| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1426
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have gote the one that came with my browser. It doesn't work as well on some things but for the most part. I'm satisfied.
|
05-01-13 06:03pm
|
Reply
1427
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Ther are some scenes were it might be nice to see some foot wear but for the most part. I prefer barefoot
|
04-30-13 06:28pm
|
Reply
1428
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Reply
Your Welcome.
This is the kind of site that might be okay at 20$ and maybe even at 25$ (if you like their stuff) but not at 30$. The fact that there is a pretty large amount of leased material available elsewhere makes this a buyer beware kind of site. It can be great for newbies who have not joined any other Eastern European site but any other may discover that they already have many of tose sets or videos in their library.
|
04-28-13 09:49am
|
Reply
1429
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
You would think that but you'd be wrong. This is one of the ways scam sites use to make money from unsuspecting people. They upload older content and pretend that it is new. One look can usually tell you that it can't be since the quality of the pic is so bad that it looks awfull in low resolution. These guys could never use larger pics because the image would be so blurry that you couldn't see what is happening in the pic.
|
04-28-13 09:42am
|
Reply
1430
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
Actually I believe the below poster is right and the site is dead. Their claim of new updates is pure B.S on their part. If you look at the preview section where they show their most recent updates then these are all old content that is promoted as new stuff. Not too mention that the same scenes are used to update more than one day.
|
04-27-13 06:20pm
|
Reply
1431
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Comment
I can't say for certain but I suspect the special price was dropped sometime after last September. I checked another review site who had an updated review in September 2012 and they were also claiming a special 19.95$ price then. Not to mention that there are two error reports in November 2012 with a note that the special price was no longer working.
|
04-27-13 06:11pm
|
Reply
1432
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Buckhead's Review
Good review. I'll only add one little thing and it's in regard to your comment that there are very few American stars. 21Sextury is a Eastern European site and they usually only hire European performers.
They do have a few scenes with Americans but I look at this more has filler than an actual plan to have a mix of Europeans and Americans.
|
04-27-13 06:02pm
|
Reply
1433
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I haven't used tech support all that often so it's hard to have a well balanced opinion. I know that it is sometimes a little long before they answer a request but I usually assume that if it's a big issue and maybe they have a lot of people to help.
On other times it is quite fast, very efficient and also friendly.
|
04-27-13 05:56pm
|
Reply
1434
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
Did you recently visit their preview section? They've finally added some brand new updates instead of using the same 28 scenes they were passing off as new stuff for the lat few weeks few months. Now that is good news but you still can't view any part of those 28 scenes, you can't see anything beyond those 28 scenes so all yo are left with is a pretty tiny pic with very little info about content and the location of the scene in question.
The fact that their content is non-exclusif was never an issue for me because it was always very good and their join price is cheap compared to similar sites. I just want to know what I'm paying for just like I do if I decide to join 21sextury and DDF Production. If your content is good then show it. Otherwise people like me will not join for fear that the content is simply no longer any good.
|
04-27-13 11:12am
|
Reply
1435
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I've never passed on a model solely based on how young she looks because that's not one of the main parameters that I use when searching for a model. I'm suspect the term "Too person so that makes it hard to agree on what constitute looking too young.
Maybe what I think is too young is significantly different than others. I still rmember watching Tracy Lords movies when they were still legal and there is no way that I would have believe that she was 15 at the time and yet she was indeed 15 in her first film.
|
04-26-13 03:57pm
|
Reply
1436
|
N/A
|
Reply of
plan b's Poll
I'm Canadian so I have to say hockey but the truth is that I don't really watch any. I'll catch part of a hockey game from time to time but that's about it.
|
04-23-13 06:26pm
|
Reply
1437
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Don't worry about it. In my opinion. The site doesn't deserve a score above 50 but a score of 60 is not much better and you gave some good info to help people know why the site is so bad. I might have a different opinion about this site and the others associated with it if they were upfront about the quality of their content but they know that if that info gets out then no one will ever join again.
|
04-23-13 06:24pm
|
Reply
1438
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
You are way more generous than I would be. I got screwed by this site but couldn't find a match on TBP so I didn't review it but it's a giant pile of poo.
|
04-22-13 06:33pm
|
Reply
1439
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Stas RC's Reply
Thanks for the news and sorry to be the bearer of bad news but the preview section is still showing the same scenes it was a month ago while the dates keep getting updated as though these were brand new scenes.
You guys have to fix that because it's giving your site a bad name. I know that I won't be joining until I see what the updates are and not just one or two but at least all of the updates going as far back as January. The options are on the site but you are limited to the same pictures you were a month ago and longer.
|
04-22-13 06:32pm
|
Reply
1440
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I think you will see stricter rules regarding porn in general and that's in large part because porn is just not very proactive when it comes to their industry. We've already seen laws being passed forcing companies to use condoms for all their penetration scenes. Many Countries are starting to limit access to some sites. CC processoirs are now advising porn sites that their content is no longer acceptable and if they don't remove it then they will lose them as a processor.
The simpel truth is porn is meant for an audience that is 18 years or older but that itso rampant on the net that anyone with internet access can view porn of all kind. I don't know about the rtest of you but I don't think a 13 year old should be able to view porn anymore than he or she should be able to view mainstream materialmeant for adults.
|
04-21-13 08:22am
|
Reply
1441
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
My suggestion about not posting anything was only in regards to RK's forum. Of course there are other places where you can discuss this and since he has already posted comments about it here then he has done that. He could even start a thread in our forum about this very same subject as long as he avoids insulting the talent because it's just not nice to do that.
|
04-21-13 08:14am
|
Reply
1442
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
audrina69's Reply
It's not as bad but since they only hire from a small group of male performers than those being described still know who you are talking about. That's not to say that you aren't correct in your assessment of the quality of their work. Just that posting comments on it is not a very good idea. Much better that you let your money do the talking.
|
04-20-13 01:48pm
|
Reply
1443
|
Mandy Roe
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Yeah but you're an old pro at it. My comment were for the newbies who still make those fatal errors. I really wish TBP and PU had existed when I first started surfing the net. I would have saved so much money that it's not even funny.
|
04-20-13 10:49am
|
Reply
1444
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
audrina69's Comment
Here's my view on comments. If you are going to comment negatively on any of the performers then don't. In the first place. It's bad manners and in the second it's not nice. The people who shoot those scenes might read your comments and no one likes to be talked about in a negative way. They may not be your cup of tea but if they are still being hired then they must be somebody else because the site would be loosing customers left and right. A sites comment section is more a privilege than a right. Your money gets you access to the content so if the scenes are so bad then do what I do and don't join that site.
The problem with some of the male talents you named is that they are popular performers who shoot their own stuff and also work for other companies so hiring them is probably harder(no pun intended) and maybe more expensive. We get a regular supply of new girls but male talent is rare. Let me rephrase that. Getting good male talent is getting really hard.
This is an old story for me but my view in regards to content and updates is that it was never a question of whether or not it was going to happen but when it was going to happen. I always knew that sooner or later all those Tube and Torrent Sites were going to affect the porn industry to the point where the few of us that still pay for it can't counter-balance all those that steal it. When you couple that with an unstable economy, 3 std scares in one year, a foolish fight on condoms in the industry and you just compound the problems.
P.S: My suggestion is that if you think that 18$ a month is too much for the content you like then just join every few months or never again. Posting comments is not the way to go about changing site policies because they are just words. Your money on the other hand is quite another thing. That is tangible and hurts them where it counts.
|
04-20-13 10:46am
|
Reply
1445
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
I found your question a little vague so my reply may not be what you are looking for but here goes anyway. Most of the popular Eastern European performers have at least one scene on a TMW sites while others have multiples scenes. There's no visible pattern where the popularity of a model equals more scenes and since TMW buys a lot of their stuff from different producers then I don't expect to see any changes.
|
04-19-13 09:18pm
|
Reply
1446
|
Mandy Roe
(0)
|
Reply of
Crispin's Reply
Bad reviews are a good thing for the rest of us because it saves us money but it's not so great for the people that paid to get access to the crappy site.
|
04-19-13 09:07pm
|
Reply
1447
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't have an issue with joining a site that no longer updates because there can still be plenty of great porn in the site. As long as I know what I'm getting for my money then where's the problem?
|
04-19-13 09:05pm
|
Reply
1448
|
Mandy Roe
(0)
|
Reply of
Crispin's Reply
It was my pleasure. Anything that helps other members save money and helps put a stop to sites like this one is a good thing. I know that I never join any site before visiting TBP and checking to see if there are any other sites associated with the parent company. If there are then I check to see if any have a review.
Mind you I rarely do that for single model sites because I know what to look for and that's why I knew this site was going to be a huge pile of crap just by visiting it.
|
04-18-13 06:15pm
|
Reply
1449
|
Mandy Roe
(0)
|
Reply of
Crispin's Review
Thanks for the review but I wish you hadn't wasted your money on what is an obviously bad site.
This is the proto-single model site with just a few inticing little tid bits to hook some poor unsuspecting person who the discovers that there is nothing else inside. I don't know if you checked out TBP before joining this site because this site didn't have a review but another site associated with the parent company had one and the score was only 69.5 3 years ago. If nothing else. That should have been your first warning. The other major warning was the lack of actual visible content in the preview section.
|
04-18-13 03:46pm
|
Reply
1450
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I rarely take the plunge these days and one reason why is because there are so few new sites being added to the net that discovering one that has no comments or review is quite rare. I guess another reason is that those that don't have a comment or review aren't worth joining.
|
04-17-13 06:37pm
|
