometimes up to 5am! I've always been a late person. I'm now off to watch some poker for a few hours.
|
11-29-08 04:38pm
|
Reply
588
|
Gag N Gape
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Cheers Pat!
|
11-29-08 04:14pm
|
Reply
589
|
Cock For Two
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Nice job of reporting JD. That's the beauty of it - you can let everyone know what a bunch of shits they are, and that this sort of behaviour will cost them customers, and so it should. They sound like a typical shady bunch of rip off artists, with customer service that is just there to con you, and once they've done that they tell you to go screw yourself. There's no way I'd touch that site with a barge pole. Hope everyone reads this and it costs the site money. This means that PU improves porn quality in the long run as it helps to send money to the better sites.
|
11-29-08 03:20pm
|
Reply
590
|
Gag N Gape
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Good review - I like the sound of this network.
|
11-29-08 12:57pm
|
Reply
591
|
Cock For Two
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Very annoying. It's all supposed to be so easy, but the amount of time you spend trying to iron out all the various crap that happens on the internet is very frustrating. You give your credit card and username plus password, what could be simpler? Yeah right!
|
11-29-08 10:33am
|
Reply
592
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Cheers! I think I may try one. What's the best one? I think you can pick up viruses from some of them.
|
11-29-08 06:17am
|
Reply
593
|
Pure Cherry Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
Yes I agree with the amateur homemade porn thing being a bit different. I quite like that, as well as the glossy sort that organisations like Pink Visual do. If you go to Video Box, so much of it looks like it's produced by the same company. Only occasionally does something really impress. On the other hand there's tons of well made run of the mill stuff which 30 years ago would have cost $100, just for one video!
|
11-28-08 11:10am
|
Reply
594
|
Pure Cherry Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Cheers! You ask questions, which I like. So I find you a welcome adition to the site as well.
|
11-28-08 11:02am
|
Reply
595
|
Pure Cherry Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
Hmm - if it's genuine clip stealing then yes. But quite often what happens is that sites sell their clips to other sites. For instance you can see a number of Pink Visual clips on Video Box. I haven't seen that many Pink Visual clips elsewhere though.
Mind you as someone who loves Pirate Bay and supports some of the anti copyright organisations and also the ones who support free speech on the internet, there is a whole lot of discussion and opinions to be found on this. There are a lot of grey areas around now due to the internet, that were not around before.
|
11-28-08 10:40am
|
Review
596
|
Pure Cherry Girls
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Quite attractive girls, surprisingly young and relatively inexperienced. (I said "relatively")
Great camerawork, as on most of the Pink Visual sites. This means you get to see all of the girl looking attractive rather than too many close up gynaecological shots.
No condoms.
NO DRM.
You get pictures, good ones, and lots of them.
No download limits, apart from only a limited amount of episodes being available for download.
The DVD quality is really good, although only the newer clips have that. |
| Cons: |
Excruciating navigation. Older clips are cut up into tiny pieces - sometimes 7-9 without any picture clue as to where you are in the clip.
An awful lot of talking followed by a an awful lot of oral, especially on the old clips.
Only a few clips are relesed for download each month. You have to be a member for a month then they release some more. Then you have to stay for another month to have access to the next batch.
Older clips are poor to average quality and not available for download.
The men talk too much, are occasionally irritating, and make some unpleasant comments about the girls or at least treat them a little less than respectfully.
There is the cheap and nasty trick extra site sign up box, so I deduct 5 marks for that.
If you cancel they offer you a discount, plus access to other sites. Shame they don't do that for loyal customers. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was a memeber of this site as it was a member of the Pink Visual organisation. I thought it worth doing a review as TBP have just done one.
The site used to be called "Teens For Cash."
My membership lapsed at the end of September.
The TBP review said they were no longer updating, although they were when my membership lapsed, but that was 2 months ago. There are still a lot of episodes to keep you happy.
For me what is the best thing about the site is the attractivenes of the girls (although still too many tattoos - arghhh!) and the camerawork which brings out the best of the models. The whole site gives an appearance of quality.
The older clips are more annoying because with the lousy navigation and shorter clips you can just find yourself continually streaming all the talking and more talking.
Even for the photo enthusiasts the navigation is a pain.
You get a $10 discount if you join through TBP, which is what I did.
The DVD quality on the Pink Visual sites have dimensions of 1068 by 600 with bit rates of around 5000. Below this there is the 852 by 480 dimension with bit rates of around 2500. Toadsith suggested I put in more tech, so I have tried. You tech boffins will know what that all means. Personally I think the top rate is very good, and even the rate below that is quite good. |
|
11-28-08 10:18am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
597
|
Ass Smoothie
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
Great review. I don't like the sound of the negatives. They should label the real ass smoothies from the interview ones. A real waste of time and effort.
I agree that when they actually do the smoothie, the video is great.
|
11-27-08 10:01am
|
Reply
598
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I'm similar to Wittyguy and Denner, in that I usually only join for a month, download what is worthwhile, then come back later if need be. The longest I have joined a site was 2 months, but there's no 2 month option! So I went with 3 months, as that's probably the closest. (Yes I know it's half way between ome month and two months, but it's closer in spirit to 3 months)
|
11-27-08 09:54am
|
Reply
599
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Yeah I have to say it's the sound of those ads which I think would annoy me the most. I'm figuring if I'm paying for something, I don't want to have a ton of annoying ads in there. That would really piss me off, and give the impression of a really cheap and nasty site run by cheap and nasty people.
|
11-26-08 09:30am
|
Reply
600
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Review
Great review. The positives make me want to check the site out, but the negatives sound so annoying it makes me want to not waste my money.
|
11-26-08 07:16am
|
