| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
NS All Access
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Reply
Yeah I've decided to give it a miss too.
|
03-24-09 08:56pm
|
Reply
452
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Just read it. Thanks Denner I really appreciate it, especially as you are one of the most objective members here, and one who's opinion I always valued, even before I was a member.
|
03-18-09 12:17pm
|
Reply
453
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thanks Denner. Will do.
|
03-18-09 11:43am
|
Reply
454
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Great review Denner. I was thinking of joining this one as I refuse to joing Video Box or New Sensations because of regional discrimination. I would rather pay more for this site than be insulted by Video Box's higher price for Europeans. VideosZ sounds like a really good site. That review has sort of settled it as far as I'm concerend. Your review was very timely, so I think this will be my next site to join.
|
03-18-09 11:01am
|
Reply
455
|
NS All Access
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
I sent Epoch billing this email
"I followed the link from The Best Porn in order to get the New Sensations $14.95 offer. I found the site seems to support regional discrimination. The price is now £13.95. I find this an insult and am urging everyone on Porn Users to boycott these sites. I would never join a site that discriminates against me in this way. I have heard the arguments for this sort of discrimination, and I find them dishonest and an insult. It's just best to say "we are going to get out of you what we can, as europeans are stupid enough to pay more for the same service. Not me."
|
03-17-09 11:45am
|
Reply
456
|
Spanked Cutie
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
It reminds me of Reginald Perrin - "amazing sale, 25% ON." Yes, it's regional discrimination again. You could do what Denner suggests. Email them and hassle them about the price. Even if they don't relent and give you the correct price, it costs them time and money to deal with you, and also lets them know they've lost a customer.
|
03-15-09 07:51am
|
Reply
457
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
80.0-84.9. This may surprise those who know what a miserable mean bastard I am. But I only join sites that I know I am really going to like. Even though I have a high average, my marks for the site I have reviewed are mainly lower than TBP or PU reviews.
|
03-15-09 06:55am
|
Reply
458
|
XXX Movie Online
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
It's only a con if you believe the 100.
|
03-14-09 05:11pm
|
Reply
459
|
XXX Movie Online
(0)
|
Reply of
pornoman's Review
If you look you will see this is a clone of EI-DVD.com. This is what pornjackker thought of that site. He awarded a 65.
"DVD site updates up to 10 new titles weekly
Titles from studios most sites do not carry
No DRM
Cons: Very expensive price of 52.00 per month
Tacky looking grainy graphics
Navigation is the worst I've seen
Only one preview pic per scene doesn't cut it
Downloads can take forever
Scenes cannot be streamed period
WMV is the only download option and most files
are way too big to begin with.
too big
Bottom Line: There are hardly any DVD sites I know that carry
titles from Historical Erotica or Maximum Grind
and various foreign ones this site has- not even
Vixeo. It's a mess with slow downloads, terrible
navigation and it's priced way too high."
|
03-13-09 11:27am
|
Reply
460
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Comment
Ik2 - Look under the comment and your vote is there, even though it doesn't register if you ring up his profile.
Khan - Yeah I sorta figured you'd have to be the one who decides on the trust votes! You shoulda been a judge.
|
03-12-09 07:30pm
|
Reply
461
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Look at the top of the page. He has a talkback badge. It's under "Khan PU Staff."
|
03-12-09 07:26pm
|
Reply
462
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Sounds reasonable. I sort of guessed you and Rick must have been working on something in the background. They were really taking the piss.
|
03-12-09 07:23pm
|
Reply
463
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
As a natural subversive with an evil sense of humour I was tempted to press the "no" button. But the poor old bugger doesn't deserve it.
|
03-12-09 07:19pm
|
Reply
464
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Comment
At last! Hooray! How about removing all the ones that have already been done?
|
03-12-09 07:11pm
|
Reply
465
|
Black Cream White Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
As an anal retentive Englishman I am thoroughly ashamed to have left the "r" out of covert. My old English master would be shouting at me. So I may have to beat him up again. Just so I don't waste this post entirely here are some more misspelled words.
MISSPELLED
ACCOMMODATE
EMBARRASS
HARASS
OCCURRENCE
ANTIDISESTABLISHMENTAREANISM (One of my old English master's favourites)
Some people claim ATHEIST is too, but I don't believe that.
There wil be a test tomorrow.
|
03-11-09 11:19am
|
Reply
466
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
The site has some serious supporters on here. I'm not one of them, for all the reasons stated. My taste also does not stretch to enjoying tons of fake breasts, tattoos, and 30 or 40 somethings with a ton of make up trying to look 20. Even if the girls were to my taste, I would not touch the place given what some some say about customer service.
I guess I know the site is not to my taste. I could join, give the place a 60 and so could others. I am not going to join just to give the place a low mark. I think this is the reason for the high average. The high marks come from those who know they are going to love the place. If you look at Trashman's justification for such a high mark when I questioned the 98 he gave, he said that he does not "downgrade on the type of content." If you look at his review it will give you a very good idea about the site, and the reasoning behind his score. At least he gave his reasons for such a high mark. I know enough about the site to not want to join, even if it were 5 dollars a month.
|
03-11-09 09:31am
|
Reply
467
|
Black Cream White Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
I'd keep well away if I were you. Unless you want to get the CIA to try and cancel for you. Even they may give up, and consider a covet undercover operation to overthrow the Chinese government an easier proposition.
|
03-11-09 08:56am
|
Reply
468
|
Real Spankings
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Ah yes, a lot of spankers do like the clothed spankings. At least with RealSpankings there's enough material to satisfy everyone's taste. The one thing I have noticed about the site which may be a bit picky, is if you go to the model directory, and look up a model, the list does not necessarily contain all the clips for that model. But then their system has always been a little haphazard.
|
03-10-09 08:06pm
|
Reply
469
|
Fantasy Girl Carmella
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Review
Great review. I'd send you a "yes" trust vote, but I've already done that. At least we have one new reliable member.
|
03-10-09 12:19pm
|
Reply
470
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Comment
It's about time all these were removed IMO. If anyone wants to subscribe to this oragnisation after all this, you deserve all that you get, which judging by the one reliable review about this site, isn't a lot.
|
03-10-09 07:26am
|
Reply
471
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
creolo's Reply
Sounds like an awful experience. I am not sure if sites make these things complicated by design, so that customers have difficulty finding out how to cancel. My strong suspicion is yes. I am sorry to hear your first experience has been so awful. Some sites are less complicated than this. But this is the drawback of temporary or trial subscriptions. Sometimes it's better to just get a month's subscription. Incidentally TBP does a number of discount subscriptions. You can get a month's subscription to a site for as little as $9.95. They discount $10 with quite a few sites. So for $10-15 you can get a month's subscription. (I am sounding like a shill for TBP!)
I have never had a trial with any site. I think one of the reasons is I have always feared running in to the same difficulties you have had. All you can do is check with your credit card company and make sure you have not been charged, or to contact them now, to tell them you have not authorised further charges. Some people do not like to do this. That's another reason sites get away with overcharging and signing people up for sites they did not originally mean to sign up for.
No wonder free porn and piracy is rife. This poor guy finally signed up to try some genuine site, and then gets all these problems.
One of the problems with trials is, they are so quick, you have very little time to cancel, and get confirmation.
|
03-10-09 06:47am
|
Reply
472
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Ah, it looks like the review is gone, but looks like kinkykarl
is worthy of a "no" too."
|
03-10-09 06:26am
|
Reply
473
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Reply
As Andy has said, most of the members here can spot a fake. It can either be someone affiliated to the site or someone who just registers to go over the top in praise about one particular site. Neither of these reviewer types are particular trustworthy IMO. The signs are all there - a quick review, a first review from a new member, no objectivity, no negatives, full of "what else can I say a brilliant site" type comments, a ridiculusly high mark, and no, or little, tech specifications, then they disappear without any further reviews. Allied to that, you have a number of these reviews all in quick succession. Maybe it's the site itself that deserves a "no" trust. I would strongly suggest the members here take a note of the other sites under the same ownership and treat them with high suspicion. I would also suggest to these new members to hand around and put in some reviews. Then maybe people will treat them seriously and not be so suspicious.
|
03-10-09 06:18am
|
Reply
474
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
This is why I have awarded my first two negative trust votes to the people giving this site a ridiculusly high mark and a review containing no detail and no objectivity. I would have given a negative to the other guy, but it looks like Marshall Khan kicked his ass out of town.
|
03-10-09 05:54am
|
Reply
475
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Review
This is bullshit. I have awarded my first 2 negative votes to the two members who gave this site 100. A well deserving negative in my opinion. As you can see I did not do it anonymously.
|
03-10-09 05:48am
|
